Add Framework-Specific section (LangChain, OpenAI, Anthropic, LlamaIndex) per review

This commit is contained in:
Viper Droid 2026-07-01 21:54:40 +03:00
parent 3eb217b7f3
commit 25e9aa088b

View file

@ -82,6 +82,36 @@ Applications that pass untrusted input into an LLM prompt are vulnerable to prom
- Role-play, hypothetical framing, "for a security test", instruction laundering across turns
- Splitting a blocked request across multiple messages or encodings
## Framework-Specific
### LangChain / LangGraph
- `AgentExecutor` and tool-calling agents parse model output into tool calls — injected content can steer **which** tool runs and **what arguments** it receives
- Sinks to grep: custom `Tool`/`@tool` functions (shell, SQL, HTTP, file), `initialize_agent`, `create_react_agent`, output parsers
- Untrusted documents flowing through chains (retrieval → prompt) are a prime indirect-injection path
### OpenAI Assistants / Function Calling
- The model chooses the function and its arguments from untrusted text — validate arguments server-side; never treat them as sanitized
- Assistants `file_search`/retrieval ingests uploaded files → indirect injection via document content
- Code Interpreter is a code-execution sink reachable from model output
- `tool_choice`/forced tools do not prevent argument injection
### Anthropic Tool Use
- `tool_use` blocks carry model-chosen input; schema and result handling differ from OpenAI
- Check how `tool_result` is fed back and whether untrusted tool output re-enters the prompt unbounded
### LlamaIndex / RAG Pipelines
- Injection rides inside indexed documents; retrieval hooks (node post-processors, query engines, `response_synthesizer`) and agent tools change the surface
- Grep: data loaders ingesting untrusted sources, `QueryEngineTool`, sub-question/agent query engines
### Guardrail Layers (NeMo Guardrails, LLM Guard, etc.)
- If the guard is the same model or otherwise in-band, it is bypassable by the same injection
- Confirm the guard inspects the **final merged prompt** (including retrieved/ingested content), not just the user message
## Exploitation Scenarios
### Indirect Injection → Data Exfiltration