* fix(bedrock): normalize Messages system role and adaptive-thinking for Claude Invoke
* style(bedrock): use builtin generics in new Invoke helpers to clear UP006 gate
* fix(bedrock): honor explicit thinking budget_tokens=0 in clear_thinking conversion
The clear_thinking_20251015 -> adaptive conversion resolved the thinking
budget with `thinking.get("budget_tokens") or BEDROCK_MIN_THINKING_BUDGET_TOKENS`,
which treats a caller-supplied `budget_tokens=0` as missing and silently
substitutes the Bedrock minimum. Resolve the budget with an explicit
`is not None` check so an explicit 0 is honored.
* fix(bedrock): gate Fable 5 into clear_thinking adaptive injection on Invoke
_ensure_thinking_for_clear_thinking_context_management returns early when
_supports_extended_thinking_on_bedrock(model) is False, so the adaptive-thinking
injection never runs for models absent from that gate. Opus 4.8 slips through on
the incidental "opus-4" substring, but Fable 5 had no matching pattern, so a
clear_thinking_20251015 request on Fable 5 reached Bedrock with an unsupported
context-management edit and no thinking field; the exact 400 this path exists to
prevent. Add the fable-5 patterns to the gate so Fable 5 (mapped ids and unmapped
aliases) gets thinking.type=adaptive + output_config.effort like the other
adaptive models.
Extend the adaptive-injection regression test to cover Fable 5 (a mapped id and
an unmapped alias) so it fails without the gate entry, and add focused coverage
for the budget->effort tiers, the disabled/enabled/adaptive thinking branches,
output_config.effort preservation, and list/dict system-role normalization.
Also normalize the Invoke transformation module and its test to line-length 88
so ruff format --check (CI format-check) passes.
* refactor(anthropic): make supports_adaptive_thinking flag authoritative for thinking detection
Replace the per-version name helpers (_is_claude_4_6/4_7/4_8_model,
_is_claude_fable_5_model) with cost-map-flag-first detection. _is_adaptive_thinking_model
now reads supports_adaptive_thinking from the model cost map and falls back to a single
generalized family-version regex (_claude_version_at_least(model, 4, 6)) only when a model
is unmapped, instead of hard-coding each new Claude release.
Wire supports_adaptive_thinking through ProviderSpecificModelInfo and ModelInfo so the cost
map flag actually surfaces at lookup time. Reroute the Bedrock Invoke extended-thinking gate
and the two anthropic/chat/transformation.py call sites through _is_adaptive_thinking_model.
Known gap left to the fallback_generalizations work (#29718): unmapped Fable 5 aliases have
no parseable minor version, so they defer to the cost map and are not detected until a mapped
entry or a generalization rule exists. Covered by an explicit regression test.
* refactor(anthropic): drop name-based version fallback; resolve adaptive thinking from cost map only
The prior commit kept a regex (_claude_version_at_least) as a fallback when an id
resolved to no cost-map entry. Remove it: _is_adaptive_thinking_model now reads
supports_adaptive_thinking and nothing else, so "which Claude versions think
adaptively" lives entirely in the model cost map, and a new adaptive release is a
JSON edit rather than a Python edit.
To keep the flag authoritative across the id forms the Bedrock Invoke and anthropic
paths actually see, backfill supports_adaptive_thinking=true on every adaptive Claude
entry that was missing it (Opus 4.6/4.7 and Sonnet 4.6 across region/provider aliases)
in both the root and bundled cost maps, and generalize _model_map_lookup_candidates to
normalize an id to its base cost-map key: strip a Bedrock version suffix (-v1:0 fully,
or just the :0 inference-profile minor so the -v1-keyed 4.6 entries resolve), strip a
dated-release suffix (-20260219), and rewrite a dotted family version (4.6 -> 4-6).
This is id normalization feeding the lookup, not capability-by-name.
Tests load the PR-local cost map (the flags are not on main until merge) and cover each
normalization path plus the unmapped-alias deferral to fallback_generalizations (#29718).
