litellm/tests/test_litellm/test_cost_calculator.py
Sameer Kankute 816fca939f
chore(oss): litellm oss staging 150626 (#30463)
* fix(pricing): add GitHub Copilot MAI Code Flash pricing (#30415)

* fix(pricing): add GitHub Copilot MAI Code Flash pricing

Add GitHub Copilot pricing entries for MAI-Code-1-Flash and the internal Copilot CLI model name so cost calculation can price input, cached input, and output tokens.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(pricing): cover GitHub Copilot MAI Code Flash pricing

Add regression coverage for both GitHub Copilot MAI-Code-1-Flash model names, including cached input pricing, chat endpoint metadata, and cost_per_token arithmetic.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(router/proxy): propagate completed_response through FallbackResponsesStreamWrapper for streaming /v1/responses container ownership (#30210) (#30213)

* fix(router/proxy): propagate completed_response through FallbackResponsesStreamWrapper for streaming /v1/responses container ownership (#30210)

#28990 added ownership recording for streaming /v1/responses via
_wrap_responses_stream_for_container_ownership, which reads
`getattr(stream_response, 'completed_response', None)` to extract the
ResponsesAPIResponse. The unit test bypassed the Router, so it never
exercised the production wrapping path.

Through the Router (every proxy deployment), the stream is wrapped by
FallbackResponsesStreamWrapper (router.py:2527). Its __init__ set
`self.completed_response = None` and __anext__ only forwarded chunks
— the inner source iterator's terminal event never bubbled up to the
attribute the ownership hook reads, so the hook silently recorded
nothing and every follow-up /v1/containers/<id>/files call returned
403 for non-admin keys.

This commit:

- router.py: pre-resolves the responses-API terminal event tuple
  (response.completed / .incomplete / .failed) once per
  _aresponses_streaming_iterator call, and has the wrapper's __anext__
  sniff each forwarded chunk's .type. First terminal event hit gets
  stored on the wrapper's completed_response. Iterator-agnostic — works
  for source_iterator AND any future wrapper.

- common_request_processing.py: when _extract_completed_responses_response
  returns None we now warn instead of silently skipping. Reporter on
  #30210 lost a day to this exact silent skip; the warning surfaces
  future regressions of the same shape directly in operator logs.

Fixes #30210

* fix(router): type-ignore wrapper getattr-defaults; broaden ownership-skip warning

CI lint (mypy) flagged the three pre-existing getattr(..., None) assignments
in FallbackResponsesStreamWrapper.__init__:

  router.py:2564 self.response = getattr(source_iterator, 'response', None)
  router.py:2565 self.model    = getattr(source_iterator, 'model', None)
  router.py:2566 self.logging_obj = getattr(..., None)

Those lines also exist on litellm_internal_staging and pass mypy there.
Adding the typed terminal-event tuple above the class made the function
body more narrowable, which surfaced the pre-existing mismatch — base
class declares non-Optional types but the bridge path
(LiteLLMCompletionStreamingIterator) legitimately omits these. Keep
the None fallback and silence with type: ignore[assignment].

Greptile 4/5 note: the ownership-skip warning hard-named code_interpreter
which misleads operators when a non-code_interpreter stream aborts.
Generalize to 'any tool container (e.g. code_interpreter)'.

* fix(register_model): drop synthesized zero costs to preserve sparse entries (#30198) (#30201)

* fix(register_model): drop synthesized zero costs to preserve sparse entries (#30198)

get_model_info synthesizes input_cost_per_token / output_cost_per_token = 0
when they are absent from the raw entry (the price-unknown and free cases
share the same representation). register_model then merges that result back
into litellm.model_cost, which flips a sparse entry from 'no cost keys'
(priced via model name) to 'cost keys = 0' (free).

That defeats _is_cost_explicitly_configured (#24949) on re-registration:
_is_model_cost_zero returns True, common_checks skips every tag / key /
team / user / org budget check for the group, and over-budget traffic
keeps returning 200. Spend keeps recording because cost calc still resolves
by model name, so the symptom is silent and only triggers on the second
register_model pass (router rebuild, /model/update, config sync).

Mirror the existing litellm_provider-None guard one block above and pop
the cost fields from the synthesized result when they are absent from the
raw entry and not in the caller's value. Caller-provided zeros (genuinely
free models, BYOK overrides) are preserved.

Fixes #30198

* fix(register_model): switch _raw_entry to is-None checks + drop dead test assertion

Greptile #30201 review notes:
- the `or`-chain in the raw-entry lookup treated an empty dict (a key
  with no fields) as falsy and fell through to the second arm — replace
  with explicit `is None` checks so a present-but-empty entry is still
  taken at face value.
- the first assertion in `test_router_double_init_keeps_db_model_entry_sparse`
  used `in (None, 0)` which passes under the bug condition (cost = 0
  matches the tuple); the strong follow-up assertion already covers
  every shape, so drop the dead branch.

* fix(bedrock mantle): use unique function-call id for responses->chat tool calls (#30426)

* fix(bedrock mantle): use unique function-call id for responses->chat tool calls

...

* fix(bedrock mantle): scope unique tool-call id fallback to degenerate call_id

The previous revision preferred the Responses item id for every tool call, which broke providers (and existing tests) where call_id is a unique, canonical correlation key. Restrict the fallback to the degenerate index-based call_id that Bedrock Mantle returns (call_0, call_1, ... resetting per response) and keep call_id otherwise. Revert the change to the OUTPUT_ITEM_DONE streaming handler, whose tool_call_chunk is never emitted (dead code, per review). Extend the regression tests to assert a normal call_id is preserved.

* fix(router): preserve azure_ad_token through CredentialLiteLLMParams for /v1/files + batches (#30235) (#30241)

* fix(router): preserve azure_ad_token through CredentialLiteLLMParams for /v1/files + batches (#30235)

Router.get_deployment_credentials_with_provider re-validates a
deployment's litellm_params through CredentialLiteLLMParams before
handing them to file/batch/passthrough callers:

    return CredentialLiteLLMParams(
        **deployment.litellm_params.model_dump(exclude_none=True)
    ).model_dump(exclude_none=True)

Any field NOT declared on CredentialLiteLLMParams gets silently dropped
on the way through. azure_ad_token was undeclared, so Azure deployments
using OAuth/M2M (azure_ad_token instead of a static api_key) silently
lost their token at the files endpoint and the proxy returned:

    Missing credentials. Please pass one of api_key, azure_ad_token,
    azure_ad_token_provider, ...

Declare azure_ad_token on CredentialLiteLLMParams alongside api_key /
api_base / api_version so it rides through the round-trip. Static-key
deployments stay unaffected (Optional, default None, dropped by
exclude_none=True). Provider-callable (azure_ad_token_provider) is a
separate concern and out of scope here.

Fixes #30235

* fix(ui-types): regenerate schema.d.ts for new azure_ad_token field

CI's 'Verify schema.d.ts matches the proxy OpenAPI spec' check
auto-detected the new field and emitted the exact diff to apply.
Two schemas had `aws_secret_access_key` from CredentialLiteLLMParams,
both get the new azure_ad_token marker next to it.

* fix(proxy): org_admin with own user_id now sees all org teams on /v2/team/list (#30247)

When the UI sends the callers own user_id (as it does for non-Admin
global roles), _enforce_list_team_v2_access now nulls it out for org
admins so _build_team_list_where_conditions scopes by organization_id
only -- matching the legacy /team/list behavior and the documented intent.

Fixes #30215

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(vertex_ai): multi-region regression coverage for cachedContents host (#29571) (#29707)

litellm_internal_staging already routes the cachedContents URL through
get_vertex_base_url, fixing the multi-region 404 reported in #29571 —
but carries no test coverage for the actual regression scenario (eu/us
must resolve to the REP host aiplatform.{geo}.rep.googleapis.com).

Add TestContextCachingMultiRegionUrls: parametrized eu/us REP-host
assertions (including absence of the old broken {geo}-aiplatform host),
plus regional (us-central1) and global no-regression checks.

* fix(proxy): close upstream LLM stream when client disconnects mid-stream (#30245)

* fix(proxy): close upstream LLM stream when client disconnects mid-stream

When a streaming client disconnects, Starlette abandons the response
body iterator without calling aclose(), so the proxy's connection to
the upstream backend stays open until garbage collection, which may
never come. The backend (e.g. vLLM) keeps generating into a dead pipe:
small responses drain invisibly into TCP buffers while large ones block
the backend on a full send buffer indefinitely (observed via lsof as an
ESTABLISHED proxy->backend connection minutes after the client left)

create_response now returns a StreamingResponse subclass that closes
both its body iterator and the wrapped upstream-facing generator in a
shielded finally. The upstream generator is closed directly rather than
through a cascade because aclose() on a never-started generator skips
its body, which would make the cascade a no-op when the client
disconnects before the first chunk is sent.
async_streaming_data_generator also gains the same shielded
finally-aclose that async_data_generator in proxy_server.py already
had, covering the Anthropic and Google SSE paths

With this, killing a streaming client causes the backend to observe the
abort within about a second and free its slot, while completed streams
are unaffected. No flag is needed, unlike the non-streaming opt-in
cancel in #30223: this only releases resources after the client is
already gone and does not change any response a client can observe

Fixes #30244

* fix(proxy): close upstream even when body iterator aclose raises BaseException

Addresses the Greptile finding on #30245: the cleanup loop caught only
Exception while the generator-level cleanup catches BaseException, so a
CancelledError or GeneratorExit escaping body_iterator.aclose() would
skip closing the upstream generator. Both sites now use the same scope
and a regression test pins that the upstream is closed even when the
body iterator explodes with a BaseException

* fix(llms): expose aclose on BaseModelResponseIterator so stream close reaches the provider connection

The response-level close added for #30244 only worked for SDK-based
providers (e.g. openai), whose streams expose aclose all the way down.
Providers served by base_llm_http_handler (hosted_vllm and most modern
transformation-based providers) wrap a bare response.aiter_lines()
generator in BaseModelResponseIterator, which had no aclose or close at
all, and nothing retained the httpx response object; so
CustomStreamWrapper.aclose() silently did nothing and the upstream
connection stayed open. Verified with a vLLM-style mock: with
hosted_vllm/ the backend streamed all 100 chunks to completion after
the client disconnected, while openai/ aborted at chunk 6

BaseModelResponseIterator now carries an optional http_response and an
aclose() that closes it; make_async_call_stream_helper attaches the
response after building the iterator. With this, hosted_vllm aborts the
backend within ~1.6s of the client dropping, and completed streams are
unaffected

---------

Co-authored-by: kursad <kursad.lacin@brado.net>

* feat(anthropic): surface compaction usage iterations data (#27065)

* feat(anthropic): surface compaction usage iterations data

* style: apply black formatting to fix lint checks

* fix(usage): correct calculate usage with cached tokens when use ChatCompletionUsageBlock (#30422)

* fix(usage): correct calculate usage with cached tokens when use ChatCompletionUsageBlock

* fix(usage): optimize test imports

* feat: add fastCRW search provider (#30434)

* feat(provider): add LibertAI as a JSON-configured OpenAI-compatible provider (#30203)

* feat(provider): add LibertAI as a JSON-configured OpenAI-compatible provider

* libertai: update served endpoints backup + add mode/matrix tests

Addresses review feedback:
- Add libertai to litellm/provider_endpoints_support_backup.json, the file
  actually served by GET /public/supported_endpoints (the root
  provider_endpoints_support.json already had it).
- Add tests asserting bge-m3 normalizes to mode='embedding' and that the
  served matrix lists libertai. embeddings stays false: the JSON-configured
  provider path only wires chat routing (OpenAILike embedding handler is
  reached only for literal openai_like/llamafile/lm_studio), matching the
  llamagate precedent; bge-m3 remains in the cost map for metadata.

