* fix(router): stop a chat-mode Mantle deployment from rewriting the shared Responses routing row A deployment with an explicit custom_llm_provider and model_info.mode: chat used to overwrite the shared litellm.model_cost row, moving every other deployment and plain SDK calls onto Chat Completions until restart, because the downgrade guard read a double-prefixed key and never fired. The guard now reads the real key, and a deployment's own mode decides its routing in responses_api_bridge_check, except on chatgpt and github_copilot where Chat Completions is dead for responses-mode models. Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(responses): keep the bridge-check mode tests in the sharded bridge flag file Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(responses): let a deployment mode pin replace only the shared-row mode so the bridge capability rules still run Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(responses): keep Responses-only backends bridged under a deployment chat pin and satisfy the type gate Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(responses): give the bridge casts a reason and drop the bare noqa so the type discipline gate passes Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(responses): keep a responses row with no supported_endpoints bridged under a deployment chat pin Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(router): read the downgrade guard's mode from the row registration writes A chat-mode openai/<name> deployment merged into the bare <name> row while the guard read openai/<name>, so the guard never fired and the shared responses row turned to chat. An explicit responses/ prefix now also outranks a deployment's chat pin. * fix(router): let an explicit responses/ prefix outrank a registered chat row The router now registers a chat-pinned openai/responses/<model> deployment under its own name, so the lookup found mode chat and the request went to Chat Completions as responses/<model>. * fix(router): keep the shared row's mode for every deployment pin and honor the pin on /v1/messages A deployment's mode pin now never rewrites the shared cost-map row in either direction, including the responses/-stripped twin key, so siblings and SDK calls keep routing by the registered mode. The backend key formula goes back to main's, which keeps capability fields off rows that registration never wrote at base. The /v1/messages adapter and handler read the deployment's model_info, so a chat-pinned deployment gets a plain reasoning effort on chat completions. * fix(router): keep copilot responses opt-in, make unmapped pins order-free, send Mantle auto summary as auto A responses pin on a github_copilot model or a model missing from the cost map still marks the shared row, since that is how those models opt into the Responses API. A chat pin never marks a row, so registration order no longer matters. Mantle's OpenAI path gets summary auto in place of the auto summary detailed. The Azure o3-pro and o3-deep-research rows drop Chat Completions, which Azure does not serve for them. * fix(router): skip a non-string model_info.mode when keeping the registered mode * fix(router): keep chat-pinned Mantle tool calls and summaries on the Responses API A Mantle row that also serves the Responses API now follows the GPT-5 tool and reasoning summary bridge rules, since Mantle Chat Completions rejects function tools on gpt-5.4+ unless reasoning is off and rejects the summary aliases. Mantle chat gets a dict reasoning_effort as its effort level. The opt-in auto summary asks each Responses config for its level, auto on Mantle's OpenAI path, so a client's own detailed summary follows drop_params as at base. No mode replaces a registered responses mode, and chatgpt and github_copilot rows take any pin until they are responses, which restores the Copilot chat opt-out. * fix(responses): ask the target for its auto summary level on the chat bridge and reasoning_effort * test(integration): run the Mantle region-prefixed v1 base case again This PR routes that deployment by its own chat pin, so the case passes and no longer needs the skip * fix(bedrock_mantle): keep web search and reasoning summaries on the Responses API under a chat pin A chat-pinned Mantle GPT-5 deployment now sends web_search_options and a dict reasoning_effort carrying a summary to the Responses API, which serves them. Mantle Chat Completions drops n above 1 and a reasoning summary under drop_params and answers 400 without it. The /v1/messages adapter probes the bridge with only the client's own summary, so an auto-injected one never moves the request * fix(bedrock_mantle): check n and reasoning summaries only on the Chat Completions request * fix(router): keep a non-string deployment mode off the shared routing row A deployment whose model_info.mode was an int, a list, or an object still reached the shared cost-map row, so an unpinned sibling on the same backend stopped routing to the Responses API. The shared registration now drops a mode that is not a string, and the deployment keeps its own raw value. Adds integration cells for per-deployment routing across the OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs, raw httpx, wildcard routes, malformed modes, an upstream outage, config changes under traffic, and a worker kill plus restart. * test(integration): find each routing cell's spend