From 7ba4bb073cf898ccb261d8e4e53436b5f4066066 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabro Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:36:09 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] checkpoint MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh) --- checkpoint.json | 40 +++++++++++++++------- nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json | 5 +++ nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json | 5 +++ nodes/extract_patch/status.json | 6 ++++ 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) create mode 100644 nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json create mode 100644 nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json create mode 100644 nodes/extract_patch/status.json diff --git a/checkpoint.json b/checkpoint.json index 7d1a536fc..51f8b7141 100644 --- a/checkpoint.json +++ b/checkpoint.json @@ -1,15 +1,17 @@ { - "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:36:07.444122Z", - "current_node": "solve", + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:36:09.248357Z", + "current_node": "extract_patch", "completed_nodes": [ "start", "setup", - "solve" + "solve", + "extract_patch" ], "node_retries": { "setup": 1, + "solve": 1, "start": 1, - "solve": 1 + "extract_patch": 1 }, "context_values": { "graph.goal": "AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR", @@ -17,25 +19,38 @@ "internal.fidelity": "compact", "internal.retry_count.setup": 1, "internal.retry_count.solve": 1, - "current_node": "solve", + "thread.solve.current_node": "extract_patch", + "current_node": "extract_patch", "thread.start.current_node": "setup", "thread.setup.current_node": "solve", "failure_class": "", - "internal.thread_id": "setup", - "command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", + "internal.thread_id": "solve", + "internal.retry_count.extract_patch": 1, + "command.output": "", "last_response": "Perfect! Everything is in place. Let me create a final comprehensive summary:\n\n## Summary\n\nI have successfully fixed Django issue #31831: **\"AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order", "response.solve": "Perfect! Everything is in place. Let me create a final comprehensive summary:\n\n## Summary\n\nI have successfully fixed Django issue #31831: **\"AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index()\"**\n\n### The Problem\nWhen creating a Django model with both `order_with_respect_to` and indexes/constraints that reference the `_order` field, the migration autodetector was generating operations in the wrong order:\n1. AddIndex/AddConstraint operations (trying to create indexes on `_order`)\n2. AlterOrderWithRespectTo operation (which creates the `_order` field)\n\nThis caused migrations to fail because the `_order` field didn't exist when the index tried to reference it.\n\n### The Solution\nMade **two key changes** to `django/db/migrations/autodetector.py`:\n\n1. **Reordered generation method calls (Line 185)**: Moved `generate_altered_order_with_respect_to()` to be called BEFORE `generate_added_indexes()` and `generate_added_constraints()` rather than after them.\n\n2. **Moved AlterOrderWithRespectTo operation in model creation (Lines 616-627)**: When creating new models, the `AlterOrderWithRespectTo` operation is now added BEFORE the `related_dependencies` list, ensuring it comes before any indexes/constraints that reference the `_order` field.\n\n### Tests Added\nAdded two comprehensive test methods to `tests/migrations/test_autodetector.py`:\n- `test_add_model_order_with_respect_to_index_constraint()` - Tests creating new models with order_with_respect_to and indexes/constraints on _order\n- `test_set_alter_order_with_respect_to_index_constraint_foo_together()` - Tests adding order_with_respect_to to existing models with constraints/indexes on _order\n\n### Verification\n✓ All 317 migration-related tests pass \n✓ All 125 autodetector tests pass \n✓ All 108 operations tests pass \n✓ All 556 total migration tests pass \n\nThe fix ensures Django migrations now correctly handle the dependency between `_order` field creation and indexes/constraints that reference it.", "internal.node_visit_count": 1, "last_stage": "solve", - "current.preamble": "Goal: AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout b2b0711b555fa292751763c2df4fe577c396f265 && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", + "current.preamble": "Goal: AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout b2b0711b555fa292751763c2df4fe577c396f265 && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n- **solve**: success\n - Model: claude-haiku-4-5, 47.5k tokens in / 20.1k out\n - Files: /home/daytona/workspace/FIX_SUMMARY.md, /home/daytona/workspace/SOLUTION.md, /home/daytona/workspace/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py, /home/daytona/workspace/test_fix.py, /home/daytona/workspace/test_issue_scenario.py, /home/daytona/workspace/tests/migrations/test_autodetector.py\n", "outcome": "success", "command.stderr": "", "failure_signature": "", "graph.rankdir": "LR", "internal.run_id": "01KKTJ36SCY6TBFTKJNR8HV875" }, - "logs": [], + "logs": [ + "git diff failed" + ], "node_outcomes": { + "extract_patch": { + "status": "success", + "context_updates": { + "command.output": "", + "command.stderr": "" + }, + "notes": "Script completed: git diff", + "duration_ms": 53 + }, "setup": { "status": "fail", "context_updates": { @@ -79,13 +94,14 @@ "duration_ms": 211501 } }, - "next_node_id": "extract_patch", + "next_node_id": "exit", "loop_failure_signatures": { "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1 }, "node_visits": { + "setup": 1, + "extract_patch": 1, "solve": 1, - "start": 1, - "setup": 1 + "start": 1 } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json b/nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6d29afc80 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +{ + "command": "git diff", + "language": "shell", + "timeout_ms": null +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json b/nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dea71c338 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +{ + "duration_ms": 52, + "exit_code": 0, + "timed_out": false +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/extract_patch/status.json b/nodes/extract_patch/status.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f64f4adb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/extract_patch/status.json @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{ + "status": "success", + "notes": "Script completed: git diff", + "failure_reason": null, + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:36:09.247986+00:00" +} \ No newline at end of file