mirror of
https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git
synced 2026-09-11 22:51:28 +00:00
Bundle of low-medium-severity follow-ups that were deferred when PR #720 landed the 3 blocking bugs. None of these silently break correctness — they're discoverability, consistency, and convention gaps. Bugs / code-quality: 1. fullstack_decision_engine.py: asymmetric cadence matching `inputs.cadence in target or target in inputs.cadence` produced asymmetric results — "per-pr" matched "per-pr-with-gates" but not vice versa. Profile cadences are intentional alternatives joined by "-or-" (e.g. "weekly-or-on-demand" → {weekly, on-demand}); now parsed explicitly with "-with-..." modifier suffixes stripped. Verified: cadence=per-pr → matches per-pr, per-pr-with-gates, daily-or-per-pr cadence=daily → matches daily-or-per-pr (only) cadence=on-demand → matches weekly-or-on-demand 2. fullstack_decision_engine.py: rename weight_total/weight_matched to w_total/w_matched. Backend and frontend engines already use the short form; this aligns the three files as a family. 3. sync-gemini-skills.py: 3-way name collision in dedup logic The naive `if name in seen_names: name = parent-name` handled one collision but not two. Three "status" skills under "skills" parent dirs produced two entries both named "skills-status". Now suffixes with -2, -3, ... so each entry has a unique index name. Eliminates the duplicate-name ambiguity surfaced when checking PR #713. Discoverability: 4. senior-fullstack/SKILL.md: surface fullstack_decision_engine.py in the labeled "Tools" section at the top. Previously only mentioned inline in the body (5 references buried in the Stack Decision Matrix section); not findable when scanning the SKILL.md. Conventions / v2.8.0 compliance: 5. commands/cs-{fullstack,backend,frontend}-review.md: add explicit "## Forcing-question library" section header per the v2.8.0 convention. Each lists the 7 questions inline with a pointer to the canonical reference file. 6. agents/engineering/cs-{fullstack,backend,frontend}-engineer.md: alphabetize the specialist list in the description field (annotated that workflow body order remains dependency-driven). Makes the three agent descriptions consistent as a family. 7. agents/engineering/cs-{backend,frontend}-engineer.md: promote the "Cross-agent invocation" content out of Workflow 3 into a dedicated "## When invoked as fork target" section with an explicit question- skip table per parent agent (cs-fullstack-engineer, cs-cto-advisor, cs-vpe-advisor, cs-ciso-advisor for backend; cs-fullstack-engineer, cs-content-creator, cs-product-manager for frontend). Closes the cross-agent contract gap the bot flagged. Not changed: - CLAUDE.md plugin-schema section (already corrected in #715; bot's "stale text" claim was incorrect — it was reading the cumulative diff) - Workflow body specialist order (intentional dependency order; would break the SLO-first → API → DB → migration → observability sequence) Verification: - All 3 decision engines: --sample → exit 0 - Cadence matching: 3 test cases pass cleanly - check_plugin_json.py --all → 0 FAIL, 0 WARN, 69 OK - sync-gemini-skills.py → 392 unique names (was 391 unique / 1 dupe)
3.2 KiB
3.2 KiB
| description | argument-hint |
|---|---|
| Fullstack engineering review — walks the 7 Matt Pocock forcing questions, picks the profile, forks into POWERFUL specialists (api-design-reviewer, database-designer, slo-architect). Invokes the cs-fullstack-engineer agent with context fork. | <problem or codebase to review> |
/cs:fullstack-review — Fullstack engineering review
Use the cs-fullstack-engineer agent (which uses context: fork to keep the parent thread clean) to handle this inquiry:
$ARGUMENTS
Forcing-question library
Canonical source: engineering-team/skills/senior-fullstack/references/forcing_questions.md (7 questions, one-per-turn, recommendation + canon citation per question).
- Team size now + 12-month headcount
- Deployment cadence (per-PR / daily / weekly / quarterly)
- Customer-facing / internal tool / marketing site
- One-year p50 + p99 traffic forecast
- Hiring-against vs training-into the stack
- Year-one monthly cloud + SaaS budget ceiling
- Three verifiable success criteria with numeric targets
Routing protocol
- Walk the 7 forcing questions in
engineering-team/skills/senior-fullstack/references/forcing_questions.md. One per turn. Recommend the answer with cited canon. Track in/tmp/fullstack-grill-<date>.md. - Surface kill criteria — if any question trips one (e.g., "microservices day 1, team size 3"), STOP and resolve before proceeding.
- Run the deterministic profile picker:
python engineering-team/skills/senior-fullstack/scripts/fullstack_decision_engine.py \ --team-size <N> --team-size-12mo <N12> --cadence <c> \ --user-facing <true|false> --budget <USD/mo> \ --traffic-p99-rps <N> --data-sensitivity <tier> - Surface the matched profile + runner-up tradeoff (if within 15%).
- Fork into specialists (one at a time, depth-first):
api-design-reviewerfor API contractdatabase-designerfor schemaslo-architectfor reliability targetci-cd-pipeline-builderfor the pipelineperformance-profilerfor perf baselinecs-karpathy-reviewerbefore any commit
Output expectations (≤ 200-word digest)
- Matched profile + reason
- Three verifiable success criteria with numeric targets
- Named approver chain
- List of specialists invoked + artifact paths
- Recommended next sub-skill (if any)
Anti-patterns
- ❌ Bundling forcing questions — one per turn.
- ❌ Skipping the kill-criteria check.
- ❌ Reimplementing specialist scope. Fork — don't duplicate.
- ❌ Auto-approving production changes. Always name the human approver.
Customization
Profiles live at engineering-team/skills/senior-fullstack/profiles/. To customize for your org:
- Copy
saas-startup.json(or whichever best fits) to<your-org>.json. - Edit
constraints,stack_recommendations,success_thresholds,named_approver_chain. - The decision engine auto-discovers new profile JSONs.
Related commands
/cs:frontend-review— frontend-only deep dive/cs:backend-review— backend-only deep dive/cs:engineer-grill— cross-role 21-question forcing-question runner/karpathy-check— Karpathy 4-principle review before commit