---------

Co-authored-by: Moshe Malawach <moshemalawach@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(provider): add ModelScope as an OpenAI-compatible provider (#28460)

* add ModelScope API support

* add modelscope api support

* update modelscope model list

* add image-genetation support

* update test and multimodal

* fix: address PR review feedback for modelscope provider

* update README

* fix(customer_endpoints): restrict /customer/daily/activity to admin-only (#28849)

* fix(customer_endpoints): restrict /customer/daily/activity to admin-only

* fix(customer_endpoints): check role before prisma_client guard

* fix(custom_guardrail): key disable_global_guardrails takes precedence over team guardrail list (#28563)

* fix(fallbacks): preserve fallback model in SDK fallback responses (#28260)

* fix(fallbacks): preserve fallback model in response when using SDK-level fallbacks

* fix(fallbacks): gate x-litellm-* passthrough to trusted callers only

The previous patch unconditionally let `x-litellm-*` keys bypass the
`llm_provider-` prefix in `process_response_headers`. That function is
also called on raw upstream-provider response headers (e.g. from
`llm_http_handler.py`), so a malicious provider could return
`x-litellm-attempted-fallbacks` and spoof a LiteLLM-internal marker,
bypassing the proxy model-override guard.

Add a `preserve_litellm_internal_headers` flag (default False). Only
`response_metadata.py`, which re-processes the already-built
`_hidden_params["additional_headers"]` dict (LiteLLM-owned), passes
True. Raw provider header callsites keep the default False, so upstream
`x-litellm-*` still gets the `llm_provider-` prefix.

Adds a regression test for the spoofing case and renames the existing
preserve test to make the trusted-path semantics explicit.

* fix(fallbacks): ignore preserve_litellm_internal_headers for raw httpx.Headers inputs

* style(core_helpers): apply black formatting

* fix(lint): remove banned typing.List/Dict/Any imports and suppress PLR0913 on interface overrides

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(lint): apply black formatting to modelscope chat transformation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(lint): replace noqa with proper fixes — use **kwargs and Awaitable instead of Any/List

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(lint): remove unused AllMessageValues import

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* revert: restore base_model_iterator.py to original PR state

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(lint): restore full method signatures for MyPy compatibility; bump PLR0913 budget for new provider files

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(lint): use @override to suppress PLR0913 on inherited signatures instead of bumping budget

The overrides keep their full base-class signatures for MyPy compatibility, but those signatures carry more than five parameters, which tripped PLR0913 on each subclass redeclaration. Since the arity is dictated by the base class and cannot be reduced, decorate the overrides with typing_extensions.override; ruff treats that as the intended signal that the parameter count is not under the author's control and skips PLR0913. This restores the PLR0913 baseline to 1813.

* fix(lint): add @override to modelscope image generation overrides

Apply the same typing_extensions.override treatment to the image generation config so its inherited-signature overrides do not count against PLR0913.

---------

Co-authored-by: Joel Tony <github@jaytau.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: hcl <chenglunhu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ztko <96878659+koztkozt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nahrin <nahrin@nahrinoda.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Humphrey <a739376838@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kursadlacin <kursadlacin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kursad <kursad.lacin@brado.net>
Co-authored-by: Dushyant Acharya <dushyantacharya873@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuriy <yuriy.shuyskiy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Recep S <22618852+us@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Moshe Malawach <moshe.malawach@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Moshe Malawach <moshemalawach@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rongkun Yan <2493404415@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Varshith <kvarshithgowda@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <277851410+mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-16 12:06:41 -07:00

