GitNexus/eval/README.md
Gergő Magyar 0005574dce
docs: restructure root README, fact-check all READMEs (#2360)
* docs(readme): restructure for readability, fix stale facts

Reorganize the README so the visible page reads as a short narrative
(Quick Start -> Two Ways -> Why -> What Your Agent Gets -> Editor Setup
-> CLI -> How It Works -> Docker -> Enterprise) and move deep
operational detail into 13 collapsible <details> sections: env vars,
.gitnexusrc, Cosign/Kubernetes verification, manual MCP configs,
install troubleshooting, and extended tool examples.

Accuracy fixes verified against gitnexus/src:
- MCP tools: 17 (15 per-repo + 2 group), not 16/11+5; drop
  group_contracts/group_query/group_status (CLI + resources now, not
  tools); add check, trace, explain, pdg_query, route_map, tool_map,
  shape_check, api_impact rows from src/mcp/tools.ts
- Agent skills: 6 installed (adds Guide + CLI), not 4
- Wiki default model: minimax/minimax-m2.5, not gpt-4o-mini
- Resources: add gitnexus://setup and gitnexus://group/{name}/...
- CLI: document group impact, doctor, and the direct terminal query
  commands (query/context/impact/trace/cypher/detect-changes/check);
  note the optional branch param on per-repo tools (#2106)

Structural cleanups: dedupe the two Codex config blocks, move Community
Integrations out of the MCP setup flow, move Star History to the
bottom. No content deleted - verbose material is collapsed, not cut.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: fact-check and fix the remaining READMEs

Reviewed all 9 tracked non-root READMEs against the source; fixed the
four with stale facts, left the already-accurate ones untouched
(pr-swarm-review, .claude reviewer-swarm adapter, and the three
bench/ methodology docs).

gitnexus/README.md (npm package page):
- MCP tools table: 17 tools (15 per-repo + 2 group), was 7 rows
- Resources: add gitnexus://setup and gitnexus://group/{name}/...
- Skills: 6 bundled (adds Guide + CLI) plus --skills generated ones
- Languages: add Dart (14 total) to the list and feature matrix
- Wiki default model: minimax/minimax-m2.5, not gpt-4o-mini
- Requirements: Node >= 22 (package.json engines), not >= 18
- Claude Code hooks: PreToolUse + PostToolUse
- CLI: add --skills/--skip-skills/--skip-git/--workers, doctor,
  trace, check, group impact
- Optional grammars note: include Proto, mention
  GITNEXUS_SKIP_OPTIONAL_GRAMMARS=1

gitnexus-cursor-integration/README.md:
- 17 MCP tools, was 16; skills list: all 9 bundled skills, was 5

eval/README.md:
- Model list matches configs/models/: Claude Haiku 4.5 (was
  '3.5 Haiku'), adds MiniMax M2.5 and DeepSeek
- Node.js 22+ for GitNexus, was 18+

.devcontainer/README.md:
- Add a table of contents (364 lines, ~15 sections, no navigation)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: empty commit to retrigger CI

