docs: decluttered card-based home, fix /overview folder collision

/ resolved into overview/use-cases because both overview.mdx and the
overview/ directory existed — move use-cases to /use-cases (redirected)
and remove the folder. Rewrite the landing as a mem0-style home: one
paragraph, the two-call loop, then card grids (start here / pick your
door / go deep / why) instead of the long-form pitch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dhravya Shah 2026-07-17 16:33:20 -07:00
parent b8f90929bd
commit 7d3993f0da
3 changed files with 61 additions and 159 deletions

View file

@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
"patterns/agent-task-memory",
"patterns/company-brain",
"patterns/ingestion",
"overview/use-cases"
"use-cases"
]
},
{
@ -749,6 +749,10 @@
{
"source": "/intro",
"destination": "/overview"
},
{
"source": "/overview/use-cases",
"destination": "/use-cases"
}
],
"styling": {

View file

@ -1,21 +1,18 @@
---
title: "What is supermemory?"
title: "supermemory docs"
sidebarTitle: "Overview"
description: "Supermemory is a context engine: you feed it everything, it derives memories, a knowledge graph, and live profiles — and serves the right context back in ~300ms."
description: "The context engine for AI apps — memories, a knowledge graph, and live profiles from everything you feed it."
mode: "center"
icon: "book-open"
---
Supermemory is a context engine. You feed it everything — chat sessions, files, URLs, connector data — and it derives memories, a knowledge graph, and live profiles. When your app needs context, supermemory serves the right slice back in ~300ms.
Supermemory is a context engine. You feed it everything — chat sessions, files, URLs, connector data — and it derives memories, a knowledge graph, and live profiles. When your app needs context, supermemory serves the right slice back in ~300ms. <!-- CONFIRM: publishable latency figure -->
Here's the whole loop in two calls:
The whole loop is two calls:
<CodeGroup>
```typescript TypeScript
import Supermemory from "supermemory";
const client = new Supermemory({ apiKey: process.env.SUPERMEMORY_API_KEY });
await client.add({
content: "Sarah's being promoted to VP of Product",
containerTag: "user_4f8a",
@ -28,10 +25,6 @@ const results = await client.search.memories({
```
```python Python
from supermemory import Supermemory
client = Supermemory()
client.add(
content="Sarah's being promoted to VP of Product",
container_tag="user_4f8a",
@ -43,160 +36,65 @@ results = client.search.memories(
)
```
```bash cURL
# add — POST /v3/documents
curl -X POST "https://api.supermemory.ai/v3/documents" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUPERMEMORY_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"content": "Sarah'\''s being promoted to VP of Product", "containerTag": "user_4f8a"}'
# search — POST /v4/search
curl -X POST "https://api.supermemory.ai/v4/search" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUPERMEMORY_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"q": "who'\''s getting promoted?", "containerTag": "user_4f8a"}'
```
</CodeGroup>
You didn't chunk anything, embed anything, or write a schema. That's the point: supermemory decides what's worth remembering, how facts connect, and which of them are still true.
## Start here
## How it thinks about your data
You ingest **documents** — any content, from a one-line chat message to a 200-page PDF. The ingestion pipeline (a custom fine-tuned memory model, not an off-the-shelf embedder) derives **memories**: individual facts with provenance and time attached. Memories interconnect into a **graph** of entities and relations. And for each entity, supermemory maintains a **profile** — its current derived understanding, ready to drop into a system prompt. You recall all of it through **hybrid search**: semantic, keyword, and graph combined.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A["Documents<br/>chats · files · URLs · connectors"] --> B["Ingestion pipeline<br/>fine-tuned memory model"]
B --> C["Memories<br/>facts with provenance + time"]
C --> D["Graph<br/>entities · relations"]
C --> E["Profiles<br/>current understanding per entity"]
D --> E
C -.-> F["Hybrid search"]
D -.-> F
E -.-> F
F --> G["Your app"]
```
Isolation comes from **container tags** (you may see "space" as a synonym — same thing): one tag per user, tenant, or project, and nothing crosses the boundary. **Metadata** slices *within* a boundary — agent role, channel, stage. [Scoped API keys](/concepts/permissioning) enforce the boundary at the key level, so a leaked key can't read another tenant.