2735 lines
93 KiB
Python

import os
import sys
import pytest
sys.path.insert(
0, os.path.abspath("../..")
) # Adds the parent directory to the system path
from pydantic import BaseModel
import litellm
from litellm.cost_calculator import (
RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor,
completion_cost,
cost_per_token,
handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation,
response_cost_calculator,
)
from litellm.types.llms.openai import OpenAIRealtimeStreamList
from litellm.types.utils import ModelResponse, PromptTokensDetailsWrapper, Usage
from litellm.utils import TranscriptionResponse
def test_cost_per_token_duplicate_openai_prefix_matches_model_cost(monkeypatch):
"""
Router/proxy configs may use deployment ids like openai/openai/<model>. Cost lookup must
resolve to model_prices keys (e.g. gpt-5.5), not fail or multiply prefixes.
"""
monkeypatch.setenv("LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP", "True")
monkeypatch.setattr(litellm, "model_cost", litellm.get_model_cost_map(url=""))
prompt_usd, completion_usd = cost_per_token(
model="openai/openai/gpt-5.5",
prompt_tokens=100,
completion_tokens=50,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
assert prompt_usd + completion_usd > 0
def test_cost_per_token_non_string_model_does_not_hang():
"""
The provider-prefix dedup loop must not spin forever when `model` is a
non-string object (e.g. a MagicMock from a mocked transport). It should
return or raise promptly instead of looping on a truthy `.startswith()`.
"""
import threading
from unittest.mock import MagicMock
result: dict = {}
def _run():
try:
cost_per_token(
model=MagicMock(),
prompt_tokens=10,
completion_tokens=5,
custom_llm_provider="anthropic",
)
result["status"] = "returned"
except Exception:
result["status"] = "raised"
worker = threading.Thread(target=_run, daemon=True)
worker.start()
worker.join(timeout=10)
assert not worker.is_alive(), "cost_per_token hung on a non-string model"
assert result.get("status") in ("returned", "raised")
def test_completion_cost_uses_response_model_for_dynamic_routing():
"""
Test that completion_cost uses the model from the response object
when the input model (e.g., azure-model-router) is not in model_cost.
This supports Azure Model Router and similar dynamic routing scenarios.
"""
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
# Simulate Azure Model Router: input is generic router, response has actual model
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
model="azure_ai/gpt-4o-2024-08-06", # Response contains actual model used
choices=[],
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Should calculate cost using the response model, not the input model
cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="azure_ai/azure-model-router", # Input model doesn't exist in model_cost
custom_llm_provider="azure_ai",
)
assert cost > 0, "Cost should be calculated using response model"
def test_cost_calculator_with_response_cost_in_additional_headers():
class MockResponse(BaseModel):
_hidden_params = {
"additional_headers": {"llm_provider-x-litellm-response-cost": 1000}
}
result = response_cost_calculator(
response_object=MockResponse(),
model="",
custom_llm_provider=None,
call_type="",
optional_params={},
cache_hit=None,
base_model=None,
)
assert result == 1000
def test_baseten_model_api_pricing_entries():
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
expected_pricing = {
"baseten/nvidia/Nemotron-120B-A12B": (3e-07, 7.5e-07),
"baseten/MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.5": (3e-07, 1.2e-06),
"baseten/zai-org/GLM-5": (9.5e-07, 3.15e-06),
"baseten/zai-org/GLM-4.7": (6e-07, 2.2e-06),
"baseten/zai-org/GLM-4.6": (6e-07, 2.2e-06),
"baseten/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5": (6e-07, 3e-06),
"baseten/moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking": (6e-07, 2.5e-06),
"baseten/moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905": (6e-07, 2.5e-06),
"baseten/openai/gpt-oss-120b": (1e-07, 5e-07),
"baseten/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.1": (5e-07, 1.5e-06),
"baseten/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3-0324": (7.7e-07, 7.7e-07),
}
for model_name, (input_cost, output_cost) in expected_pricing.items():
model_info = litellm.model_cost.get(model_name)
assert model_info is not None, f"Missing model pricing entry: {model_name}"
assert model_info["litellm_provider"] == "baseten"
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == input_cost
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == output_cost
def test_wandb_model_api_pricing_entries():
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
expected_pricing = {
"wandb/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5": (6e-07, 3e-06),
"wandb/MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.5": (3e-07, 1.2e-06),
}
for model_name, (input_cost, output_cost) in expected_pricing.items():
model_info = litellm.model_cost.get(model_name)
assert model_info is not None, f"Missing model pricing entry: {model_name}"
assert model_info["litellm_provider"] == "wandb"
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == input_cost
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == output_cost
def test_openrouter_qwen36_plus_model_info():
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
model_info = litellm.model_cost.get("openrouter/qwen/qwen3.6-plus")
assert model_info is not None
assert model_info["litellm_provider"] == "openrouter"
assert model_info["mode"] == "chat"
assert model_info["max_input_tokens"] == 1000000
assert model_info["max_output_tokens"] == 65536
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == 3.25e-07
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == 1.95e-06
assert model_info["supports_function_calling"] is True
assert model_info["supports_tool_choice"] is True
assert model_info["supports_reasoning"] is True
assert model_info["supports_vision"] is True
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"model",
[
"github_copilot/mai-code-1-flash",
"github_copilot/mai-code-1-flash-internal",
],
)
def test_github_copilot_mai_code_1_flash_pricing(model):
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
model_info = litellm.model_cost.get(model)
assert model_info is not None, f"Missing model pricing entry: {model}"
assert model_info["litellm_provider"] == "github_copilot"
assert model_info["mode"] == "chat"
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == 7.5e-07
assert model_info["cache_read_input_token_cost"] == 7.5e-08
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == 4.5e-06
assert model_info["supported_endpoints"] == ["/v1/chat/completions"]
prompt_usd, completion_usd = cost_per_token(
model=model,
prompt_tokens=1000,
completion_tokens=500,
custom_llm_provider="github_copilot",
usage_object=Usage(
prompt_tokens=1000,
completion_tokens=500,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(cached_tokens=200),
),
)
assert prompt_usd == pytest.approx((800 * 7.5e-07) + (200 * 7.5e-08))
assert completion_usd == pytest.approx(500 * 4.5e-06)
def test_cost_calculator_with_usage(monkeypatch):
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
usage = Usage(
prompt_tokens=120,
completion_tokens=100,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
text_tokens=10,
audio_tokens=90,
image_tokens=20,
),
)
mr = ModelResponse(usage=usage, model="gemini-2.0-flash-001")
result = response_cost_calculator(
response_object=mr,
model="",
custom_llm_provider="vertex_ai",
call_type="acompletion",
optional_params={},
cache_hit=None,
base_model=None,
)
model_info = litellm.model_cost["gemini-2.0-flash-001"]
# Step 1: Test a model where input_cost_per_image_token is not set.
# In this case the calculation should use input_cost_per_token as fallback.
assert (
model_info.get("input_cost_per_image_token") is None
), "Test case expects that input_cost_per_image_token is not set"
expected_cost = (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.audio_tokens
* model_info["input_cost_per_audio_token"]
+ usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens * model_info["input_cost_per_token"]
+ usage.prompt_tokens_details.image_tokens * model_info["input_cost_per_token"]
+ usage.completion_tokens * model_info["output_cost_per_token"]
)
assert result == expected_cost, f"Got {result}, Expected {expected_cost}"
# Step 2: Set input_cost_per_image_token.
# In this case the explicit cost information should be used.
temp_model_info_object = dict(model_info)
temp_model_info_object["input_cost_per_image_token"] = 0.5
monkeypatch.setattr(
litellm,
"model_cost",
{"gemini-2.0-flash-001": temp_model_info_object},
)
# Invalidate caches after modifying litellm.model_cost
from litellm.utils import _invalidate_model_cost_lowercase_map
_invalidate_model_cost_lowercase_map()
result = response_cost_calculator(
response_object=mr,
model="",
custom_llm_provider="vertex_ai",
call_type="acompletion",
optional_params={},
cache_hit=None,
base_model=None,
)
expected_cost = (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.audio_tokens
* temp_model_info_object["input_cost_per_audio_token"]
+ usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens
* temp_model_info_object["input_cost_per_token"]
+ usage.prompt_tokens_details.image_tokens
* temp_model_info_object["input_cost_per_image_token"]
+ usage.completion_tokens * temp_model_info_object["output_cost_per_token"]
)
assert result == expected_cost, f"Got {result}, Expected {expected_cost}"
def test_transcription_cost_uses_token_pricing():
from litellm import completion_cost
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
usage = Usage(
prompt_tokens=14,
completion_tokens=45,
total_tokens=59,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
text_tokens=0, audio_tokens=14
),
)
response = TranscriptionResponse(text="demo text")
response.usage = usage
cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4o-transcribe",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
call_type="atranscription",
)
expected_cost = (14 * 2.5e-06) + (45 * 1e-05)
assert pytest.approx(cost, rel=1e-6) == expected_cost
def test_transcription_cost_falls_back_to_duration():
from litellm import completion_cost
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
response = TranscriptionResponse(text="demo text")
response.duration = 10.0
cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="whisper-1",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
call_type="atranscription",
)
expected_cost = 10.0 * 0.0001
assert pytest.approx(cost, rel=1e-6) == expected_cost
def test_handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation():
from litellm.cost_calculator import RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor
# Setup test data
results: OpenAIRealtimeStreamList = [
{"type": "session.created", "session": {"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo"}},
{
"type": "response.done",
"response": {
"usage": {"input_tokens": 100, "output_tokens": 50, "total_tokens": 150}
},
},
{
"type": "response.done",
"response": {
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 200,
"output_tokens": 100,
"total_tokens": 300,
}
},
},
]
combined_usage_object = RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor.collect_and_combine_usage_from_realtime_stream_results(
results=results,
)
# Test with explicit model name
cost = handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation(
results=results,
combined_usage_object=combined_usage_object,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
litellm_model_name="gpt-3.5-turbo",
)
# Calculate expected cost
# gpt-3.5-turbo costs: $0.0015/1K tokens input, $0.002/1K tokens output
expected_cost = (300 * 0.0015 / 1000) + ( # input tokens (100 + 200)
150 * 0.002 / 1000
) # output tokens (50 + 100)
assert (
abs(cost - expected_cost) <= 0.00075
) # Allow small floating point differences
# Test with different model name in session
results[0]["session"]["model"] = "gpt-4"
cost = handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation(
results=results,
combined_usage_object=combined_usage_object,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
litellm_model_name="gpt-3.5-turbo",
)
# Calculate expected cost using gpt-4 rates
# gpt-4 costs: $0.03/1K tokens input, $0.06/1K tokens output
expected_cost = (300 * 0.03 / 1000) + ( # input tokens
150 * 0.06 / 1000
) # output tokens
assert abs(cost - expected_cost) < 0.00076
# Test with no response.done events
results = [{"type": "session.created", "session": {"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo"}}]
combined_usage_object = RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor.collect_and_combine_usage_from_realtime_stream_results(
results=results,
)
cost = handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation(
results=results,
combined_usage_object=combined_usage_object,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
litellm_model_name="gpt-3.5-turbo",
)
assert cost == 0.0 # No usage, no cost
def test_realtime_stream_combines_text_and_audio_token_details():
"""Realtime response.done usage with input_token_details / output_token_details."""
from litellm.cost_calculator import RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor
results: OpenAIRealtimeStreamList = [
{"type": "session.created", "session": {"model": "gpt-4o-realtime-preview"}},
{