row by the response it logged A bridged call logs its row under the wrapped Responses id, which the caller never sees on a streamed Messages answer, so look the row up by the answer's own ids and the upstream ids for its marker. Int and list modes 500 their own model group on main too, so those cells check only the sibling, and the summary cell sends the auto level Mantle's Responses path accepts * fix(bedrock_mantle): run extra_body fields through the chat checks A chat-pinned Mantle request that nests n or reasoning_effort in extra_body now gets the same 400, drop, and effort-level handling as the top-level fields. The bridge test injects a MockTransport client instead of patching HTTPHandler.post. * test(router): cover nested reasoning_effort routing, messages thinking summaries and per-target auto summary levels * fix(router): probe a pinned deployment's own API on /health and keep a requested summary beside an extra_body effort * fix(router): keep a custom-priced deployment's mode pin off the shared backend row on each request * fix(router): run per-request custom pricing through the shared mode guard so a health probe keeps the row's mode * fix(router): drop the debug log that wrote a request's model name from keep_registered_mode * test(router): cover custom-priced chat pins, their health probes and summary aliases beside an extra_body effort * fix(proxy): pass only the mode pin to a /health probe so a failing probe never cools its deployment down * test(router): cover failing health probes leaving their deployment out of cooldown, with and without background checks * test(router): kill the worker that holds burst calls, so the worker kill cell never depends on how the kernel spread them * fix(router): route a fine-tune the same whichever deployment registers first Main's register_model now seeds an unmapped fine-tune's row from its base model's built-in row, mode included, on the first registration. The mode guard read only the live row, so a responses pin marked the shared row only when it registered before its siblings. The guard now reads the row the registration merges onto, the live row or else the row it would seed. --------- Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .cargo | ||
| .circleci | ||
| .devcontainer | ||
| .githooks | ||
| .github | ||
| .semgrep/rules | ||
| backend | ||
| ci_cd | ||
| cookbook | ||
| db_scripts | ||
| docker | ||
| enterprise | ||
| examples | ||
| gateway | ||
| helm | ||
| litellm | ||
| litellm-proxy-extras | ||
| litellm-rust | ||
| litellm_cli | ||
| migrations | ||
| packaging | ||
| scripts | ||
| terraform | ||
| tests | ||
| ui | ||
| vscode-extension | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .git-blame-ignore-revs | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitguardian.yaml | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .grype.yaml | ||
| .npmrc | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| ARCHITECTURE.md | ||
| codecov.yaml | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| cosign.pub | ||
| docker-compose.hardened.yml | ||
| docker-compose.liteadmin.yml | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| GEMINI.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| license_cache.json | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mcp_servers.json | ||
| model_prices_and_context_window.json | ||
| model_prices_and_context_window.schema.json | ||
| osv-scanner.toml | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| policy_templates.json | ||
| prometheus.yml | ||
| provider_endpoints_support.json | ||
| proxy_server_config.yaml | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| pyrightconfig.json | ||
| qa_sticky_session.sh | ||
| README.md | ||
| render.yaml | ||
| router_plugins.json | ||
| ruff-strict.toml | ||
| ruff-tests.toml | ||
| ruff.toml | ||
| rust-toolchain.toml | ||
| schema.prisma | ||
| security.md | ||
| taplo.toml | ||
| uv.lock | ||
| whitelisted_bedrock_models.txt | ||
🚅 LiteLLM
LiteLLM AI Gateway
Open Source AI Gateway for 100+ LLMs. Self-hosted. Enterprise-ready. Call any LLM in OpenAI format.
LiteLLM Proxy Server (AI Gateway) | Hosted Proxy | Enterprise Tier | Website
What is LiteLLM
LiteLLM is an open source AI Gateway that gives you a single, unified interface to call 100+ LLM providers — OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock, Azure, and more — using the OpenAI format.
Use it as a Python SDK for direct library integration, or deploy the AI Gateway (Proxy Server) as a centralized service for your team or organization.
Jump to LiteLLM Proxy (LLM Gateway) Docs
Jump to Supported LLM Providers
Why LiteLLM
Managing LLM calls across providers gets complicated fast — different SDKs, auth patterns, request formats, and error types for every model. LiteLLM removes that friction:
- Unified API — one interface for 100+ LLMs, no provider-specific SDK juggling
- Drop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code
- Production-ready gateway — virtual keys, spend tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and an admin dashboard out of the box
- 8ms P95 latency at 1k RPS (benchmarks)
OSS Adopters
Netflix |
Features
LLMs - Call 100+ LLMs (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
All Supported Endpoints - /chat/completions, /responses, /embeddings, /images, /audio, /batches, /rerank, /a2a, /messages and more.
