* test(e2e/ui): cover creating, testing and deleting a guardrail
The Guardrails page had no browser coverage. The RC checklist covers it by
hand against a live Presidio, which is why it has always been skipped in CI.
These drive the LiteLLM content filter instead, which runs inside the proxy,
so the whole flow is exercised without a third-party moderation service. The
create test does not stop at the table row: it sends a prompt carrying the
keyword it just banned and asserts the gateway refuses it, then sends a clean
prompt through the same guardrail and asserts it is served.
* test(e2e/ui): delete the guardrails these tests create
Review caught the fixtures being left behind. Guardrails are database rows
that show up in the table and in the playground's list, so a run that leaves
them changes what the next run sees.
Also trims the comments that restated what the helpers already say.
* test(e2e/ui): fail the run when guardrail teardown does not delete
Review caught the afterEach discarding the DELETE response, so a failed
cleanup finished quietly and left the guardrail for the next run to trip on.
* test(e2e/ui): wait for a new guardrail to reach the request path
The wizard test drove one chat completion immediately after creating the
guardrail and required a 400. A trace from the deployed stack shows the
record is stored correctly (blocked_words, action BLOCK, block_on_violation)
and the call six seconds later is still served unguarded, so the first
request can land before the proxy picks the guardrail up.
Polls the same call to the same 400 instead, which keeps the assertion and
lets the refresh land. If it never blocks, this stays red, which is what we
want it to say.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(e2e/ui): cover the Budgets page create, edit and delete flows
The Budgets page had no browser coverage at all, so an admin creating or
editing a spend cap through the UI was only exercised by hand at RC time.
Each test reads the budget back from /budget/list, a different route from
the one the table renders, so a row that only exists in the table's cache
does not pass. The edit test pins the rate limits an unrelated spend-cap
edit has no business touching.
* test(e2e/ui): trim comments that restate the test steps
Review flagged the explanatory comments as restating ordinary setup rather
than explaining anything. Keeps the two that carry the regression rationale
for an assertion and drops the rest.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