"type": "response.done",
"response": {
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 10,
"output_tokens": 20,
"total_tokens": 30,
"input_token_details": {"text_tokens": 8, "audio_tokens": 2},
"output_token_details": {"text_tokens": 12, "audio_tokens": 8},
}
},
},
{
"type": "response.done",
"response": {
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 5,
"output_tokens": 15,
"total_tokens": 20,
"input_token_details": {"text_tokens": 3, "audio_tokens": 2},
"output_token_details": {"text_tokens": 5, "audio_tokens": 10},
}
},
},
]
combined = RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor.collect_and_combine_usage_from_realtime_stream_results(
results=results,
)
assert combined.prompt_tokens_details is not None
assert combined.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens == 11
assert combined.prompt_tokens_details.audio_tokens == 4
assert combined.completion_tokens_details is not None
assert combined.completion_tokens_details.text_tokens == 17
assert combined.completion_tokens_details.audio_tokens == 18
def test_realtime_logging_object_allows_null_transcript_in_conversation_item_added():
results: OpenAIRealtimeStreamList = [
{
"type": "conversation.item.added",
"event_id": "event_added",
"item": {
"id": "item_123",
"type": "message",
"role": "assistant",
"status": "in_progress",
"content": [{"type": "audio", "transcript": None}],
},
},
{
"type": "response.done",
"event_id": "event_done",
"response": {
"id": "resp_123",
"object": "realtime.response",
"status": "completed",
"usage": {"input_tokens": 11, "output_tokens": 7, "total_tokens": 18},
},
},
]
usage = RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor.collect_and_combine_usage_from_realtime_stream_results(
results=results
)
logging_result = RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor.create_logging_realtime_object(
usage=usage,
results=results,
)
assert logging_result.usage.total_tokens == 18
assert logging_result.results[0]["item"]["content"][0]["transcript"] is None
assert logging_result.results[0]["item"]["content"][0]["transcript"] is None
def test_realtime_transcription_duration_cost(monkeypatch):
"""
gpt-realtime-whisper transcription sessions are billed by input audio duration
($0.017/min). The .completed events carry usage {type: duration, seconds: N};
cost must equal total_seconds * input_cost_per_second.
"""
monkeypatch.setenv("LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP", "True")
monkeypatch.setattr(litellm, "model_cost", litellm.get_model_cost_map(url=""))
from litellm.cost_calculator import RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor
results: OpenAIRealtimeStreamList = [
{
"type": "session.created",
"session": {
"type": "transcription",
"audio": {
"input": {"transcription": {"model": "gpt-realtime-whisper"}}
},
},
},
{
"type": "conversation.item.input_audio_transcription.completed",
"transcript": "hello",
"usage": {"type": "duration", "seconds": 60.0},
},
{
"type": "conversation.item.input_audio_transcription.completed",
"transcript": "world",
"usage": {"type": "duration", "seconds": 30.0},
},
]
combined = RealtimeAPITokenUsageProcessor.collect_and_combine_usage_from_realtime_stream_results(
results=results
)
cost = handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation(
results=results,
combined_usage_object=combined,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
litellm_model_name="gpt-realtime-whisper",
)
# 90 seconds at $0.017/minute.
expected = 90.0 * (0.017 / 60)
assert abs(cost - expected) < 1e-9
assert cost > 0 # guards against the duration branch being dropped
def test_realtime_transcription_duration_cost_resolves_model_from_litellm_name(
monkeypatch,
):
"""When no session event carries the ASR model, the litellm_model_name is used."""
monkeypatch.setenv("LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP", "True")
monkeypatch.setattr(litellm, "model_cost", litellm.get_model_cost_map(url=""))
results: OpenAIRealtimeStreamList = [
{
"type": "conversation.item.input_audio_transcription.completed",
"usage": {"type": "duration", "seconds": 120.0},
},
]
cost = handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation(
results=results,
combined_usage_object=Usage(),
custom_llm_provider="azure",
litellm_model_name="azure/gpt-realtime-whisper",
)
assert abs(cost - 120.0 * (0.017 / 60)) < 1e-9
def test_realtime_transcription_no_completed_events_is_zero(monkeypatch):
"""A realtime stream without transcription completed events adds no extra cost."""
monkeypatch.setenv("LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP", "True")
monkeypatch.setattr(litellm, "model_cost", litellm.get_model_cost_map(url=""))
from litellm.cost_calculator import handle_realtime_transcription_cost_calculation
results: OpenAIRealtimeStreamList = [
{"type": "session.created", "session": {"model": "gpt-realtime-whisper"}},
{"type": "response.done", "response": {"usage": {}}},
]
assert (
handle_realtime_transcription_cost_calculation(
results=results,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
litellm_model_name="gpt-realtime-whisper",
)
== 0.0
)
def test_realtime_transcription_token_billed_fallback(monkeypatch):
"""
Token-billed transcription models price by audio/text tokens. Verify the
fallback path multiplies audio tokens by the model's audio token cost.
"""
monkeypatch.setenv("LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP", "True")
monkeypatch.setattr(litellm, "model_cost", litellm.get_model_cost_map(url=""))
from litellm.cost_calculator import _transcription_usage_cost
# gpt-4o-transcribe: input_cost_per_audio_token = 2.5e-06, input_cost_per_token = 2.5e-06,
# output_cost_per_token = 1e-05
model_info = litellm.get_model_info(
model="gpt-4o-transcribe", custom_llm_provider="openai"
)
usage = {
"type": "tokens",
"input_tokens": 40,
"output_tokens": 10,
"total_tokens": 50,
"input_token_details": {"audio_tokens": 30, "text_tokens": 10},
}
cost = _transcription_usage_cost(usage, model_info)
expected = (
30 * 2.5e-06 # audio tokens
+ 10 * 2.5e-06 # text tokens
+ 10 * 1e-05 # output tokens
)
assert abs(cost - expected) < 1e-12
def test_transcription_usage_cost_returns_zero_for_unknown_type():
"""An unrecognized usage type yields 0 (safe fallback, no exception)."""
from litellm.cost_calculator import _transcription_usage_cost
assert _transcription_usage_cost({"type": "future_billing_type"}, {}) == 0.0
assert _transcription_usage_cost({}, {}) == 0.0
def test_get_transcription_model_falls_back_to_session_model(monkeypatch):
"""session.model is used when transcription-specific model fields are absent."""
monkeypatch.setenv("LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP", "True")
monkeypatch.setattr(litellm, "model_cost", litellm.get_model_cost_map(url=""))
from litellm.cost_calculator import _get_transcription_model_name_from_results
results: OpenAIRealtimeStreamList = [
{"type": "session.created", "session": {"model": "gpt-realtime-whisper"}},
]
assert _get_transcription_model_name_from_results(results) == "gpt-realtime-whisper"
from litellm import Router
router = Router(
model_list=[
{
"model_name": "prod/claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
"api_key": "test_api_key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "my-unique-model-id",
"input_cost_per_token": 0.000006,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.00003,
"cache_creation_input_token_cost": 0.0000075,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 0.0000006,
},
},
{
"model_name": "claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
"api_key": "test_api_key",
},
"model_info": {
"input_cost_per_token": 100,
"output_cost_per_token": 200,
},
},
]
)
result = router.completion(
model="claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello, world!"}],
mock_response=True,
)
result_2 = router.completion(
model="prod/claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello, world!"}],
mock_response=True,
)
assert (
result._hidden_params["response_cost"]
> result_2._hidden_params["response_cost"]
)
model_info = router.get_deployment_model_info(
model_id="my-unique-model-id", model_name="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929"
)
assert model_info is not None
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == 0.000006
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == 0.00003
assert model_info["cache_creation_input_token_cost"] == 0.0000075
assert model_info["cache_read_input_token_cost"] == 0.0000006
def test_custom_pricing_cost_calc_uses_router_model_id_from_litellm_metadata():
"""When custom pricing is in litellm_metadata.model_info,
use_custom_pricing_for_model should return True and
_select_model_name_for_cost_calc should use router_model_id.
This tests the full chain that was broken for /messages and /responses
endpoints. Regression test for #23185.
"""
from litellm.cost_calculator import _select_model_name_for_cost_calc
from litellm.litellm_core_utils.litellm_logging import use_custom_pricing_for_model
custom_model_id = "claude-sonnet-4-custom-pricing-test"
custom_pricing_info = {
"input_cost_per_token": 0.0003,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.0015,
"max_tokens": 8192,
"litellm_provider": "anthropic",
}
litellm.register_model(model_cost={custom_model_id: custom_pricing_info})
litellm_params = {
"litellm_metadata": {
"model_info": {
"id": custom_model_id,
"input_cost_per_token": 0.0003,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.0015,
},
},
}
custom_pricing = use_custom_pricing_for_model(litellm_params)
assert custom_pricing is True
# _select_model_name_for_cost_calc appends provider prefix to the
# selected router_model_id, so the result is "anthropic/<model_id>"
selected_model = _select_model_name_for_cost_calc(
model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
completion_response=None,
custom_pricing=custom_pricing,
custom_llm_provider="anthropic",
router_model_id=custom_model_id,
)
assert selected_model is not None
assert custom_model_id in selected_model
# Without custom_pricing, the router_model_id is NOT selected
selected_model_no_custom = _select_model_name_for_cost_calc(
model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
completion_response=None,
custom_pricing=False,
custom_llm_provider="anthropic",
router_model_id=custom_model_id,
)
assert custom_model_id not in (selected_model_no_custom or "")
def test_per_request_custom_pricing_with_router():
"""When custom pricing is passed as per-request kwargs (not in model_list),
_select_model_name_for_cost_calc should fall back to the model name
(where register_model stored the pricing) instead of the router_model_id
(which has no pricing data).
Regression test for the bug where response._hidden_params["response_cost"]
returned 0.0 for per-request custom pricing via Router.
"""
from litellm import Router
from litellm.cost_calculator import _select_model_name_for_cost_calc
router = Router(
model_list=[
{
"model_name": "openai/gpt-3.5-turbo",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "openai/gpt-3.5-turbo",
"api_key": "test_api_key",
},
},
]
)
# Get the deployment's model_id (hash) that the router registered
deployment = router.model_list[0]
router_model_id = deployment["model_info"]["id"]
# The router registered this hash in model_cost but without custom pricing
assert router_model_id in litellm.model_cost
entry = litellm.model_cost[router_model_id]
# No custom pricing was set in model_list, so these should be None
assert entry.get("input_cost_per_token") is None
# Now simulate what completion() does: register custom pricing under the model name
litellm.register_model(
{
"openai/gpt-3.5-turbo": {
"input_cost_per_token": 2.0,
"output_cost_per_token": 2.0,
"litellm_provider": "openai",
}
}
)
# _select_model_name_for_cost_calc should pick the model name (which has pricing),
# NOT the router_model_id (which has no pricing)
selected = _select_model_name_for_cost_calc(
model="openai/gpt-3.5-turbo",
completion_response=None,
custom_pricing=True,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
router_model_id=router_model_id,
)
assert selected is not None
assert router_model_id not in selected
assert "gpt-3.5-turbo" in selected
def test_azure_realtime_cost_calculator():
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
cost = handle_realtime_stream_cost_calculation(
results=[
{
"type": "session.created",
"session": {"model": "gpt-4o-realtime-preview-2024-12-17"},
},
],
combined_usage_object=Usage(
prompt_tokens=100,
completion_tokens=100,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
text_tokens=10, audio_tokens=90
),
),
custom_llm_provider="azure",
litellm_model_name="my-custom-azure-deployment",
)
assert cost > 0
def test_azure_audio_output_cost_calculation():
"""
Test that Azure audio models correctly calculate costs for audio output tokens.
Reproduces issue: https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/19764
Audio tokens should be charged at output_cost_per_audio_token rate,
not at the text token rate (output_cost_per_token).
"""
from litellm.types.utils import Choices, CompletionTokensDetailsWrapper, Message
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
# Scenario from issue #19764:
# Input: 17 text tokens, 0 audio tokens
# Output: 110 text tokens, 482 audio tokens
usage_object = Usage(
prompt_tokens=17,
completion_tokens=592, # 110 text + 482 audio
