mirror of
https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
synced 2026-09-28 01:32:17 +00:00
* ci: run the unit_selection.sh shard files on every event instead of only fork pull requests Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * ci: rename fork-flag to unit-flag now that it applies on every event * test: move tests/test_litellm root and small trees into tests/unit Pure renames, no content changes. Follow-up commits in this PR fix references, merge the three files that already existed in tests/unit, keep live-provider tests in tests/test_litellm and wire CI. * test: carry tests/test_litellm conftest isolation into tests/unit Callback lists, routing fallbacks, cached HTTP clients, logger state, AWS, proxy-URL and keychain env, and session-end client cleanup now reset for unit tests too. The environment isolation owns its MonkeyPatch so a test's own monkeypatch is undone before the model-cost teardown runs. * test: merge, split and prune the moved root and small-tree tests Merge batches/test_batch_utils.py and the chat_completions and messages dispatch tests into the files that already existed in tests/unit. Keep the live Gemini interactions tests, the async image-fetch format test and the OpenAI embedding scorer test in tests/test_litellm since they need real network or keys. Put test_router.py under tests/unit/test_router so the existing package no longer shadows it. Delete eight tests the audit found superseded by stronger ones kept in this move. * ci: run the moved root and small-tree tests under their legacy flags Add the misc and responses-caching-types flags to unit_selection.sh and CircleCI, extend enterprise-routing and mcp-integration, and point the legacy GHA shards, Makefile, redis-compat workflow, merge smoke manifest and change classifier at the new paths. * test: make the new tests/unit directories packages tests/unit/test_package_layout.py requires every directory to carry an __init__.py, and without one the moved and retained test_litellm_responses_bridge.py modules collide on import. * test: scope the unit socket block to tests/unit in shared sessions The GHA shards collect the legacy test-path and the unit selection in one pytest session. The unit conftest's loopback-only block leaked into legacy modules that reach the network at import. The legacy conftest now lifts the restriction at collect and setup time, and the unit conftest re-applies it when collecting its own modules. * test: move tests/test_litellm/llms into tests/unit/llms Rename-only. Moves the provider tests and the fine-tuning fixtures they load, mirroring the old paths. Follow-up commits merge, split and wire them. * test: merge, split and prune the moved llms tests Merges the Databricks chat transformation tests into the existing unit file, keeps the tests that need real keys or the network in tests/test_litellm, deletes the audited tests a stronger unit test already covers, and points imports at tests.unit.llms. * ci: run the moved llms tests under their legacy flags The Vertex AI and All Other Providers shards keep their legacy test-path for the retained files and add the llm-vertex-ai and llm-other-providers unit selections. CircleCI gets matching unit jobs. * test: make the tests/unit/llms directories packages Adds __init__.py to the moved dirs and drops the legacy ones whose directories no longer hold tests. * test: drop script runners and path hacks the llms split left dangling The __main__ runners in the split openai_like files and the Databricks e2e runner called tests that now live in the other half of the split or were deleted. The retained legacy halves also no longer need sys.path edits. * test: give the shard-script tests their own GITHUB_OUTPUT They only passed where the runner set it. The CircleCI unit job's env allowlist drops it, so the script's redirect failed there. * test: point the router and module-deletion checks at tests/unit router_code_coverage and code_qa_check_tests only searched tests/test_litellm, so the moved router tests no longer counted. The two silent-experiment tests the audit deleted were the only direct callers of those methods; they are replaced with tests that assert the forwarded shadow request and the recursion guard. * test: keep the Databricks manual e2e runner and fix the SageMaker Nova run path The Databricks e2e file is a manual script whose main() calls the tests that were pruned, so pruning them broke the documented run. It is back to its main version. The SageMaker Nova docstring now points at the file's real location in tests/local_testing. * test: keep the job's UNIT_FLAG out of the shard-script tests --------- Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
424 lines
17 KiB
Python
424 lines
17 KiB
Python
import json
|
|
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
|
|
import litellm
|
|
from litellm.exceptions import ContentPolicyViolationError
|
|
from litellm.litellm_core_utils.exception_mapping_utils import exception_type
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestAzureExceptionMapping:
|
|
"""Test Azure OpenAI exception mapping with provider-specific fields"""
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_content_policy_violation_innererror_access(self):
|
|
"""Test that Azure content policy violation exceptions provide access to innererror details"""
|
|
|
|
# Create a mock Azure OpenAI exception with body containing innererror
|
|
mock_exception = Exception(
|
|
"The response was filtered due to the prompt triggering Azure OpenAI's content management policy"
|
|
)
|
|
mock_exception.body = {
|
|
"innererror": {
|
|
