* fix: enforce features.direct_tool_servers on chat-completion tool_servers
The features.direct_tool_servers per-user permission was correctly
enforced on the storage path (routers/users.py user/settings/update,
which strips toolServers from saved settings when the caller lacks the
permission), but the inference path (/api/chat/completions) popped
tool_servers straight from the request body into metadata with no
permission check. The middleware (utils/middleware.py:2799) then
consumed direct_tool_servers to inject system_prompt into the message
array and register external tool specs that get invoked during the
completion. End result: any authenticated user could bypass the
admin-set per-user feature toggle and use inline tool_servers in their
chat-completion requests, even when admin had explicitly denied the
permission.
Default for USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_DIRECT_TOOL_SERVERS is False
(config.py:2750), so under default config no regular user is supposed
to be able to use direct tool servers — making this a real boundary
bypass on out-of-the-box deployments rather than a corner case.
Mirror the storage-side behaviour at the inference entry point: pop
tool_servers from the request body, then silently drop the value if
the caller is non-admin and lacks features.direct_tool_servers. Admins
always pass; users with the explicit grant always pass; everyone else
gets None propagated into metadata, which the middleware already
handles as the no-tool-servers case.
Reported by berkant-koc in GHSA-f582-c373-jjf6.
Co-authored-by: berkant-koc <berkant-koc@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: trim verbose comment on tool_servers permission check
---------
Co-authored-by: berkant-koc <berkant-koc@users.noreply.github.com>
POST /api/v1/chats/new and POST /api/v1/chats/{id}/folder accepted a
caller-supplied folder_id with no validation — neither ownership, nor
existence, nor UUID format. The row was persisted with the supplied
value verbatim, so the DB ended up with chat rows whose folder_id
referenced another user's folder, a non-existent UUID, or even a
non-UUID string.
No read path surfaces this across users — every chat-folder read is
user_id-filtered on both sides — so this is referential-integrity
hardening rather than a security boundary fix. But there's no reason
to accept dangling references either, and the downstream consumers
shouldn't have to assume the column is clean.
Add a Folders.get_folder_by_id_and_user_id() lookup at both writers:
if a folder_id is supplied, it must match a folder owned by the
caller. None remains allowed (chat-without-folder is the default).
Non-existent and non-UUID values fall through to 404.
Reported by ShigekiTsuchiyama in GHSA-4vrg-2vcq-q7jc.
Co-authored-by: ShigekiTsuchiyama <ShigekiTsuchiyama@users.noreply.github.com>
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args: free_disk:false name:main suffix:]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true
USE_CUDA_VER=cu126
free_disk:true name:cuda126 suffix:-cuda126]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true free_disk:true name:cuda suffix:-cuda]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_OLLAMA=true free_disk:false name:ollama suffix:-ollama]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_SLIM=true free_disk:false name:slim suffix:-slim]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args: free_disk:false name:main suffix:]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true
USE_CUDA_VER=cu126
free_disk:true name:cuda126 suffix:-cuda126]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true free_disk:true name:cuda suffix:-cuda]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_OLLAMA=true free_disk:false name:ollama suffix:-ollama]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_SLIM=true free_disk:false name:slim suffix:-slim]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args: free_disk:false name:main suffix:]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true
USE_CUDA_VER=cu126
free_disk:true name:cuda126 suffix:-cuda126]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true free_disk:true name:cuda suffix:-cuda]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_OLLAMA=true free_disk:false name:ollama suffix:-ollama]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_SLIM=true free_disk:false name:slim suffix:-slim]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args: free_disk:false name:main suffix:]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true
USE_CUDA_VER=cu126
free_disk:true name:cuda126 suffix:-cuda126]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true free_disk:true name:cuda suffix:-cuda]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_OLLAMA=true free_disk:false name:ollama suffix:-ollama]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_SLIM=true free_disk:false name:slim suffix:-slim]) (push) Waiting to run
Adds an IFRAME_CSP environment variable that injects a Content-Security-Policy
<meta> tag into all srcdoc iframes rendering untrusted content:
- Artifacts (LLM-generated HTML previews)
- FullHeightIframe (tool/embed output)
- FilePreview (user-uploaded HTML files)
- CitationModal (RAG document HTML)
Shared utility in src/lib/utils/csp.ts handles injection with HTML-safe
attribute escaping. URL-based iframes (src=) are correctly excluded.
Env-var only — no PersistentConfig, no admin UI, no DB. Set once at deploy
time, requires restart. Empty string (default) means no CSP restriction.
* fix: prevent mass-assignment user_id spoofing in POST /api/v1/evaluations/feedback
Two independent gaps in backend/open_webui/models/feedbacks.py let an
authenticated caller forge the `user_id` (and `id`, `version`) on a new
feedback record submitted to POST /api/v1/evaluations/feedback:
1. `FeedbackForm` declared `model_config = ConfigDict(extra='allow')`,
so Pydantic preserved any extra fields supplied in the request body —
including `user_id`, `id`, `version`. The form is the public input
boundary for the endpoint and should not accept unknown fields.