total_tokens=609,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
audio_tokens=0,
cached_tokens=0,
text_tokens=17,
image_tokens=0,
),
completion_tokens_details=CompletionTokensDetailsWrapper(
audio_tokens=482,
reasoning_tokens=0,
text_tokens=110,
),
)
completion = ModelResponse(
id="test-azure-audio-cost",
choices=[
Choices(
finish_reason="stop",
index=0,
message=Message(
content="Test response",
role="assistant",
),
)
],
created=1729282652,
model="azure/gpt-audio-2025-08-28",
object="chat.completion",
usage=usage_object,
)
cost = completion_cost(completion, model="azure/gpt-audio-2025-08-28")
model_info = litellm.get_model_info("azure/gpt-audio-2025-08-28")
# Calculate expected cost
expected_input_cost = model_info["input_cost_per_token"] * 17 # text tokens
expected_output_cost = (
model_info["output_cost_per_token"] * 110 # text tokens
+ model_info["output_cost_per_audio_token"] * 482 # audio tokens
)
expected_total_cost = expected_input_cost + expected_output_cost
# The bug was: all output tokens charged at text rate
wrong_output_cost = model_info["output_cost_per_token"] * 592
wrong_total_cost = expected_input_cost + wrong_output_cost
# Verify audio tokens are NOT charged at text rate (the bug)
assert (
abs(cost - wrong_total_cost) > 0.001
), "Bug: Audio tokens are being charged at text token rate"
# Verify cost matches
assert (
abs(cost - expected_total_cost) < 0.0000001
), f"Expected cost {expected_total_cost}, got {cost}"
def test_default_image_cost_calculator(monkeypatch):
from litellm.cost_calculator import default_image_cost_calculator
temp_object = {
"litellm_provider": "azure",
"input_cost_per_pixel": 10,
}
monkeypatch.setattr(
litellm,
"model_cost",
{
"azure/bf9001cd7209f5734ecb4ab937a5a0e2ba5f119708bd68f184db362930f9dc7b": temp_object
},
)
args = {
"model": "azure/bf9001cd7209f5734ecb4ab937a5a0e2ba5f119708bd68f184db362930f9dc7b",
"custom_llm_provider": "azure",
"quality": "standard",
"n": 1,
"size": "1024-x-1024",
"optional_params": {},
}
cost = default_image_cost_calculator(**args)
assert cost == 10485760
def test_cost_calculator_with_cache_creation():
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Choices, Message, Usage
litellm_model_response = ModelResponse(
id="chatcmpl-cc5638bc-fdfe-48e4-8884-57c8f4fb7c63",
created=1750733889,
model=None,
object="chat.completion",
system_fingerprint=None,
choices=[
Choices(
finish_reason="stop",
index=0,
message=Message(
content="Hello! How can I help you today?",
role="assistant",
tool_calls=None,
function_call=None,
provider_specific_fields=None,
),
)
],
usage=Usage(
**{
"total_tokens": 28508,
"prompt_tokens": 28495,
"completion_tokens": 13,
"prompt_tokens_details": {"audio_tokens": None, "cached_tokens": 0},
"cache_read_input_tokens": 28491,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": None,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"accepted_prediction_tokens": None,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": None,
},
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 15,
}
),
)
model = "claude-sonnet-4@20250514"
assert litellm_model_response.usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens == 28491
result = completion_cost(
completion_response=litellm_model_response,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="vertex_ai",
)
print(result)
def test_bedrock_cost_calculator_comparison_with_without_cache():
"""Test that Bedrock caching reduces costs compared to non-cached requests"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Choices, Message, Usage
# Response WITHOUT caching
response_no_cache = ModelResponse(
id="msg_no_cache",
created=1750733889,
model="anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-20250514-v1:0",
object="chat.completion",
choices=[
Choices(
finish_reason="stop",
index=0,
message=Message(
content="Response without cache",
role="assistant",
),
)
],
usage=Usage(
total_tokens=28508,
prompt_tokens=28495,
completion_tokens=13,
),
)
# Response WITH caching (same total tokens, but most are cached)
response_with_cache = ModelResponse(
id="msg_with_cache",
created=1750733889,
model="anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-20250514-v1:0",
object="chat.completion",
choices=[
Choices(
finish_reason="stop",
index=0,
message=Message(
content="Response with cache",
role="assistant",
),
)
],
usage=Usage(
**{
"total_tokens": 28508,
"prompt_tokens": 28495,
"completion_tokens": 13,
"prompt_tokens_details": {"audio_tokens": None, "cached_tokens": 0},
"cache_read_input_tokens": 28491, # Most tokens are read from cache (cheaper)
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": None,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"accepted_prediction_tokens": None,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": None,
},
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 15, # Only 15 new tokens added to cache
}
),
)
# Calculate costs
cost_no_cache = completion_cost(
completion_response=response_no_cache,
model="bedrock/anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-20250514-v1:0",
custom_llm_provider="bedrock",
)
cost_with_cache = completion_cost(
completion_response=response_with_cache,
model="bedrock/anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-20250514-v1:0",
custom_llm_provider="bedrock",
)
# Verify that cached request is cheaper
assert cost_with_cache < cost_no_cache
print(f"Cost without cache: {cost_no_cache}")
print(f"Cost with cache: {cost_with_cache}")
def test_gemini_25_implicit_caching_cost():
"""
Test that Gemini 2.5 models correctly calculate costs with implicit caching.
This test reproduces the issue from #11156 where cached tokens should receive
a 75% discount.
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import (
Choices,
Message,
ModelResponse,
PromptTokensDetailsWrapper,
Usage,
)
# Create a mock response similar to the one in the issue
litellm_model_response = ModelResponse(
id="test-response",
created=1750733889,
model="gemini/gemini-2.5-flash",
object="chat.completion",
system_fingerprint=None,
choices=[
Choices(
finish_reason="stop",
index=0,
message=Message(
content="Understood. This is a test message to check the response from the Gemini model.",
role="assistant",
tool_calls=None,
function_call=None,
),
)
],
usage=Usage(
total_tokens=15050,
prompt_tokens=15033,
completion_tokens=17,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
audio_tokens=None,
cached_tokens=14316, # This is cachedContentTokenCount from Gemini
),
completion_tokens_details=None,
),
)
# Calculate the cost
result = completion_cost(
completion_response=litellm_model_response,
model="gemini/gemini-2.5-flash",
)
# Current pricing for gemini/gemini-2.5-flash:
# input: $0.30 / 1M tokens (3e-07 per token)
# cache_read: $0.03 / 1M tokens (3e-08 per token)
# output: $2.50 / 1M tokens (2.5e-06 per token)
# Breakdown:
# - Cached tokens: 14316 * 3e-08 = 0.00042948
# - Non-cached tokens: (15033-14316) * 3e-07 = 717 * 3e-07 = 0.00021510
# - Output tokens: 17 * 2.5e-06 = 0.00004250
# Total: 0.00042948 + 0.00021510 + 0.00004250 = 0.00068708
expected_cost = 0.00068708
# Allow for small floating point differences
assert (
abs(result - expected_cost) < 1e-8
), f"Expected cost {expected_cost}, but got {result}"
print(f"✓ Gemini 2.5 implicit caching cost calculation is correct: ${result:.8f}")
def test_log_context_cost_calculation():
"""
Test that log context cost calculation works correctly with tiered pricing.
This test verifies that when using extended context (above 200k tokens),
the log context costs are calculated using the appropriate tiered rates.
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import (
Choices,
Message,
ModelResponse,
PromptTokensDetailsWrapper,
Usage,
)
# Create a mock response with extended context usage
extended_context_response = ModelResponse(
id="test-extended-context-response",
created=1750733889,
model="claude-4-sonnet-20250514",
object="chat.completion",
system_fingerprint=None,
choices=[
Choices(
finish_reason="stop",
index=0,
message=Message(
content="This is a test response for extended context cost calculation.",
role="assistant",
tool_calls=None,
function_call=None,
),
)
],
usage=Usage(
total_tokens=350000, # Above 200k threshold
prompt_tokens=301000, # Above 200k threshold
completion_tokens=50000,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
text_tokens=300000,
cached_tokens=0, # No cache hits
audio_tokens=None,
image_tokens=None,
character_count=None,
video_length_seconds=None,
cache_creation_tokens=1000,
),
completion_tokens_details=None,
_cache_creation_input_tokens=1000, # Some tokens added to cache
),
)
# Calculate the cost using the extended context model
result = completion_cost(
completion_response=extended_context_response,
model="claude-4-sonnet-20250514",
custom_llm_provider="anthropic",
)
# Debug: Print the actual result
print(f"DEBUG: Actual cost result: ${result:.6f}")
# Get model info to understand the pricing
from litellm import get_model_info
model_info = get_model_info(
model="claude-4-sonnet-20250514", custom_llm_provider="anthropic"
)
# Calculate expected cost based on actual model pricing
input_cost_per_token = model_info.get("input_cost_per_token", 0)
output_cost_per_token = model_info.get("output_cost_per_token", 0)
cache_creation_cost_per_token = model_info.get("cache_creation_input_token_cost", 0)
# Check if tiered pricing is applied
input_cost_above_200k = model_info.get(
"input_cost_per_token_above_200k_tokens", input_cost_per_token
)
output_cost_above_200k = model_info.get(
"output_cost_per_token_above_200k_tokens", output_cost_per_token
)
cache_creation_above_200k = model_info.get(
"cache_creation_input_token_cost_above_200k_tokens",
cache_creation_cost_per_token,
)
print(f"DEBUG: Base input cost per token: ${input_cost_per_token:.2e}")
print(f"DEBUG: Base output cost per token: ${output_cost_per_token:.2e}")
print(
f"DEBUG: Base cache creation cost per token: ${cache_creation_cost_per_token:.2e}"
)
# Handle tiered pricing - if not available, use base pricing
if input_cost_above_200k is not None:
print(
f"DEBUG: Tiered input cost per token (>200k): ${input_cost_above_200k:.2e}"
)
else:
print("DEBUG: No tiered input pricing available, using base pricing")
input_cost_above_200k = input_cost_per_token
if output_cost_above_200k is not None:
print(
f"DEBUG: Tiered output cost per token (>200k): ${output_cost_above_200k:.2e}"
)
else:
print("DEBUG: No tiered output pricing available, using base pricing")
output_cost_above_200k = output_cost_per_token
if cache_creation_above_200k is not None:
print(
f"DEBUG: Tiered cache creation cost per token (>200k): ${cache_creation_above_200k:.2e}"
)
else:
print("DEBUG: No tiered cache creation pricing available, using base pricing")
cache_creation_above_200k = cache_creation_cost_per_token
# Since we're above 200k tokens, we should use tiered pricing if available
expected_input_cost = 300000 * input_cost_above_200k
expected_output_cost = 50000 * output_cost_above_200k
expected_cache_cost = 1000 * cache_creation_above_200k
expected_total = expected_input_cost + expected_output_cost + expected_cache_cost
print(f"DEBUG: Expected total: ${expected_total:.6f}")
# Allow for small floating point differences
assert (
abs(result - expected_total) < 1e-6
), f"Expected cost ${expected_total:.6f}, but got ${result:.6f}"
print(
f"✓ Log context cost calculation with tiered pricing is correct: ${result:.6f}"
)
print(f" - Input tokens (300k): ${expected_input_cost:.6f}")
print(f" - Output tokens (50k): ${expected_output_cost:.6f}")
print(f" - Cache creation (1k): ${expected_cache_cost:.6f}")
print(f" - Total: ${result:.6f}")
def test_gemini_25_explicit_caching_cost_direct_usage():
"""
Test that Gemini 2.5 models correctly calculate costs with explicit caching.
This test reproduces the issue from #11156 where cached tokens should receive
a 75% discount.
"""
from litellm.litellm_core_utils.llm_cost_calc.utils import generic_cost_per_token
from litellm.types.utils import (
CompletionTokensDetailsWrapper,
PromptTokensDetailsWrapper,
Usage,
)
from litellm.utils import get_model_info
model_info = get_model_info(model="gemini-2.5-pro", custom_llm_provider="gemini")
usage = Usage(
completion_tokens=2522,
prompt_tokens=42001,
total_tokens=44523,
completion_tokens_details=CompletionTokensDetailsWrapper(
accepted_prediction_tokens=None,
audio_tokens=None,
reasoning_tokens=1908,
rejected_prediction_tokens=None,
text_tokens=614,
),
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
audio_tokens=None, cached_tokens=40938, text_tokens=1063, image_tokens=None
),
)
input_cost, output_cost = generic_cost_per_token(
model="gemini/gemini-2.5-pro",
usage=usage,
custom_llm_provider="gemini",
)
total_cost = input_cost + output_cost
expected_higher_than_actual_cost = (
model_info["input_cost_per_token"] * usage.prompt_tokens
+ model_info["output_cost_per_token"] * usage.completion_tokens
)
print(f"expected_higher_than_actual_cost: {expected_higher_than_actual_cost}")
assert expected_higher_than_actual_cost > total_cost
expected_actual_cost = (
model_info["input_cost_per_token"] * usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens
+ model_info["cache_read_input_token_cost"]
* usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens
+ model_info["output_cost_per_token"] * usage.completion_tokens
)
print(
