litellm/scripts/ruff_strict_gate.py
Mateo Wang e141596204
refactor(lint): collapse type/lint budgets to a single per-rule limit (#31883)
* chore(lint): raise basedpyright per-rule slack to 50% of baseline

The per-rule ceilings in basedpyright-code-budget.json sat at roughly 10% slack over baseline, which several in-flight PRs are already bumping into. Raise the slack on every rule to at least 50% of its baseline so there is ample headroom for a long while, while never lowering any rule that already had more generous slack (e.g. reportReturnType stays at 100).

Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor(lint): collapse type/lint budgets to a single per-rule limit

The three non-frontend budget files (ruff-strict, type-discipline, basedpyright-code) tracked a per-rule baseline and slack whose sum was the ceiling. Nothing consumed the split beyond that sum, so this replaces both keys with a single limit equal to the old baseline + slack; the original baselines live in git history if anyone needs them.

The gate scripts and the ratchet guard now read limit directly. lint-budget-update no longer re-captures raw counts; it ratchets each rule's limit down by the number of violations this branch cleared since its branch point (the merge-base), so the granted headroom shrinks by exactly what was fixed and a limit never rises. The ratchet guard reads either schema so it still compares correctly across the migration boundary.

Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore(lint): surface staged-vs-working parity for pre-commit and budget-update

make pre-commit selects which checks to run from the staged index but runs the linters over the working tree, so unstaged edits to tracked files and untracked files skew a green/red away from what a commit of only the staged changes would produce. There is no safe in-place way to lint the index, so the script now warns when unstaged or untracked changes are present, and CLAUDE.md documents that you must stage everything first for both make pre-commit and make lint-budget-update to predict CI correctly.

Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(lint): list type-discipline budget in lint-budget-update instruction