* refactor(reasoning_effort): single-source effort<->thinking-budget mappings
Route every reasoning_effort <-> thinking-budget conversion through the DEFAULT_REASONING_EFFORT_*_THINKING_BUDGET constants so the numbers stay in sync across providers. The five constants are now 2000/5000/10000/20000/40000
Add reasoning_effort_from_thinking_budget() in litellm_core_utils/reasoning_effort_utils.py and route the three OpenAI-style forward maps (anthropic adapters, responses adapters, hosted_vllm) through it. The bedrock invoke and experimental messages adaptive maps now reference the constants directly; the only behavior change is the xhigh threshold moving from 24000 to 20000. Reverse maps and the cross-provider test grid read the same constants
* test(reasoning_effort): lift budget-mode max_tokens above the new high budget
The single-sourced DEFAULT_REASONING_EFFORT_*_THINKING_BUDGET thresholds moved
high from 4096 to 10000. The live reasoning_effort grid sends budget-mode
requests with max_tokens=8192, so reasoning_effort=high now produces
budget_tokens=10000 > max_tokens and every provider returns 'max_tokens must be
greater than thinking.budget_tokens'. Derive a shared BUDGET_MODE_MAX_TOKENS
(2x the high budget) for the spec and the request builder so the ceiling always
clears the largest 200-expected tier. Also resolve the inherited base
test_reasoning_effort assertion off the same high-budget constant instead of the
stale 4096 literal so it tracks the source of truth.
* fix(reasoning_effort): keep effort<->budget thresholds at pre-PR values
The single-sourcing refactor moved the shared effort<->budget thresholds up
(low 1024->2000, medium 2048->5000, high 4096->10000, xhigh 8192->20000,
max 16384->40000). That silently changes the effort->budget direction: a caller
who sets reasoning_effort together with a max_tokens that used to sit above the
old per-tier budget but below the new one now trips the provider's
"max_tokens must be greater than thinking.budget_tokens" 400. It spans every
backend that derives a budget from an effort (Anthropic, Gemini/Vertex,
hosted vLLM), not just Bedrock.
Restore the constants to their pre-PR values while keeping every backend reading
from the shared DEFAULT_REASONING_EFFORT_*_THINKING_BUDGET constants, so the
mapping stays single-sourced without the behavior change. Tests that pinned the
raised thresholds now derive their boundaries from the same constants.
* test(reasoning_effort): derive high effort->budget assertions from the shared constant
The cross-provider translation tests pinned reasoning_effort="high" to a literal
budget_tokens=10000, the raised value. Point them at
DEFAULT_REASONING_EFFORT_HIGH_THINKING_BUDGET so they track the single source
instead of a magic number.
* fix(anthropic): resolve adaptive flag for combined dated+versioned Bedrock ids
The model-map candidate normalization applied each suffix strip independently to
the original id, so the real Bedrock shape "<base>-<YYYYMMDD>-v1:0" never reduced
to its base cost-map key: stripping the version left the date, and the
dated-suffix regex is anchored to the end so it could not fire while the version
was still present. An adaptive Claude model invoked by its full dated+versioned
id (e.g. us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6-20251101-v1:0) therefore resolved to
supports_adaptive_thinking=null and was treated as non-adaptive, reaching Bedrock
with the rejected thinking.type=enabled shape, the exact 400 this path prevents.
Add a composed normalization that rewrites the dotted family version, then peels
the -vN:rev version suffix, then the -YYYYMMDD dated suffix, so the combined form
resolves to its base key. Regression tests pin the combined suffix on sonnet-4-6
and opus-4-8 across provider/region prefixes.
* fix(reasoning_effort): align budget<->effort tests with reverted constants and format common_utils
The constant revert restored the effort<->budget thresholds to their pre-PR
values (1024/2048/4096/8192/16384) and single-sourced the reverse
budget->effort ladder through reasoning_effort_from_thinking_budget, but
several tests still pinned the briefly-raised values and the old hardcoded
reverse buckets, so the "All Other Providers" shard failed
Derive the anthropic chat effort->budget assertions from the shared
DEFAULT_REASONING_EFFORT_*_THINKING_BUDGET constants, and update the
experimental pass-through and responses adapter expectations to the
single-sourced reverse ladder (budget 1024 -> low, 5000 -> high)
Also run ruff format --line-length 88 over anthropic/common_utils.py so the
CI format-check, which checks the whole changed file, passes
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .cargo | ||
| .circleci | ||
| .devcontainer | ||
| .githooks | ||
| .github | ||
| .semgrep/rules | ||
| backend | ||
| ci_cd | ||
| cookbook | ||
| db_scripts | ||
| deploy | ||
| dist | ||
| docker | ||
| docs | ||
| enterprise | ||
| examples | ||
| gateway | ||
| helm/litellm | ||
| litellm | ||
| litellm-proxy-extras | ||
| litellm-rust | ||
| migrations | ||
| packaging/homebrew | ||
| scripts | ||
| terraform/litellm | ||
| tests | ||
| ui | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .flake8 | ||
| .git-blame-ignore-revs | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitguardian.yaml | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .npmrc | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| ARCHITECTURE.md | ||
| basedpyright-code-budget.json | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| codecov.yaml | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| cosign.pub | ||
| docker-compose.hardened.yml | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| GEMINI.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| license_cache.json | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mcp_servers.json | ||
| model_prices_and_context_window.json | ||
| osv-scanner.toml | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| policy_templates.json | ||
| prometheus.yml | ||
| provider_endpoints_support.json | ||
| proxy_server_config.yaml | ||
| pyproject.toml | ||
| pyrightconfig.json | ||
| README.md | ||
| render.yaml | ||
| ruff-strict-budget.json | ||
| ruff-strict.toml | ||
| ruff.toml | ||
| schema.prisma | ||
| security.md | ||
| taplo.toml | ||
| type-discipline-budget.json | ||
| uv.lock | ||
🚅 LiteLLM
LiteLLM AI Gateway
Open Source AI Gateway for 100+ LLMs. Self-hosted. Enterprise-ready. Call any LLM in OpenAI format.
