mirror of
https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git
synced 2026-09-11 22:51:28 +00:00
a251800e62
New productivity/roast/ plugin. Convenes five independent reviewers (The Critic, The Champion, The Analyst, The Investigator, The Customer) in parallel on a business idea, then a Judge synthesizes one GO / RESHAPE / KILL verdict with the cheapest 48-hour test to de-risk it. Renamed the personas/steps from the source draft to be self-explanatory for users: Critic/Champion/Analyst/Investigator/Customer (was Contrarian/Expansionist/Logician/ Researcher/Buyer) and Frame the idea / Run the 5-angle panel / Call the verdict. Path-B contract: - 3 stdlib tools (no LLM calls): brief_builder, verdict_synthesizer (weighted, non-compensatory veto gates, tension detection — never a plain average), cheapest_test_designer (risk → falsifiable 48-hour test) - 3 references (5-7 cited sources each), 2 assets, cs-roast-judge agent, /cs:roast command - source.distinct_from disambiguates vs andreessen (single lens), boardroom (enterprise pipeline), grill-me (no verdict) Counters trued up via scripts/derive_counters.py --check (passes): 346 skills, 582 tools, 708 refs, 94 agents, 100 commands, 79 plugins. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Kmw1eZQoSMDr2diHbCcUkF
2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
roast — 5-Angle Idea Panel → One Verdict
Pressure-test a business idea before you build it. The opposite of Claude's default agreeableness.
/roast convenes a panel of five independent reviewers who attack an idea from every angle, then a
Judge synthesizes one honest GO / RESHAPE / KILL verdict with the cheapest 48-hour test to
de-risk it.
The five seats
| Seat | The question it answers | Web? |
|---|---|---|
| The Critic | "What kills this?" — fatal flaws, fastest way it dies | no |
| The Champion | "What's the 10x upside?" — biggest case for it | no |
| The Analyst | "Does the logic actually hold?" — first principles | forbidden |
| The Investigator | "What does the real market say?" — evidence, competitors | required |
| The Customer | "Would I actually pay?" — first-person target buyer | no |
All five fire in parallel with the same brief so they judge independently. The Judge then weights the scores (Customer + Critic heaviest, Champion lightest), applies veto gates (no buyer / a landed fatal flaw / broken logic caps a GO), names the real tension, and resolves it.
Quick start
# 1. Assemble the shared brief
python skills/roast/scripts/brief_builder.py --sample
# 2. (the skill fires the five reviewers in parallel as subagents)
# 3. Synthesize the call — NOT an average
python skills/roast/scripts/verdict_synthesizer.py --sample
# 4. Design the cheapest 48-hour test
python skills/roast/scripts/cheapest_test_designer.py --risk price --price 99
Or just say "roast this idea: …" or run /cs:roast.
What's in the box
- Skill:
skills/roast/SKILL.md - Agent:
agents/cs-roast-judge.md - Command:
commands/cs-roast.md—/cs:roast - 3 stdlib tools:
brief_builder.py,verdict_synthesizer.py,cheapest_test_designer.py - 3 references (5-7 sources each), 2 assets (brief worksheet + worked example)
Not the same as
productivity/andreessen— a single market-first operator. Roast is five lenses → a judge.c-level-advisor/cs:boardroom— an enterprise C-suite pipeline needing onboarding. Roast is a zero-setup, solo-founder gut check.engineering/grill-me— interrogates to clarify a plan; issues no verdict. Roast judges.
License
MIT.