Adds the DingTalk credentials to every path that actually delivers
configuration: compose.release.yml (which has no env_file, so variables must
be listed explicitly), the Helm secret template and values, the k8s
deployment and its secret example. validate-release-config.sh gains DingTalk
in its provider loop, so a half-configured pair is rejected the same way.
Documents the three-stage strategy contract in the authentication design: a
table mapping each deviation -- authorize parameters, token exchange,
userinfo loading -- to its interface and current implementations, plus the
rule that a provider must never make account decisions itself.
Deployment notes and both FAQs now cover DingTalk, including the shared trap
with Feishu: their emails are admin-recorded and never confirmed, so
emailVerified is always false and an EMAIL_DOMAIN access policy would reject
every login through either provider.
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(auth): let providers override OAuth userinfo loading
Some providers do not return a flat, standard userinfo payload, so
DefaultOAuth2UserService cannot read them. Add ProviderOAuth2UserService
so a provider can claim its own registration id and supply the loading
step, while everything after it stays shared.
The override runs inside the RemoteIdentityIoExecutor boundary added in
R1-A, so a provider's HTTP call does not hold the surrounding
transaction open. Registrations without an override keep using the
default user service unchanged.
Part of R1-A2 (public Provider adapters) per
openspec/changes/enterprise-identity-platform/rollout-plan.md.
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(auth): add Feishu as a public login provider
Adds Feishu (Lark) as a public sign-in option: it authenticates a
SkillHub platform account and nothing more. No Organization membership,
no directory sync, no Namespace grants.
Feishu deviates from standard OAuth in two ways this handles:
its userinfo response is wrapped in a {code, msg, data} envelope, and it
reports errors with HTTP 200. FeishuOAuth2UserService unwraps that
envelope into flat attributes; FeishuClaimsExtractor maps them to the
shared OAuthClaims, so account decisions still run through the unified
identity core added in R1-A.
Subject and email semantics, which decide whether a login can reach an
existing account:
- open_id is the only subject. union_id stays in extra rather than
acting as a fallback: a subject that can change between logins would
split one person across two platform accounts. Promoting union_id
later needs an explicit alias migration.
- A blank or missing open_id fails the login instead of binding the
literal string "null".
- emailVerified is always false. Feishu emails are imported by an
organization admin and never confirmed with the user, so they carry no
verification signal and cannot be used to join an existing account.
Operational bounds: the userinfo call has connect and read timeouts so an
unresponsive Feishu endpoint cannot hold a login thread, and the
OAuth2Error description carries only the provider error code, because an
upstream message can quote the request URI and with it the access token.
Like the GitHub and GitLab extractors, the claims extractor logs nothing.
The login button follows the existing config-driven catalog: with no
client id configured, /api/v1/auth/methods does not list Feishu and no
button renders. No frontend code change is needed; the icon resolves by
provider name.
Adapted from the implementation in #696 by @yhd4711499, re-extracted onto
current main with the subject, logging and timeout changes above.
Part of R1-A2 (public Provider adapters) per
openspec/changes/enterprise-identity-platform/rollout-plan.md.
Co-authored-by: yhd4711499 <yhd4711499@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(auth): bound Feishu userinfo response and stop subject leaking into displayName
Three defects found reviewing this batch against the R1-A2 spec.
Response size limit. The spec's scope line asks for "远程 I/O 超时与响应大小
限制"; only the timeouts were implemented, so a misconfigured or hostile
OAUTH2_FEISHU_BASE_URI could stream an unbounded body into the parser.
Reads at most 64 KB before parsing, mirroring the 10 MB cap the shared
WebClientConfig already applies. Uses InputStream.readNBytes rather than
adding commons-io or guava, neither of which skillhub-auth declares.
Synthesized displayName. Falling back to "feishu-<open_id>" wrote the
external subject into UserAccount.displayName and into
UserActivatedEvent, carrying it somewhere event consumers may log it --
against the R1-A gate that logs must not contain the subject. Now stops
at name -> en_name like the GitHub and GitLab extractors.
Unused mobile attribute. A phone number was extracted into the principal
attributes and read by nothing. It is PII the spec did not ask for and it
widened the redaction surface for free.
Also drops a constructor overload that only passed List.of() through, and
a test that duplicated the blank-subject path.
