From 30caa9e4e1450b904c1ecdf6ba22bdc501452557 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: MOHIT PRASANTH KALAHASTHI
 <22170424+mohitprasanth@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 22:24:18 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Honour runs_on_no_log in should_run_callback instead of
 sniffing class names

---
 litellm/litellm_core_utils/litellm_logging.py | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/litellm/litellm_core_utils/litellm_logging.py b/litellm/litellm_core_utils/litellm_logging.py
index 9475441e214..af0faf9200d 100644
--- a/litellm/litellm_core_utils/litellm_logging.py
+++ b/litellm/litellm_core_utils/litellm_logging.py
@@ -1669,7 +1669,21 @@ class Logging(LiteLLMLoggingBaseClass):
         if litellm_params.get("no-log", False) is True:
             # proxy cost tracking cal backs should run
 
-            if not (isinstance(callback, CustomLogger) and "_PROXY_" in callback.__class__.__name__):
+            if not (
+
+                isinstance(callback, CustomLogger)
+
+                and (
+
+                    callback.runs_on_no_log
+
+                    # Retained for callbacks predating `runs_on_no_log`.
+
+                    or "_PROXY_" in callback.__class__.__name__
+
+                )
+
+            ):
                 verbose_logger.debug("no-log request, skipping logging for %s event", event_hook)
                 return False