LiteLLM Proxy Server (AI Gateway) | Hosted Proxy | Enterprise Tier | Website
What is LiteLLM
LiteLLM is an open source AI Gateway that gives you a single, unified interface to call 100+ LLM providers — OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock, Azure, and more — using the OpenAI format.
Use it as a Python SDK for direct library integration, or deploy the AI Gateway (Proxy Server) as a centralized service for your team or organization.
Jump to LiteLLM Proxy (LLM Gateway) Docs
Jump to Supported LLM Providers
Why LiteLLM
Managing LLM calls across providers gets complicated fast — different SDKs, auth patterns, request formats, and error types for every model. LiteLLM removes that friction:
- Unified API — one interface for 100+ LLMs, no provider-specific SDK juggling
- Drop-in OpenAI compatibility — swap providers without rewriting your code
- Production-ready gateway — virtual keys, spend tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and an admin dashboard out of the box
- 8ms P95 latency at 1k RPS (benchmarks)
OSS Adopters
Netflix |
Features
LLMs - Call 100+ LLMs (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
All Supported Endpoints - /chat/completions, /responses, /embeddings, /images, /audio, /batches, /rerank, /a2a, /messages and more.
Python SDK
uv add litellm
from litellm import completion
import os
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"
os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"] = "your-anthropic-key"
# OpenAI
response = completion(model="openai/gpt-4o", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}])
# Anthropic
response = completion(model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}])
AI Gateway (Proxy Server)
Getting Started - E2E Tutorial - Setup virtual keys, make your first request
uv tool install 'litellm[proxy]'
litellm --model gpt-4o
import openai
client = openai.OpenAI(api_key="anything", base_url="http://0.0.0.0:4000")
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
Agents - Invoke A2A Agents (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
Supported Providers - LangGraph, Vertex AI Agent Engine, Azure AI Foundry, Bedrock AgentCore, Pydantic AI
Python SDK - A2A Protocol
from litellm.a2a_protocol import A2AClient
from a2a.types import SendMessageRequest, MessageSendParams
from uuid import uuid4
client = A2AClient(base_url="http://localhost:10001")
request = SendMessageRequest(
id=str(uuid4()),
params=MessageSendParams(
message={
"role": "user",
"parts": [{"kind": "text", "text": "Hello!"}],
"messageId": uuid4().hex,
}
)
)
response = await client.send_message(request)
AI Gateway (Proxy Server)
Step 1. Add your Agent to the AI Gateway
Step 2. Call Agent via A2A SDK
from a2a.client import A2ACardResolver, A2AClient
from a2a.types import MessageSendParams, SendMessageRequest
from uuid import uuid4
import httpx
base_url = "http://localhost:4000/a2a/my-agent" # LiteLLM proxy + agent name
headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer sk-1234"} # LiteLLM Virtual Key
async with httpx.AsyncClient(headers=headers) as httpx_client:
resolver = A2ACardResolver(httpx_client=httpx_client, base_url=base_url)
agent_card = await resolver.get_agent_card()
client = A2AClient(httpx_client=httpx_client, agent_card=agent_card)
request = SendMessageRequest(
id=str(uuid4()),
params=MessageSendParams(
message={
"role": "user",
"parts": [{"kind": "text", "text": "Hello!"}],
"messageId": uuid4().hex,
}
)
)
response = await client.send_message(request)
MCP Tools - Connect MCP servers to any LLM (Python SDK + AI Gateway)
Python SDK - MCP Bridge
from mcp import ClientSession, StdioServerParameters
from mcp.client.stdio import stdio_client
from litellm import experimental_mcp_client
import litellm
server_params = StdioServerParameters(command="python", args=["mcp_server.py"])
async with stdio_client(server_params) as (read, write):
async with ClientSession(read, write) as session:
await session.initialize()
# Load MCP tools in OpenAI format
tools = await experimental_mcp_client.load_mcp_tools(session=session, format="openai")
