some users do not use make pre-commit as it is a multi-minute process. I personally use it but I want users themselves to decide whether to pre-commit before each commit or not, based on what works best for them
LIT001/LIT002 and the typing.Dict ban all steered dict-shaped values to
frozen dataclasses or suppression even though the checker already accepts
MappingProxyType as a freezing wrapper; the messages now name it so the
dict-shaped freeze path is actually discoverable at fix time.
The 15-25 word cap previously applied only to replies/rebuttals to AI PR
review bots; it now covers every GitHub comment (issue comments and PR
discussion comments included). The public-writing punctuation bullet also
gains a warning that a word cap is not a one-sentence cap, so tight budgets
should be met with period splits or conjunctions rather than ";" splices,
at most one ";" per message
* feat(pre-commit): save full lint output to a per-worktree log file
* docs(claude): point agents at the pre-commit log instead of rerunning
* fix(pre-commit): warn when the log cannot be created or fully written
For a backend-only commit, staging the regenerated schema.d.ts newly
satisfies the ui file triggers, so the folder-wide dashboard lint
budgets run locally for the first time and CI's frontend-lint job
(budgets plus knip) activates on the PR. Those can only fail from
pre-existing dashboard-tree state, never from the regenerated file,
but the guidance should say so instead of implying a re-run is
always redundant.
The stale-types failure already writes the regenerated schema.d.ts to the
working tree, and staging it cannot introduce a new failure: the file is
listed in .prettierignore and the eslint config ignores, so no lint pass
sees it, and gen:api derives it purely from the Python proxy code, so a
second regeneration is a no-op. The only reason left to re-run is when
other checks also failed, so say exactly that in the script message and
CLAUDE.md instead of prescribing an unconditional re-run.
Removes the scheduled workflow that cut litellm_oss_daily_YYYY_MM_DD
branches and the guardrails workflow that only ran on them. The secret
scan and ruff checks that workflow duplicated already run on PRs to
litellm_internal_staging via test-linting.yml, so no coverage is lost.
Retargets contributor-facing messaging in CONTRIBUTING.md, CLAUDE.md,
and the guard-main-branch error output at litellm_internal_staging.