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-01 18:12:35 +03:00

187 lines
6.3 KiB
Python

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Total-count gate for the strict ruff rules in ruff-strict.toml.
Each rule has a hard ``limit`` in ruff-strict-budget.json. The gate counts each
rule across the whole tree and fails when a rule is both over its limit and
higher than the base it merges into, so a change is blamed for the violations it
adds, never for drift that already exists in the base. ``--update`` ratchets each
rule's limit down by the number of violations this branch fixed relative to its
branch point (the merge-base).
"""
import argparse
import json
import re
import shutil
import subprocess
import sys
import tempfile
from collections import Counter
from pathlib import Path
from typing import NamedTuple
REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
STRICT_CONFIG = REPO_ROOT / "ruff-strict.toml"
BUDGET_PATH = REPO_ROOT / "ruff-strict-budget.json"
TARGET = "litellm"
DEFAULT_BASE = "origin/litellm_internal_staging"
_HUNK = re.compile(r"^@@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(?:,(\d+))? @@")
class Violation(NamedTuple):
file: str
line: int
code: str
class Breach(NamedTuple):
rule: str
total: int
cap: int
added: int
def _run(cmd: list, cwd: Path = REPO_ROOT) -> str:
proc = subprocess.run(cmd, cwd=cwd, capture_output=True, text=True)
if proc.returncode not in (0, 1):
sys.stderr.write(proc.stderr)
raise SystemExit(f"{cmd[0]} exited {proc.returncode}")
return proc.stdout
def _ruff_json(cwd: Path, config: Path) -> list:
raw = _run(
["ruff", "check", TARGET, "--config", str(config), "--output-format", "json"],
cwd=cwd,
)
return json.loads(raw or "[]")
def head_violations() -> list:
out = []
for item in _ruff_json(REPO_ROOT, STRICT_CONFIG):
name = Path(item["filename"])
rel = (
(name if name.is_absolute() else REPO_ROOT / name)
.resolve()
.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)
.as_posix()
)
out.append(Violation(rel, item["location"]["row"], item["code"]))
return out
def count_by_rule(violations: list) -> dict:
return dict(Counter(v.code for v in violations))
def base_counts(ref: str) -> dict:
parent = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="ruff_base_"))
worktree = parent / "wt"
try:
_run(["git", "worktree", "add", "--detach", str(worktree), ref])
shutil.copy(STRICT_CONFIG, worktree / "ruff-strict.toml")
items = _ruff_json(worktree, worktree / "ruff-strict.toml")
return dict(Counter(item["code"] for item in items))
finally:
_run(["git", "worktree", "remove", "--force", str(worktree)])
shutil.rmtree(parent, ignore_errors=True)
def evaluate(head: dict, base: dict, budget: dict) -> list:
breaches = []
for rule, spec in budget.items():
cap = spec["limit"]
total = head.get(rule, 0)
if total > cap and total > base.get(rule, 0):
breaches.append(Breach(rule, total, cap, total - base.get(rule, 0)))
return sorted(breaches)
def parse_changed_lines(diff_text: str) -> dict:
changed: dict = {}
path = None
for line in diff_text.splitlines():
if line.startswith("+++ b/"):
path = line[6:]
elif path and (match := _HUNK.match(line)):
start = int(match.group(1))
count = int(match.group(2)) if match.group(2) is not None else 1
changed.setdefault(path, set()).update(range(start, start + count))
return changed
def introduced(violations: list, changed: dict) -> list:
return [v for v in violations if v.line in changed.get(v.file, set())]
def cmd_check(base: str) -> None:
budget = json.loads(BUDGET_PATH.read_text())
head = head_violations()
base_point = _run(["git", "merge-base", base, "HEAD"]).strip() or base
breaches = evaluate(count_by_rule(head), base_counts(base_point), budget)
if not breaches:
print(f"OK: every strict rule is within its codebase ceiling (base {base})")
return
new = introduced(
head,
parse_changed_lines(
_run(["git", "diff", base_point, "--unified=0", "--no-color", "--", TARGET])
),
)
print(f"FAIL: strict-rule totals exceed their limit (base {base}):")
for breach in breaches:
print(
f" {breach.rule}: total {breach.total} over limit {breach.cap} (this change added {breach.added})"
)
for violation in sorted(v for v in new if v.code == breach.rule):
print(f" {violation.file}:{violation.line}")
print(
"Reduce the new violations or remove an equal number elsewhere; the ceiling is the limit in ruff-strict-budget.json."
)
raise SystemExit(1)
def ratcheted_budget(budget: dict, current: dict, base: dict) -> dict:
"""Each rule's limit lowered by the violations `current` fixed vs `base`.
`base` is the count at the branch point (the commit this branch diverged
from). The drop is clamped to what was actually cleared (a rule that grew
stays put), so the limit only ever falls.
"""
return {
rule: {
"limit": max(0, spec["limit"] - max(0, base.get(rule, 0) - current.get(rule, 0)))
}
for rule, spec in sorted(budget.items())
}
def cmd_update(base_ref: str = DEFAULT_BASE) -> None:
"""Ratchet each rule's limit down by the violations this branch fixed.
The working-tree count is compared against a ruff pass over a detached
worktree at the branch point (the merge-base with `base_ref`), so a branch's
fixes tighten its own ceilings by exactly what they cleared since it diverged.
"""
budget = json.loads(BUDGET_PATH.read_text())
base_point = _run(["git", "merge-base", base_ref, "HEAD"]).strip() or base_ref
updated = ratcheted_budget(
budget, count_by_rule(head_violations()), base_counts(base_point)
)
BUDGET_PATH.write_text(json.dumps(updated, indent=2, sort_keys=True) + "\n")
cleared = sum(budget[rule]["limit"] - updated[rule]["limit"] for rule in updated)
print(f"Ratcheted strict-rule limits down by {cleared} violations this branch fixed")
def main() -> None:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
parser.add_argument("--base", default=DEFAULT_BASE)
parser.add_argument("--update", action="store_true")
args = parser.parse_args()
cmd_update(args.base) if args.update else cmd_check(args.base)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()