Python SDK
uv add litellm
An independent litellm-core distribution provides the Python SDK with the same
import litellm API and runtime dependencies. It has no optional extras, CLI entry
points, or bundled dashboard. Install one SDK distribution per environment because
litellm and litellm-core own overlapping Python files. Use litellm for the
proxy, CLI, and optional extras
Build and install core from this checkout while its release integration is pending:
python scripts/build_core_distribution.py --out-dir dist/core
python -m pip install dist/core/litellm_core-*.whl
The builder requires Git, uv and the Rust build toolchain. It reads the release version
from the root pyproject.toml, leaves source files unchanged, and produces a wheel
and a self-contained sdist in dist/core. Run installation in a fresh environment
without litellm
from litellm import completion
import os
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"
os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"] = "your-anthropic-key"
# OpenAI
response = completion(model="openai/gpt-4o", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}])
# Anthropic
response = completion(model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}])
AI Gateway (Proxy Server)
Getting Started - E2E Tutorial - Setup virtual keys, make your first request
uv tool install 'litellm[proxy]'
litellm --model gpt-4o
import openai
client = openai.OpenAI(api_key="anything", base_url="http://0.0.0.0:4000")
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
Agents - Invoke A2A Agents (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
Supported Providers - LangGraph, Vertex AI Agent Engine, Azure AI Foundry, Bedrock AgentCore, Pydantic AI
Python SDK - A2A Protocol
from litellm.a2a_protocol import A2AClient
from a2a.types import SendMessageRequest, MessageSendParams
from uuid import uuid4
client = A2AClient(base_url="http://localhost:10001")
request = SendMessageRequest(
id=str(uuid4()),
params=MessageSendParams(
message={
"role": "user",
"parts": [{"kind": "text", "text": "Hello!"}],
"messageId": uuid4().hex,
}
)
)
response = await client.send_message(request)
AI Gateway (Proxy Server)
Step 1. Add your Agent to the AI Gateway — set protocolVersion to 1.0 or 0.3 per agent
Step 2. Call Agent via A2A SDK (requires a2a-sdk>=1.1.0)
import httpx
from a2a.client import A2ACardResolver, ClientConfig, ClientFactory
from a2a.types import Message, Part, Role, SendMessageRequest
from a2a.utils.constants import TransportProtocol
from uuid import uuid4
base_url = "http://localhost:4000/a2a/my-agent" # LiteLLM proxy + agent name
headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer <your-master-key>"} # LiteLLM master key or a virtual key
async with httpx.AsyncClient(headers=headers, timeout=60.0) as http_client:
resolver = A2ACardResolver(httpx_client=http_client, base_url=base_url)
agent_card = await resolver.get_agent_card()
config = ClientConfig(
httpx_client=http_client,
streaming=False,
supported_protocol_bindings=[TransportProtocol.JSONRPC, TransportProtocol.HTTP_JSON],
)
client = ClientFactory(config).create(agent_card)
request = SendMessageRequest(
message=Message(
message_id=uuid4().hex,
role=Role.ROLE_USER,
parts=[Part(text="Hello!")],
)
)
async for event in client.send_message(request):
populated = event.ListFields()
if populated and populated[0][0].name in ("message", "msg"):
print("".join(getattr(p, "text", "") or "" for p in populated[0][1].parts))
MCP Tools - Connect MCP servers to any LLM (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
Python SDK - MCP Bridge
from mcp import ClientSession, StdioServerParameters
from mcp.client.stdio import stdio_client
from litellm import experimental_mcp_client
import litellm
server_params = StdioServerParameters(command="python", args=["mcp_server.py"])
async with stdio_client(server_params) as (read, write):
async with ClientSession(read, write) as session:
await session.initialize()
# Load MCP tools in OpenAI format
tools = await experimental_mcp_client.load_mcp_tools(session=session, format="openai")
# Use with any LiteLLM model
response = await litellm.acompletion(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What's 3 + 5?"}],
tools=tools
)
AI Gateway - MCP Gateway
Step 1. Add your MCP Server to the AI Gateway
Step 2. Call MCP tools via /chat/completions
curl -X POST 'http://0.0.0.0:4000/v1/chat/completions' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <your-master-key>' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"model": "gpt-4o",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the latest open PR"}],
"tools": [{
"type": "mcp",
"server_url": "litellm_proxy/mcp/github",
"server_label": "github_mcp",
"require_approval": "never"
}]
}'
Use with Cursor IDE
{
"mcpServers": {
"LiteLLM": {
"url": "http://localhost:4000/mcp/",
"headers": {
"x-litellm-api-key": "Bearer <your-master-key>"
}
}
}
}
For MCP OAuth, an upstream may advertise dynamic client registration but refuse requests with HTTP 401 or 403. If the provider requires a pre-registered OAuth app, configure its credentials.client_id and, when required, credentials.client_secret on the MCP server. This skips dynamic registration in the gateway sign-in flow. The provider must approve the app for MCP access; reaching its authorization page does not establish that login or tool calls will succeed
Agents - Run Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode or Deep Agents on any model (Python SDK)
Python SDK - Agents
import litellm
from litellm import Harness, sandbox
result = litellm.agent(
Harness.CLAUDE_CODE, # or Harness.CODEX, Harness.OPENCODE, Harness.DEEPAGENTS
"Find why tests/test_router.py is flaky and fix it.",
sandbox=sandbox.local("./repo"),
model="litellm_proxy/claude-sonnet-4-5", # a model group on your AI Gateway
)
print(result.text, result.cost, [f.path for f in result.files])
Set LITELLM_PROXY_API_BASE and LITELLM_PROXY_API_KEY and every model call the agent makes goes through your AI Gateway, tagged harness,claude_code. Drop the litellm_proxy/ prefix to call a provider directly. Install starlette uvicorn plus the agent's CLI (claude, codex or opencode), or deepagents langchain-litellm for Deep Agents.
