mirror of
https://github.com/fabro-sh/fabro.git
synced 2026-10-09 03:20:56 +00:00
Fabro
parent
3e7a474a26
commit
9b55cee447
4 changed files with 48 additions and 18 deletions
|
|
@ -1,38 +1,51 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:01:45.157969Z",
|
||||
"current_node": "solve",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:01:48.756421Z",
|
||||
"current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"completed_nodes": [
|
||||
"start",
|
||||
"setup",
|
||||
"solve"
|
||||
"solve",
|
||||
"extract_patch"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"node_retries": {
|
||||
"setup": 1,
|
||||
"start": 1,
|
||||
"extract_patch": 1,
|
||||
"solve": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context_values": {
|
||||
"thread.setup.current_node": "solve",
|
||||
"current.preamble": "Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
|
||||
"current.preamble": "Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n- **solve**: fail\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: transient_infra\n- failure_signature: solve|transient_infra|api_transient|gemini|rate_limited\n",
|
||||
"graph.goal": "Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.",
|
||||
"thread.start.current_node": "setup",
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.solve": 4,
|
||||
"current_node": "solve",
|
||||
"internal.thread_id": "setup",
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.extract_patch": 1,
|
||||
"current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"internal.thread_id": "solve",
|
||||
"graph.rankdir": "LR",
|
||||
"command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
|
||||
"failure_signature": "solve|transient_infra|api_transient|gemini|rate_limited",
|
||||
"command.output": "",
|
||||
"failure_signature": "",
|
||||
"thread.solve.current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"command.stderr": "",
|
||||
"internal.run_id": "01KKV895DBNNFDRK0D4NWFHH7T",
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.start": 1,
|
||||
"internal.node_visit_count": 1,
|
||||
"outcome": "fail",
|
||||
"outcome": "success",
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.setup": 1,
|
||||
"internal.fidelity": "compact",
|
||||
"failure_class": "transient_infra"
|
||||
"failure_class": ""
|
||||
},
|
||||
"logs": [],
|
||||
"node_outcomes": {
|
||||
"solve": {
|
||||
"status": "fail",
|
||||
"failure": {
|
||||
"message": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 14.840210969s.",
|
||||
"failure_class": "transient_infra",
|
||||
"failure_signature": "api_transient|gemini|rate_limited"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"duration_ms": 83280
|
||||
},
|
||||
"start": {
|
||||
"status": "success",
|
||||
"duration_ms": 0
|
||||
|
|
@ -49,23 +62,24 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"duration_ms": 256
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solve": {
|
||||
"status": "fail",
|
||||
"failure": {
|
||||
"message": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 14.840210969s.",
|
||||
"failure_class": "transient_infra",
|
||||
"failure_signature": "api_transient|gemini|rate_limited"
|
||||
"extract_patch": {
|
||||
"status": "success",
|
||||
"context_updates": {
|
||||
"command.output": "",
|
||||
"command.stderr": ""
|
||||
},
|
||||
"duration_ms": 83280
|
||||
"notes": "Script completed: git diff",
|
||||
"duration_ms": 220
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"next_node_id": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"next_node_id": "exit",
|
||||
"loop_failure_signatures": {
|
||||
"setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"node_visits": {
|
||||
"setup": 1,
|
||||
"start": 1,
|
||||
"extract_patch": 1,
|
||||
"solve": 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json
Normal file
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"command": "git diff",
|
||||
"language": "shell",
|
||||
"timeout_ms": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json
Normal file
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"duration_ms": 219,
|
||||
"exit_code": 0,
|
||||
"timed_out": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
6
nodes/extract_patch/status.json
Normal file
6
nodes/extract_patch/status.json
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"status": "success",
|
||||
"notes": "Script completed: git diff",
|
||||
"failure_reason": null,
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:01:48.755701+00:00"
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue