In the case where a field with a foreign index opens before the
foreign index has opened (and is available as a reference in the
holder), push the field into a queue to have its foreign index
applied once all indexes have opened.
In the `Inspect` function in `server/grpc.go`, getting
the value of an `int` field with a foreign index to
an index with `Keys()`, we need to return the string
key value instead of the BSI int value for the field.
This commit also changes the method `Field.keys()` to be
exported as `Field.Keys()` so that it's accessible in
the server package.
This commit changes the order of FieldOption application so that
it's always set before field.Open() is called.
This was required because field.Open() now uses some of the values
from FieldOptions to determine if/when to use a particular
translateStore. For example, when FieldOptions.ForeignIndex is set,
the translateStore from the foreign index is retrieved during
field.Open().
This allows a BSI field to have an option indicating
that it is a foreign key to another index. If the foreign
index has column keys, then this field handles string values
by using the foreign index's translate store.
The snapshot queue needs a bit more subtlety. In some cases,
we really do want to do a snapshot right now -- these shouldn't
have to wait for possibly a hundred or more other snapshots
to complete.
In other cases, we don't really care that much whether we do
a snapshot, and just dropping it is probably fine.
To accommodate this, we distinguish between "urgent" and
"normal" snapshots, and between "Immediate" (does an urgent
snapshot, waits for it) and "Enqueue" (might enqueue a snapshot
but *also might not* if we're already busy). There's a
corresponding "Await" to wait for a snapshot, if one is
pending, but not if one isn't.
We also have a background scan that checks the holder. It will
scan pretty actively when it's finding fragments that need
snapshots (no enqueued snapshot, opN > MaxOpN). It pauses
for a second after every hundred fragments that didn't need
snapshots, and for a minute after each holder scan that didn't
find any. So, if you don't need snapshots, it does basically
nothing, if you do, it'll be moderately aggressive about
submitting tasks -- but it always waits if there's *any*
requested snapshots in the queues.
Updates since initial draft:
Check results from Await more consistently, and in one case, use Immediate
instead and then check its error.
Fix a race condition. The race condition comes about if:
1. You have a limited enough worker pool that this can happen.
(In testing we tend to have a worker pool of 1.)
2. A fragment is in the normal, non-urgent, queue already.
3. An immediate request comes in for that fragment. This always
happens *with the fragment lock held*.
4. A worker thread grabs that fragment from the queue.
5. The worker thread now waits on the lock. Meanwhile, the
immediate request blocks on sending the fragment to the urgent
queue.
6. The worker can't read the urgent queue, and the immediate
request can't send it, so the immediate request can't proceed.
What's supposed to happen is that the immediate request sends
the thing, and gets into Await(), which sleeps on a condition
variable using the lock, which is to say, releases the lock.
The obvious resolution is to let go of the lock, send the
message, and then reclaim the lock. But then we have the
possibility that the message sent ends up with a timestamp
right after a snapshot that happened *after* the Immediate
request was started. Oops. So we create the request, then let
go of the lock, then send the request, then reclaim the lock
and go into the Await state. All is well.
This is on top of more general use of wait groups, etcetera,
to allow us to ensure that any holder scans terminate *before*
we close the channels they might otherwise be trying to write to.
So, shutdown process is now:
* grab lock on queue (workers and scanners don't use the lock)
* mark snapshotqueue done
* wait for holder scans to complete/exit
* close and nil out all the channels
* release lock
Anything trying to submit to this needs to hold the lock, unless
it's a holder scan, so either it got the lock before we did and already
submitted the thing, or it will get the lock after this and not find
a channel to write to; it's just the holder scanner that has an
ongoing thing that might have started a write to the channel *without*
a lock held, because it's expected that it might have to wait minutes
or hours before the write will complete because it's a background task.
Also, rework the background holder scan to grab lists of
indexes/fields/views/fragments, then scan the grabbed/copied lists,
rather than iterating over maps, allowing us to grab the lock when
we're about to access a thing and let it go when done.
There might be a simpler/cleaner way to do this but opinions on how
safe it is are very mixed, so in the mean time, I'm making the range
behavior not depend at all on there being no writes to the various tiers
of holder/index/view/fragment during the background scans.
The available shards file is just a hint to save us a bit
of time later; we don't need it to run and it can get updated
pretty easily later. If we have problems reading it, we
should just report the error, nuke the file, and continue
without it.
If you imported only small values, BSI fields could end up
not bothering to clear higher bits in existing values, which
produced strange behaviors.
We also move the computation of requiredDepth, and the change
to the field, down, combining it with the other checks of the
values for min/max being in range.
Without this, a data set with a ludicrously large value in it
could break a BSI field's depth even though the import would then
reject it.
This commit adds a Decimal field type which is implemented mostly with
the Int field. It adds an optional "Scale" value to the Int field
which means that the values stored in that field are actually meant to
be divided by 10^Scale before being interpreted.
In order to make use of this functionality, we extend the importValue
request to allow a slice of floats rather than just int64. If the
slice of floats is present, each float in the slice is multiplied by
10^Scale and converted to an int64 before being imported. If a slice
of int64 is imported to a Decimal field, it is treated normally, and
scale is ignored. This allows the conversion to be handled at the
client side if desired.
Currently there are Field level methods for querying Float values out
of a decimal field, but no support in PQL or the executor for getting
float values. Going to wait until I can use the generic result type
before doing that, so for now, any values queried will be the scaled
integer values.
needed to add client support for importing float values, and did this
by adding a more general and simplified client method for value
imports.
rewrote api.ImportValue to use the new method which should be more
performant and efficient.
allow floats to be "pilosa import"ed into decimal fields
break in a select in a for terminates the current case of the
select, but does not terminate the for loop. The worker queue
implementations for opening indexes/fields/views all suffered
from the same issue here.
Also fix a `<= 0` on a uint value.
All hail staticcheck.
When starting up, we can have a large number of views, each
with some number of fragments, and by default these were being
opened sequentially. There's no real benefit to that; they're
all nicely independent from each other and don't need much
locking, so we implement a trivial semaphore and launch the
operations asynchronously. We also combine them into
errgroups.
Similarly, we do this for fields and views, capping the number
of fields (or views) opened in parallel to avoid hitting a
system-wide limit on threads created (oops). Note that the
limits are shared, not multiplicative; we cap this fairly
arbitrarily at 8 fields being opened, and 16 views being opened,
at a time, but NumCPU*2 fragments being opened by those views.
This dramatically increases CPU load during startup, but doesn't
seem to significantly increase total CPU time, it just scales
much better on machines with lots of cores.
As the size of a fragment grows, the cost of snapshots
increases; with a large fragment getting a lot of large writes,
every write will trigger a snapshot, while any other writes have
to wait for that snapshot before they, too, can trigger a snapshot.
To address this, we introduce a background queue of snapshots.
In general, operations which were omitting their ops log writes
and just snapshotting no longer do; they emit an ops log. This does
mean that, in some cases, the ops log is written and then a snapshot
takes place essentially immediately, which costs us some performance.
However, that only actually happens under very light load; under
heavier load, there's generally going to be multiple writes coalesced
into each snapshot, and the ops log writes for them will be much
cheaper than a full snapshot.
This commit implements BSI with variable bit depth using a
sign magnitudeto indicate whether a value is positive or negative.
This also rearranges the existence bit to be the first bit instead
of the last bit.
So with the switch to a new linter, we get a lot of new warnings,
and the majority of them are harmless probably, but a few might be
real. Variously just use _ to suppress warnings, or report errors.
There's probably things here that deserve better fixes, but we can
always revisit it.