f"model_info['input_cost_per_token']: {model_info['input_cost_per_token']}, usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens: {usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens}, model_info['cache_read_input_token_cost']: {model_info['cache_read_input_token_cost']}, model_info['output_cost_per_token']: {model_info['output_cost_per_token']}"
)
print(f"Expected actual cost: {expected_actual_cost}")
assert expected_actual_cost == total_cost
def test_azure_ai_cache_cost_calculation():
"""
Test that azure_ai provider correctly calculates cache costs using generic_cost_per_token.
This verifies that azure_ai models with custom cache pricing in model_info
will have their cache_creation_input_token_cost and cache_read_input_token_cost
applied correctly.
"""
from litellm.litellm_core_utils.llm_cost_calc.utils import generic_cost_per_token
from litellm.types.utils import PromptTokensDetailsWrapper, Usage
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
# Register a custom azure_ai model with cache pricing
test_model_id = "test-azure-ai-claude-model"
litellm.register_model(
model_cost={
test_model_id: {
"input_cost_per_token": 5.0e-06,
"output_cost_per_token": 2.5e-05,
"cache_creation_input_token_cost": 6.25e-06,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 5.0e-07,
"litellm_provider": "azure_ai",
"max_tokens": 200000,
}
}
)
# Create usage with cache tokens
usage = Usage(
completion_tokens=100,
prompt_tokens=1000,
total_tokens=1100,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
cached_tokens=800, # 800 cache read tokens
text_tokens=100, # 100 regular text tokens
),
cache_creation_input_tokens=100, # 100 cache creation tokens
)
input_cost, output_cost = generic_cost_per_token(
model=test_model_id,
usage=usage,
custom_llm_provider="azure_ai",
)
total_cost = input_cost + output_cost
# Calculate expected cost manually
model_info = litellm.model_cost[test_model_id]
expected_input_cost = (
model_info["input_cost_per_token"] * 100 # text tokens
+ model_info["cache_read_input_token_cost"] * 800 # cached tokens
+ model_info["cache_creation_input_token_cost"] * 100 # cache creation tokens
)
expected_output_cost = model_info["output_cost_per_token"] * 100
print(f"Input cost: {input_cost}, Expected: {expected_input_cost}")
print(f"Output cost: {output_cost}, Expected: {expected_output_cost}")
print(f"Total cost: {total_cost}")
assert (
abs(input_cost - expected_input_cost) < 1e-10
), f"Input cost mismatch: got {input_cost}, expected {expected_input_cost}"
assert (
abs(output_cost - expected_output_cost) < 1e-10
), f"Output cost mismatch: got {output_cost}, expected {expected_output_cost}"
def test_cost_discount_vertex_ai():
"""
Test that cost discount is applied correctly for Vertex AI provider
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original config
original_discount_config = litellm.cost_discount_config.copy()
# Create mock response (use a model that exists in model_prices_and_context_window.json)
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gemini-3-pro-preview",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Calculate cost without discount
litellm.cost_discount_config = {}
cost_without_discount = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="vertex_ai/gemini-3-pro-preview",
custom_llm_provider="vertex_ai",
)
# Set 5% discount for vertex_ai
litellm.cost_discount_config = {"vertex_ai": 0.05}
# Calculate cost with discount
cost_with_discount = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="vertex_ai/gemini-3-pro-preview",
custom_llm_provider="vertex_ai",
)
# Restore original config
litellm.cost_discount_config = original_discount_config
# Verify discount is applied (5% off means 95% of original cost)
expected_cost = cost_without_discount * 0.95
assert cost_with_discount == pytest.approx(expected_cost, rel=1e-9)
print("✓ Cost discount test passed:")
print(f" - Original cost: ${cost_without_discount:.6f}")
print(f" - Discounted cost (5% off): ${cost_with_discount:.6f}")
print(f" - Savings: ${cost_without_discount - cost_with_discount:.6f}")
def test_cost_discount_not_applied_to_other_providers():
"""
Test that cost discount only applies to configured providers
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original config
original_discount_config = litellm.cost_discount_config.copy()
# Create mock response for OpenAI
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gpt-4",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Set discount only for vertex_ai (not openai)
litellm.cost_discount_config = {"vertex_ai": 0.05}
# Calculate cost for OpenAI - should NOT have discount applied
cost_with_selective_discount = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Clear discount config
litellm.cost_discount_config = {}
cost_without_discount = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Restore original config
litellm.cost_discount_config = original_discount_config
# Costs should be the same (no discount applied to OpenAI)
assert cost_with_selective_discount == cost_without_discount
print("✓ Selective discount test passed:")
print(f" - OpenAI cost (no discount configured): ${cost_without_discount:.6f}")
print(f" - Cost remains unchanged: ${cost_with_selective_discount:.6f}")
def test_cost_margin_percentage():
"""
Test that percentage-based cost margin is applied correctly
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original config
original_margin_config = litellm.cost_margin_config.copy()
# Create mock response
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gpt-4",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Calculate cost without margin
litellm.cost_margin_config = {}
cost_without_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Set 10% margin for openai
litellm.cost_margin_config = {"openai": 0.10}
# Calculate cost with margin
cost_with_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Restore original config
litellm.cost_margin_config = original_margin_config
# Verify margin is applied (10% margin means 110% of original cost)
expected_cost = cost_without_margin * 1.10
assert cost_with_margin == pytest.approx(expected_cost, rel=1e-9)
print("✓ Cost margin percentage test passed:")
print(f" - Original cost: ${cost_without_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Cost with margin (10%): ${cost_with_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Margin added: ${cost_with_margin - cost_without_margin:.6f}")
def test_cost_margin_fixed_amount():
"""
Test that fixed amount cost margin is applied correctly
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original config
original_margin_config = litellm.cost_margin_config.copy()
# Create mock response
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gpt-4",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Calculate cost without margin
litellm.cost_margin_config = {}
cost_without_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Set $0.001 fixed margin for openai
litellm.cost_margin_config = {"openai": {"fixed_amount": 0.001}}
# Calculate cost with margin
cost_with_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Restore original config
litellm.cost_margin_config = original_margin_config
# Verify fixed margin is applied
expected_cost = cost_without_margin + 0.001
assert cost_with_margin == pytest.approx(expected_cost, rel=1e-9)
print("✓ Cost margin fixed amount test passed:")
print(f" - Original cost: ${cost_without_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Cost with margin ($0.001): ${cost_with_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Margin added: ${cost_with_margin - cost_without_margin:.6f}")
def test_cost_margin_combined():
"""
Test that combined percentage and fixed amount margin is applied correctly
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original config
original_margin_config = litellm.cost_margin_config.copy()
# Create mock response
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gpt-4",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Calculate cost without margin
litellm.cost_margin_config = {}
cost_without_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Set 8% margin + $0.0005 fixed for openai
litellm.cost_margin_config = {
"openai": {"percentage": 0.08, "fixed_amount": 0.0005}
}
# Calculate cost with margin
cost_with_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Restore original config
litellm.cost_margin_config = original_margin_config
# Verify combined margin is applied
expected_cost = cost_without_margin * 1.08 + 0.0005
assert cost_with_margin == pytest.approx(expected_cost, rel=1e-9)
print("✓ Cost margin combined test passed:")
print(f" - Original cost: ${cost_without_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Cost with margin (8% + $0.0005): ${cost_with_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Margin added: ${cost_with_margin - cost_without_margin:.6f}")
def test_cost_margin_global():
"""
Test that global margin is applied when no provider-specific margin is configured
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original config
original_margin_config = litellm.cost_margin_config.copy()
# Create mock response
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gpt-4",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Calculate cost without margin
litellm.cost_margin_config = {}
cost_without_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Set 5% global margin (no provider-specific margin)
litellm.cost_margin_config = {"global": 0.05}
# Calculate cost with global margin
cost_with_global_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Restore original config
litellm.cost_margin_config = original_margin_config
# Verify global margin is applied
expected_cost = cost_without_margin * 1.05
assert cost_with_global_margin == pytest.approx(expected_cost, rel=1e-9)
print("✓ Cost margin global test passed:")
print(f" - Original cost: ${cost_without_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Cost with global margin (5%): ${cost_with_global_margin:.6f}")
print(f" - Margin added: ${cost_with_global_margin - cost_without_margin:.6f}")
def test_cost_margin_provider_overrides_global():
"""
Test that provider-specific margin overrides global margin
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original config
original_margin_config = litellm.cost_margin_config.copy()
# Create mock response
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gpt-4",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Calculate cost without margin
litellm.cost_margin_config = {}
cost_without_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Set 5% global margin and 10% provider-specific margin
litellm.cost_margin_config = {"global": 0.05, "openai": 0.10}
# Calculate cost - should use provider-specific margin (10%), not global (5%)
cost_with_provider_margin = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Restore original config
litellm.cost_margin_config = original_margin_config
# Verify provider-specific margin is used (not global)
expected_cost = cost_without_margin * 1.10 # 10% from provider, not 5% from global
assert cost_with_provider_margin == pytest.approx(expected_cost, rel=1e-9)
print("✓ Cost margin provider override test passed:")
print(f" - Original cost: ${cost_without_margin:.6f}")
print(
f" - Cost with provider margin (10%, overrides 5% global): ${cost_with_provider_margin:.6f}"
)
print(f" - Margin added: ${cost_with_provider_margin - cost_without_margin:.6f}")
def test_cost_margin_with_discount():
"""
Test that margin is applied after discount (independent calculation)
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.types.utils import Usage
# Save original configs
original_margin_config = litellm.cost_margin_config.copy()
original_discount_config = litellm.cost_discount_config.copy()
# Create mock response
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
choices=[],
created=1234567890,
model="gpt-4",
object="chat.completion",
usage=Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150),
)
# Calculate base cost
litellm.cost_margin_config = {}
litellm.cost_discount_config = {}
base_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Set 5% discount and 10% margin
litellm.cost_discount_config = {"openai": 0.05}
litellm.cost_margin_config = {"openai": 0.10}
# Calculate cost with both discount and margin
cost_with_both = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gpt-4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Restore original configs
litellm.cost_margin_config = original_margin_config
litellm.cost_discount_config = original_discount_config
# Verify: discount applied first, then margin
# Base cost -> discount: base * 0.95 -> margin: (base * 0.95) * 1.10
expected_cost = base_cost * 0.95 * 1.10
assert cost_with_both == pytest.approx(expected_cost, rel=1e-9)
print("✓ Cost margin with discount test passed:")
print(f" - Base cost: ${base_cost:.6f}")
print(f" - Cost with 5% discount + 10% margin: ${cost_with_both:.6f}")
print(f" - Expected: ${expected_cost:.6f}")
def test_azure_image_generation_cost_calculator():
from unittest.mock import MagicMock
from litellm.types.utils import (
ImageObject,
ImageResponse,
ImageUsage,
ImageUsageInputTokensDetails,
)
response_cost_calculator_kwargs = {
"response_object": ImageResponse(
created=1761785270,
background=None,
data=[
ImageObject(
b64_json=None,