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-03 08:46:59 +01:00

270 lines
11 KiB
Markdown

# GitNexus SWE-bench Evaluation Harness
Evaluate whether GitNexus code intelligence improves AI agent performance on real software engineering tasks. Runs SWE-bench instances across multiple models and compares baseline (no graph) vs GitNexus-enhanced configurations.
## What This Tests
**Hypothesis**: Giving AI agents structural code intelligence (call graphs, execution flows, blast radius analysis) improves their ability to resolve real GitHub issues — measured by resolve rate, cost, and efficiency.
**Evaluation modes:**
| Mode | What the agent gets |
|------|-------------------|
| `baseline` | Standard bash tools (grep, find, cat, sed) — control group |
| `native` | Baseline + explicit GitNexus tools via eval-server (~100ms) |
| `native_augment` | Native tools + grep results automatically enriched with graph context (**recommended**) |
> **Recommended**: Use `native_augment` mode. It mirrors the Claude Code model — the agent gets both explicit GitNexus tools (fast bash commands) AND automatic enrichment of grep results with callers, callees, and execution flows. The agent decides when to use explicit tools vs rely on enriched search output.
**Models supported** (see `configs/models/` for the current list):
- Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Opus 4
- MiniMax M1 2.5, MiniMax M2.5
- GLM 4.7, GLM 5
- DeepSeek
- Any model supported by litellm (add a YAML config)
## Prerequisites
- Python 3.11+
- Docker (for SWE-bench containers)
- Node.js 22+ (for GitNexus)
- API keys for your chosen models
## Setup
```bash
cd eval
# Install dependencies
pip install -e .
# Set up API keys — copy the template and fill in your keys
cp .env.example .env
# Then edit .env and paste your key(s)
```
All models are routed through **OpenRouter** by default, so a single `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` is all you need. To use provider APIs directly (Anthropic, ZhipuAI, etc.), edit the model YAML in `configs/models/` and set the corresponding key in `.env`.
```bash
# Pull SWE-bench Docker images (pulled on-demand, but you can pre-pull)
docker pull swebench/sweb.eval.x86_64.django_1776_django-16527:latest
```
### Debug logging
Set `GITNEXUS_EVAL_DEBUG=1` to include full Python tracebacks in run summaries and logs. By default, errors are sanitized to avoid leaking host paths or stack traces.
## Quick Start
### Debug a single instance
```bash
# Fastest way to verify everything works
python run_eval.py debug -m claude-haiku -i django__django-16527 --subset lite
```
### Run a single configuration
```bash
# 5 instances, Claude Sonnet, native_augment mode (default)
python run_eval.py single -m claude-sonnet --subset lite --slice 0:5
# Baseline comparison (no GitNexus)
python run_eval.py single -m claude-sonnet --mode baseline --subset lite --slice 0:5
# Full Lite benchmark, 4 parallel workers
python run_eval.py single -m claude-sonnet --subset lite -w 4
```
### Run the full matrix
```bash
# All models x all modes
python run_eval.py matrix --subset lite -w 4
# Key comparison: baseline vs native_augment
python run_eval.py matrix -m claude-sonnet -m claude-haiku --modes baseline --modes native_augment --subset lite --slice 0:50
```
### Analyze results
```bash
# Summary table
python -m analysis.analyze_results results/
# Compare modes for a specific model
python -m analysis.analyze_results compare-modes results/ -m claude-sonnet
# GitNexus tool usage analysis
python -m analysis.analyze_results gitnexus-usage results/
# Export as CSV for further analysis
python -m analysis.analyze_results summary results/ --format csv > results.csv
# Run official SWE-bench test evaluation
python -m analysis.analyze_results summary results/ --swebench-eval
```
### List available configurations
```bash
python run_eval.py list-configs
```
## Architecture
```
eval/
run_eval.py # Main entry point (single, matrix, debug commands)
agents/
gitnexus_agent.py # GitNexusAgent: extends DefaultAgent with augmentation + metrics
environments/
gitnexus_docker.py # Docker env with GitNexus + eval-server + standalone tool scripts
bridge/
gitnexus_tools.sh # Bash wrappers (legacy — now standalone scripts are installed directly)
mcp_bridge.py # Legacy MCP bridge (kept for reference)
prompts/
system_baseline.jinja # System: persona + format rules
instance_baseline.jinja # Instance: task + workflow
system_native.jinja # System: + GitNexus tool reference
instance_native.jinja # Instance: + GitNexus debugging workflow
system_native_augment.jinja # System: + GitNexus tools + grep enrichment docs
instance_native_augment.jinja # Instance: + GitNexus workflow + risk assessment
configs/
models/ # Per-model YAML configs
modes/ # Per-mode YAML configs (baseline, native, native_augment)
analysis/
analyze_results.py # Post-run comparative analysis
results/ # Output directory (gitignored)
```
## How It Works
### Template structure
mini-swe-agent requires two Jinja templates:
- **system_template** → system message: persona, format rules, tool reference (static)
- **instance_template** → first user message: task, workflow, rules, examples (contains `{{task}}`)
Each mode has a `system_{mode}.jinja` + `instance_{mode}.jinja` pair. The agent loads both automatically based on the configured mode.
### Per-instance flow
1. Docker container starts with SWE-bench instance (repo at specific commit)
