Backfill PostHog reference provenance

This commit is contained in:
axiomlogicnexus 2026-05-27 16:13:03 +02:00
parent 7927e2902d
commit f62e856bee
3 changed files with 145 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -385,15 +385,16 @@ additional live non-71 surfaces are now complete, including `SpeedCubeDB`,
`CubingApp`, `superliminal.com`, and `Superliminal Wiki`.
The retained-web-content reference side, the `screenpipe/screenpipe`
capture-history reference side, and the `remotion-dev/remotion` media-export
reference side are now explicit.
capture-history reference side, the `remotion-dev/remotion` media-export
reference side, and the `PostHog/posthog` control-plane reference side are now
explicit.
The next clean bounded move is a source-backed pass on the remaining
repo-backed reference-incorporation families whose hierarchy or canon
follow-through is still only implicit in
`hypertwist-reference-incorporation-targets.json`, starting with
`PostHog/posthog` if you want the adjacent boundary-sensitive control-plane
reference side closed to the same standard.
`google/model-viewer/packages/shared-assets` if you want the adjacent
boundary-sensitive shared-assets provenance side closed to the same standard.
For the readable all-rows follow-up board that pairs this audit with the reset schedule, use:

View file

@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
# HyperTwist PostHog Reference Incorporation Provenance Board - 2026-05-27
## Status
This document is the source-backed provenance and hierarchy note for the live
repo-backed reference-incorporation side currently materialized from
`PostHog/posthog`.
It closes the source-specific reference side that remained implicit after the
landed `Phase 4R-D` packet and the broader live-lane and mixed-license-boundary
audits.
It answers one narrow question:
- do the live `PostHog/posthog` reference targets reopen already landed
first-party control-plane, replay-diagnostic, and rollout-governance
implementation, or do they instead need a reference-side provenance-board and
canon backfill
Result:
- no product-code reopening is required
- yes reference-side provenance-board and feature-canon backfill is required
## Source basis
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HT_REPO_INCORPORATION_AUDIT_2026-05-11.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_4R_PACKET_4R_D_POSTHOG_CONTROL_PLANE_IMPLEMENTATION_2026-05-13.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_LIVE_LANES_SOURCE_AND_PRESERVATION_AUDIT_2026-05-13.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\v6_5_deep_manual_pack\HyperTwist\FEATURE_REGISTRY.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\UnrealHyperTwist\Content\HyperTwistTraining\MaterializedCatalog\hypertwist-reference-incorporation-targets.json`
- `C:\HyperTwist\UnrealHyperTwist\Content\HyperTwistTraining\MaterializedCatalog\raw-extracts\posthog-posthog-control-plane-reference-pages.jsonl`
## Counts confirmed from current first-party materialization
Current live `PostHog/posthog` reference-incorporation targets:
- `6` total rewritten reference targets
- all `6` are under `Control-Plane Telemetry and Replay Governance`
- all `6` stay inside the already-landed `Phase 4R-D` bounded lane
Exact surfaces:
1. `reference/posthog-replay-diagnostics-reference-page`
- `SurfaceType`: `control-plane-replay-diagnostic-reference`
- `IncorporationChannel`: `replay-diagnostic-contract`
- `TargetAssetFamily`: `replay-diagnostic-note`
2. `reference/posthog-replay-segmentation-reference-page`
- `SurfaceType`: `control-plane-replay-segmentation-reference`
- `IncorporationChannel`: `replay-segmentation-contract`
- `TargetAssetFamily`: `replay-segmentation-note`
3. `reference/posthog-feature-governance-reference-page`
- `SurfaceType`: `control-plane-feature-governance-reference`
- `IncorporationChannel`: `feature-governance-contract`
- `TargetAssetFamily`: `feature-governance-note`
4. `reference/posthog-scheduled-change-reference-page`
- `SurfaceType`: `control-plane-scheduled-change-reference`
- `IncorporationChannel`: `scheduled-change-contract`
- `TargetAssetFamily`: `scheduled-change-note`
5. `reference/posthog-early-access-reference-page`
- `SurfaceType`: `control-plane-early-access-reference`
- `IncorporationChannel`: `early-access-rollout-contract`
- `TargetAssetFamily`: `early-access-note`
6. `reference/posthog-compliance-boundary-reference-page`
- `SurfaceType`: `control-plane-compliance-boundary-reference`
- `IncorporationChannel`: `compliance-boundary`