## What makes it different
Most memory layers are a vector store that retrieves the nearest chunk. Supermemory is built differently, and each difference shows up in what you can ship:
- **A full context engine.** A custom memory model plus a custom data engine handle extraction, deduplication, and consolidation — you send raw content and get structured understanding back. See [Architecture](/concepts/architecture).
- **Memory that handles time.** Facts carry temporal validity; new statements supersede old ones, and explicit time-bound intent ("remind me for a week from now") creates expiring memories. See [Graph Memory](/concepts/graph-memory).
- **User profiles.** Each container tag gets a live profile of static and dynamic facts — derived, not hand-written, and sized to a ~1k-token budget so it's prompt-cache-friendly. See [User Profiles](/concepts/user-profiles).
- **Hybrid search you can tune.** Semantic + keyword + graph in one query, with `rewriteQuery`, `rerank`, and `threshold` knobs when defaults aren't enough. See [Hybrid Search](/concepts/hybrid-search).
- **Real permissioning.** Container tags for hard isolation, metadata filters for dimensions inside it, scoped keys to enforce both. See [Permissioning](/concepts/permissioning).
## Why retrieval alone isn't memory
Say a user talks to your agent over six weeks:
```text
Day 1: "I love my Adidas sneakers"
Day 30: "My Adidas broke after a month, terrible quality"
Day 31: "I'm switching to Puma"
Day 45: "What sneakers should I buy?"
```
A vector store answers day 45 by finding the most similar text. "I love my Adidas sneakers" is the closest match to a sneaker question — so your agent recommends Adidas to someone who quit the brand two weeks earlier.
Supermemory tracks the progression instead: the day-1 preference was invalidated by day 30, and the day-31 statement is what's true now. Ask it:
<CodeGroup>
```typescript TypeScript
const results = await client.search.memories({
q: "what sneakers does this user like?",
containerTag: "user_4f8a",
});
```
```python Python
results = client.search.memories(
q="what sneakers does this user like?",
container_tag="user_4f8a",
)
```
```bash cURL
# POST /v4/search
curl -X POST "https://api.supermemory.ai/v4/search" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUPERMEMORY_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"q": "what sneakers does this user like?", "containerTag": "user_4f8a"}'
```
</CodeGroup>
And you get back what's true now:
```json
{
"results": [
{
"memory": "Switched from Adidas to Puma after quality issues",
"similarity": 0.89,
"updatedAt": "2026-06-30T…"
},
…
]
}
```
The outdated Adidas preference is **not** returned as if it were still true — it's been superseded. If you want the history anyway (superseded facts are useful for "why" questions), pass `include: { forgottenMemories: true }` and you'll get them back, marked as forgotten.
RAG answers "what do I know?". Memory answers "what's true about this user *right now*?". Supermemory does both — the same search endpoint reaches document chunks when you need raw retrieval. The full comparison is in [Memory vs RAG](/concepts/memory-vs-rag).
## One engine, many doors
The API and SDKs, MCP, plugins and hooks, the SMFS filesystem mount, connectors, and Company Brain are all doors into the same engine — one store of memories, one graph, one set of profiles. Anything ingested through any door is retrievable through every other door.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A["API & SDKs"] --> G
B["MCP"] --> G
C["Plugins & hooks"] --> G
D["SMFS<br/>filesystem mount"] --> G
E["Connectors"] --> G
F["Company Brain"] --> G
G[("One engine<br/>memories · graph · profiles")]
```
- **[API & SDKs](/quickstart)** — TypeScript, Python, and REST. The primitives everything else is built on.
- **[MCP](/supermemory-mcp/setup)** — give Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client persistent memory.
- **[Plugins & hooks](/integrations/ai-sdk)** — `withSupermemory` wraps your model so memory happens automatically per request.
- **[SMFS](/smfs/overview)** — mount memory as a filesystem for coding agents; each mount is scoped to one container tag.
- **[Connectors](/connectors/overview)** — sync Google Drive, Notion, OneDrive, and more on a schedule.
