mirror of
https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
synced 2026-10-05 02:41:56 +00:00
ci(duplicate-check): only warn about the auto close the sweep will actually do
The notice now asks the sweep's own duplicateTarget whether the title match would close the issue, so a two-word title no longer gets a close warning the sweep would refuse to act on. The ask no longer promises that a reply removes the label, since nothing does that automatically
This commit is contained in:
parent
009d6f364b
commit
5bad1a85f7
2 changed files with 15 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -85,6 +85,17 @@ describe("noticeBody", () => {
|
|||
const closedTwin = issue(10, "[bug] gemma 4-e4b fails on vertex!", { state: "closed" });
|
||||
expect(noticeBody(reporter, closedTwin, "Same stack.")).not.toContain("closes automatically");
|
||||
expect(duplicateTarget(reporter, [closedTwin], []).kind).toBe("skip");
|
||||
|
||||
const short = issue(35, "[Bug]: Vertex crash");
|
||||
const shortTwin = issue(10, "Vertex crash");
|
||||
expect(noticeBody(short, shortTwin, "Same stack.")).not.toContain("closes automatically");
|
||||
expect(duplicateTarget(short, [shortTwin], []).kind).toBe("skip");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("never promises a label removal nothing performs", () => {
|
||||
const body = noticeBody(reporter, issue(10, "Vertex Gemma 4 crash"), "Same stack.");
|
||||
expect(body).toContain("a maintainer will take the label off");
|
||||
expect(body).not.toContain("the label comes off");
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
|
|||
import {
|
||||
DEFAULT_GRACE_DAYS,
|
||||
FLAG_LABEL,
|
||||
duplicateTarget,
|
||||
githubApi,
|
||||
listAll,
|
||||
normalizeTitle,
|
||||
type Comment,
|
||||
type GitHubApi,
|
||||
type Issue,
|
||||
|
|
@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ export function noticeBody(issue: Issue, prior: Issue, evidence: string): string
|
|||
? `**Already reported in #${prior.number}**, which is closed`
|
||||
: `**Possible duplicate of #${prior.number}**`;
|
||||
const ask = closed
|
||||
? "If that issue covers this one, follow up there. If this is a new case, say so here and the label comes off."
|
||||
: `If that is right, add a thumbs-up to #${prior.number} and follow along there. If it is not, say so here and the label comes off.`;
|
||||
const autoCloses = !closed && normalizeTitle(issue.title) === normalizeTitle(prior.title);
|
||||
? "If that issue covers this one, follow up there. If this is a new case, say so here and a maintainer will take the label off."
|
||||
: `If that is right, add a thumbs-up to #${prior.number} and follow along there. If it is not, say so here and a maintainer will take the label off.`;
|
||||
const autoCloses = duplicateTarget(issue, [prior], []).kind === "close";
|
||||
const warning = autoCloses
|
||||
? `\n\nYour title is identical to #${prior.number}, so this issue closes automatically in ${DEFAULT_GRACE_DAYS} days unless someone responds here.`
|
||||
: "";
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue