Moving a folder under one of its own subfolders was accepted. A folder in a parent loop is never a root, so it and everything under it silently disappeared from the sidebar, and there was no way to get it back from the UI.
The move is now rejected with a 400, folders whose parent chain loops are put back at the root on the next folder list, and the folder tree traversals skip ids they have already visited so existing data in that state stays workable.
Opening the shared folder list fetched every shared folder in its own query, fetched a chunk of them a second time to walk their children, and looked up each distinct owner separately. With forty folders shared with a user that is over a hundred queries before any subtree work starts.
The folders and their owners now come back in one query each, and the inheritance pass reuses the rows already in hand. Both folder listings also gained an explicit order: the sidebar merges shared subfolders in response order without sorting them, and neither query had an ORDER BY, so on Postgres a folder rename could reshuffle its siblings.
Measured with forty shared folders and no subtrees: 181 queries and ~105 ms before, 92 and ~66 ms after. With subtrees attached, 203 folders in total, it is 341 queries before against 252 after; the remainder is the recursive child walk, which this change deliberately leaves alone. The returned set, permissions and owner names are unchanged, including for a grant pointing at a deleted folder row, a folder the caller owns that is also shared with them, a folder whose owner record is gone, and a child folder that is itself directly shared.
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args: free_disk:false name:main suffix:]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true
USE_CUDA_VER=cu126
free_disk:true name:cuda126 suffix:-cuda126]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true free_disk:true name:cuda suffix:-cuda]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_OLLAMA=true free_disk:false name:ollama suffix:-ollama]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/amd64 runner:ubuntu-latest], map[build_args:USE_SLIM=true free_disk:false name:slim suffix:-slim]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args: free_disk:false name:main suffix:]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true
USE_CUDA_VER=cu126
free_disk:true name:cuda126 suffix:-cuda126]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_CUDA=true free_disk:true name:cuda suffix:-cuda]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_OLLAMA=true free_disk:false name:ollama suffix:-ollama]) (push) Waiting to run
Create and publish Docker images with specific build args / build (map[arch:linux/arm64 runner:ubuntu-24.04-arm], map[build_args:USE_SLIM=true free_disk:false name:slim suffix:-slim]) (push) Waiting to run
* fix: drop extra='allow' on FolderForm and FolderUpdateForm
These request models were configured to accept arbitrary extra fields,
which were then merged into the folder row via form_data.model_dump().
In insert_new_folder the server-assigned user_id is placed before the
form spread, so a client-supplied user_id in the request body would
override it and the folder would be persisted against another account.
Strictly typed inputs are the correct shape for these endpoints — the
client has no legitimate reason to send fields beyond the declared
ones, and dropping extra='allow' closes the mass-assignment sink at
the validation layer instead of relying on every callsite to merge
fields in the right order.
* fix: reject unknown fields on FolderForm and FolderUpdateForm
Address review feedback: dropping extra='allow' fell back to Pydantic
v2's default extra='ignore', which only silently drops unknown fields
instead of rejecting them. The intent for these request models is a
strict input contract — fail fast when a client sends anything the
server does not expect — so explicitly set extra='forbid'. This also
makes the hardening visible in the form definition rather than implicit
in the default.
