First, it is possible for us to end up allocating *or freeing* pages during
a modification of the free list, in a way such that the change to the free list
means that when we finish the modification which caused the allocate or free,
we've overwritten the inner change.
Second, when deallocating trees, we don't actually deallocate the branch nodes
themselves.
The former causes potentially severe data corruption. The latter causes us
to gradually leak pages in a way that we don't notice because we only run those
tests during the RBF tests.
The fix for this is surprisingly intricate, because of the counterintuitive
fact that *allocating* a page means *removing* things from the free list
(and thus potentially deallocating free list pages), while *freeing* a page
means *adding* things to the free list (and thus potentially needing to
allocate pages for the free list).
While modifying the free list, any allocations we need always just come from
the end of the file; we don't try to reuse free pages. If a page becomes
*deallocated* by a free list modification, we don't annotate it in the free
list at the instant that it happens; we stash that information until the
current modification of the free list happens, then iterate through any
such pages.
I am pretty sure there's virtually never more than one, and I don't actually
know that I can create a case wherein we'd end up with the nested case
firing, wherein removing a page from the free list causes us to remove another
page, but I think if the free list got large and cluttered and needed
rebalancing or something it could maybe happen.
The "just open the holder" subcommand doesn't work the way it used
to, because now that we rely on etcd to open a holder, trying to open
a holder without things set up just coredumps.
Step 1: Fix that.
Step 2: Also add a test that covers it so we don't get bitrotted again.
Step 3: Remove an unrelated stale comment that doesn't deserve its
own commit log, having to do with an option that no longer exists
which is no longer being set right under the comment saying we set it.