# Use with any LiteLLM model
response = await litellm.acompletion(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What's 3 + 5?"}],
tools=tools
)
AI Gateway - MCP Gateway
Step 1. Add your MCP Server to the AI Gateway
Step 2. Call MCP tools via /chat/completions
curl -X POST 'http://0.0.0.0:4000/v1/chat/completions' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer sk-1234' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"model": "gpt-4o",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the latest open PR"}],
"tools": [{
"type": "mcp",
"server_url": "litellm_proxy/mcp/github",
"server_label": "github_mcp",
"require_approval": "never"
}]
}'
Use with Cursor IDE
{
"mcpServers": {
"LiteLLM": {
"url": "http://localhost:4000/mcp/",
"headers": {
"x-litellm-api-key": "Bearer sk-1234"
}
}
}
}
Supported Providers (Website Supported Models | Docs)
Get Started
You can use LiteLLM through either the Proxy Server or Python SDK. Both give you a unified interface to access multiple LLMs (100+ LLMs). Choose the option that best fits your needs:
| LiteLLM AI Gateway | LiteLLM Python SDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Use Case | Central service (LLM Gateway) to access multiple LLMs | Use LiteLLM directly in your Python code |
| Who Uses It? | Gen AI Enablement / ML Platform Teams | Developers building LLM projects |
| Key Features | Centralized API gateway with authentication and authorization, multi-tenant cost tracking and spend management per project/user, per-project customization (logging, guardrails, caching), virtual keys for secure access control, admin dashboard UI for monitoring and management | Direct Python library integration in your codebase, Router with retry/fallback logic across multiple deployments (e.g. Azure/OpenAI) - Router, application-level load balancing and cost tracking, exception handling with OpenAI-compatible errors, observability callbacks (Lunary, MLflow, Langfuse, etc.) |
Stable Release: Use docker images with the -stable tag. These have undergone 12 hour load tests, before being published. More information about the release cycle here
Support for more providers. Missing a provider or LLM Platform, raise a feature request.
Deploy on AWS or GCP with Terraform
Run the LiteLLM proxy as a production-ready componentized stack (gateway, backend, UI on separate services; managed Postgres + Redis + object store) using the published Terraform modules. Both modules are on the public Terraform Registry — no auth needed.
AWS — ECS Fargate + Aurora + ElastiCache + ALB
— opens an in-browser shell, already authenticated to your AWS account. Once inside, run:
git clone https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
cd litellm/terraform/litellm/aws/examples/default
cp terraform.tfvars.example terraform.tfvars # edit region/tenant/env
terraform init && terraform apply
Or call the module from your own root config:
# main.tf
terraform {
required_version = ">= 1.6.0"
required_providers {
aws = { source = "hashicorp/aws", version = "~> 5.60" }
}
}
provider "aws" {
region = "us-west-2"
}
module "litellm" {
source = "BerriAI/litellm/aws"
version = "~> 1.89"
region = "us-west-2"
azs = ["us-west-2a", "us-west-2b"]
tenant = "acme"
env = "prod"
# Production: provide an ACM cert. Without one, set allow_plaintext_alb = true
# (dev/trial only).
# acm_certificate_arn = "arn:aws:acm:us-west-2:111122223333:certificate/..."
allow_plaintext_alb = true
}
output "litellm_url" {
value = module.litellm.alb_dns_name
}
terraform init
terraform apply
Provider API keys live in AWS Secrets Manager; reference ARNs via gateway_extra_secrets. Full input list and architecture diagram on the registry page.
GCP — Cloud Run + Cloud SQL + Memorystore + HTTPS LB
Real 1-click. Opens Cloud Shell, clones this repo, and walks you through terraform apply via a built-in DeployStack tutorial — pick the project, the tutorial sets up the Artifact Registry remote repo, writes terraform.tfvars from your answers, and runs apply.
