Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mateo Wang
f769aa4675
fix(router): give cooldowns their own cache so siblings see a bench in ~1s (#40025)
Cooldown entries rode the router-wide DualCache, which re-reads a key that is
missing from memory at most once every 10s. A deployment benched on one replica
therefore kept taking traffic on its siblings for up to 10 seconds, and the same
shared in-memory tier could evict a live cooldown once 200 unrelated router keys
crowded it out, which sent even the benching replica back to the dead deployment.

CooldownCache now owns a DualCache over the router's Redis with a 1s read
interval and an in-memory tier that only holds cooldown keys. Redis is attached
lazily because the router builds the cooldown cache before it wires Redis up.
2026-09-08 10:11:20 -07:00
yuneng-jiang
6a0d03914c
test: drop the cwd-relative sys.path.insert calls from the test suite (#37802)
* test: drop the cwd-relative sys.path.insert calls from the test suite

TQ003 stands at 1,077 across 1,058 files, and 1,015 of them are the same shape:
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath("../..")) and its deeper siblings. The
argument resolves against the working directory rather than the file, so from
the repo root, where every job runs pytest, it inserts the directory two levels
above the checkout. It has never pointed at litellm. The package is installed
into the environment anyway, which is what actually makes the import work, and
what the rule's message has said all along.

Removing them leaves 1,634 imports of sys and os with no remaining reference,
and those go too, except where another test module imports the name back out of
the file. The rest of TQ003 is 62 call sites that resolve against __file__ or a
variable, which are a different question and are left alone.

Collection is identical either way: 45,871 tests and the same 51 pre-existing
collection errors before and after, and ruff reports no new undefined name.

* test: drop the duplicate imports the sys.path sweep exposed to F811

* test(pre-call-utils): restore the os import the new bedrock tests need
2026-08-22 09:25:58 -07:00
Deepanshu Lulla
05943b47a3
fix(router): cool down failed fallback deployments and correct cooldown TTL after Redis backfill (#35104)
* fix(router): cool down failed fallback deployments and correct cooldown TTL after Redis backfill

A deployment that failed partway through a fallback chain (any attempt after
the first) was silently exempt from cooldown, because the has_logged_async_failure
dedup flag blocks the normal failure callback for every attempt past the first.
_trigger_cooldown_for_failed_deployment now explicitly evaluates cooldown for
that deployment when the dedup flag is set, using the same deployment-config >
response-header > router-default precedence as the primary failure path, and
skips advisor-orchestration failures. Deployment-ID resolution prefers the
exception's stamped failed_deployment_id, now also set from the generic-API-call
fallback path (rerank, embeddings, /v1/messages, etc.), falling back to metadata
inspection for call paths that don't stamp it yet.

CooldownCache also recomputes the remaining TTL when DualCache promotes a Redis
entry into the in-memory layer: before this, a cooldown entry restored from Redis
kept the in-memory layer's default 600s TTL regardless of the deployment's real
cooldown_time, so a deployment could stay excluded from routing for up to 10
minutes after a much shorter cooldown had already expired.

* fix(router): address Greptile review on the fallback-cooldown trigger

Two P1 findings on PR #35104:

- _trigger_cooldown_for_failed_deployment never incremented the deployment's
  per-minute failure counter before evaluating cooldown, so a fallback
  deployment's repeated retryable failures never accumulated toward the
  default percent-fail-rate threshold that _should_cooldown_deployment checks.

- The metadata-bucket fallback (checking "metadata" before "litellm_metadata"
  for a deployment_model_name marker) could be fooled by a caller with
  permission to set metadata, since neither bucket's authorship can be
  determined without knowing the call's function_name. Removed it entirely;
  cooldown now requires the server-stamped failed_deployment_id, matching
  what the primary chat-completions path and the generic-API-call path
  (rerank, embeddings, /v1/messages, etc.) already set unconditionally.

* fix(router): freeze the litellm_params fallback mapping to satisfy the type-discipline gate

* fix(router): defer f-string interpolation in fallback-cooldown debug logs

* fix(router): annotate cooldown-path locals with Final to satisfy the LIT010 budget

* fix(router): don't cool down deployments for request-scoped 404s on generic API fallbacks

* fix(router): stamp the dynamic client-side-credential deployment id, not the shared static one

* fix(router): don't cool down deployments for a caller-supplied x-litellm-timeout

* fix(router): stamp dynamic client-side-credential id in completion fallback paths too

The generic-API-call helper already stamped the effective (dynamic-if-client-side-credential)
deployment id on exceptions, but the regular _completion/_acompletion exception handlers still
stamped the static shared deployment's id. A tenant using invalid forwarded credentials could
generate repeated failures attributed to, and eventually cooling down, the shared deployment
other tenants rely on. Extracted the stamping logic into one shared helper used by all three
call sites (generic API, sync completion, async completion) so the fix and future changes to it
stay in one place.