2. **GitNexus setup**: Node.js + gitnexus installed, `gitnexus analyze` runs (or restores from cache)
3. **Eval-server starts**: `gitnexus eval-server` daemon (persistent HTTP server, keeps LadybugDB warm)
4. **Standalone tool scripts installed** in `/usr/local/bin/` — works with `subprocess.run` (no `.bashrc` needed)
5. Agent runs with the configured model + system prompt + GitNexus tools
6. Agent's patch is extracted as a git diff
7. Metrics collected: cost, tokens, tool calls, GitNexus usage, augmentation stats
### Tool architecture
```
Agent → bash command → /usr/local/bin/gitnexus-query
→ curl http://127.0.0.1:4848/tool/query (fast path: eval-server, ~100ms)
→ npx gitnexus query (fallback: cold CLI, ~5-10s)
```
Each tool script in `/usr/local/bin/` is standalone — no sourcing, no env inheritance needed. This is critical because mini-swe-agent runs every command via `subprocess.run` in a fresh subshell.
### Eval-server
The eval-server is a lightweight HTTP daemon that:
- Keeps LadybugDB warm in memory (no cold start per tool call)
- Returns LLM-friendly text (not raw JSON — saves tokens)
- Includes next-step hints to guide tool chaining (query → context → impact → fix)
- Auto-shuts down after idle timeout
**CLI flags:**
| Flag | Default | Purpose |
|------|---------|---------|
| `--port <port>` | `4848` | Port to listen on |
| `--host <host>` | `127.0.0.1` | Bind address — use `0.0.0.0` for cross-container access |
| `--idle-timeout <seconds>` | `0` (disabled) | Auto-shutdown after N seconds of inactivity |
**READY signal:**
When the server is ready, it writes to stdout:
```
# IPv4
GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:127.0.0.1:4848
# IPv6 (bracketed to avoid colon ambiguity)
GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:[::1]:4848
```
Parse the port as the last colon-segment (`split(':').pop()`) — not `split(':')[1]`, which breaks for IPv6 and for non-loopback IPv4 hosts added in this release.
### Custom port and host
`run_eval.py` does not expose `--port` or `--host` as CLI flags. Configure them in your mode YAML under the `environment:` key:
```yaml
# configs/modes/native_augment.yaml (or whichever mode you're running)
environment:
eval_server_port: 4849 # change if 4848 is already in use on the host
eval_server_host: "0.0.0.0" # bind all interfaces — needed for cross-container setups
```
Defaults are `port: 4848` and `host: 127.0.0.1` (loopback only). Use `0.0.0.0` only when the agent container needs to reach the eval-server from a separate network namespace. The health probe and tool scripts connect via the configured bind host (defaulting to `127.0.0.1`), which is reachable for both loopback and all-interface binds.
`"localhost"` is also a valid `eval_server_host` value. The OS resolves it at bind time — typically `127.0.0.1` on dual-stack or IPv4-only systems, and `::1` on IPv6-only systems. The exact result depends on your `/etc/hosts` and `gai.conf`. The READY signal will reflect the actual bound address (e.g. `GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:127.0.0.1:4848` or `GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:[::1]:4848`), not the literal string `localhost`. Use this when you want the server to bind to whichever loopback address the OS prefers rather than forcing IPv4.
**Running eval-server directly in Docker / Docker Compose:**
```bash
# Bind to all interfaces so sibling containers can reach it
gitnexus eval-server --host 0.0.0.0 --port 4848
# Then probe from a sibling container via its service hostname
curl http://eval-container:4848/health
```
If you need a non-default port (e.g. to avoid conflicts), pass `--port <port>` alongside `--host`. The READY signal will reflect both:
```
GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:0.0.0.0:5000
```
Parse the port as the last colon-segment (`split(':').pop()`) — safe for both IPv4 and bracketed IPv6 forms.
### Index caching
SWE-bench repos repeat (Django has 200+ instances at different commits). The harness caches GitNexus indexes per `(repo, commit)` hash in `~/.gitnexus-eval-cache/` to avoid redundant re-indexing.
### Grep augmentation (native_augment mode)
When the agent runs `grep` or `rg`, the observation is post-processed: the agent class calls `gitnexus-augment` on the search pattern and appends `[GitNexus]` annotations showing callers, callees, and execution flows for matched symbols. This mirrors the Claude Code / Cursor hook integration.
## Adding Models
Create a YAML file in `configs/models/`:
```yaml
# configs/models/my-model.yaml
model:
model_name: "openrouter/provider/model-name"
cost_tracking: "ignore_errors" # if not in litellm's cost DB
model_kwargs:
max_tokens: 8192
temperature: 0
```
The model name follows [litellm conventions](https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/providers).
## Metrics Collected
| Metric | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Patch Rate | % of instances where agent produced a patch |
| Resolve Rate | % of instances where patch passes tests (requires --swebench-eval) |
| Total Cost | API cost across all instances |
| Avg Cost/Instance | Cost efficiency |
| API Calls | Number of LLM calls |
| GN Tool Calls | How many GitNexus tools the agent used |
| Augment Hits | How many grep/find results got enriched |
| Augment Hit Rate | % of search commands that got useful enrichment |