A gpt-5 model accepts a non-default temperature only while its effective reasoning
effort resolves to "none". litellm had no representation of the effort a model applies
when the request omits reasoning_effort, so it substituted supports_none_reasoning_effort,
which is a different fact. Every model that supports "none" without defaulting to it
therefore had temperature forwarded and rejected upstream, and because the carve-out
returned before the drop_params branch, drop_params: true could not save it.
Declare the fact instead. A new cost-map key, default_reasoning_effort, states the effort
the provider applies when the request omits one, and one shared predicate resolves the
effective effort from it: an explicit reasoning_effort wins, otherwise the declared
default, otherwise the catalogue decides.
That last step matters because the cost map is fetched from the published branch at import
time, so it can be OLDER than the code reading it. On such a map every model looks
undeclared, and reading that as "reasoning is active" would strip temperature from the 39
gpt-5.1/5.2/5.4 entries that accept it, a regression caused by data lag rather than by
anything about the model. So an absent declaration is only meaningful once the catalogue
carries the key at all; a map that predates the feature keeps the answer litellm gave
before it existed, and the conservative answer applies from the moment the data lands.
The top_p/logprobs/top_logprobs gate carried the same assumption spelled differently and
now shares the predicate, as does the Responses API, which reimplemented the rule and is
what the default /v1/messages bridge routes openai models through. Azure normalises its
routing names in one resolver that every capability lookup goes through, which replaces
its bespoke per-lookup rewrite.
Declared on the 37 gpt-5.1/5.2/5.4 entries measured to accept temperature=0 today, so
their behaviour is unchanged. The 23 gpt-5.5/5.6 entries that reject it stay undeclared
and are fixed once the catalogue carries the key.
Resolves LIT-3797
Resolves LIT-5028
Kimi K3 accepts exactly low, high and max, defaults to max, and always thinks.
The map could not say that: medium and high have no supports_*_reasoning_effort
flag because every other reasoning model takes them, so the ten kimi-k3 entries
carried supports_reasoning alone and resolved to unknown. The dashboard then fell
back to a capability-blind level list that deliberately omits max, which is why a
kimi-k3 tier cannot be set to max thinking today.
Add reasoning_effort_levels, an array key in the shape the map already uses for
supported_endpoints and supported_modalities. Where present it is read first and
wins whole; every other entry keeps answering through the per-level flags,
unchanged. It is deliberately a different name from the computed
ModelGroupInfo.supported_reasoning_efforts, which stays derived from a group's
deployments and is never seeded from one deployment's model_info.
The levels are per entry rather than per model, because the deployments differ:
Moonshot, Together, Fireworks and Azure Foundry all forward the level unchanged
and get the model's own low/high/max, while Perplexity documents a six-value
enum it maps down internally and gets that. The /v1/messages degradation chain
consults the same declaration, so the level the map advertises is the level that
path forwards.
Gemini API Maps-grounded prompts were billed as web search and Vertex AI Maps-grounded prompts were not billed at all. Classify grounding metadata per candidate into web search vs Maps requests, carry a distinct google_maps_grounding_requests usage counter through non-streaming and streaming paths, and price it via the new google_maps_grounding_cost_per_query cost map key with per-query and per-prompt defaults keyed off web_search_billing_unit. Fixes#35906
Regenerate model_prices_and_context_window.schema.json and add the flag to
the inline validator schema in test_utils.py so the new cost-map key passes
validate-model-prices-json and the JSON-valid test.
The cache control hook also runs on litellm.responses() input. On a
GPT-5.6 deployment it wrapped a string-content item into a chat-shaped
{"type": "text"} part, which the Responses API rejects, and it never
marked input_text, input_image or input_file parts, so no breakpoint and
no prompt_cache_options reached the provider. Add the Responses part
types to the eligible block set and translate chat-shaped text parts on
non-assistant items to input_text in
ResponsesAPIRequestUtils.merge_prompt_management_input, which both the
async and the sync prompt management sites go through.
The dialect also fired for any GPT-5.6 name that resolved to provider
openai, including deployments pointed at a custom api_base that does not
understand prompt_cache_breakpoint. Decide it once per request from the
provider, the model map and the resolved api_base (request, then
litellm.api_base, then OPENAI_BASE_URL / OPENAI_API_BASE): only
api.openai.com and *.api.openai.com hosts speak the dialect, a top-level
prompt_cache_options opts a custom target in, and litellm_proxy/ targets
never get it. maybe_seed_default_injection_points takes api_base and
stamps the finished decision on the points as _litellm_openai_dialect so
the sync completion() path, whose hook params do not carry api_base,
honors it; maybe_inject_cache_control takes api_base from the
/v1/messages handler.
Eligibility now comes from a supports_prompt_cache_breakpoint model map
flag on the OpenAI gpt-5.6 entries, exposed through
litellm.utils.supports_prompt_cache_breakpoint, with the GPT version rule
kept only for models the map does not know. The OpenAI dialect no longer
reserves a slot for tool_config points, which OpenAI has no cache block
for, and with_prompt_cache_breakpoint plus the chat bridge helper return
a new block instead of mutating their input.
Price ApplyGuardrail usage units recorded by PR #37225 with a new
bedrock/guardrails entry in the model cost map (regional override via
bedrock/{region}/guardrails), add the per-request guardrail_cost to the
standard logging payload's response_cost and CostBreakdown, surface it in
the x-litellm-response-cost header, and bill blocked requests through the
failure hook so key and team budgets see what AWS bills