* test(router): add direct-reference unit tests for the new stamping helper

router_code_coverage.py's coverage gate flags _stamp_failed_deployment_id_with_effective_model_info
as untested because it only sees the function invoked indirectly through _completion/_acompletion's
exception handlers. Added two tests that call it directly, covering both the dynamic-id-present and
static-fallback branches.

* test(router): cover the timeout stamping branch and async active-cooldown append

_acompletion's litellm.Timeout handler and async_get_active_cooldowns' happy
path both lacked direct coverage despite their sibling branches (the generic
Exception handler, the sync get_active_cooldowns) being tested.

* test(router): remove duplicate cooldown-trigger and fallback-helper tests

#34416 landed its own TestTriggerCooldownForFailedDeployment/
TestRunAsyncFallbackTriggersCooldown classes and
test_ageneric_api_call_with_fallbacks_helper_stamps_failed_deployment_id
covering the exact same scenarios as this branch's earlier flat-function
tests, once its version of fallback_event_handlers.py was taken as-is
during the last merge. Dropping the redundant copies.

---------

Co-authored-by: Deepanshu <deepanshu.lulla@alpha-sense.com>
2026-08-10 16:51:55 -07:00
Deepanshu Lulla
0580465384
feat(router): add per-deployment allowed_fails_policy and cooldown_time override support (#34416)
* feat(router): add per-deployment allowed_fails_policy and cooldown_time override support

Three bugs fixed in the router cooldown system: (1) deployment-level allowed_fails and
allowed_fails_policy in model_info now take precedence over router-level settings in
_should_cooldown_deployment; (2) failed fallback deployments now get evaluated for
cooldown via _trigger_cooldown_for_failed_deployment, bypassing the Logging dedup gate;
(3) DualCache promotes Redis cooldown entries using default 600s TTL instead of true
remaining cooldown time -- _corrected_active_cooldown now evicts expired entries and
corrects stale in-memory TTLs on backfill. Adds ServiceUnavailableError, BadGatewayError,
and NotFoundError fields to AllowedFailsPolicy and cooldown_time to LiteLLMParamsTypedDict.

* fix(router): gate fallback cooldown trigger on has_logged_async_failure; use only litellm_metadata for deployment ID

* fix(router): use X | Y union syntax to fix UP007 strict lint gate

* test(router_utils): add coverage for _trigger_cooldown_for_failed_deployment and has_logged_async_failure gate

* test(router_utils): cover deployment cooldown override and exception swallow paths

* fix(router): add InternalServerError/ServiceUnavailableError/BadGatewayError/NotFoundError to router-level get_allowed_fails_from_policy

* fix(router): format router.py and add router-level policy tests

* test(router): add CI-visible coverage for per-deployment cooldown policy

Tests for `_get_deployment_cooldown_policy`, `_resolve_allowed_fails_from_policy`,
and `_should_cooldown_based_on_deployment_policy` (cooldown_handlers.py), the
`_corrected_active_cooldown` branches in CooldownCache, and the four new
exception-type branches in `Router.get_allowed_fails_from_policy` (router.py) --
all in `tests/test_litellm/` which the enterprise-routing CI job runs.

* fix(router): use is not None guard for cooldown_time_override in should_cooldown_based_on_allowed_fails_policy

A cooldown_time_override of 0 was previously treated as falsy and silently
fell through to the router-level cooldown_time value. Switched to an explicit
is not None check so that zero is honored as a valid override.

Added a regression test covering the zero case.

* fix(router): honor has_logged_async_failure and metadata for fallback cooldown; support both model_info and litellm_params locations

Manual verification against a live proxy surfaced that the fallback-cooldown-gap
trigger never actually fired: the has_logged_async_failure check read a plain
attribute that Logging never sets (the real flag lives in model_call_details),
and the deployment_id lookup only trusted litellm_metadata, which regular chat
completions never populate (only batch/thread/file endpoints do). Router
overwrites model_info on whichever key is present before every attempt, so
metadata is equally authoritative there, not caller-controlled as previously
assumed. Also let allowed_fails/allowed_fails_policy/cooldown_time be set under
either model_info or litellm_params, each preferring its own canonical location.

