diff --git a/.github/pull_request_template.md b/.github/pull_request_template.md index 6077b077f6..27f795ace7 100644 --- a/.github/pull_request_template.md +++ b/.github/pull_request_template.md @@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ Do not open a PR as the first step. For real, reproducible bugs, start with a well-described Issue that explains the problem, why it matters, and what outcome you are looking for. For feature requests, enhancements, behavior changes, UI/UX changes, architecture changes, suspected fixes, or unconfirmed approaches, start with an active Discussion. - If you want to propose an implementation, include a local diff or patch in the Issue or Discussion. + If you want to propose an implementation, include it only as a reference in the Issue or Discussion, such as a local diff, patch, or branch. + Opening an Issue or Discussion does not mean a PR is the right next step. Maintainers will confirm when a PR would be useful. + We ask for this because PRs, especially from first-time contributors, often need broader maintainer context on product direction, scope, architecture, UX, edge cases, compatibility, documentation, and long-term maintenance before implementation. We may close unsolicited PRs without review. Contributors with a history of successful merged PRs may be given more latitude. 3. Do NOT delete the CLA section at the bottom. It is required for the bot to accept your PR. @@ -19,7 +21,11 @@ For real, reproducible bugs, start with a well-described [Issue](https://github. For feature requests, enhancements, behavior changes, UI/UX changes, architecture changes, suspected fixes, or unconfirmed approaches, start with an active [Discussion](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/discussions). Merely opening a discussion is not enough; it needs to be actively discussed. -If you want to propose an implementation, include a local diff or patch in the Issue or Discussion for context. +If you want to propose an implementation, include it only as a reference in the Issue or Discussion, such as a local diff, patch, or branch. + +Opening an Issue or Discussion does not mean a PR is the right next step. Maintainers will confirm when a PR would be useful. + +We ask for this because PRs, especially from first-time contributors, often need broader maintainer context on product direction, scope, architecture, UX, edge cases, compatibility, documentation, and long-term maintenance before implementation. Unsolicited PRs may be closed without review. Contributors with a history of successful merged PRs may be given more latitude.