mirror of
https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git
synced 2026-10-09 03:17:54 +00:00
abd9c9d8de
generate-docs.py learns the agent-launcher domain (5 hardcoded maps extended); regenerated docs tree: 343 skill pages / 96 agent pages / 122 command pages (561 total). mkdocs.yml nav gains the Agent Launcher skill section (7 pages), 4 cs-agent-* agent entries, and 8 /cs:* command entries; all nav targets verified to exist. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012FwXG6TqCXKZQvF4iD69cv
90 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
90 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "/cs-roast — Slash Command for AI Coding Agents"
|
|
description: "/cs:roast — Convene a 5-angle adversarial panel (Critic, Champion, Analyst, Investigator, Customer) on an idea, then a Judge delivers one GO /. Slash command for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# /cs-roast
|
|
|
|
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-console: Slash Command</span>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/2-claude-skills/tree/main/productivity/roast/commands/cs-roast.md">Source</a></span>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Command:** `/cs:roast [the idea]`
|
|
|
|
Claude's default is to agree with you. `/roast` is the opposite. It convenes five independent
|
|
reviewers who tear an idea apart and build it up from every angle, then acts as the Judge to deliver
|
|
one honest verdict. Run it before you sink time and money into building the wrong thing.
|
|
|
|
## When to Run
|
|
|
|
- "Roast / pressure-test / stress-test this idea"
|
|
- "Validate this business idea" / "convene the panel"
|
|
- "Give me a brutal second opinion before I build this"
|
|
- You want a real GO/KILL call — and you can take a "no."
|
|
|
|
## When NOT to Run
|
|
|
|
- You want encouragement or gentle brainstorming. This exists to tell you the idea is dead when it is.
|
|
- A cross-functional enterprise decision needing the full C-suite → use `/cs:boardroom`.
|
|
- A purely factual lookup with no decision attached.
|
|
|
|
## What You Get
|
|
|
|
1. **One shared brief** — assembled from idea / who / money / edge / constraints (`brief_builder.py`).
|
|
2. **Five reviewers in parallel**, each scoring their own dimension 1-10:
|
|
- The Critic ("what kills this?"), The Champion ("the 10x upside?"), The Analyst ("does the logic
|
|
hold?", no web), The Investigator ("what does the market say?", web), The Customer ("would I pay?").
|
|
3. **One verdict** — `GO / RESHAPE / KILL` + confidence, from the weighted synthesizer (not an average;
|
|
demand/fatal-flaw/logic gates can veto a GO), with the real tension named and resolved.
|
|
4. **A money read** + **the cheapest 48-hour test** with explicit pass/fail signals.
|
|
|
|
## Trigger Phrases (auto-invoke without /cs:)
|
|
|
|
- "roast this idea" / "roast my idea"
|
|
- "pressure-test this" / "stress-test this idea"
|
|
- "validate this business idea" / "convene the panel"
|
|
- "brutal second opinion before I build"
|
|
|
|
## Discipline
|
|
|
|
- **Same brief to all five** — they must judge the same thing.
|
|
- **Parallel, not sequential** — five `Task` calls in one message so they think independently.
|
|
- **Never average** — run the synthesizer, resolve the tension.
|
|
- **Gates veto a GO** — no buyer, a landed fatal flaw, or broken logic caps the call below GO.
|
|
- **End on a falsifiable test** — name it, cost it, time-box it, state pass/fail.
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# 1. Assemble the shared brief
|
|
python ../skills/roast/scripts/brief_builder.py \
|
|
--idea "..." --who "..." --money "..." --edge "..." --constraints "..."
|
|
|
|
# 2. Fire all five reviewers in parallel (one Task each, subagent_type: general-purpose),
|
|
# pasting the same brief into each. Collect five 1-10 scores.
|
|
|
|
# 3. Synthesize the call (weighting + veto gates + tension, NOT an average)
|
|
python ../skills/roast/scripts/verdict_synthesizer.py \
|
|
--critic 4 --champion 8 --analyst 7 --investigator 5 --customer 6
|
|
|
|
# 4. Design the cheapest test from the riskiest assumption
|
|
python ../skills/roast/scripts/cheapest_test_designer.py --risk price --price 99
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Stop Conditions
|
|
|
|
- Verdict issued (GO/RESHAPE/KILL) + confidence + cheapest test → done.
|
|
- User brings new evidence → re-roast the changed dimension. Otherwise hold the call.
|
|
- User says "stop" → drop it.
|
|
|
|
## Related
|
|
|
|
- Agent: [`cs-roast-judge`](https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/productivity/roast/agents/cs-roast-judge.md)
|
|
- Skill: [`roast`](https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/productivity/roast/skills/roast/SKILL.md)
|
|
- Siblings: `/cs:andreessen` (single market-first lens), `/cs:boardroom` (enterprise C-suite)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Version:** 1.0.0
|