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs(auth): document the provider adapter contract and Feishu operator setup
AGENTS.md and CONTRIBUTING.md both require docs updates when auth flows or
deployment config change; this batch changed both and touched no docs.
03-authentication-design.md described adding a provider as "branch on
registrationId inside CustomOAuth2UserService", which the
ProviderOAuth2UserService strategy supersedes. Rewrites that recipe:
register an OAuthClaimsExtractor bean per provider, add a
ProviderOAuth2UserService only when the userinfo response is non-standard,
and note that the login page needs no code change. Also records the
provider-side obligations that are easy to get wrong -- stable subject with
no fallback, emailVerified only on proven ownership, bounded remote calls,
no subject in logs -- and un-comments the config example, which still
listed GitLab as a future possibility.
faq.md told operators to delete "the github and gitlab blocks" to hide SSO
buttons. That advice was already incomplete and gets worse per provider, so
it now explains the config-driven mechanism: an empty client id keeps the
entry off the login page, no file edit needed.
09-deployment.md listed only the GitHub credentials. Adds GitLab and Feishu,
and flags a deployment trap: Feishu emails are admin-imported so
emailVerified is always false, and skillhub.access-policy.mode=EMAIL_DOMAIN
denies every unverified email, which would reject all Feishu logins.
Squares the Feishu logo viewBox. It was 407.87x324.19 while login-button
renders it in a square w-5 h-5 box, so the mark was distorted.
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(deploy): wire Feishu credentials into the release surfaces
.env.release.example advertised OAUTH2_FEISHU_* knobs that no deployment
path could actually deliver. compose.release.yml has no env_file, so every
variable must be listed explicitly, and the Helm chart and k8s base only
mapped the GitHub secret keys. Setting the documented variables therefore
did nothing.
Adds Feishu to compose.release.yml, the Helm secret template and values,
the k8s deployment and its secret example. GitLab had the identical gap, so
it is wired at the same time rather than leaving the example file half true.
validate-release-config.sh only checked that GitHub's id and secret appear
together. A half-configured provider renders a login button whose exchange
then fails, so the check now loops over all three providers. Its test gained
both-directions cases per provider plus a fully configured pass; reverting
the loop to GitHub-only makes them fail.
Also adds the provider's only failure log. Nothing downstream records a
Feishu userinfo failure -- OAuth2LoginFailureHandler does not log either --
so the previous code was silent on error. Logs the exception class and
Feishu's own error code, never the upstream msg, which can quote the access
token; a test asserts the code is present and the token is not.
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(auth): use JSON token exchange for Feishu OAuth
Made-with: Proma
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(auth): preserve Feishu OAuth browser redirect
Add safe phase-level OAuth diagnostics and redact callback credentials from request logs.
Made-with: Proma
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs(deploy): clarify Feishu OAuth configuration and validation
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(deploy): pass Feishu redirect URI through releases
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(deploy): pass S3 chunked encoding setting
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(deploy): preserve default Feishu callback derivation
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: yhd4711499 <yhd4711499@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(auth): expose skill lifecycle routes to API tokens
With an API token, v0.2.19 can remove a whole skill (DELETE
/api/v1/skills/{ns}/{slug} with skill:delete) but cannot archive or
unarchive a skill, nor delete a single draft/rejected version. Those
three routes are opened by AUTHORIZATION_POLICIES (authenticated
fallback) yet have no entry in API_TOKEN_POLICIES, so a bearer request
falls through to "unsupported" and is rejected with 403.
That contradicts the contract written above SESSION_ONLY_ROUTES in
RouteSecurityPolicyRegistry: bearer tokens are rejected on exactly the
listed session-only routes and nowhere else, and anything else the
authorization list opens must be reachable with a token holding the
required scope.
Add API-token policies for both the /api/v1 and /api/web prefixes that
SkillLifecycleController serves:
- POST .../skills/{ns}/{slug}/archive and .../unarchive require
skill:publish. They are owner-level operations, gated by the same
assertCanManageLifecycle check as publishing, so they sit at the same
scope tier.
- DELETE .../skills/{ns}/{slug}/versions/{version} requires
skill:delete, matching the existing whole-skill delete.