revised_prompt="A futuristic, techno-inspired green duck wearing cool modern sunglasses. The duck has a sleek, metallic appearance with glowing neon green accents, standing on a high-tech urban background with holographic billboards and illuminated city lights in the distance. The duck's feathers have a glossy, high-tech sheen, resembling a robotic design but still maintaining its avian features. The scene has a vibrant, cyberpunk aesthetic with a neon color palette.",
url="test-azure-blob-url-with-sas-token",
)
],
output_format=None,
quality="hd",
size=None,
usage=ImageUsage(
input_tokens=0,
input_tokens_details=ImageUsageInputTokensDetails(
image_tokens=0, text_tokens=0
),
output_tokens=0,
total_tokens=0,
),
),
"model": "azure/dall-e-3",
"cache_hit": False,
"custom_llm_provider": "azure",
"base_model": "azure/dall-e-3",
"call_type": "aimage_generation",
"optional_params": {},
"custom_pricing": False,
"prompt": "",
"standard_built_in_tools_params": {
"web_search_options": None,
"file_search": None,
},
"router_model_id": "6738c432ffc9b733597c6b86613ca20dc5f49bde591fd3d03e7cd6aa25bb241e",
"litellm_logging_obj": MagicMock(),
"service_tier": None,
}
cost = response_cost_calculator(**response_cost_calculator_kwargs)
assert cost > 0.079
def test_completion_cost_extracts_service_tier_from_response():
"""Test that completion_cost extracts service_tier from completion_response object."""
from litellm import completion_cost
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
# Test with gpt-5-nano which has flex pricing
model = "gpt-5-nano"
# Create usage object
usage = Usage(prompt_tokens=1000, completion_tokens=500, total_tokens=1500)
# Create ModelResponse with service_tier in the response object
response_with_service_tier = ModelResponse(
usage=usage,
model=model,
)
# Set service_tier as an attribute on the response
setattr(response_with_service_tier, "service_tier", "flex")
# Test that flex pricing is used when service_tier is in response
flex_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response_with_service_tier,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Create ModelResponse without service_tier (should use standard pricing)
response_without_service_tier = ModelResponse(
usage=usage,
model=model,
)
# Test that standard pricing is used when service_tier is not in response
standard_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response_without_service_tier,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Flex should be approximately 50% of standard
assert flex_cost > 0, "Flex cost should be greater than 0"
assert standard_cost > 0, "Standard cost should be greater than 0"
assert flex_cost < standard_cost, "Flex cost should be less than standard cost"
flex_ratio = flex_cost / standard_cost
assert (
0.45 <= flex_ratio <= 0.55
), f"Flex pricing should be ~50% of standard, got {flex_ratio:.2f}"
def test_completion_cost_extracts_service_tier_from_usage():
"""Test that completion_cost extracts service_tier from usage object."""
from litellm import completion_cost
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
# Test with gpt-5-nano which has flex pricing
model = "gpt-5-nano"
# Create usage object with service_tier
usage_with_service_tier = Usage(
prompt_tokens=1000, completion_tokens=500, total_tokens=1500
)
# Set service_tier as an attribute on the usage object
setattr(usage_with_service_tier, "service_tier", "flex")
# Create ModelResponse with usage containing service_tier
response = ModelResponse(
usage=usage_with_service_tier,
model=model,
)
# Test that flex pricing is used when service_tier is in usage
flex_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Create usage object without service_tier
usage_without_service_tier = Usage(
prompt_tokens=1000, completion_tokens=500, total_tokens=1500
)
# Create ModelResponse with usage without service_tier
response_standard = ModelResponse(
usage=usage_without_service_tier,
model=model,
)
# Test that standard pricing is used when service_tier is not in usage
standard_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response_standard,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Flex should be approximately 50% of standard
assert flex_cost > 0, "Flex cost should be greater than 0"
assert standard_cost > 0, "Standard cost should be greater than 0"
assert flex_cost < standard_cost, "Flex cost should be less than standard cost"
flex_ratio = flex_cost / standard_cost
assert (
0.45 <= flex_ratio <= 0.55
), f"Flex pricing should be ~50% of standard, got {flex_ratio:.2f}"
def test_completion_cost_service_tier_priority():
"""Test that service_tier extraction follows priority: optional_params > completion_response > usage."""
from litellm import completion_cost
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
# Test with gpt-5-nano which has flex pricing
model = "gpt-5-nano"
# Create usage object with service_tier="flex"
usage = Usage(prompt_tokens=1000, completion_tokens=500, total_tokens=1500)
setattr(usage, "service_tier", "flex")
# Create response with service_tier="priority"
response = ModelResponse(
usage=usage,
model=model,
)
setattr(response, "service_tier", "priority")
# Test that optional_params takes priority over response and usage
cost_from_params = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
optional_params={"service_tier": "flex"},
)
# Test that response takes priority over usage when optional_params is not provided
completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# Test that usage is used when neither optional_params nor response have service_tier
# Create a new response without service_tier attribute
response_no_tier = ModelResponse(
usage=usage,
model=model,
)
# Don't set service_tier on response, so it will fall back to usage
cost_from_usage = completion_cost(
completion_response=response_no_tier,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
)
# All should use flex pricing (from different sources)
assert cost_from_params > 0, "Cost from params should be greater than 0"
assert cost_from_usage > 0, "Cost from usage should be greater than 0"
# Costs should be similar (all using flex)
assert (
abs(cost_from_params - cost_from_usage) < 1e-6
), "Costs from params and usage should be similar (both flex)"
def test_completion_cost_service_tier_for_bedrock():
"""Test that Bedrock cost calculation applies service_tier-specific pricing."""
from litellm import completion_cost
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
model = "bedrock/us-east-1/test-bedrock-service-tier-cost-model"
litellm.register_model(
model_cost={
model: {
"input_cost_per_token": 0.001,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.002,
"input_cost_per_token_priority": 0.01,
"output_cost_per_token_priority": 0.02,
"input_cost_per_token_flex": 0.0005,
"output_cost_per_token_flex": 0.001,
"litellm_provider": "bedrock",
"max_tokens": 8192,
}
}
)
usage = Usage(prompt_tokens=100, completion_tokens=50, total_tokens=150)
response = ModelResponse(usage=usage, model=model)
default_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="bedrock",
)
priority_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="bedrock",
optional_params={"service_tier": "priority"},
)
response_with_flex_tier = ModelResponse(usage=usage, model=model)
setattr(response_with_flex_tier, "service_tier", "flex")
flex_cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response_with_flex_tier,
model=model,
custom_llm_provider="bedrock",
)
assert priority_cost > default_cost > flex_cost > 0
def test_gemini_cache_tokens_details_no_negative_values():
"""
Test for Issue #18750: Negative text_tokens with Gemini caching
When using Gemini with explicit caching, the response includes cacheTokensDetails
which breaks down cached tokens by modality. This test ensures that:
1. text_tokens is never negative
2. We correctly subtract cached tokens per modality (not total)
"""
from litellm.llms.vertex_ai.gemini.vertex_and_google_ai_studio_gemini import (
VertexGeminiConfig,
)
# Scenario from issue #18750: Image + text with explicit caching
# Real Gemini response structure when using cached content
completion_response = {
"usageMetadata": {
"promptTokenCount": 9660,
"candidatesTokenCount": 7,
"totalTokenCount": 9667,
"cachedContentTokenCount": 9651,
# Total tokens by modality (includes cached + non-cached)
"promptTokensDetails": [
{"modality": "TEXT", "tokenCount": 9402},
{"modality": "IMAGE", "tokenCount": 258},
],
# Breakdown of cached tokens by modality
"cacheTokensDetails": [
{"modality": "TEXT", "tokenCount": 9393},
{"modality": "IMAGE", "tokenCount": 258},
],
}
}
usage = VertexGeminiConfig._calculate_usage(completion_response)
# Text tokens should be non-cached text only: 9402 - 9393 = 9
assert (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens == 9
), f"Expected text_tokens=9, got {usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens}"
# Image tokens should be non-cached image only: 258 - 258 = 0
assert (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.image_tokens == 0
), f"Expected image_tokens=0, got {usage.prompt_tokens_details.image_tokens}"
# Total cached should match
assert (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens == 9651
), f"Expected cached_tokens=9651, got {usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens}"
# MOST IMPORTANT: text_tokens should NEVER be negative
assert (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens >= 0
), f"BUG: text_tokens is negative ({usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens})! This was the issue in #18750"
print(
"✅ Issue #18750 fix verified: text_tokens is correctly calculated and non-negative"
)
def test_gemini_without_cache_tokens_details():
"""
Test Gemini response without cacheTokensDetails (implicit caching or no cache)
When cacheTokensDetails is not present, we should use promptTokensDetails as-is
without subtracting anything.
"""
from litellm.llms.vertex_ai.gemini.vertex_and_google_ai_studio_gemini import (
VertexGeminiConfig,
)
completion_response = {
"usageMetadata": {
"promptTokenCount": 264,
"candidatesTokenCount": 15,
"totalTokenCount": 279,
"promptTokensDetails": [
{"modality": "TEXT", "tokenCount": 6},
{"modality": "IMAGE", "tokenCount": 258},
],
# No cacheTokensDetails
}
}
usage = VertexGeminiConfig._calculate_usage(completion_response)
# Should use promptTokensDetails values directly
assert usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens == 6
assert usage.prompt_tokens_details.image_tokens == 258
assert usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens >= 0
print("✅ Gemini without cacheTokensDetails works correctly")
def test_gemini_implicit_caching_cost_calculation():
"""
Test for Issue #16341: Gemini implicit cached tokens not counted in spend log
When Gemini uses implicit caching, it returns cachedContentTokenCount but NOT
cacheTokensDetails. In this case, we should subtract cachedContentTokenCount
from text_tokens to correctly calculate costs.
See: https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/16341
"""
from litellm import completion_cost
from litellm.llms.vertex_ai.gemini.vertex_and_google_ai_studio_gemini import (
VertexGeminiConfig,
)
from litellm.types.utils import Choices, Message, ModelResponse
# Simulate Gemini response with implicit caching (cachedContentTokenCount only)
completion_response = {
"usageMetadata": {
"promptTokenCount": 10000,
"candidatesTokenCount": 5,
"totalTokenCount": 10005,
"cachedContentTokenCount": 8000, # Implicit caching - no cacheTokensDetails
"promptTokensDetails": [{"modality": "TEXT", "tokenCount": 10000}],
"candidatesTokensDetails": [{"modality": "TEXT", "tokenCount": 5}],
}
}
usage = VertexGeminiConfig._calculate_usage(completion_response)
# Verify parsing
assert (
usage.cache_read_input_tokens == 8000
), f"cache_read_input_tokens should be 8000, got {usage.cache_read_input_tokens}"
assert (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens == 8000
), f"cached_tokens should be 8000, got {usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens}"
# CRITICAL: text_tokens should be (10000 - 8000) = 2000, NOT 10000
# This is the fix for issue #16341
assert (
usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens == 2000
), f"text_tokens should be 2000 (10000 - 8000), got {usage.prompt_tokens_details.text_tokens}"
# Verify cost calculation uses cached token pricing
response = ModelResponse(
id="mock-id",
model="gemini-2.0-flash",
choices=[
Choices(
index=0,
message=Message(role="assistant", content="Hello!"),
finish_reason="stop",
)
],
usage=usage,
)
cost = completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="gemini-2.0-flash",
custom_llm_provider="gemini",
)
# Get model pricing for verification
import litellm
model_info = litellm.get_model_info("gemini/gemini-2.0-flash")
input_cost = model_info.get("input_cost_per_token", 0)
cache_read_cost = model_info.get("cache_read_input_token_cost", input_cost)
output_cost = model_info.get("output_cost_per_token", 0)
# Expected cost: (2000 * input) + (8000 * cache_read) + (5 * output)
expected_cost = (2000 * input_cost) + (8000 * cache_read_cost) + (5 * output_cost)
assert abs(cost - expected_cost) < 1e-9, (
f"Cost calculation is wrong. Got ${cost:.6f}, expected ${expected_cost:.6f}. "
f"Cached tokens may not be using reduced pricing."
)
print(
"✅ Issue #16341 fix verified: Gemini implicit caching cost calculated correctly"
)
def test_additional_costs_only_for_azure_ai():
