mirror of
https://github.com/usestrix/strix.git
synced 2026-11-02 07:12:37 +00:00
refactor(skills): put the coverage conditionals on their own lines
This commit is contained in:
parent
898bbb4741
commit
bac386e509
2 changed files with 12 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ that sentence, you are not in `ruled_out`.
|
|||
|
||||
**3. `open_proof_gap`** — the candidate is plausible, you could not
|
||||
confirm it, and you also could not name a control that rules it out. This
|
||||
is a legitimate, expected outcome. {% if coverage_tools %}Record it with
|
||||
`record_coverage(outcome="needs_follow_up")`, carry{% else %}Carry{% endif %} it up in
|
||||
{% if coverage_tools %}
|
||||
is a legitimate, expected outcome. Record it with
|
||||
`record_coverage(outcome="needs_follow_up")`, carry it up in
|
||||
{% else %}
|
||||
is a legitimate, expected outcome. Carry it up in
|
||||
{% endif %}
|
||||
`agent_finish(open_items=[...])`, and reflect it in `counterevidence` /
|
||||
`confidence_rationale` if you file a related report. Do **not** convert
|
||||
it to `ruled_out` to tidy up your worklist.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ Not worth it: "this could use more validation" with no path, style and
|
|||
maintainability complaints, and cosmetic variants of a candidate you
|
||||
already opened.
|
||||
|
||||
Keep reading until no distinct plausible candidate remains{% if coverage_tools %} — then record
|
||||
{% if coverage_tools %}
|
||||
Keep reading until no distinct plausible candidate remains — then record
|
||||
what you swept with `record_coverage`, including the families that came
|
||||
back clean{% endif %}.
|
||||
back clean.
|
||||
{% else %}
|
||||
Keep reading until no distinct plausible candidate remains.
|
||||
{% endif %}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue