mirror of
https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git
synced 2026-09-11 22:51:28 +00:00
7405298b4b
- #954: strip non-spec source/attribution keys from all 39 plugin.json manifests so Claude Code's validator accepts them; metadata preserved in new .claude-plugin/authoring-notes.json sidecars; check_plugin_json.py now hard-fails manifests carrying those keys and sanity-checks the sidecar; CLAUDE.md ClawHub schema section updated to the new rule. - #949: move the c-level-agents plugin out of c-level-advisor/ to a top-level directory so the two marketplace sources no longer overlap; updated marketplace.json source, homepage, descriptions, all cross-references, docs, harness manifest, mirror-tree symlinks/indexes, and rebased the moved files' relative links; domain counters trued up (18 -> 19 domains). - #933: replace dead links to the gitignored maintainer-local megaprompts/ tree with annotated plain-text references (44 files: SKILL.md, READMEs, agents, commands). - #931: DynamoDB on-demand pricing updated to post-Nov-2024 rates ($0.625/M writes, $0.125/M strongly consistent reads). - #969: skill_security_auditor.py and the three dossier scripts reconfigure stdout/stderr to UTF-8 (errors=replace) so legacy Windows codepages no longer crash at print time; PYTHONUTF8=1 documented. - #968: Windows Notes section in INSTALLATION.md + README pointer for the core.symlinks mirror-tree checkout caveat. - #924/#885 residuals: hook commands quote "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}" paths in all plugin hooks.json/settings.json (space-safe roots); removed the stale pre-rename status/review mirror symlinks and index entries left over from the memory-status/memory-review rename. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qgc6RYXWJPr5oW9DHU7zR4 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| .claude-plugin | ||
| agents | ||
| commands | ||
| skills/roast | ||
| README.md | ||
roast — 5-Angle Idea Panel → One Verdict
Pressure-test a business idea before you build it. The opposite of Claude's default agreeableness.
/roast convenes a panel of five independent reviewers who attack an idea from every angle, then a
Judge synthesizes one honest GO / RESHAPE / KILL verdict with the cheapest 48-hour test to
de-risk it.
The five seats
| Seat | The question it answers | Web? |
|---|---|---|
| The Critic | "What kills this?" — fatal flaws, fastest way it dies | no |
| The Champion | "What's the 10x upside?" — biggest case for it | no |
| The Analyst | "Does the logic actually hold?" — first principles | forbidden |
| The Investigator | "What does the real market say?" — evidence, competitors | required |
| The Customer | "Would I actually pay?" — first-person target buyer | no |
All five fire in parallel with the same brief so they judge independently. The Judge then weights the scores (Customer + Critic heaviest, Champion lightest), applies veto gates (no buyer / a landed fatal flaw / broken logic caps a GO), names the real tension, and resolves it.
Quick start
# 1. Assemble the shared brief
python skills/roast/scripts/brief_builder.py --sample
# 2. (the skill fires the five reviewers in parallel as subagents)
# 3. Synthesize the call — NOT an average
python skills/roast/scripts/verdict_synthesizer.py --sample
# 4. Design the cheapest 48-hour test
python skills/roast/scripts/cheapest_test_designer.py --risk price --price 99
Or just say "roast this idea: …" or run /cs:roast.
What's in the box
- Skill:
skills/roast/SKILL.md - Agent:
agents/cs-roast-judge.md - Command:
commands/cs-roast.md—/cs:roast - 3 stdlib tools:
brief_builder.py,verdict_synthesizer.py,cheapest_test_designer.py - 3 references (5-7 sources each), 2 assets (brief worksheet + worked example)
Not the same as
productivity/andreessen— a single market-first operator. Roast is five lenses → a judge.c-level-advisor/cs:boardroom— an enterprise C-suite pipeline needing onboarding. Roast is a zero-setup, solo-founder gut check.engineering/grill-me— interrogates to clarify a plan; issues no verdict. Roast judges.
License
MIT.