* test(e2e/ui): cover creating, testing and deleting a guardrail
The Guardrails page had no browser coverage. The RC checklist covers it by
hand against a live Presidio, which is why it has always been skipped in CI.
These drive the LiteLLM content filter instead, which runs inside the proxy,
so the whole flow is exercised without a third-party moderation service. The
create test does not stop at the table row: it sends a prompt carrying the
keyword it just banned and asserts the gateway refuses it, then sends a clean
prompt through the same guardrail and asserts it is served.
* test(e2e/ui): delete the guardrails these tests create
Review caught the fixtures being left behind. Guardrails are database rows
that show up in the table and in the playground's list, so a run that leaves
them changes what the next run sees.
Also trims the comments that restated what the helpers already say.
* test(e2e/ui): fail the run when guardrail teardown does not delete
Review caught the afterEach discarding the DELETE response, so a failed
cleanup finished quietly and left the guardrail for the next run to trip on.
* test(e2e/ui): wait for a new guardrail to reach the request path
The wizard test drove one chat completion immediately after creating the
guardrail and required a 400. A trace from the deployed stack shows the
record is stored correctly (blocked_words, action BLOCK, block_on_violation)
and the call six seconds later is still served unguarded, so the first
request can land before the proxy picks the guardrail up.
Polls the same call to the same 400 instead, which keeps the assertion and
lets the refresh land. If it never blocks, this stays red, which is what we
want it to say.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(e2e/ui): cover the Budgets page create, edit and delete flows
The Budgets page had no browser coverage at all, so an admin creating or
editing a spend cap through the UI was only exercised by hand at RC time.
Each test reads the budget back from /budget/list, a different route from
the one the table renders, so a row that only exists in the table's cache
does not pass. The edit test pins the rate limits an unrelated spend-cap
edit has no business touching.
* test(e2e/ui): trim comments that restate the test steps
Review flagged the explanatory comments as restating ordinary setup rather
than explaining anything. Keeps the two that carry the regression rationale
for an assertion and drops the rest.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This reverts commit 65a46a5f32 (#38113)
That change made two edits that combine into a hard failure for SDK
users. It dropped the null-router guard in
_select_search_tool_from_router, so a missing router now yields an empty
search_tools list instead of returning early, and it turned the no-match
case in _select_search_tool_from_list from a debug-logged fallback into
a raised ValueError. It also added a call site in
async_pre_call_deployment_hook that invokes the selection purely for the
side effect of raising, discarding the return value
Used together, any SDK caller that sets search_tool_name and sends a web
search tool now raises "Configured search tool '<name>' was not found"
on every request. There is no way to satisfy the check off the proxy,
because search_tools is only ever populated from the proxy router, so
the SDK path cannot register one
tests/pass_through_unit_tests/test_websearch_interception_e2e.py caught
this, but #38113 only updated the handler unit tests, so the break
landed on staging
Reverting restores the previous behavior while we work out a fix that
keeps the stricter validation on the proxy path, where a silently
substituted search provider is the real problem worth rejecting, without
turning the SDK path into an unconditional error
The pure helpers express the same regression: the save-side drop must
leave the alias in place, and two registries must expand it to their
own ids. The full validate path is already covered by the
persists-verbatim test and the live e2e test.
A single-instance run cannot reproduce the two-region setup, but the
regression is fully visible in one: the alias must survive to /key/info
unrewritten, and the alias-granted key must still list the server's
tools. The broken write path stored the resolved server id instead.
Since PR #29128, key create/update/regenerate resolved every
object_permission.mcp_servers entry against the saving instance's
DB + config registry and persisted the resolved server ids. For
config-loaded servers the id is derived from a hash of the regional
URL, so in a shared-database multi-region deployment the rewrite baked
one region's ids into the row and every other region denied the key.
Grants written before v1.88.0 kept the raw alias and kept working,
which is why only newly provisioned keys broke.
Keep the validation and the stale-entry drop (the LIT-3278 fix), but
persist the caller's original identifiers for everything that resolves.
Read-time expand_permission_list already maps a name to each region's
local server id.
* fix(proxy): include litellm_model_table in GET /v2/team/list
GET /v2/team/list built its find_many queries without joining the
LiteLLM_ModelTable relation, so litellm_model_table (and the
model_aliases it carries) always read back as null there, same bug
class as GH #26312 which PR #33047 fixed on /team/info and /team/list
but never touched this endpoint.
* fix(test): assert observable output, not mock calls, in v2 team list test
The test-quality gate flagged the regression test for asserting on
find_many's call args instead of what the caller gets back. Rewritten
so the fake find_many only attaches litellm_model_table when its own
include kwarg asks for it, so the assertions are on the response.
* fix(proxy): drop invalid litellm_model_table include on deleted-team query
Greptile caught that LiteLLM_DeletedTeamTable has no litellm_model_table
relation in the Prisma schema, so passing that include on the deleted-team
find_many raised UnknownRelationalFieldError against a real database on
every GET /v2/team/list?status=deleted call. Confirmed live against
Postgres. Scope the fix to the active-team branch only, where the relation
exists; update the test to reflect that and assert the deleted branch no
longer requests it.
