scriptoriumadmin/fabro
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fabro-sh/fabro.git synced 2026-09-09 22:33:37 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

checkpoint

Browse source 
⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh)
This commit is contained in:
Fabro 2026-03-16 08:01:45 -04:00
parent b7fc977bc2
commit 3e7a474a26
3 changed files with 62 additions and 11 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

36
checkpoint.json
View file

@ -1,23 +1,27 @@
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:00:17.526012Z",
"current_node": "setup",
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:01:45.157969Z",
"current_node": "solve",
"completed_nodes": [
"start",
"setup"
"setup",
"solve"
],
"node_retries": {
"setup": 1,
"start": 1
"start": 1,
"solve": 4
},
"context_values": {
"current.preamble": "Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\n",
"thread.setup.current_node": "solve",
"current.preamble": "Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
"graph.goal": "Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.",
"thread.start.current_node": "setup",
"current_node": "setup",
"internal.thread_id": "start",
"internal.retry_count.solve": 4,
"current_node": "solve",
"internal.thread_id": "setup",
"graph.rankdir": "LR",
"command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
"failure_signature": "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.",
"failure_signature": "solve|transient_infra|api_transient|gemini|rate_limited",
"command.stderr": "",
"internal.run_id": "01KKV895DBNNFDRK0D4NWFHH7T",
"internal.retry_count.start": 1,
@ -25,7 +29,7 @@
"outcome": "fail",
"internal.retry_count.setup": 1,
"internal.fidelity": "compact",
"failure_class": "deterministic"
"failure_class": "transient_infra"
},
"logs": [],
"node_outcomes": {
@ -44,14 +48,24 @@
"failure_class": "deterministic"
},
"duration_ms": 256
},
"solve": {
"status": "fail",
"failure": {
"message": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 14.840210969s.",
"failure_class": "transient_infra",
"failure_signature": "api_transient|gemini|rate_limited"
},
"duration_ms": 83280
}
},
"next_node_id": "solve",
"next_node_id": "extract_patch",
"loop_failure_signatures": {
"setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1
},
"node_visits": {
"setup": 1,
"start": 1
"start": 1,
"solve": 1
}
}

31
nodes/solve/prompt.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.
Description
Error message:
table_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.
We have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.
We have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names.
Is this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.
## Additional Context
Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.
I agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.
## Completed stages
- **setup**: fail
- Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea && python -m pip install -e .`
- Stdout:
```
fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.
```
- Stderr: (empty)
## Context
- failure_class: deterministic
- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.
Fix this GitHub issue in the repository. Make the minimal code change needed.

6
nodes/solve/status.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
{
"status": "fail",
"notes": null,
"failure_reason": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 14.840210969s.",
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:01:45.157709+00:00"
}