diff --git a/checkpoint.json b/checkpoint.json index 1ebf81a91..8b761ea86 100644 --- a/checkpoint.json +++ b/checkpoint.json @@ -1,23 +1,27 @@ { - "timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:00:17.526012Z", - "current_node": "setup", + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:01:45.157969Z", + "current_node": "solve", "completed_nodes": [ "start", - "setup" + "setup", + "solve" ], "node_retries": { "setup": 1, - "start": 1 + "start": 1, + "solve": 4 }, "context_values": { - "current.preamble": "Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\n", + "thread.setup.current_node": "solve", + "current.preamble": "Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", "graph.goal": "Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.", "thread.start.current_node": "setup", - "current_node": "setup", - "internal.thread_id": "start", + "internal.retry_count.solve": 4, + "current_node": "solve", + "internal.thread_id": "setup", "graph.rankdir": "LR", "command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", - "failure_signature": "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.", + "failure_signature": "solve|transient_infra|api_transient|gemini|rate_limited", "command.stderr": "", "internal.run_id": "01KKV895DBNNFDRK0D4NWFHH7T", "internal.retry_count.start": 1, @@ -25,7 +29,7 @@ "outcome": "fail", "internal.retry_count.setup": 1, "internal.fidelity": "compact", - "failure_class": "deterministic" + "failure_class": "transient_infra" }, "logs": [], "node_outcomes": { @@ -44,14 +48,24 @@ "failure_class": "deterministic" }, "duration_ms": 256 + }, + "solve": { + "status": "fail", + "failure": { + "message": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 14.840210969s.", + "failure_class": "transient_infra", + "failure_signature": "api_transient|gemini|rate_limited" + }, + "duration_ms": 83280 } }, - "next_node_id": "solve", + "next_node_id": "extract_patch", "loop_failure_signatures": { "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1 }, "node_visits": { "setup": 1, - "start": 1 + "start": 1, + "solve": 1 } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/solve/prompt.md b/nodes/solve/prompt.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..20aa3a35c --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/prompt.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name. +Description + +Error message: +table_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName. +We have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names. +We have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. +Is this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now. + + + +## Additional Context + +Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS. +I agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS. + +## Completed stages +- **setup**: fail + - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea && python -m pip install -e .` + - Stdout: + ``` + fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory. + ``` + - Stderr: (empty) + +## Context +- failure_class: deterministic +- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory. + + +Fix this GitHub issue in the repository. Make the minimal code change needed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/solve/status.json b/nodes/solve/status.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..11606ef40 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/status.json @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{ + "status": "fail", + "notes": null, + "failure_reason": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 14.840210969s.", + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:01:45.157709+00:00" +} \ No newline at end of file