Whole-skill DELETE on /api/web stays session-only as documented; the
new version-delete pattern does not overlap it. No scope allow-list
exists outside the registry (TokenController and ApiTokenScopeService
accept any scope string), so no other change is needed for tokens to
carry these scopes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DdnYX4jTS3JwMMP9JCGxzU
* feat(skills): let skill owners yank a published version
Yanking a published version is only available through
POST /api/v1/admin/skills/versions/{versionId}/yank, which is
session-only (SESSION_ONLY_ROUTES covers /api/v1/admin/**) and requires
SKILL_ADMIN or SUPER_ADMIN. A skill owner therefore cannot pull a
broken release themselves, neither from the web surface nor from a
script holding an API token.
In package registries yank is an act of the publisher: `cargo yank`
and PyPI's "yank release" are performed by the package owner, not by a
registry admin, because the goal is to stop new installs of a bad
release while keeping the artifact available for lock files. SkillHub
already lets owners archive, unarchive, rerelease and delete draft
versions through SkillLifecycleController under the
assertCanManageLifecycle rule (owner, or namespace ADMIN/OWNER); yank
belongs on the same surface with the same rule.
Changes:
- SkillGovernanceService: add an owner-checked yankVersion(skill,
version, actor, roles, ip, ua, reason) that runs
assertCanManageLifecycle and then the same yank logic as the admin
variant, now shared in yankVersionInternal. The admin entry point is
unchanged for AdminSkillController.
- SkillLifecycleAppService / GovernanceWorkflowAppService: resolve
skill and version by namespace/slug/version, delegate to the new
domain method, and return SkillLifecycleMutationResponse with action
YANK and the resulting version status. The YANK_SKILL_VERSION audit
record and SkillVersionYankedEvent are emitted by the domain service
exactly as for the admin path.
- SkillLifecycleController: POST /{namespace}/{slug}/versions/{version}/yank
on both /api/v1/skills and /api/web/skills, optional body
AdminSkillActionRequest (reason).
- RouteSecurityPolicyRegistry: require skill:yank for the new route on
both prefixes, so tokens can reach it as the SESSION_ONLY_ROUTES
comment promises for every route the authorization list opens. The
admin yank stays session-only. No allow-list of scopes exists outside
the registry; the docs' scope enumeration is updated to include
skill:yank.
- Tests: RouteSecurityPolicyRegistryTest (scope required on both
prefixes, admin route still closed), SkillGovernanceServiceTest
(owner and namespace ADMIN allowed, MEMBER forbidden, unpublished
rejected), SkillLifecycleControllerTest (envelope with and without
body).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DdnYX4jTS3JwMMP9JCGxzU
* fix(auth): complete API token lifecycle access
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(skills): align owner lifecycle token access
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Thiago Nascimento Nogueira <thiago.nascimento.nogueira@emeal.nttdata.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(auth): expose skill lifecycle routes to API tokens
With an API token, v0.2.19 can remove a whole skill (DELETE
/api/v1/skills/{ns}/{slug} with skill:delete) but cannot archive or
unarchive a skill, nor delete a single draft/rejected version. Those
three routes are opened by AUTHORIZATION_POLICIES (authenticated
fallback) yet have no entry in API_TOKEN_POLICIES, so a bearer request
falls through to "unsupported" and is rejected with 403.
That contradicts the contract written above SESSION_ONLY_ROUTES in
RouteSecurityPolicyRegistry: bearer tokens are rejected on exactly the
listed session-only routes and nowhere else, and anything else the
authorization list opens must be reachable with a token holding the
required scope.
Add API-token policies for both the /api/v1 and /api/web prefixes that
SkillLifecycleController serves:
- POST .../skills/{ns}/{slug}/archive and .../unarchive require
skill:publish. They are owner-level operations, gated by the same
assertCanManageLifecycle check as publishing, so they sit at the same
scope tier.
- DELETE .../skills/{ns}/{slug}/versions/{version} requires
skill:delete, matching the existing whole-skill delete.
Whole-skill DELETE on /api/web stays session-only as documented; the
new version-delete pattern does not overlap it. No scope allow-list
exists outside the registry (TokenController and ApiTokenScopeService
accept any scope string), so no other change is needed for tokens to
carry these scopes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DdnYX4jTS3JwMMP9JCGxzU
* fix(auth): complete API token lifecycle access
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Thiago Nascimento Nogueira <thiago.nascimento.nogueira@emeal.nttdata.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: XiaoSeS <87064762+XiaoSeS@users.noreply.github.com>
