scriptoriumadmin/fabro
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fabro-sh/fabro.git synced 2026-09-08 22:21:45 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

checkpoint

Browse source 
⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh)
This commit is contained in:
Fabro 2026-03-16 01:36:09 -04:00
parent e609b1ea4a
commit 7ba4bb073c
4 changed files with 44 additions and 12 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

40
checkpoint.json
View file

@ -1,15 +1,17 @@
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:36:07.444122Z",
"current_node": "solve",
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:36:09.248357Z",
"current_node": "extract_patch",
"completed_nodes": [
"start",
"setup",
"solve"
"solve",
"extract_patch"
],
"node_retries": {
"setup": 1,
"solve": 1,
"start": 1,
"solve": 1
"extract_patch": 1
},
"context_values": {
"graph.goal": "AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR",
@ -17,25 +19,38 @@
"internal.fidelity": "compact",
"internal.retry_count.setup": 1,
"internal.retry_count.solve": 1,
"current_node": "solve",
"thread.solve.current_node": "extract_patch",
"current_node": "extract_patch",
"thread.start.current_node": "setup",
"thread.setup.current_node": "solve",
"failure_class": "",
"internal.thread_id": "setup",
"command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
"internal.thread_id": "solve",
"internal.retry_count.extract_patch": 1,
"command.output": "",
"last_response": "Perfect! Everything is in place. Let me create a final comprehensive summary:\n\n## Summary\n\nI have successfully fixed Django issue #31831: **\"AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order",
"response.solve": "Perfect! Everything is in place. Let me create a final comprehensive summary:\n\n## Summary\n\nI have successfully fixed Django issue #31831: **\"AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index()\"**\n\n### The Problem\nWhen creating a Django model with both `order_with_respect_to` and indexes/constraints that reference the `_order` field, the migration autodetector was generating operations in the wrong order:\n1. AddIndex/AddConstraint operations (trying to create indexes on `_order`)\n2. AlterOrderWithRespectTo operation (which creates the `_order` field)\n\nThis caused migrations to fail because the `_order` field didn't exist when the index tried to reference it.\n\n### The Solution\nMade **two key changes** to `django/db/migrations/autodetector.py`:\n\n1. **Reordered generation method calls (Line 185)**: Moved `generate_altered_order_with_respect_to()` to be called BEFORE `generate_added_indexes()` and `generate_added_constraints()` rather than after them.\n\n2. **Moved AlterOrderWithRespectTo operation in model creation (Lines 616-627)**: When creating new models, the `AlterOrderWithRespectTo` operation is now added BEFORE the `related_dependencies` list, ensuring it comes before any indexes/constraints that reference the `_order` field.\n\n### Tests Added\nAdded two comprehensive test methods to `tests/migrations/test_autodetector.py`:\n- `test_add_model_order_with_respect_to_index_constraint()` - Tests creating new models with order_with_respect_to and indexes/constraints on _order\n- `test_set_alter_order_with_respect_to_index_constraint_foo_together()` - Tests adding order_with_respect_to to existing models with constraints/indexes on _order\n\n### Verification\n✓ All 317 migration-related tests pass \n✓ All 125 autodetector tests pass \n✓ All 108 operations tests pass \n✓ All 556 total migration tests pass \n\nThe fix ensures Django migrations now correctly handle the dependency between `_order` field creation and indexes/constraints that reference it.",
"internal.node_visit_count": 1,
"last_stage": "solve",
"current.preamble": "Goal: AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout b2b0711b555fa292751763c2df4fe577c396f265 && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
"current.preamble": "Goal: AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout b2b0711b555fa292751763c2df4fe577c396f265 && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n- **solve**: success\n - Model: claude-haiku-4-5, 47.5k tokens in / 20.1k out\n - Files: /home/daytona/workspace/FIX_SUMMARY.md, /home/daytona/workspace/SOLUTION.md, /home/daytona/workspace/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py, /home/daytona/workspace/test_fix.py, /home/daytona/workspace/test_issue_scenario.py, /home/daytona/workspace/tests/migrations/test_autodetector.py\n",
"outcome": "success",
"command.stderr": "",
"failure_signature": "",
"graph.rankdir": "LR",
"internal.run_id": "01KKTJ36SCY6TBFTKJNR8HV875"
},
"logs": [],
"logs": [
"git diff failed"
],
"node_outcomes": {
"extract_patch": {
"status": "success",
"context_updates": {
"command.output": "",
"command.stderr": ""
},
"notes": "Script completed: git diff",
"duration_ms": 53
},
"setup": {
"status": "fail",
"context_updates": {
@ -79,13 +94,14 @@
"duration_ms": 211501
}
},
"next_node_id": "extract_patch",
"next_node_id": "exit",
"loop_failure_signatures": {
"setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1
},
"node_visits": {
"setup": 1,
"extract_patch": 1,
"solve": 1,
"start": 1,
"setup": 1
"start": 1
}
}

5
nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
"command": "git diff",
"language": "shell",
"timeout_ms": null
}

5
nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
"duration_ms": 52,
"exit_code": 0,
"timed_out": false
}

6
nodes/extract_patch/status.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
{
"status": "success",
"notes": "Script completed: git diff",
"failure_reason": null,
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:36:09.247986+00:00"
}