litellm/scripts/budget_ratchet_check.py
Mateo Wang 92d0788da2
chore(lint): widen ANN slack to 10% of baseline and drop PLR0913 from the strict gate (#31335)
* chore(lint): widen ruff budget slack to 10% of baseline for high-volume ANN rules and PLR0913

Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore(lint): drop PLR0913 from strict gate to roll out rules gradually

Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(lint): ratchet-guard rising baselines even when slack is cut to mask them

Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-25 14:43:45 -07:00

211 lines
6.9 KiB
Python

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Non-gating ratchet guard: budget baselines and ceilings may only fall, never rise.
Every `*-budget.json` file (ruff-strict, type-discipline, basedpyright-code) is a
one-way ratchet: each rule's ceiling is `baseline + slack`, and both the recorded
`baseline` (the live violation count) and that ceiling are meant to be driven DOWN
over time. This check compares every budget file against its own content at the
merge-base with the target branch and fails (exits 1, red) if:
* a rule's ceiling (`baseline + slack`) went up,
* a rule's `baseline` went up, even if `slack` was lowered to keep the ceiling
flat (a higher baseline bakes in more accepted debt and must be acknowledged),
* a rule was dropped from a budget (its ceiling effectively became infinite), or
* an entire budget file was deleted.
New rules and lowered/equal baselines and ceilings are fine.
This is deliberately NOT a gating check. It should turn the run red so that a
loosening is impossible to miss in review, but it must stay OUT of the
branch-protection required-checks list: a justified bump (e.g. banning a new API,
which mechanically raises a baseline) can then still be merged by a human who has
seen the red and accepted it.
Usage:
python scripts/budget_ratchet_check.py [--base REF] [budget.json ...]
Stdlib only.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import json
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
from typing import NamedTuple
REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
DEFAULT_BASE = "origin/litellm_internal_staging"
DEFAULT_BUDGETS: tuple[str, ...] = (
"ruff-strict-budget.json",
"type-discipline-budget.json",
"basedpyright-code-budget.json",
)
class Regression(NamedTuple):
budget: str
rule: str
detail: str
def _run(cmd: list[str]) -> subprocess.CompletedProcess[str]:
return subprocess.run(cmd, cwd=REPO_ROOT, capture_output=True, text=True)
def _merge_base(base: str) -> str:
"""The common ancestor of `base` and HEAD, so unrelated base drift is ignored."""
proc = _run(["git", "merge-base", base, "HEAD"])
return proc.stdout.strip() or base
def _load_head(rel: str) -> dict | None:
path = REPO_ROOT / rel
if not path.exists():
return None
return json.loads(path.read_text())
def _ref_is_commit(ref: str) -> bool:
return (
_run(
["git", "rev-parse", "--verify", "--quiet", f"{ref}^{{commit}}"]
).returncode
== 0
)
def _load_base(rel: str, ref: str) -> dict | None:
"""Budget content at `ref`, or None when the file did not exist there.
`ref` is verified as a real commit by the caller, so a non-zero `git show` here means
the path was absent at that commit, not that the ref itself is unresolvable.
"""
proc = _run(["git", "show", f"{ref}:{rel}"])
if proc.returncode != 0:
return None
return json.loads(proc.stdout)
def _baselines(budget: dict) -> dict[str, int]:
"""Map each rule to its recorded baseline; skip malformed specs."""
return {
rule: int(spec.get("baseline", 0))
for rule, spec in budget.items()
if isinstance(spec, dict)
}
def _caps(budget: dict) -> dict[str, int]:
"""Map each rule to its ceiling (baseline + slack); skip malformed specs."""
return {
rule: int(spec.get("baseline", 0)) + int(spec.get("slack", 0))
for rule, spec in budget.items()
if isinstance(spec, dict)
}
def _regression_detail(
rule: str,
base_caps: dict[str, int],
head_caps: dict[str, int],
base_baselines: dict[str, int],
head_baselines: dict[str, int],
) -> str | None:
"""Why `rule` regressed vs base, or None when it held flat or fell.
A dropped rule is terminal; otherwise a raised ceiling and a raised baseline are
independent loosenings (the latter catches a baseline bump masked by a slack cut),
so both reasons are reported when both apply.
"""
base_cap = base_caps[rule]
if rule not in head_caps:
return f"rule dropped (ceiling {base_cap} -> removed)"
reasons = tuple(
message
for raised, message in (
(
head_caps[rule] > base_cap,
f"ceiling raised {base_cap} -> {head_caps[rule]}",
),
(
head_baselines[rule] > base_baselines[rule],
f"baseline raised {base_baselines[rule]} -> {head_baselines[rule]}",
),
)
if raised
)
return "; ".join(reasons) or None
def regressions_for(rel: str, base: dict | None, head: dict | None) -> list[Regression]:
if base is None:
return [] # new budget file: nothing to ratchet against yet
if head is None:
return [Regression(rel, "*", "budget file was deleted (every ceiling removed)")]
base_caps, head_caps = _caps(base), _caps(head)
base_baselines, head_baselines = _baselines(base), _baselines(head)
return [
Regression(rel, rule, detail)
for rule in sorted(base_caps)
if (
detail := _regression_detail(
rule, base_caps, head_caps, base_baselines, head_baselines
)
)
is not None
]
def main() -> int:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
parser.add_argument("--base", default=DEFAULT_BASE)
parser.add_argument("budgets", nargs="*", help="budget files to check")
args = parser.parse_args()
budgets = args.budgets or list(DEFAULT_BUDGETS)
ref = _merge_base(args.base)
if not _ref_is_commit(ref):
print(
f"FAIL: base ref {ref!r} does not resolve to a commit, so the ratchet has nothing "
f"to compare against; refusing to pass vacuously (check the --base / BASE_SHA value)",
file=sys.stderr,
)
return 1
regressions: list[Regression] = []
checked: list[str] = []
for rel in budgets:
base = _load_base(rel, ref)
head = _load_head(rel)
if base is None and head is None:
continue
if base is None:
print(f"skip {rel}: new file (no base at {args.base} to ratchet against)")
continue
checked.append(rel)
regressions.extend(regressions_for(rel, base, head))
if regressions:
print(
f"FAIL: budget baseline(s)/ceiling(s) loosened vs base {args.base} (merge-base {ref[:12]}):"
)
for reg in regressions:
print(f" {reg.budget} {reg.rule}: {reg.detail}")
print(
"Budgets are one-way ratchets and may only go down or stay flat. This "
"check is non-gating: if the increase is justified (e.g. a newly banned "
"API), a human can merge over the red after acknowledging it."
)
return 1
suffix = f" ({', '.join(checked)})" if checked else ""
print(f"OK: no budget ceiling increased vs base {args.base}{suffix}")
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(main())