From b134dbfe7361cd30ee3e5976588149b106b53e6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mateo-berri <277851410+mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:19:51 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] test: exempt _resolved_provider in router_code_coverage gate --- tests/code_coverage_tests/router_code_coverage.py | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tests/code_coverage_tests/router_code_coverage.py b/tests/code_coverage_tests/router_code_coverage.py index c541c035db7..a5e00799519 100644 --- a/tests/code_coverage_tests/router_code_coverage.py +++ b/tests/code_coverage_tests/router_code_coverage.py @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ ignored_function_names = [ "_merge_tools_from_deployment", # Tested indirectly via _update_kwargs_with_deployment (test files lack "router" in name) "_invalidate_access_groups_cache", # Tested indirectly via set_model_list, upsert_model etc. (test files lack "router" in name) "has_buffered_provider_output", # Property, so its reads in test_router.py are never an ast.Call + "_resolved_provider", # Tested via get_pattern in test_pattern_match_deployments.py (file lacks "router" in name) ]