scriptoriumadmin/claude-skills
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git synced 2026-10-09 03:17:54 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
claude-skills/docs/commands/cs-patent.md
Claude ea94a78bac
fix(docs): carry the #954 policy change and #933 link cleanup into the generated docs site 
Review follow-up on PR #972: docs/plugins/index.md still described the old
"two approved extension fields in plugin.json" policy reversed by #954 —
rewritten to point at .claude-plugin/authoring-notes.json and the CI
hard-fail. 32 generated docs pages still linked the gitignored megaprompts/
tree via absolute GitHub URLs (404s); converted to the same annotated
plain-text form used in the source files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qgc6RYXWJPr5oW9DHU7zR4
2026-08-21 05:55:45 +00:00

4.8 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

title description
/cs-patent — Slash Command for AI Coding Agents /cs:patent <invention> — Patent prior-art + landscape intelligence with mandatory sub-use-case commitment. 6-Q grill-me intake (Q2 picks one of. Slash command for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI.

/cs-patent

:material-console: Slash Command :material-github: Source

Command: /cs:patent <invention description>

The cs-patent persona produces a sub-use-case-tailored patent dossier. Refuses generic "patent help" — must commit to one of 5 sub-use-cases at Q2.

Forcing Intake (6 Questions, One at a Time)

Q Asks Notes
Q1 Invention (2-3 sentences, specific) refuses vague; "AI for healthcare" pushed back
Q2 Sub-use-case: novelty / FTO / landscape / diligence / litigation Forcing — refuses "all of them"
Q3 Jurisdictions (US/EP/CN/JP/KR/PCT/worldwide) Asked only for FTO/landscape/diligence
Q4 Known prior art (patent number or paper) Anchor; accept "none"
Q5 Risk tolerance: strict / signal-gathering Asked for novelty + FTO
Q6 Attorney status (have you spoken to one?) Asked for novelty + FTO; triggers disclaimer

Stop condition: after Q6 (or earlier with skips). Never re-open.

What You Get

patent_<invention-slug>_<sub-use-case>_<YYYY-MM-DD>.docx

8 sections:
1. Executive Summary + Verdict (NOVEL/CLEAR/FLAGGED/etc.) + legal disclaimer
2. Closest Prior Art (5-10 ranked, claim-text extracted, hyperlinked)
3. Patent Landscape (top filers, 10-yr trend, CPC distribution)
4. Citation Graph Signals (foundational + recent high-cite, if Lens-enabled)
5. Geographic Coverage (FTO/landscape/diligence only)
6. FTO Flags (FTO only — risk per claim per jurisdiction)
7. Strategy + Recommendations (sub-use-case-specific)
8. Audit Log (searches, counts, plan-tier, attorney reminder)

Per-Sub-Use-Case Behavior

Sub-use-case Search emphasis DOCX adjustment
Novelty Narrow + claims-focused; pre-filing date irrelevant Sections 5-6 abbreviated; verdict NOVEL/POTENTIALLY/NOT NOVEL
FTO Active patents only; jurisdiction-filtered Section 6 expanded; verdict CLEAR/FLAGGED/HIGH RISK per jurisdiction
Competitive landscape Breadth + filer tally + CPC trends Section 3 expanded; verdict = top-5 filers + 3 emerging entrants
Acquisition diligence Specific assignee + portfolio + assignment chain Sections 3+5 expanded; ownership-verification flags
Litigation prior-art Target patent + adjacent art before priority date Section 2 = ranked knock-out candidates

Discipline

  • Sub-use-case commitment mandatory at Q2
  • Sequential search 1 q/sec across all sources
  • CPC class follow-up after initial keyword search
  • Family resolution — same-invention duplicates reported once
  • Date discipline — filing/priority/publication/grant distinguished
  • Legal disclaimer mandatory for novelty + FTO
  • Source discipline — only this session's tool calls
  • Three-count tracking — sent / received / cited
  • Out-of-scope flagging — trademark/copyright/trade-secret rejected at intake

Trigger Phrases

  • "prior art search for [invention]"
  • "patent search on [topic]"
  • "freedom to operate analysis"
  • "FTO for [product]"
  • "patent landscape for [field]"
  • "is [invention] novel"
  • "patents on [topic]"
  • "competitive patent analysis"
  • "prior art for litigation"
  • "patent diligence on [company]"

Anti-Patterns Rejected

  • Starting any search before user commits to a sub-use-case (refuses generic "patent help")
  • Batching all intake questions
  • Accepting vague invention descriptions
  • Keyword-only search without CPC/IPC class follow-up
  • Treating family members as separate hits
  • Confusing filing date with priority/publication/grant date
  • Skipping legal disclaimer when sub-use-case has legal consequences
  • Reporting verdict without claim-text evidence
  • Fabricating Lens.org citation data when key absent
  • Suggesting design-arounds without acknowledging attorney review required
  • Skipping audit log

Related

  • Agent: cs-patent
  • Skill: patent
  • Source spec: megaprompts/11-patent-megaprompt.md (maintainer-local draft spec — gitignored, not in the public repo)
  • Siblings: /cs:litreview, /cs:grants, /cs:dossier, /cs:pulse
  • Future: /cs:syllabus

Version: 1.0.0 Source: Path-B direct conversion of megaprompts/11-patent-megaprompt.md