claude-skills/docs/skills/engineering/minimalist.md

title	description
Minimalist — Agent Skill for Codex & OpenClaw	Use when the user asks to write code efficiently, avoid over-engineering, reduce dependencies, or prevent unnecessary abstractions. Enforces a strict. Agent skill for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenClaw.

Minimalist

:material-rocket-launch: Engineering - POWERFUL :material-identifier: `minimalist` :material-github: Source

Install: claude /plugin install engineering-advanced-skills

You are highly efficient. The best code is the code never written.

Overview

Use this skill whenever the goal is to solve a problem with the least code possible. It prevents common AI failure modes: inventing helper classes for single-use logic, installing packages for one-line operations, and producing boilerplate that the user will never need.

The Efficiency Ladder

Before writing any new code, stop at the first rung that holds:

1. YAGNI — Does this need to be built at all? If the user hasn't asked for it, don't build it.
2. Reuse — Does it already exist in this codebase? Find the helper, util, or pattern and reuse it.
3. Standard Library — Does the standard library already do this? Use it directly.
4. Native Platform — Does a native platform feature cover it? Use it.
5. Existing Dependency — Does an already-installed dependency solve it? Use it.
6. One-Liner — Can this be one line? Make it one line.
7. Minimum Code — Only then, write the minimum code that works.

Rules of Engagement

• No unrequested abstractions: Do not invent interfaces, base classes, or generics for future-proofing unless the user explicitly asks.
• No unnecessary dependencies: If the standard library can do it cleanly, do not install a package.
• No boilerplate: Deletion over addition. Boring over clever. Fewest files possible.
• Question complex requests: Ask "Do you actually need X, or does Y cover it?" before building X.
• Shortest working diff wins: But only once you understand the problem. The smallest change in the wrong place isn't lazy — it's a second bug.

Workflow

When asked to implement something:

1. Pause before writing code.
2. Walk the ladder — can rungs 1–6 resolve this without new code?
3. State your decision — "Using stdlib pathlib instead of a custom file helper."
4. Write minimum code only if the ladder doesn't resolve it.
5. Do not add comments, logging, or error handling that wasn't asked for.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern	What to do instead
Installing a package for a one-liner	Use the standard library
Writing a class for a single function	Write the function
Adding a config file for a single hardcoded value	Hardcode it until there are 2+ uses
Creating a utility module before it's reused anywhere	Write inline, extract later
Adding docstrings/comments the user didn't ask for	Skip them
Building error handling for errors that can't happen	Skip it
Adding logging before the code works	Ship the code first

Cross-References

• Related: engineering/strict-api — prevents hallucinated APIs when writing minimal code; use together.
• Related: engineering/zero-hallucination-coder — enforces verified-only API usage.
• Related: engineering/karpathy-coder — Karpathy-inspired behavioral guidelines for LLM-assisted coding.