2. In `insert_new_feedback`, the dict literal placed
`**form_data.model_dump()` AFTER `'id': id`, `'user_id': user_id`,
`'version': 0`. Python dict-literal duplicate-key resolution is
last-wins, so any of those fields present in `form_data` overwrote
the server-derived values.
Combined effect: a regular user could POST a feedback record with an
arbitrary `user_id`, attributing the rating to any other user. The Elo
leaderboard at backend/open_webui/routers/evaluations.py computes model
rankings from these records, and the admin export
(GET /api/v1/evaluations/feedbacks/export) and admin list
(GET /api/v1/evaluations/feedbacks/all) display the spoofed attribution.
Two fixes, defense-in-depth:
- FeedbackForm: switch `extra='allow'` to `extra='ignore'` so Pydantic
drops unknown fields at parse time. Sub-models (RatingData / MetaData /
SnapshotData) intentionally keep `extra='allow'` because their contents
are deliberately schema-flexible — the spoofing surface was the form,
not the sub-payloads.
- insert_new_feedback: spread `form_data.model_dump()` first, then
overlay server-controlled fields (`id`, `user_id`, `version`,
`created_at`, `updated_at`) so the explicit keys win on duplicate-key
resolution regardless of what reaches the function. Matches the secure
pattern already used in backend/open_webui/models/functions.py:120.
Reported by yantongggg in GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g. Same root-cause class as
the prior published GHSA-hr43-rjmr-7wmm (folder mass-assignment, fixed
in v0.9.0); that fix did not generalize across the codebase, this fix
closes the feedback variant.
Co-authored-by: yantongggg <yantongggg@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: trim comments
---------
Co-authored-by: yantongggg <yantongggg@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: prevent redirect-based SSRF in get_image_base64_from_url
Cohort follow-up to PR #24491. That PR patched three call sites
(SafeWebBaseLoader._scrape, get_content_from_url, load_url_image) to
pass allow_redirects=False on the underlying HTTP client; this fourth
call site in utils/files.py was missed.
get_image_base64_from_url() is invoked from convert_url_images_to_base64
in utils/middleware.py on every /api/chat/completions request whose
message content includes an image_url part. validate_url() is called on
the originally-submitted URL only; the aiohttp session.get() call had
no allow_redirects argument and the shared session pool does not
override the aiohttp default (allow_redirects=True). An authenticated
user sending a chat message with image_url pointing at an attacker host
that 302-redirects to 169.254.169.254 / 127.0.0.1 / RFC1918 reached the
internal target. This is the most reachable variant in the redirect
cluster: no special endpoint, no admin permission, no feature flag.
Apply the same one-line fix as the other three call sites: pass
allow_redirects=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS (defaults to False).
Reported by nayakchinmohan in GHSA-88jq-grjp-jx6f; consolidated under
GHSA-rh5x-h6pp-cjj6.
Co-authored-by: nayakchinmohan <nayakchinmohan@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: enforce collection write access on process_file endpoint
Cohort follow-up to ba83613ff. That commit added _validate_collection_access
to process_text and process_web (the user-supplied collection_name path)
but missed process_file in the same router.
process_file accepts a user-supplied collection_name and writes the file's
embedded content into that collection via save_docs_to_vector_db. The
file_id is gated by file ownership (line 1562) but collection_name was
unchecked, so an authenticated user could append content from a file they
own into another user's knowledge-base collection by passing the victim's
KB UUID as collection_name. Identical pattern to the process_text and
process_web gaps that ba83613ff closed.
Apply the same one-line gate as the sibling endpoints: when
collection_name is user-supplied (not the default file-{file.id} fallback),
require write access via _validate_collection_access. The shared validator
delegates to filter_accessible_collections, which already correctly
handles file-* prefixes (via has_access_to_file) and KB UUIDs
(via Knowledges.check_access_by_user_id) — admins bypass.
Reported by tenbbughunters (Tenable) in GHSA-4g37-7p2c-38r9 (the
comprehensive write-path filing covering process_text / process_file /
process_web / process_youtube and the _validate_collection_access UUID
root cause), and independently re-identified for the missed process_file
call site by kodareef5 in GHSA-4m74-3cmc-293g.
Co-authored-by: tenbbughunters <tenbbughunters@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kodareef5 <kodareef5@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: enforce collection write access on process_files_batch endpoint
Cohort follow-up to ba83613ff and the prior process_file fix on this
branch. process_files_batch (line 2604) is the third write endpoint in
the same router that accepts a user-supplied collection_name; it was
covered in the same Tenable filing as process_file and was missed by
the same cohort fix. The endpoint validates per-file ownership at line
2642 but does not check whether the caller has write access to the
target collection_name before save_docs_to_vector_db writes into it
at line 2683-2690 with add=True.
Apply the same one-line gate as the sibling endpoints. Validate only
when collection_name is user-supplied (truthy) so the existing fall
through behavior for the None case is unchanged.
Same Tenable / kodareef5 cohort as the previous commit.
Co-authored-by: tenbbughunters <tenbbughunters@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kodareef5 <kodareef5@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: nayakchinmohan <nayakchinmohan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: tenbbughunters <tenbbughunters@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kodareef5 <kodareef5@users.noreply.github.com>
