* Split LLM e2e coverage modules * Add e2e coverage dashboard metrics * Remove dashboard brief from e2e coverage PR |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| collector.py | ||
| guardrail.yaml | ||
| llm_conversational.yaml | ||
| llm_nonconversational.yaml | ||
| logging.yaml | ||
| mcp.yaml | ||
| mgmt.yaml | ||
| other.yaml | ||
| README.md | ||
| registry.py | ||
| reliability.yaml | ||
| schema.py | ||
| test_collector.py | ||
e2e coverage registry
This directory is the denominator for e2e test coverage: the set of behaviors we
want covered, one row per behavior, checked into the repo so coverage is a number we
can track instead of a guess. It implements the plan in the "E2E Coverage Tracking"
note; the naming grammar lives in tests/e2e/CLAUDE.md.
The model
A cell is one customer-noticeable behavior a single e2e test can assert pass/fail
on, for example llm.chat_completions.bedrock_converse.tool_use.stream.works. Cells are
grouped module > feature > test, with LLM cells split into Core LLMs and Non-Core
LLMs for dashboarding. Each cell carries a tier (P0/P1/P2), a source, and a
fail_before_fix flag.
The rows live in per-prefix YAML files (llm_*.yaml, mgmt.yaml, mcp.yaml,
reliability.yaml, logging.yaml, guardrail.yaml, other.yaml) and validate against
the discriminated union in schema.py, so an LLM row cannot carry a guardrail field and
vice versa. llm rows with subject_endpoint of chat_completions, messages, or
responses roll up to "Core LLMs"; all other LLM endpoints roll up to "Non-Core
LLMs". LLM endpoint, route, and capability values are typed in schema.py, so new
taxonomy values require an explicit schema change. logging and guardrail are two
id-prefixes that roll up into the single "Logging & Guardrails" dashboard module.
A test declares what it covers with a marker:
@pytest.mark.covers("llm.chat_completions.openai.tool_use.stream.works")
def test_openai_streaming_tool_calls(self) -> None:
...
The number
collector.py diffs the registry against those markers and reports coverage per module.
It is static: a collect-only pass reads the markers, so it runs no test and needs no live
proxy. Whether a covered cell currently passes or fails is a separate, live concern.
cd tests/e2e && PYTHONPATH=. python -m coverage_registry.collector
Use --format prometheus or --format json for CI jobs that publish coverage to
Grafana.
The headline is overall coverage. The collector also lists markers that point at ids not in the registry, so a typo or an unenumerated behavior surfaces instead of being silently dropped.
Use strict mode in CI once existing draft markers are reconciled:
cd tests/e2e && PYTHONPATH=. python -m coverage_registry.collector --strict
Strict mode exits non-zero on @pytest.mark.covers(...) ids that are not checked into
the registry. Add --fail-on-collection-errors when the job should also fail on pytest
collection errors.
Status: this is a draft for review
The cells were enumerated from the codebase and the tiers are a first proposal. Known things to settle before treating the set as final:
- tiers are proposed, not signed off; 125 P0 is a lot to prove fail-before-fix, so P0 may want tightening
- a few cells need a support check or a prune (for example
llm.embeddings.anthropic.*andreliability.perf.throughput.under_slo) - auth is covered in two places (
other.auth.*and the mgmt authz assertions); the boundary needs a decision, and the auth cluster may deserve promotion to its own module - the P2 "niche" cells each stand in for a large tail of integrations/providers by design, so the denominator is deliberately P0-weighted rather than a full inventory