* fix(router): fix ContentPolicyViolationError policy shadowing and partial-policy zero-threshold

Two bugs from Greptile review on PR #34416:

- ContentPolicyViolationError subclasses BadRequestError, so listing
  BadRequestError first in _EXCEPTION_POLICY_FIELDS made the isinstance
  check always match BadRequestError for content-policy errors, using the
  wrong allowed_fails threshold. Reordered so the subclass is checked first.

- A deployment with a partial allowed_fails_policy and no deployment-wide
  allowed_fails forced allowed_fails_override=0 for any exception type its
  policy didn't cover, cooling the deployment down on the first unrelated
  failure. Now defers to router-level behavior for uncovered exception
  types instead of forcing an immediate cooldown.

* fix(router): only trust a metadata/litellm_metadata bucket the router itself wrote deployment info into

veria-ai flagged that preferring litellm_metadata whenever present could pick up a
caller-supplied litellm_metadata.model_info.id (preserved via allow_client_pricing_override)
instead of the metadata bucket the router actually populated for a regular completion's
fallback attempt, naming an arbitrary "victim" deployment for cooldown.

Router._update_kwargs_with_deployment() always writes model_info and
deployment_model_name into the same bucket together. Only trust a bucket that
carries deployment_model_name alongside model_info, since that marker is only
ever set by the router itself, not by request-body metadata.

* test(router): add regression coverage for ContentPolicyViolationError policy shadowing

The subclass-ordering fix in commit 38fe4e4490 had no regression test.
Verified the new test fails on the pre-fix ordering (asserts 2, got 10)
before restoring the fix, and confirmed the same behavior through the full
_should_cooldown_deployment call path against a real Router instance.

* fix(router): let explicit allowed_fails_policy entries override the generic 4XX cooldown exclusion

_is_cooldown_required skips cooldown evaluation for any 4XX status outside
{429, 401, 408, 404} by default, since a generic client error is usually not
the deployment's fault. BadRequestError and ContentPolicyViolationError both
carry status 400, so their AllowedFailsPolicy fields (BadRequestErrorAllowedFails,
ContentPolicyViolationErrorAllowedFails, both router-level pre-existing and the
new deployment-level ones) were silently unreachable: an operator could set
them to any value with no effect, since _is_cooldown_required blocked cooldown
evaluation before that policy was ever consulted.

_should_run_cooldown_logic now also checks whether an explicit allowed_fails_policy
entry (deployment-level or router-level) covers the exception's type, and if so,
proceeds with cooldown evaluation regardless of the generic status-code exclusion.
The exclusion remains the default for exception types with no explicit policy.

Verified live against a mock-triggered ContentPolicyViolationError (config-level
mock_response, azure/gpt-4.1-mini deployment) with BadRequestErrorAllowedFails=100
and ContentPolicyViolationErrorAllowedFails=0 on the same deployment: it now cools
down after exactly one ContentPolicyViolationError instead of never cooling down.

* fix(router): use the router-stamped failed_deployment_id for fallback cooldown targeting

Greptile flagged a real gap in the metadata-bucket-based deployment lookup:
for a generic-API-call fallback, the router writes the current attempt into
litellm_metadata, but a stale "metadata" bucket carrying the same
deployment_model_name marker (from an earlier point) would be picked first,
cooling the wrong deployment.

Router already has a more robust, pre-existing mechanism for this exact
problem: _set_failed_deployment_id_on_exception stamps the failing
deployment's id directly onto the exception at the point of failure,
immune to metadata-bucket ambiguity since a caller can't influence it and
it doesn't depend on which bucket the current call type happens to use.
It just wasn't called from _ageneric_api_call_with_fallbacks_helper's
except block, unlike _completion/_acompletion.

Added the missing call there (matching the existing pattern exactly), and
changed _trigger_cooldown_for_failed_deployment to prefer
exception.failed_deployment_id when present, falling back to metadata-bucket
inspection only for call paths that don't stamp it yet.

Verified live: the standard fallback-cooldown-gap scenario (two bad-key
deployments in a fallback chain) still correctly cools down both the
originally-called and fallback deployment.

