claude-skills/docs/skills/engineering/agent-memory.md
Claude d928ec95d5
release: v2.12.0 — consolidated release notes, version bump, docs-site regeneration
- CHANGELOG.md gains the [2.12.0] entry (first tagged release since v2.9.0):
  consolidates the previously documented but untagged v2.10.0-v2.11.2 work,
  all post-2.11.2 merges, and the full 17-issue triage sweep; the ten stacked
  [Unreleased] sections are demoted into the 2.12.0 body so the Release
  workflow tags and publishes the whole span. Verified parseable with
  scripts/extract_release_notes.py (version 2.12.0, 554-line body).
- Version markers bumped to 2.12.0: marketplace.json metadata,
  CLAUDE.md current-version header + footer.
- Counters trued to the derived values (380 skills / 96 plugins / 20 domains /
  706 tools / 823 refs / 114 agents / 138 commands) in README badges + prose,
  CLAUDE.md, marketplace.json, and the long-stale mkdocs.yml/docs/index.md
  site description (was still claiming 345/78/17).
- Docs site regenerated via scripts/generate-docs.py (568 generated pages;
  new pages for the recently merged plugins); codex/gemini mirrors resynced;
  mkdocs build verified locally with the same plugin set static.yml uses
  (670 HTML pages, no errors).
- Fix: the three hivemind worker personas (assets/agents/{coder,scout,tester}.md,
  merged via #979 while Actions was not triggering) lacked the frontmatter
  `name:` field and hard-failed the blocking G10 gate — named
  hive-coder/hive-scout/hive-tester; 645 files now scan with 0 errors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qgc6RYXWJPr5oW9DHU7zR4
2026-08-24 20:35:06 +00:00

105 lines
5 KiB
Markdown

---
title: "Agent Memory — promotion is earned, not asserted — Agent Skill for Codex & OpenClaw"
description: "Use when a project's CLAUDE.md has grown past what anyone reads and you want the agent to learn durable facts from its own sessions instead — or when. Agent skill for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenClaw."
---
# Agent Memory — promotion is earned, not asserted
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-rocket-launch: Engineering - POWERFUL</span>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-identifier: `agent-memory`</span>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/engineering/agent-memory/skills/agent-memory/SKILL.md">Source</a></span>
</div>
<div class="install-banner" markdown>
<span class="install-label">Install:</span> <code>claude /plugin install engineering-advanced-skills</code>
</div>
> **Portability:** stdlib only. No database, no embeddings, no network, no LLM calls.
## The problem
A project's `CLAUDE.md` is a memory system with one tier and no eviction: every
durable fact and every passing preference land in the same always-loaded file,
until the important lines are diluted by the incidental ones. Facts learned
mid-session vanish at teardown unless someone writes them down.
**The fix is not more storage — it is a promotion ladder.** A claim earns its
way toward always-loaded context by recurring; a human confirms the last step.
## The four tiers
Tiers are distinguished by **injection policy**, not storage format.
| Tier | Holds | Injected | Committed |
|---|---|---|---|
| **L0** | raw session transcripts | never | no (already on disk) |
| **L1** | candidate atoms | on relevance, at prompt time | no (gitignored) |
| **L2** | this project's context | every session start | yes, after adopt |
| **L3** | stable cross-project persona | always | yes, after adopt |
## The gates
Nothing moves up because it sounded important. It moves up because it recurred.
- **L0 → L1** — an explicit marker fires (a directive, a correction, a stated
preference, a named lesson, a reproducible failure). Rule-based, high
precision, deliberately low recall.
- **L1 → L2** — ≥ 3 distinct sessions spanning ≥ 2 distinct calendar days. A
claim stated outright needs 2 sessions; the distinct-day rule still applies. A
verified claim promotes on one observation and is the only day-exempt path.
- **L2 → L3** — held in ≥ 2 distinct projects, aged ≥ 30 days, uncontested.
**Two gates refuse rather than guess.** A claim whose text was altered by
redaction never promotes on evidence alone — the flag firing is evidence the
source was sensitive, and a lexical filter finding one secret is not proof it
found all of them. A claim with an open contradiction is frozen at L1 until a
human resolves it; the incumbent is never silently overwritten.
## Use it
```bash
# what is remembered, and what is blocking the next promotion
python3 scripts/memory_inspect.py --tier L1
# where did this line come from — sessions, days, transcript, quoted source
python3 scripts/memory_inspect.py --why "PR base branch is dev"
# every claim with an open contradiction, both directions of the join
python3 scripts/memory_inspect.py --contested
# dry-run the promotion pass; writes nothing
python3 scripts/memory_promote.py
```
Three hooks run the loop unattended: `SessionStart` injects L2 + L3,
`UserPromptSubmit` recalls relevant L1 atoms, `SessionEnd` captures and stages.
Each is disabled independently with `AGENT_MEMORY_SESSIONSTART=0`,
`AGENT_MEMORY_USERPROMPTSUBMIT=0`, `AGENT_MEMORY_SESSIONEND=0`. Every hook fails
open: a broken memory system costs you memory, never a session.
## Hard rules
1. **Redact before writing.** Every atom passes the filter before it reaches
disk. Anything altered is quarantined from promotion.
2. **Propose, never apply.** Promotions land in `.memory/staged/`. Only an
explicit `/cs:memory adopt` touches a `CLAUDE.md`, and it backs both up first.
3. **Cite, don't invent.** Every atom carries a back-pointer to the transcript
line that produced it. `--why` resolving to *ambiguous* prints nothing rather
than guess: a wrong citation is worse than a missing one.
4. **Never surface a contested claim as fact.** It is still injected — hiding
the conflict is worse — but always tagged.
5. **The committed tiers carry no paths.** Promotion strips the back-pointer
prefix, which embeds an OS username.
## Forcing questions
Walk these one at a time before trusting the store.
1. Which line in your `CLAUDE.md` did you last actually read before acting?
2. Would you rather the agent forget a true thing, or remember a false one?
3. When two remembered rules disagree, who decides — and when?
4. What would make you delete `.memory/` entirely?
Rationale, open decisions, field schema: [[`agent-memory/DESIGN.md`](https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/engineering/agent-memory/DESIGN.md)](https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/engineering/agent-memory/DESIGN.md).