* chore(e2e): establish litellm_e2e_staging integration line Long-lived berri branch for e2e suite recovery work (LIT-4479 through LIT-4486) before merge to litellm_internal_staging * test(e2e): remove langfuse_otel logging e2e suite (#33558) * test(e2e): remove langfuse_otel logging e2e suite Removes the LIT-4483 dynamic per-team/key/org langfuse_otel logging e2e tests (tests/e2e/logging/test_langfuse_e2e.py, added in #32857). The shared logging_client harness and the langfuse coverage-registry cells are left in place; only the test module is removed. The otel and prometheus logging e2e suites are unaffected. Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(e2e): drop orphaned langfuse coverage-registry cells The three logging.langfuse.*.logs_spend P0 cells were only exercised by the deleted langfuse_otel e2e suite. Remove them so the coverage registry has no orphaned rows. Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: yucheng <yucheng@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(e2e): log into the react admin ui in the management browser fixture (#33562) The management ui_page fixture drove the old server-rendered login form: it clicked input[type="submit"] and treated wait_for_url("**/ui/**") as the done signal. /ui/ now serves the react (antd) dashboard whose submit is a <button type="submit">, so the click waited out the full 30s timeout and errored every browser test in the suite. wait_for_url also matched instantly because the login page already lives at /ui/, so on the fast path the fixture navigated before the auth cookie landed and got bounced back to login. Click the antd submit button and wait for the token cookie loginCall sets on document.cookie, the real post-login signal. Co-authored-by: Mubashir Osmani <mubashir@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(e2e): make ui login readiness robust to httpOnly token cookies (#33564) The login readiness check waited only on document.cookie including token=, which is empty when the token cookie is httpOnly. If the server ever sets it via a Set-Cookie header, the wait would spin to the 30s timeout and silently reproduce the original hang. Also accept the login form detaching (#username gone after the post-login redirect) so readiness holds regardless of how the cookie is delivered. Co-authored-by: Mubashir Osmani <mubashir@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: yucheng <yucheng@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: Mubashir Osmani <mubashir@berri.ai> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| collector.py | ||
| guardrail.yaml | ||
| llm_claude_code_compat.yaml | ||
| llm_conversational.yaml | ||
| llm_nonconversational.yaml | ||
| logging.yaml | ||
| mcp.yaml | ||
| mgmt.yaml | ||
| other.yaml | ||
| quota_management.yaml | ||
| README.md | ||
| registry.py | ||
| reliability.yaml | ||
| schema.py | ||
| test_collector.py | ||
e2e coverage registry
This directory is the denominator for e2e test coverage: the set of behaviors we
want covered, one row per behavior, checked into the repo so coverage is a number we
can track instead of a guess. It implements the plan in the "E2E Coverage Tracking"
note; the naming grammar lives in tests/e2e/CLAUDE.md.
The model
A cell is one customer-noticeable behavior a single e2e test can assert pass/fail
on, for example llm.chat_completions.bedrock_converse.tool_use.stream.works. Cells are
grouped module > feature > test, with LLM cells split into Core LLMs and
Non-Core LLMs for dashboarding. Each cell carries a tier (P0/P1/P2), a source, and a
fail_before_fix flag.
The rows live in per-prefix YAML files (llm_*.yaml, mgmt.yaml, mcp.yaml,
reliability.yaml, quota_management.yaml, logging.yaml, guardrail.yaml,
other.yaml) and validate against
the discriminated union in schema.py, so an LLM row cannot carry a guardrail field and
vice versa. llm rows with subject_endpoint of chat_completions, messages, or
responses roll up to Core LLMs; all other LLM endpoints roll up to Non-Core LLMs.
LLM endpoint, route, and capability values are typed in schema.py, so new taxonomy
values require an explicit schema change. logging and guardrail are two id-prefixes
that roll up into the single Logging & Guardrails dashboard module.
A test declares what it covers with a marker:
@pytest.mark.covers("llm.chat_completions.openai.tool_use.stream.works")
def test_openai_streaming_tool_calls(self) -> None:
...
The number
collector.py diffs the registry against those markers and reports coverage per module.
It is static: a collect-only pass reads the markers, so it runs no test and needs no live
proxy. Whether a covered cell currently passes or fails is a separate, live concern.
cd tests/e2e && PYTHONPATH=. python -m coverage_registry.collector
Use --format loki after the e2e pytest run in the same Kubernetes job/pod to print
structured stdout lines for Loki:
cd tests/e2e && PYTHONPATH=. python -m coverage_registry.collector --format loki --strict
This emits exactly one COVERAGE_TOTAL line and one COVERAGE_MODULE line per module
in MODULE_ORDER, in that order. Loki uses log-safe module= labels from
LOKI_MODULE_LABELS (core_llms, management_ui, etc.) so existing JSON and
Prometheus consumers keep their human-readable module names unchanged.
The headline is overall coverage. The collector also lists markers that point at ids not in the registry, so a typo or an unenumerated behavior surfaces instead of being silently dropped.
Use strict mode in CI once existing draft markers are reconciled:
cd tests/e2e && PYTHONPATH=. python -m coverage_registry.collector --strict
Strict mode exits non-zero on @pytest.mark.covers(...) ids that are not checked into
the registry. Add --fail-on-collection-errors when the job should also fail on pytest
collection errors.
Status: this is a draft for review
The cells were enumerated from the codebase and the tiers are a first proposal. Known things to settle before treating the set as final:
- tiers are proposed, not signed off; 125 P0 is a lot to prove fail-before-fix, so P0 may want tightening
- a few cells need a support check or a prune (for example
llm.embeddings.anthropic.*andreliability.perf.throughput.under_slo) - auth is covered in two places (
other.auth.*and the mgmt authz assertions); the boundary needs a decision, and the auth cluster may deserve promotion to its own module - the P2 "niche" cells each stand in for a large tail of integrations/providers by design, so the denominator is deliberately P0-weighted rather than a full inventory