"""
Test that _get_additional_costs is only called for azure_ai provider.
completion_cost() guards the call with `if custom_llm_provider == "azure_ai"`.
This test verifies that non-azure_ai providers get additional_costs=None
(reflected by the absence of "additional_costs" in cost_breakdown),
while azure_ai providers can include additional costs.
"""
from litellm.cost_calculator import _get_additional_costs
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
# Non-azure_ai providers should return None
result = _get_additional_costs(
model="gpt-4o",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
prompt_tokens=100,
completion_tokens=50,
)
assert result is None, "Non-azure_ai providers should have no additional costs"
result = _get_additional_costs(
model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
custom_llm_provider="anthropic",
prompt_tokens=100,
completion_tokens=50,
)
assert result is None, "Anthropic should have no additional costs"
result = _get_additional_costs(
model="gemini-2.0-flash",
custom_llm_provider="vertex_ai",
prompt_tokens=100,
completion_tokens=50,
)
assert result is None, "Vertex AI should have no additional costs"
def test_openrouter_gemini_3_1_flash_lite_preview_pricing():
"""
Test that openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview has a pricing entry.
Regression test for https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/25604
The model exists and is callable via OpenRouter, but was missing from
model_prices_and_context_window.json when other Gemini 3.x variants were present.
This caused ValueError: This model isn't mapped yet during router pre-call checks.
"""
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
model_name = "openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview"
model_info = litellm.model_cost.get(model_name)
assert model_info is not None, f"Missing model pricing entry: {model_name}"
assert model_info["litellm_provider"] == "openrouter"
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == 2.5e-07
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == 1.5e-06
assert model_info["max_input_tokens"] == 1048576
assert model_info["max_output_tokens"] == 65536
def test_gemini_3_1_flash_lite_pricing():
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
for model_name in (
"gemini-3.1-flash-lite",
"gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite",
"vertex_ai/gemini-3.1-flash-lite",
):
model_info = litellm.model_cost.get(model_name)
assert model_info is not None, f"Missing model pricing entry: {model_name}"
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == 2.5e-07
assert model_info["input_cost_per_audio_token"] == 5e-07
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == 1.5e-06
assert model_info["output_cost_per_reasoning_token"] == 1.5e-06
assert model_info["cache_read_input_token_cost"] == 2.5e-08
assert model_info["max_input_tokens"] == 1048576
def test_custom_pricing_applies_cache_read_input_cost():
"""
Bug 1 reproduction: custom_cost_per_token with cache_read_input_token_cost
should bill cached prompt tokens at the cache rate, not the full input rate.
"""
usage = Usage(
prompt_tokens=6074,
completion_tokens=285,
total_tokens=6359,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
cached_tokens=3456,
audio_tokens=0,
),
)
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
created=1234567890,
model="openai/gpt-5.4",
object="chat.completion",
choices=[],
usage=usage,
)
cost = litellm.completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="openai/gpt-5.4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
custom_cost_per_token={
"input_cost_per_token": 0.0000025,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.000015,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 0.00000025,
},
)
expected = (6074 - 3456) * 0.0000025 + 3456 * 0.00000025 + 285 * 0.000015
assert cost == pytest.approx(expected)
def test_custom_pricing_applies_cache_creation_input_cost_via_prompt_details():
"""
OpenAI-compatible providers report cache-write tokens under
prompt_tokens_details.cache_creation_tokens. The custom-pricing helper must
bill those at cache_creation_input_token_cost, not the full input rate.
"""
pt_details = PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(cached_tokens=1000, audio_tokens=0)
pt_details.cache_creation_tokens = 500
usage = Usage(
prompt_tokens=4000,
completion_tokens=100,
total_tokens=4100,
prompt_tokens_details=pt_details,
)
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
created=1234567890,
model="openai/gpt-5.4",
object="chat.completion",
choices=[],
usage=usage,
)
cost = litellm.completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="openai/gpt-5.4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
custom_cost_per_token={
"input_cost_per_token": 0.0000025,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.000015,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 0.00000025,
"cache_creation_input_token_cost": 0.000003125,
},
)
expected = (
(4000 - 1000 - 500) * 0.0000025
+ 1000 * 0.00000025
+ 500 * 0.000003125
+ 100 * 0.000015
)
assert cost == pytest.approx(expected)
def test_custom_pricing_applies_cache_creation_input_cost_via_cache_write_tokens_alias():
"""
Some OpenAI-compatible providers (e.g. kimi-k2) emit cache-write tokens as
`cache_write_tokens` rather than `cache_creation_tokens`. The cost
calculator must mirror db_spend_update_writer and accept either name —
otherwise daily aggregation counts the tokens but the per-request cost
bills them at the full input rate.
Drives `cost_per_token` directly with a SimpleNamespace usage stub so the
`cache_write_tokens` alias survives the call (Pydantic's Usage init
rebuilds prompt_tokens_details and drops dynamic attributes).
"""
from types import SimpleNamespace
from litellm.cost_calculator import cost_per_token
pt_details = SimpleNamespace(cached_tokens=1000, cache_write_tokens=500)
usage_stub = SimpleNamespace(
prompt_tokens=4000,
completion_tokens=100,
total_tokens=4100,
prompt_tokens_details=pt_details,
cache_read_input_tokens=None,
cache_creation_input_tokens=None,
)
prompt_cost, completion_cost = cost_per_token(
model="moonshotai/kimi-k2",
prompt_tokens=4000,
completion_tokens=100,
custom_llm_provider="openai",
usage_object=usage_stub,
custom_cost_per_token={
"input_cost_per_token": 0.0000025,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.000015,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 0.00000025,
"cache_creation_input_token_cost": 0.000003125,
},
)
expected_prompt = (
(4000 - 1000 - 500) * 0.0000025 + 1000 * 0.00000025 + 500 * 0.000003125
)
expected_completion = 100 * 0.000015
assert prompt_cost == pytest.approx(expected_prompt)
assert completion_cost == pytest.approx(expected_completion)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Bug 2 — db_spend_update_writer cache token extraction helpers.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_extract_cache_read_tokens_anthropic_top_level():
from litellm.proxy.db.db_spend_update_writer import _extract_cache_read_tokens
usage_obj = {
"prompt_tokens": 100,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 80,
"prompt_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 80},
}
# Anthropic top-level value should win over prompt_tokens_details fallback.
assert _extract_cache_read_tokens(usage_obj) == 80
def test_extract_cache_read_tokens_openai_compatible_fallback():
from litellm.proxy.db.db_spend_update_writer import _extract_cache_read_tokens
# Anthropic field absent — fall back to prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens.
usage_obj = {
"prompt_tokens": 22583,
"prompt_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 22016},
}
assert _extract_cache_read_tokens(usage_obj) == 22016
def test_extract_cache_read_tokens_zero_when_missing():
from litellm.proxy.db.db_spend_update_writer import _extract_cache_read_tokens
assert _extract_cache_read_tokens({}) == 0
assert _extract_cache_read_tokens({"cache_read_input_tokens": None}) == 0
assert (
_extract_cache_read_tokens({"prompt_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": None}})
== 0
)
def test_extract_cache_creation_tokens_anthropic_top_level():
from litellm.proxy.db.db_spend_update_writer import (
_extract_cache_creation_tokens,
)
usage_obj = {
"prompt_tokens": 100,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 50,
"prompt_tokens_details": {"cache_write_tokens": 50},
}
# Anthropic top-level should short-circuit the fallback.
assert _extract_cache_creation_tokens(usage_obj) == 50
def test_extract_cache_creation_tokens_openai_cache_write_alias():
from litellm.proxy.db.db_spend_update_writer import (
_extract_cache_creation_tokens,
)
# kimi-k2 emits cache_write_tokens.
usage_obj = {
"prompt_tokens": 1000,
"prompt_tokens_details": {"cache_write_tokens": 200},
}
assert _extract_cache_creation_tokens(usage_obj) == 200
def test_extract_cache_creation_tokens_openai_cache_creation_alias():
from litellm.proxy.db.db_spend_update_writer import (
_extract_cache_creation_tokens,
)
# Other OpenAI-compatible providers emit cache_creation_tokens.
usage_obj = {
"prompt_tokens": 1000,
"prompt_tokens_details": {"cache_creation_tokens": 300},
}
assert _extract_cache_creation_tokens(usage_obj) == 300
def test_extract_cache_creation_tokens_zero_when_missing():
from litellm.proxy.db.db_spend_update_writer import (
_extract_cache_creation_tokens,
)
assert _extract_cache_creation_tokens({}) == 0
assert _extract_cache_creation_tokens({"cache_creation_input_tokens": None}) == 0
assert (
_extract_cache_creation_tokens(
{"prompt_tokens_details": {"cache_write_tokens": None}}
)
== 0
)
def test_custom_pricing_anthropic_style_cache_tokens_not_double_counted():
"""
Anthropic providers report cache tokens at the top level of Usage, and
`prompt_tokens` EXCLUDES them. The helper expects `prompt_tokens` to
include cache tokens, so cost_per_token must adjust before invoking it —
otherwise regular_prompt_tokens goes negative and clamps to 0.
"""
usage = Usage(
prompt_tokens=2000,
completion_tokens=100,
total_tokens=2100,
cache_read_input_tokens=1500,
cache_creation_input_tokens=300,
)
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
created=1234567890,
model="anthropic/claude-3-5-sonnet",
object="chat.completion",
choices=[],
usage=usage,
)
cost = litellm.completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="anthropic/claude-3-5-sonnet",
custom_llm_provider="anthropic",
custom_cost_per_token={
"input_cost_per_token": 0.000003,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.000015,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 0.0000003,
"cache_creation_input_token_cost": 0.00000375,
},
)
# Anthropic prompt_tokens=2000 excludes cache. After normalization the
# helper sees 2000 + 1500 + 300 = 3800, of which 2000 are uncached.
expected = 2000 * 0.000003 + 1500 * 0.0000003 + 300 * 0.00000375 + 100 * 0.000015
assert cost == pytest.approx(expected)
def test_custom_pricing_without_cache_keys_preserves_legacy_behavior():
"""
Backward compatibility: when custom_cost_per_token omits both cache rates,
cached tokens must be billed at input_cost_per_token (matching the pre-fix
behavior) so existing callers see no change.
"""
usage = Usage(
prompt_tokens=1000,
completion_tokens=100,
total_tokens=1100,
prompt_tokens_details=PromptTokensDetailsWrapper(
cached_tokens=400,
audio_tokens=0,
),
)
response = ModelResponse(
id="test-id",
created=1234567890,
model="openai/gpt-5.4",
object="chat.completion",
choices=[],
usage=usage,
)
cost = litellm.completion_cost(
completion_response=response,
model="openai/gpt-5.4",
custom_llm_provider="openai",
custom_cost_per_token={
"input_cost_per_token": 0.0000025,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.000015,
},
)
# All 1000 prompt tokens billed at input rate, regardless of cached_tokens.
expected = 1000 * 0.0000025 + 100 * 0.000015
assert cost == pytest.approx(expected)
def test_openrouter_gemini_3_1_flash_lite_stable_pricing():
"""
Test that openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite (stable, no -preview suffix)
has a pricing entry.
Google promoted gemini-3.1-flash-lite to GA on 2026-05-07. PR #27933 added the
stable pricing for the bare, gemini/, and vertex_ai/ prefixes but missed the
openrouter/google/ variant — every other Gemini family in the file has an
openrouter/google/ sibling (2.0-flash-001, 2.5-flash, 2.5-pro, 3-flash-preview,
3-pro-preview, 3.1-flash-lite-preview, 3.1-pro-preview), so the gap is a
consistency issue, not a design choice. Same shape as the preview-variant gap
fixed in PR #25610.
Pricing matches the existing -preview entry one-for-one (input $0.25/M, output
$1.50/M, cache-read $0.025/M) — Google did not change costs at the GA cutover.
"""
os.environ["LITELLM_LOCAL_MODEL_COST_MAP"] = "True"
litellm.model_cost = litellm.get_model_cost_map(url="")
model_name = "openrouter/google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite"
model_info = litellm.model_cost.get(model_name)
assert model_info is not None, f"Missing model pricing entry: {model_name}"
assert model_info["litellm_provider"] == "openrouter"
assert model_info["input_cost_per_token"] == 2.5e-07
assert model_info["output_cost_per_token"] == 1.5e-06
assert model_info["cache_read_input_token_cost"] == 2.5e-08
assert model_info["max_input_tokens"] == 1048576
assert model_info["max_output_tokens"] == 65536