"code": "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation",
|
|
"content_filter_result": {
|
|
"hate": {"filtered": True, "severity": "high"},
|
|
"jailbreak": {"filtered": False, "detected": False},
|
|
"self_harm": {"filtered": False, "severity": "safe"},
|
|
"sexual": {"filtered": False, "severity": "safe"},
|
|
"violence": {"filtered": True, "severity": "medium"},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
# Test the exception mapping directly
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/gpt-4",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Access the exception and verify provider_specific_fields
|
|
e = exc_info.value
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields is not None
|
|
assert "innererror" in e.provider_specific_fields
|
|
|
|
innererror = e.provider_specific_fields["innererror"]
|
|
assert innererror["code"] == "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation"
|
|
assert "content_filter_result" in innererror
|
|
|
|
content_filter_result = innererror["content_filter_result"]
|
|
assert content_filter_result["hate"]["filtered"] is True
|
|
assert content_filter_result["hate"]["severity"] == "high"
|
|
assert content_filter_result["violence"]["filtered"] is True
|
|
assert content_filter_result["violence"]["severity"] == "medium"
|
|
assert content_filter_result["sexual"]["filtered"] is False
|
|
assert content_filter_result["self_harm"]["filtered"] is False
|
|
assert content_filter_result["jailbreak"]["filtered"] is False
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_content_policy_violation_different_categories(self):
|
|
"""Test Azure content policy violation with different filtering categories"""
|
|
|
|
# Mock exception with different content filter results
|
|
mock_exception = Exception(
|
|
"The response was filtered due to the prompt triggering Azure OpenAI's content management policy"
|
|
)
|
|
mock_exception.body = {
|
|
"innererror": {
|
|
"code": "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation",
|
|
"content_filter_result": {
|
|
"hate": {"filtered": False, "severity": "safe"},
|
|
"jailbreak": {"filtered": True, "detected": True},
|
|
"self_harm": {"filtered": True, "severity": "high"},
|
|
"sexual": {"filtered": True, "severity": "medium"},
|
|
"violence": {"filtered": False, "severity": "safe"},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
# Test the exception mapping directly with different violation type
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/gpt-4",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Verify provider_specific_fields contains the expected innererror structure
|
|
e = exc_info.value
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields is not None
|
|
print("got provider_specific_fields=", e.provider_specific_fields)
|
|
innererror = e.provider_specific_fields["innererror"]
|
|
content_filter_result = innererror["content_filter_result"]
|
|
|
|
# Check different filter categories
|
|
assert content_filter_result["sexual"]["filtered"] is True
|
|
assert content_filter_result["sexual"]["severity"] == "medium"
|
|
assert content_filter_result["self_harm"]["filtered"] is True
|
|
assert content_filter_result["self_harm"]["severity"] == "high"
|
|
assert content_filter_result["jailbreak"]["filtered"] is True
|
|
assert content_filter_result["jailbreak"]["detected"] is True
|
|
assert content_filter_result["hate"]["filtered"] is False
|
|
assert content_filter_result["violence"]["filtered"] is False
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_content_policy_violation_missing_innererror(self):
|
|
"""Test Azure content policy violation when innererror is missing from response"""
|
|
|
|
# Mock exception without body attribute
|
|
mock_exception = Exception(
|
|
"The response was filtered due to the prompt triggering Azure OpenAI's content management policy"
|
|
)
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
# Note: no mock_exception.body attribute set
|
|
|
|
# Test the exception mapping directly
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/gpt-4",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Verify that even without innererror, the exception is still raised properly
|
|
e = exc_info.value
|
|
print("got exception=", e)
|
|
# provider_specific_fields should still exist but innererror should be None
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields is not None
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields.get("innererror") is None
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_content_policy_violation_non_dict_body(self):
|
|
"""Test Azure content policy violation when body is not a dictionary"""
|
|
|
|
# Mock exception with non-dict body
|
|
mock_exception = Exception(
|
|
"The response was filtered due to the prompt triggering Azure OpenAI's content management policy"
|
|
)
|
|
mock_exception.body = "invalid body format"
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
# Test the exception mapping directly
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/gpt-4",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Verify that with invalid body format, innererror should be None
|
|
e = exc_info.value
|
|
print("got exception=", e)
|
|
print("exception fields=", vars(e))
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields is not None
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields.get("innererror") is None
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_images_content_policy_violation_preserves_nested_inner_error(self):
|
|
"""Azure Images endpoints return errors nested under body['error'] with inner_error.