- **[Company Brain](/patterns/company-brain)** — team knowledge across all of the above, no code required.
So there's no "which product am I using?" decision. A memory added through MCP shows up in an API search. A document synced from Notion is on your team's Company Brain. Pick doors by workflow, not by feature.
## Does it actually work?
- **Benchmarks:** supermemory is [state of the art](https://supermemory.ai/research) on LongMemEval and LoCoMo. <!-- CONFIRM: ConvoMem result + exact figures for the benchmark table -->
- **Latency:** profile reads ~100ms; search P50 ~300ms, P99 ~400ms. <!-- CONFIRM: publishable latency figures -->
- **Don't take our word for it:** [MemoryBench](/memorybench/quickstart) is our open benchmarking harness — run it against your own workload and reproduce the results yourself.
<Note>
Search doesn't add to your bill — you're charged on ingestion, and recall is essentially free. The billing model is covered in [Usage and Billing](/trust/usage-and-billing).
</Note>
<Columns cols={2}>
<Card title="Quickstart" icon="bolt" href="/quickstart">
Add four scattered memories, then watch supermemory connect them into an answer you never stated.
</Card>
<Card title="How it works" icon="brain" href="/concepts/architecture">
The custom memory model, the graph, and where the milliseconds go.
</Card>
</Columns>
## Pick your door
<Columns cols={2}>
<Card title="Build with the API" icon="code" href="/quickstart">
Add your first memory, search it, and wire context into your app.
Every surface below is a door into the same engine — one store of memories, one graph, one set of profiles. Anything that goes in through one door comes out through all of them.
<Columns cols={3}>
<Card title="API & SDKs" icon="code" href="/concepts/surfaces">
Full control from your own backend. TypeScript, Python, REST.
</Card>
<Card title="Give your tools memory" icon="plug" href="/supermemory-mcp/setup">
Connect Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client — or drop in the [AI SDK plugin](/integrations/ai-sdk).
<Card title="MCP" icon="terminal" href="/supermemory-mcp/mcp">
Give Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT your memory. No code.
</Card>
<Card title="Give your team memory" icon="users" href="/patterns/company-brain">
Company Brain: shared memory across your docs, drives, and conversations.
<Card title="Plugins" icon="puzzle" href="/integrations/claude-code">
Auto-inject memory into Claude Code, Codex, and OpenClaw.
</Card>
<Card title="Run it yourself" icon="server" href="/self-hosting/overview">
Self-host supermemory on your own infrastructure.
<Card title="Connectors" icon="plug" href="/connectors/overview">
Notion, Google Drive, Gmail, OneDrive, S3 — content flows in on its own.
</Card>
<Card title="SMFS" icon="database" href="/smfs/overview">
Mount memory as a filesystem for agents that think in files.
</Card>
<Card title="Self-hosting" icon="server" href="/self-hosting/overview">
From a free local binary to air-gapped enterprise deploys.
</Card>
</Columns>
## Go deep
<Columns cols={2}>
<Card title="Build on supermemory" icon="blocks" href="/patterns/overview">
Multi-tenant SaaS memory, AI companions, multi-agent systems, company brains — full patterns with code.
</Card>
<Card title="API Reference" icon="book-open" href="/api-reference">
Every endpoint, parameter, and response shape.
</Card>
<Card title="Permissioning & multi-tenancy" icon="lock" href="/concepts/permissioning">
Container tags, metadata, scoped keys — real isolation, designed in.
</Card>
<Card title="Memory vs RAG" icon="scale" href="/concepts/memory-vs-rag">
Why retrieval alone recommends Adidas to someone who switched to Puma two weeks ago.
</Card>
</Columns>
## Why supermemory
Most "memory layers" are a vector store that retrieves the nearest chunk. Supermemory understands what it stores: facts carry time, entities connect across sessions, contradictions resolve to what's true *now*, and irrelevant details fade.
- **State of the art** on LongMemEval and LoCoMo — and [MemoryBench](/memorybench/overview) lets you reproduce the numbers yourself. <!-- CONFIRM: exact benchmark figures + ConvoMem -->
- **Fast enough for the hot path**: profile reads ~100ms, search P50 ~300ms. <!-- CONFIRM: publishable latency figures -->
- **Yours to run**: the same engine powers the cloud API, a free local binary, and on-prem enterprise deploys.