To call the module from your own config instead, Cloud Run can't pull from ghcr.io directly, so first set up a one-time Artifact Registry remote repo backed by GHCR:
gcloud artifacts repositories create litellm \
--location=us-central1 \
--repository-format=docker \
--mode=remote-repository \
--remote-docker-repo=https://ghcr.io \
--project=my-gcp-project
Then:
# main.tf
terraform {
required_version = ">= 1.6.0"
required_providers {
google = { source = "hashicorp/google", version = "~> 6.10" }
google-beta = { source = "hashicorp/google-beta", version = "~> 6.10" }
}
}
provider "google" { project = "my-gcp-project"; region = "us-central1" }
provider "google-beta" { project = "my-gcp-project"; region = "us-central1" }
module "litellm" {
source = "BerriAI/litellm/google"
version = "~> 1.89"
project_id = "my-gcp-project"
region = "us-central1"
tenant = "acme"
env = "prod"
# Replace my-gcp-project with your GCP project ID (same value as project_id above).
image_registry = "us-central1-docker.pkg.dev/my-gcp-project/litellm/berriai"
# Production: provide DNS already pointing at the LB IP for Google-managed certs.
# Without one, set allow_plaintext_lb = true (dev/trial only).
# lb_domains = ["proxy.example.com"]
allow_plaintext_lb = true
}
output "litellm_url" {
value = module.litellm.load_balancer_url
}
terraform init
terraform apply
Provider API keys live in Secret Manager; reference resource IDs (e.g. projects/my-gcp-project/secrets/openai-api-key) via gateway_extra_secrets. Full input list and architecture diagram on the registry page.
Both stacks include
- The full componentized split (gateway / backend / UI as independent services)
- Managed Postgres (writer + reader) and Redis
- Versioned object store for proxy state + file uploads
- An auto-generated
LITELLM_MASTER_KEYin your cloud's secret manager - A one-off migration job that runs
prisma migrate deploybefore the proxy starts - The same
proxy_configsurface as the Helm chart — pass YAML as a typed map
The Terraform modules live at terraform/litellm/aws/ and terraform/litellm/gcp/ in this repo; the registry entries are read-only mirrors updated on each release.
Run in Developer Mode
Services
- Setup .env file in root
- Run dependent services
docker-compose up db prometheus
Backend
- (In root) create virtual environment
python -m venv .venv - Activate virtual environment
source .venv/bin/activate - Install dependencies
uv sync --all-extras --group proxy-dev uv run prisma generateprisma generate- Start proxy backend
python litellm/proxy/proxy_cli.py
Frontend
- Navigate to
ui/litellm-dashboard - Install dependencies
npm install - Run
npm run devto start the dashboard
Verify Docker Image Signatures
All LiteLLM Docker images published to GHCR are signed with cosign. Every release is signed with the same key introduced in commit 0112e53.
Verify using the pinned commit hash (recommended):
A commit hash is cryptographically immutable, so this is the strongest way to ensure you are using the original signing key:
cosign verify \
--key https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BerriAI/litellm/0112e53046018d726492c814b3644b7d376029d0/cosign.pub \
ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:<release-tag>
Verify using a release tag (convenience):
Tags are protected in this repository and resolve to the same key. This option is easier to read but relies on tag protection rules:
cosign verify \
--key https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BerriAI/litellm/<release-tag>/cosign.pub \
ghcr.io/berriai/litellm:<release-tag>
Replace <release-tag> with the version you are deploying (e.g. v1.83.0-stable).
Enterprise
For companies that need better security, user management and professional support
Get an Enterprise License Talk to founders
This covers:
- ✅ Features under the LiteLLM Commercial License:
- ✅ Feature Prioritization
- ✅ Custom Integrations
- ✅ Professional Support - Dedicated discord + slack
- ✅ Custom SLAs
- ✅ Secure access with Single Sign-On
Contributing
We welcome contributions to LiteLLM! Whether you're fixing bugs, adding features, or improving documentation, we appreciate your help.
Quick Start for Contributors
This requires uv to be installed.
git clone https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
cd litellm
make install-dev # Install development dependencies
make format # Format your code
make lint # Run all linting checks
make test-unit # Run unit tests
make format-check # Check formatting only
For detailed contributing guidelines, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
📖 Contributing to documentation? The LiteLLM docs have moved to a separate repository: BerriAI/litellm-docs. Please open doc PRs there. Docs are served at docs.litellm.ai.
Code Quality / Linting
LiteLLM follows the Google Python Style Guide.
Our automated checks include:
- Black for code formatting
- Ruff for linting and code quality
- MyPy for type checking
- Circular import detection
- Import safety checks
All these checks must pass before your PR can be merged.
Support / talk with founders
- Schedule Demo 👋
- Community Discord 💭
- Community Slack 💭
- Our emails ✉️ ishaan@berri.ai / krrish@berri.ai
