litellm/tests/test_litellm/completion_extras/__init__.py
Filippo Menghi a4bb402cf3
Forward custom_llm_provider through the Responses API bridge (Fixes #28505) (#28575)
* Forward custom_llm_provider through the Responses API bridge (Fixes #28505)

When a Chat Completions request to a GPT-5.4+ model contains both
`tools` and `reasoning_effort`, `completion()` auto-routes through
`responses_api_bridge`. The bridge handler called
`litellm.responses()` / `litellm.aresponses()` without forwarding the
already-resolved `custom_llm_provider`, so the downstream call
re-invoked `get_llm_provider()` with `custom_llm_provider=None` and
stripped a second provider prefix from a `provider/provider/model`
deployment string.

For a deployment configured as `openai/openai/openai/gpt-5.5`,
the bridge flow sent `openai/gpt-5.5` to the upstream API instead of
the correct `openai/openai/gpt-5.5`. Upstream APIs that enforce
model-name allow-lists rejected this as `key_model_access_denied`.

Fix: pass the locally-resolved `custom_llm_provider` into both the
sync `responses()` and async `aresponses()` calls so the downstream
`_resolve_model_provider_for_responses` sees an explicit provider
and skips the second prefix-strip.

New regression test
`tests/test_litellm/completion_extras/test_responses_bridge_provider_propagation.py`
pins both call sites: each must forward `custom_llm_provider`.

* fix(28505): set custom_llm_provider on request_data instead of as duplicate kwarg

Greptile flagged that the previous patch passed custom_llm_provider as an
explicit kwarg to responses()/aresponses() while request_data already
carried it via the spread of sanitized_litellm_params, which would raise
TypeError: got multiple values for keyword argument on every real bridge
call.

Switches to assigning request_data['custom_llm_provider'] before the call
so the resolved provider wins over whatever sanitized_litellm_params spread
in, without duplicating the kwarg.

Updates the regression test to seed request_data with a sentinel
custom_llm_provider so it actually exercises the overwrite path (the
previous test mocked transform_request with a minimal dict and never hit
the conflict).

* chore: trigger shin-agent re-eval on retargeted staging base

* chore: trigger shin-agent re-eval against updated Greptile state
2026-06-01 16:32:17 +05:30

0 lines
Python