|
|
|
|
Ensure we:
|
|
- Detect the violation via structured payload (code=content_policy_violation)
|
|
- Preserve code/type/message
|
|
- Surface inner_error + revised_prompt + content_filter_results
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
mock_exception = Exception("Bad request") # does not include policy substrings
|
|
mock_exception.body = {
|
|
"error": {
|
|
"code": "content_policy_violation",
|
|
"inner_error": {
|
|
"code": "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation",
|
|
"content_filter_results": {
|
|
"violence": {"filtered": True, "severity": "low"}
|
|
},
|
|
"revised_prompt": "revised",
|
|
},
|
|
"message": "Your request was rejected as a result of our safety system.",
|
|
"type": "invalid_request_error",
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/dall-e-3",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
e = exc_info.value
|
|
|
|
# OpenAI-style error fields should be populated
|
|
assert getattr(e, "code", None) == "content_policy_violation"
|
|
assert getattr(e, "type", None) == "invalid_request_error"
|
|
assert "safety system" in str(e)
|
|
|
|
# Provider-specific nested details must be preserved
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields is not None
|
|
assert (
|
|
e.provider_specific_fields["inner_error"]["code"]
|
|
== "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation"
|
|
)
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields["inner_error"]["revised_prompt"] == "revised"
|
|
assert (
|
|
e.provider_specific_fields["inner_error"]["content_filter_results"][
|
|
"violence"
|
|
]["filtered"]
|
|
is True
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_content_policy_violation_detected_via_inner_error_code(self):
|
|
"""Regression test for #20811: Azure returns inner_error with
|
|
ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation but the top-level error message is
|
|
generic. Previously this fell through to the generic
|
|
BadRequestError handler and all error details were lost."""
|
|
|
|
mock_exception = Exception("Bad request")
|
|
# This body structure mirrors what Azure OpenAI Images API returns
|
|
# for DALL-E 3 content policy violations (issue #20811).
|
|
mock_exception.body = {
|
|
"error": {
|
|
"code": "content_policy_violation",
|
|
"inner_error": {
|
|
"code": "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation",
|
|
"content_filter_results": {
|
|
"hate": {"filtered": False, "severity": "safe"},
|
|
"profanity": {"detected": False, "filtered": False},
|
|
"self_harm": {"filtered": False, "severity": "safe"},
|
|
"sexual": {"filtered": False, "severity": "safe"},
|
|
"violence": {"filtered": True, "severity": "low"},
|
|
},
|
|
"revised_prompt": (
|
|
"A dark and intense illustration of a man "
|
|
"in a dramatic action scene."
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
"message": (
|
|
"Your request was rejected as a result of our safety system."
|
|
),
|
|
"type": "invalid_request_error",
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/dall-e-3",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
e = exc_info.value
|
|
# Must surface as ContentPolicyViolationError, not generic BadRequestError
|
|
assert "safety system" in str(e)
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields is not None
|
|
inner = e.provider_specific_fields["inner_error"]
|
|
assert inner["code"] == "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation"
|
|
assert inner["content_filter_results"]["violence"]["filtered"] is True
|
|
assert inner["revised_prompt"] is not None
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_policy_violation_detected_via_inner_error_without_top_code(self):
|
|
"""When the top-level code is NOT 'content_policy_violation' but
|
|
inner_error.code IS 'ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation', the error
|
|
should still be recognized as a content policy violation."""
