# HyperTwist Later Permissive Live State Reconciliation - 2026-05-27 ## Status This document is the board-scoped reconciliation note for the later permissive live-state correction inside HyperTwist's original `71`-row shallow-eval set. It answers one narrow question: - does the current `71`-row board still correctly describe six later `Phase 6R` permissive rows as future candidates and `poliva/cubedex` as a landed live permissive lane, or have later implementation and later hierarchy work reversed that split Result: - six later permissive `Phase 6R` rows are already landed inside the `71`-row board and must now be treated as preserve-or-later-widen owner lanes - `poliva/cubedex` is no longer a landed permissive lane and now survives only as restrictive comparison context for a narrower smartcube practice/review/SRS slice - no product-code reopening is required - yes selective authority backfill is required ## Source basis - `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md` - `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md` - `C:\HyperTwist\docs\REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md` - `C:\HyperTwist\docs\v6_5_deep_manual_pack\HyperTwist\ROADMAP.md` - `C:\HyperTwist\docs\v6_5_deep_manual_pack\HyperTwist\FEATURE_REGISTRY.md` - `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_IMPLEMENTATION_PHASE_1_KICKOFF.md` - `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_SMARTCUBE_PRACTICE_REVIEW_AND_SRS_HIERARCHY_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-27.md` ## Board-scoped live correction Inside the original `71`-row shallow-eval board, later current-live permissive lanes now also include: - `HactarCE/Hyperspeedcube` - `kkoomen/qbr` - `vivaansinghvi07/rubix-cube-solver` - `roice3/MagicTile` - `roice3/Magic120Cell` - `roice3/MagicCube5D` At the same time: - `poliva/cubedex` is no longer a landed permissive lane - `poliva/cubedex` is no longer the default next clean-room queue row - `poliva/cubedex` remains useful only as restrictive comparison context for smartcube-aware practice-shell behavior, review/SRS UX, recognition-versus- execution timing presentation, and local stats/history comparison Current board-scoped counts are therefore: - `71` total curated repo rows - `29` current live repo rows - `18` live permissive rows - `6` live boundary-sensitive rows - `5` live restrictive clean-room rows - `42` current non-live rows This note is intentionally board-scoped. Broader later product live truth is higher once the later speech/provider rows that live outside this original `71`-row shallow-eval board are included. That broader truth stays with `ROADMAP.md`, `FEATURE_REGISTRY.md`, and the later speech/provider packet stack rather than with this board. ## Why the old board split is now stale Later current authority already says: - `HactarCE/Hyperspeedcube` is landed through bounded `Phase 6R-A/K/L/M/N` and is closed for the currently justified retained families - `kkoomen/qbr` is landed through bounded `Phase 6R-B/O` and remains partially incorporated rather than non-live - `vivaansinghvi07/rubix-cube-solver` is landed through bounded `Phase 6R-C/P/Q` and remains partially incorporated rather than non-live - `roice3/MagicTile` is landed through bounded `Phase 6R-D/T` and remains partially incorporated rather than non-live - `roice3/Magic120Cell` is landed through bounded `Phase 6R-I` and remains partially incorporated rather than non-live - `roice3/MagicCube5D` is landed through bounded `Phase 6R-J` and remains partially incorporated rather than non-live - `poliva/cubedex` should no longer be treated as a landed permissive lane and should no longer be treated as the next default clean-room queue row That means the old board split of: - `24` live rows - `13` live permissive rows - `35` non-live permissive candidate rows - `12` reference/benchmark/discard rows is now historical only. The corrected board split is: - `29` live rows - `18` live permissive rows - `29` non-live permissive candidate rows - `13` reference/benchmark/discard rows ## Current preserve-and-widen rule For the six later permissive rows: - do not route future work from the old candidate queue wording - do not reopen `Phase 0R`, `Phase 1R`, or `Phase 2R` as if these rows were still awaiting first implementation - start future preservation or later widening from `ROADMAP.md`, `FEATURE_REGISTRY.md`, `REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`, and the repo-specific landed `Phase 6R-*` packets For `poliva/cubedex`: - do not treat it as a live permissive lane - do not treat it as the default next clean-room packet row - start any later comparison or reopening decision from current first-party training/review/timer/smart-device owner surfaces, `REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`, and the `2026-05-27` smartcube practice/review/SRS hierarchy reconciliation note ## Final call The correct current board-scoped operator posture is: - preserve six later landed permissive `Phase 6R` rows as live owner lanes - preserve `poliva/cubedex` only as restrictive comparison context - keep the original `24`-row board split as historical only - do not reopen product code from this pass