litellm/helm/litellm-helm/Chart.yaml
Yassin Kortam de80e3afe4
fix(helm): scale the classic chart's HPA out at the documented 60 percent CPU (#35975)
* fix(helm): scale the classic chart's HPA out at the documented 60 percent CPU

The litellm-helm chart shipped targetCPUUtilizationPercentage: 80, which is
unexamined helm create scaffold rather than a chosen number. It arrived packaged
with the stock minReplicas: 1, maxReplicas: 100, a commented-out
targetMemoryUtilizationPercentage: 80, and the boilerplate "such as Minikube"
comment, the same provenance as the 128Mi resource example this file just
corrected.

60 is the documented recommendation. The mechanism behind it is scale-up lag:
the chart's own startupProbe is failureThreshold: 30 times periodSeconds: 10, so
a replica can take up to 300 seconds to become ready, and a pod added at 80
percent utilization arrives minutes after saturation.

The memory target stays commented out on purpose. The prisma query engine's
resident memory is a high-water mark that ratchets to the pod's worst-ever write
and is never returned, so a memory-target HPA reads the largest write a pod ever
did rather than what it is doing now, and replicas ratchet up without scaling
back in.

hpa_tests.yaml carried its second suite after a YAML document separator, and
helm-unittest loads only the first document per file, so that suite never ran;
an assertion planted in it still passed. Fold it into the one live suite and add
coverage pinning the rendered CPU target, the absence of a memory metric by
default, and that overrides still take effect.

Bump the chart to 1.1.2, since rendered output changes for anyone running with
autoscaling enabled.

* fix(helm): bump litellm-helm to 1.1.3 after rebase onto 1.1.2

Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-02 10:19:03 -07:00

41 lines
1.7 KiB
YAML

apiVersion: v2
# We can't call ourselves just "litellm" because then we couldn't publish to the
# same OCI repository as the "litellm" OCI image
name: litellm-helm
description: Call all LLM APIs using the OpenAI format
# A chart can be either an 'application' or a 'library' chart.
#
# Application charts are a collection of templates that can be packaged into versioned archives
# to be deployed.
#
# Library charts provide useful utilities or functions for the chart developer. They're included as
# a dependency of application charts to inject those utilities and functions into the rendering
# pipeline. Library charts do not define any templates and therefore cannot be deployed.
type: application
# This is the chart version. This version number should be incremented each time you make changes
# to the chart and its templates, including the app version.
# Versions are expected to follow Semantic Versioning (https://semver.org/)
version: 1.1.3
# This is the version number of the application being deployed. This version number should be
# incremented each time you make changes to the application. Versions are not expected to
# follow Semantic Versioning. They should reflect the version the application is using.
# It is recommended to use it with quotes.
appVersion: v1.85.1
annotations:
org.opencontainers.image.source: "https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm"
org.opencontainers.image.url: "https://docs.litellm.ai/"
dependencies:
- name: "postgresql"
version: "14.3.1"
repository: oci://registry-1.docker.io/bitnamicharts
condition: db.deployStandalone
- name: redis
version: "18.19.1"
repository: oci://registry-1.docker.io/bitnamicharts
condition: redis.enabled