* fix(router): address human review on per-deployment cooldown overrides

Scope allowed_fails_policy override to deployment-level only (a router-level
policy predates this feature and must keep its existing behavior), exempt
advisor-orchestration failures from the fallback cooldown trigger, keep the
single-deployment model group protection intact against a generic
deployment-level allowed_fails, make cooldown_time precedence consistent
across resolution paths, fix a falsy-zero swallowing bug in the router-level
allowed_fails fallback, and make allowed_fails_policy resolution fall through
to the next matching exception type instead of stopping at the first unset
field.

Also restrict allowed_fails/allowed_fails_policy/cooldown_time to model_info:
litellm_params gets copied into the actual provider request, so a router-only
setting placed there would leak into that request.

* test(router): update test_cooldown_handlers.py for the deployment-policy signature change

Surfaced by the rebase: this mirrored test file (tests/test_litellm/ mirrors
litellm/) predates the router_unit_tests/ coverage added earlier in this PR and
was still calling _should_cooldown_based_on_deployment_policy with its old
4-argument signature and asserting the now-removed litellm_params cooldown_time
location.

* test(router): update test_fallback_event_handlers.py for model_info-only cooldown_time

Another mirrored test file surfaced by the rebase that still asserted the
now-removed litellm_params.cooldown_time location.

* fix(router): match cooldown-duration precedence in the fallback path to the primary path

_trigger_cooldown_for_failed_deployment only checked deployment config before
falling back to the router default, skipping the response Retry-After header
step that Router.deployment_callback_on_failure applies on the primary path.

* fix(router): restore litellm_params.cooldown_time as a pre-existing fallback

cooldown_time already had litellm_params support on Router.deployment_callback_on_failure
before this PR; the earlier model_info-only restriction (aimed at the leak concern
for the genuinely new allowed_fails/allowed_fails_policy fields) incorrectly dropped
that pre-existing capability too. model_info still takes priority when both are set.

* fix(router): keep the fallback-cooldown trigger in sync with #35104's review fixes

Applies the same two fixes landed on the split-out PR #35104 (which #34416
still duplicates until it's rebased onto the merged base): increment the
deployment's per-minute failure counter before evaluating cooldown, and
require the server-stamped failed_deployment_id instead of trusting a
metadata bucket, since neither "metadata" nor "litellm_metadata" can be told
apart from a caller-supplied one without knowing the call's function_name.

* fix(router): freeze the model_info fallback mapping to satisfy the type-discipline gate

* fix(router): defer f-string interpolation in fallback-cooldown debug logs

* fix(router): annotate cooldown-path locals with Final to satisfy the LIT010 budget

* fix(router): suppress reportPrivateUsage for cross-module cooldown helpers

* fix(router): don't cool down deployments for request-scoped 404s on generic API fallbacks

* fix(router): stamp the dynamic client-side-credential deployment id, not the shared static one

* fix(router): keep up with upstream typing modernization and Final-annotation ratchet

* fix(router): don't cool down deployments for a caller-supplied x-litellm-timeout

* fix(router): stamp dynamic client-side-credential id in completion fallback paths too

The generic-API-call helper already stamped the effective (dynamic-if-client-side-credential)
deployment id on exceptions, but the regular _completion/_acompletion exception handlers still
stamped the static shared deployment's id. A tenant using invalid forwarded credentials could
generate repeated failures attributed to, and eventually cooling down, the shared deployment
other tenants rely on. Extracted the stamping logic into one shared helper used by all three
call sites (generic API, sync completion, async completion) so the fix and future changes to it
stay in one place.

* fix(proxy): recognize body-supplied timeout/request_timeout/stream_timeout as caller-controlled

client_side_timeout was only set when the caller used the x-litellm-timeout header, but
Router._get_timeout also resolves the effective timeout from kwargs["timeout"],
kwargs["request_timeout"], and kwargs["stream_timeout"], all settable directly in the
request body (and x-litellm-stream-timeout wasn't marked either). A caller could set any
of those to a near-zero value, force a 408 on every deployment in a fallback chain, and
cool down deployments other tenants rely on without the guard in
_trigger_cooldown_for_failed_deployment recognizing it as caller-controlled. Also strip
any client-forged client_side_timeout from the request body so the marker is always
server-computed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Deepanshu <deepanshu.lulla@alpha-sense.com>
2026-08-10 11:02:06 -07:00
Krrish Dholakia
bc9d0484e4 fix(cooldown_cache.py): mask error string to avoid leaking sensitive prompt data
Fixes https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/13329
2025-08-11 18:37:57 -07:00