|
|
|
|
mock_exception = Exception("Some error")
|
|
mock_exception.body = {
|
|
"error": {
|
|
"code": "BadRequest",
|
|
"inner_error": {
|
|
"code": "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation",
|
|
"content_filter_results": {
|
|
"violence": {"filtered": True, "severity": "medium"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"message": "The request was rejected.",
|
|
"type": "invalid_request_error",
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/dall-e-3",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
e = exc_info.value
|
|
assert e.provider_specific_fields is not None
|
|
assert (
|
|
e.provider_specific_fields["inner_error"]["code"]
|
|
== "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_image_polling_error_preserves_body(self):
|
|
"""Verify that AzureOpenAIError raised from the DALL-E polling path
|
|
carries the structured body so exception_type() can inspect it."""
|
|
from litellm.llms.azure.common_utils import AzureOpenAIError
|
|
|
|
error_payload = {
|
|
"status": "failed",
|
|
"error": {
|
|
"code": "content_policy_violation",
|
|
"message": "Your request was rejected.",
|
|
"inner_error": {
|
|
"code": "ResponsibleAIPolicyViolation",
|
|
"content_filter_results": {
|
|
"violence": {"filtered": True, "severity": "low"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Simulate what the fixed polling path now does
|
|
_error_body = error_payload.get("error", error_payload)
|
|
_error_msg = (
|
|
_error_body.get("message", "Image generation failed")
|
|
if isinstance(_error_body, dict)
|
|
else json.dumps(error_payload)
|
|
)
|
|
exc = AzureOpenAIError(
|
|
status_code=400,
|
|
message=_error_msg,
|
|
body=error_payload,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert exc.body is not None
|
|
assert isinstance(exc.body, dict)
|
|
assert exc.body["error"]["code"] == "content_policy_violation"
|
|
assert "Your request was rejected" in exc.message
|
|
|
|
def test_azure_safety_system_message_detected_as_policy_violation(self):
|
|
"""Azure's rejection message 'Your request was rejected as a result
|
|
of our safety system' should be detected by string matching even
|
|
when the structured body is unavailable."""
|
|
|
|
mock_exception = Exception(
|
|
"Your request was rejected as a result of our safety system. "
|
|
"The revised prompt may contain text that is not allowed."
|
|
)
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(ContentPolicyViolationError):
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/dall-e-3",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_invalid_encrypted_content_error_with_helpful_message(self):
|
|
"""Test that invalid_encrypted_content errors include helpful guidance
|
|
about enabling encrypted_content_affinity."""
|
|
from litellm.exceptions import BadRequestError
|
|
|
|
mock_exception = Exception(
|
|
"The encrypted content gAAAAABpnW_yEYmSNEyOG... could not be verified. "
|
|
"Reason: Encrypted content organization_id did not match the target organization."
|
|
)
|
|
mock_exception.body = {
|
|
"error": {
|
|
"message": "The encrypted content could not be verified.",
|
|
"type": "invalid_request_error",
|
|
"code": "invalid_encrypted_content",
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="azure/gpt-5.1-codex",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="azure",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
error = exc_info.value
|
|
assert "encrypted_content_affinity" in error.message
|
|
assert "enable_pre_call_checks" in error.message
|
|
assert "optional_pre_call_checks" in error.message
|
|
assert "docs.litellm.ai" in error.message
|
|
|
|
def test_openai_invalid_encrypted_content_error(self):
|
|
"""Test that OpenAI invalid_encrypted_content errors also get helpful guidance."""
|
|
from litellm.exceptions import BadRequestError
|
|
|
|
mock_exception = Exception("The encrypted content could not be verified.")
|
|
mock_response = MagicMock()
|
|
mock_response.status_code = 400
|
|
mock_exception.response = mock_response
|
|
|
|
with pytest.raises(BadRequestError) as exc_info:
|
|
exception_type(
|
|
model="gpt-5.1-codex",
|
|
original_exception=mock_exception,
|
|
custom_llm_provider="openai",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
error = exc_info.value
|
|
assert "encrypted_content_affinity" in error.message
|
|
assert "enable_pre_call_checks" in error.message
|