mirror of
https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm.git
synced 2026-09-13 23:11:40 +00:00
a43f128a74
Introduce the e2e coverage denominator: 282 behavior cells across the six tracking modules (LLMs, MCPs, Management/UI, Reliability & Performance, Logging & Guardrails, Other), one validated YAML row each, plus a collector that diffs the registry against @pytest.mark.covers markers and reports coverage per module. The registry rows validate against a pydantic discriminated union so a row cannot carry a field from another module. The collector is static: a collect-only pass reads the markers, so it runs no test and needs no live proxy. Register the covers marker suite-wide so that pass works under --strict-markers. This is a draft for review. Tiers are proposed rather than signed off, and a few cells still need a support check or a prune.
30 lines
8.6 KiB
YAML
30 lines
8.6 KiB
YAML
# Reliability & Performance (behavior features). Grounded in litellm/router.py + router_strategy/ + router_utils/.
|
|
- {id: reliability.fallback.5xx.routes_to_fallback, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: fallback, variant: "5xx", assertions: [routes_to_fallback], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "litellm/router.py:2024", rationale: "Reroute on provider 5xx to alternate deployment"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.fallback.context_window.routes_to_fallback, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: fallback, variant: context_window, assertions: [routes_to_fallback], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "litellm/router.py:6108", rationale: "Fallback when model exceeds context limit"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.fallback.content_policy.routes_to_fallback, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: fallback, variant: content_policy, assertions: [routes_to_fallback], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "litellm/router.py:6023", rationale: "Reroute on content-policy violation"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.fallback.timeout.routes_to_fallback, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: fallback, variant: "timeout", assertions: [routes_to_fallback], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "litellm/router.py:2766", rationale: "Fallback on request timeout"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.retry.5xx.succeeds_within_retries, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: retry, variant: "5xx", assertions: [succeeds_within_retries], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "litellm/router.py:6414", rationale: "Transient 5xx often succeeds on retry"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.retry.timeout.succeeds_within_retries, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: retry, variant: timeout, assertions: [succeeds_within_retries], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "get_retry_from_policy.py:44", rationale: "Timeout retried per policy"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.retry.429.succeeds_within_retries, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: retry, variant: "429", assertions: [succeeds_within_retries], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "get_retry_from_policy.py:46", rationale: "429 retried per RateLimitErrorRetries policy"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.retry.auth.succeeds_within_retries, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: retry, variant: auth, assertions: [succeeds_within_retries], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "get_retry_from_policy.py:42", rationale: "Transient auth glitch retry"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.retry.context_window.succeeds_within_retries, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: retry, variant: context_window, assertions: [succeeds_within_retries], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "get_retry_from_policy.py:51", rationale: "Multi-attempt on context error"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.cooldown.5xx.trips_then_recovers, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: cooldown, variant: "5xx", assertions: [trips_then_recovers], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "cooldown_handlers.py:40", rationale: "Deployment cools after repeated 5xx, recovers after cooldown_time"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.cooldown.429.trips_then_recovers, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: cooldown, variant: "429", assertions: [trips_then_recovers], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "cooldown_handlers.py:69", rationale: "Cools on 429, avoids hammering exhausted provider"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.cooldown.auth.trips_then_recovers, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: cooldown, variant: auth, assertions: [trips_then_recovers], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "cooldown_handlers.py:74", rationale: "Cools on 401 auth error"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.cooldown.timeout.trips_then_recovers, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: cooldown, variant: timeout, assertions: [trips_then_recovers], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "cooldown_handlers.py:77", rationale: "Cools on 408 timeout"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.ratelimit.rpm.blocks_over_limit, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: ratelimit, variant: rpm, assertions: [blocks_over_limit], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "dynamic_rate_limiter_v3.py", rationale: "v3 limiter enforces RPM per key/team/model; 429 on breach"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.ratelimit.tpm.blocks_over_limit, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: ratelimit, variant: tpm, assertions: [blocks_over_limit], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "dynamic_rate_limiter_v3.py", rationale: "v3 limiter enforces TPM per key/team/model; 429 on breach"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.ratelimit.priority_generous.picks_under_tpm, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: ratelimit, variant: priority_generous, assertions: [picks_under_tpm], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "dynamic_rate_limiter_v3.py:36-52", rationale: "Generous mode (<80% sat) allows priority borrowing"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.ratelimit.priority_strict.picks_under_tpm, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: ratelimit, variant: priority_strict, assertions: [picks_under_tpm], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "dynamic_rate_limiter_v3.py:53-71", rationale: "Strict mode (>=80% sat) enforces priority fairness"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.routing.simple_shuffle.picks_healthy_deployment, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: routing, variant: simple_shuffle, assertions: [picks_healthy_deployment], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "router_strategy/simple_shuffle.py", rationale: "Baseline weighted/uniform pick"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.routing.latency_based.picks_lowest_latency, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: routing, variant: latency_based, assertions: [picks_lowest_latency], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "router_strategy/lowest_latency.py", rationale: "Routes to lowest-latency deployment"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.routing.cost_based.picks_lowest_cost, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: routing, variant: cost_based, assertions: [picks_lowest_cost], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "router_strategy/lowest_cost.py", rationale: "Spend-aware routing"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.routing.usage_based.picks_under_tpm, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: routing, variant: usage_based, assertions: [picks_under_tpm], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "router_strategy/lowest_tpm_rpm_v2.py", rationale: "Routes to lowest-TPM deployment; prevents over-allocation"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.routing.least_busy.picks_lowest_traffic, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: routing, variant: least_busy, assertions: [picks_lowest_traffic], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "router_strategy/least_busy.py", rationale: "Fewest in-flight requests"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.cache.exact.returns_cached, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: cache, variant: exact, assertions: [returns_cached], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages, embeddings], source: "litellm/caching/caching.py", rationale: "Response cache returns cached on exact match"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.cache.prompt_caching_model_select.returns_cached, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: cache, variant: prompt_caching_model_select, assertions: [returns_cached], exercised_on: [chat_completions], source: "router_utils/prompt_caching_cache.py", rationale: "Selects model supporting prompt caching for cacheable prefix"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.circuit_breaker.redis.trips_then_recovers, module: reliability, tier: P0, behavior: circuit_breaker, variant: redis, assertions: [trips_then_recovers], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages, embeddings], source: "litellm/caching/redis_cache.py:99", rationale: "Redis breaker CLOSED->OPEN->HALF_OPEN; guards all cache/rate-limit ops"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.timeout.request_timeout.exceeds_deadline, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: timeout, variant: request_timeout, assertions: [exceeds_deadline], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "litellm/router.py:545-551", rationale: "Per-request timeout raises Timeout"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.timeout.stream_timeout.exceeds_deadline, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: timeout, variant: stream_timeout, assertions: [exceeds_deadline], exercised_on: [chat_completions], source: "litellm/router.py:551", rationale: "Streaming chunk-delivery timeout"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.perf.latency.under_slo, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: perf, variant: latency, assertions: [under_slo], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: "router_strategy/lowest_latency.py", rationale: "Latency SLO (p50/p99) compliance"}
|
|
- {id: reliability.perf.throughput.under_slo, module: reliability, tier: P1, behavior: perf, variant: throughput, assertions: [under_slo], exercised_on: [chat_completions, messages], source: grammar, rationale: "Throughput SLO under load"}
|