Supported Providers (Website Supported Models | Docs)
Get Started
You can use LiteLLM through either the Proxy Server or Python SDK. Both give you a unified interface to access multiple LLMs (100+ LLMs). Choose the option that best fits your needs:
| LiteLLM AI Gateway | LiteLLM Python SDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Use Case | Central service (LLM Gateway) to access multiple LLMs | Use LiteLLM directly in your Python code |
| Who Uses It? | Gen AI Enablement / ML Platform Teams | Developers building LLM projects |
| Key Features | Centralized API gateway with authentication and authorization, multi-tenant cost tracking and spend management per project/user, per-project customization (logging, guardrails, caching), virtual keys for secure access control, admin dashboard UI for monitoring and management | Direct Python library integration in your codebase, Router with retry/fallback logic across multiple deployments (e.g. Azure/OpenAI) - Router, application-level load balancing and cost tracking, exception handling with OpenAI-compatible errors, observability callbacks (Lunary, MLflow, Langfuse, etc.) |
Stable Release: Use docker images with the -stable tag. These have undergone 12 hour load tests, before being published. More information about the release cycle here
Support for more providers. Missing a provider or LLM Platform, raise a feature request.
Deploy on AWS or GCP with Terraform
Run the LiteLLM proxy as a production-ready componentized stack (gateway, backend, UI on separate services; managed Postgres + Redis + object store) using the published Terraform modules. Both modules are on the public Terraform Registry — no auth needed.
AWS — ECS Fargate + Aurora + ElastiCache + ALB
— opens an in-browser shell, already authenticated to your AWS account. Once inside, run:
git clone https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
cd litellm/terraform/litellm/aws/examples/default
cp terraform.tfvars.example terraform.tfvars # edit region/tenant/env
terraform init && terraform apply
Or call the module from your own root config:
# main.tf
terraform {
required_version = ">= 1.6.0"
required_providers {
aws = { source = "hashicorp/aws", version = "~> 5.60" }
}
}
provider "aws" {
region = "us-west-2"
}
module "litellm" {
source = "BerriAI/litellm/aws"
version = "~> 1.89"
region = "us-west-2"
azs = ["us-west-2a", "us-west-2b"]
tenant = "acme"
env = "prod"
# Production: provide an ACM cert. Without one, set allow_plaintext_alb = true
# (dev/trial only).
# acm_certificate_arn = "arn:aws:acm:us-west-2:111122223333:certificate/..."
allow_plaintext_alb = true
}
output "litellm_url" {
value = module.litellm.alb_dns_name
}
terraform init
terraform apply
Provider API keys live in AWS Secrets Manager; reference ARNs via gateway_extra_secrets. Full input list and architecture diagram on the registry page.
GCP — Cloud Run + Cloud SQL + Memorystore + HTTPS LB
Real 1-click. Opens Cloud Shell, clones the terraform-google-litellm module mirror at the latest stable release (a small download instead of the full litellm repo), and walks you through terraform apply via a built-in DeployStack tutorial. Pick the project, the tutorial sets up the Artifact Registry remote repo, writes terraform.tfvars from your answers, and runs apply
To call the module from your own config instead, Cloud Run can't pull from ghcr.io directly, so first set up a one-time Artifact Registry remote repo backed by GHCR:
gcloud artifacts repositories create litellm \
--location=us-central1 \
--repository-format=docker \
--mode=remote-repository \
--remote-docker-repo=https://ghcr.io \
--project=my-gcp-project
Then:
# main.tf
terraform {
required_version = ">= 1.6.0"
required_providers {
google = { source = "hashicorp/google", version = "~> 6.10" }
google-beta = { source = "hashicorp/google-beta", version = "~> 6.10" }
}
}
provider "google" { project = "my-gcp-project"; region = "us-central1" }
provider "google-beta" { project = "my-gcp-project"; region = "us-central1" }
module "litellm" {
source = "BerriAI/litellm/google"
version = "~> 1.89"
project_id = "my-gcp-project"
region = "us-central1"
tenant = "acme"
env = "prod"
# Replace my-gcp-project with your GCP project ID (same value as project_id above).
image_registry = "us-central1-docker.pkg.dev/my-gcp-project/litellm/berriai"
# Production: provide DNS already pointing at the LB IP for Google-managed certs.
# Without one, set allow_plaintext_lb = true (dev/trial only).
# lb_domains = ["proxy.example.com"]
allow_plaintext_lb = true
}
output "litellm_url" {
value = module.litellm.load_balancer_url
}
terraform init
terraform apply
Provider API keys live in Secret Manager; reference resource IDs (e.g. projects/my-gcp-project/secrets/openai-api-key) via gateway_extra_secrets. Full input list and architecture diagram on the registry page.
Both stacks include
- The full componentized split (gateway / backend / UI as independent services)
- Managed Postgres (writer + reader) and Redis
- Versioned object store for proxy state + file uploads
- An auto-generated
LITELLM_MASTER_KEYin your cloud's secret manager - A one-off migration job that runs
prisma migrate deploybefore the proxy starts - The same
proxy_configsurface as the Helm chart — pass YAML as a typed map
The Terraform modules live at terraform/litellm/aws/ and terraform/litellm/gcp/ in this repo; the registry entries are read-only mirrors updated on each release.
Run in Developer Mode
Services
- Setup .env file in root
- Run dependent services
docker-compose up db prometheus
Backend
- Run
make bootstrap - Start proxy backend:
uv run python litellm/proxy/proxy_cli.py
Frontend
- Navigate to
ui/litellm-dashboard(dependencies were already installed w/make bootstrap) - Start dashboard:
npm run dev
Verify Docker Image Signatures
All LiteLLM Docker images published to GHCR are signed with cosign. Every release is signed with the same key introduced in commit 0112e53.
Verify using the pinned commit hash (recommended):
A commit hash is cryptographically immutable, so this is the strongest way to ensure you are using the original signing key:
cosign verify \
--key https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BerriAI/litellm/0112e53046018d726492c814b3644b7d376029d0/cosign.pub \
ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:<release-tag>
Verify using a release tag (convenience):
Tags are protected in this repository and resolve to the same key. This option is easier to read but relies on tag protection rules:
cosign verify \
--key https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BerriAI/litellm/<release-tag>/cosign.pub \
ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:<release-tag>
Replace <release-tag> with the version you are deploying (e.g. v1.83.0-stable).
Enterprise
For companies that need better security, user management and professional support
Get an Enterprise License Talk to founders
This covers:
- ✅ Features under the LiteLLM Commercial License:
- ✅ Feature Prioritization
- ✅ Custom Integrations
- ✅ Professional Support - Dedicated discord + slack
- ✅ Custom SLAs
- ✅ Secure access with Single Sign-On
Contributing
We welcome contributions to LiteLLM! Whether you're fixing bugs, adding features, or improving documentation, we appreciate your help.
Quick Start for Contributors
This requires uv to be installed.
git clone https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
cd litellm
make install-dev # Install development dependencies
make format # Format your code
make lint # Run all linting checks
make test-unit # Run unit tests
make format-check # Check formatting only
For detailed contributing guidelines, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
📖 Contributing to documentation? The LiteLLM docs have moved to a separate repository: BerriAI/litellm-docs. Please open doc PRs there. Docs are served at docs.litellm.ai.
Code Quality / Linting
LiteLLM follows the Google Python Style Guide.
Our automated checks include:
- Ruff for formatting, linting, and code quality
- basedpyright for type checking
- Circular import detection
- Import safety checks
All these checks must pass before your PR can be merged.
Support / talk with founders
- Schedule Demo 👋
- Community Discord 💭
- Community Slack 💭
- Our emails ✉️ ishaan@berri.ai / krrish@berri.ai