- `TargetAssetFamily`: `compliance-boundary-note`
Important adjacent fact:
- all six targets preserve the explicit `MIT`-outside-`ee/` versus enterprise
`ee/` exclusion boundary already enforced by the landed lane
## Slice-local verdict
| Slice | Primary authority | Secondary value kept | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-party control-plane, replay-diagnostic, and rollout-governance implementation | first-party current code plus landed `Phase 4R-D` packet | retained `PostHog/posthog` reference targets stay subordinate provenance-grounding surfaces | unchanged live implementation owner |
| Rewritten replay-diagnostic, replay-segmentation, feature-governance, scheduled-change, and early-access grounding | `PostHog/posthog` retained boundary-sensitive lane | factual replay-triage, rollout, lifecycle, and governance semantics are preserved while prose remains first-party | unchanged retained reference-grounding surface beneath first-party contracts |
| Mixed-license and enterprise-subtree compliance boundary grounding | `PostHog/posthog` retained boundary-sensitive lane | the `MIT`-core versus `ee/` exclusion boundary stays explicit in a first-party compliance note | unchanged bounded compliance-grounding surface |
## Why no product-code reopening is required
The live surfaces here are already rewritten first-party targets, not copied
donor pages or donor product-shell UI.
The checked targets explicitly require:
- preserving factual replay-diagnostic, replay-segmentation, rollout,
early-access, and compliance semantics
- rewriting donor wording, donor analytics-shell framing, and any broader
product, cloud, account, or experimentation-platform assumptions
That means the retained surfaces are provenance and factual grounding, not
donor shell ownership.
So this pass does not reopen:
- the closed `Phase 4R-D` first-party control-plane lane
- any donor `ee/` subtree usage
- any broad PostHog product-shell adoption
- any mixed-license-boundary flattening
## Current exact grounded role
`PostHog/posthog` currently grounds six live rewritten first-party
contract/reference targets for `Control-Plane Telemetry and Replay Governance`:
- replay diagnostic signals and verdicts
- replay segmentation and warning categorization
- feature governance and blast-radius review
- scheduled-change and recurrence policy
- early-access lifecycle and enrollment flow
- `MIT`-core versus `ee/` compliance boundary
These targets preserve bounded control-plane and rollout-governance semantics
while keeping all surfaced prose and product framing first-party.
## Backfill result
### Earlier incorporation audit reopened
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HT_REPO_INCORPORATION_AUDIT_2026-05-11.md`
### Feature canon reopened
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\v6_5_deep_manual_pack\HyperTwist\FEATURE_REGISTRY.md`
## Final call
The live `PostHog/posthog` reference-incorporation side is now explicit:
- `6` rewritten first-party contract/reference targets
- all `6` remain inside the landed `Phase 4R-D` control-plane lane
- the `MIT`-outside-`ee/` versus enterprise-`ee/` boundary stays explicit
This closes the `PostHog/posthog` reference side without reopening product
code.

View file

@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ repo.
|---|---|---|---|
| Session continuity and workspace recall fragments | Implemented now | first-party runtime/training surfaces | Real substrate fragments under the canonical `Memory Lanes`; not yet a full lane implementation. |
| Provenance-aware training/replay/publication state | Implemented now | first-party contract/provenance surfaces | Existing product truth. |
| Control-plane telemetry, replay-diagnostic, and rollout-governance reference grounding | Implemented now | `PostHog/posthog` retained boundary-sensitive lane + first-party current code | Current live `Control-Plane Telemetry and Replay Governance` reference side includes six rewritten first-party contract/reference targets grounded in `PostHog/posthog`: replay diagnostics, replay segmentation, feature governance, scheduled changes, early-access lifecycle, and explicit `MIT`-outside-`ee/` compliance-boundary notes. This does not displace the landed `Phase 4R-D` first-party owner lane, any replay-shell owner family, or the explicit enterprise-subtree exclusion boundary. |
| Capture-history, vault, and replay-inspection reference grounding | Implemented now | `screenpipe/screenpipe` retained boundary-sensitive lane + first-party current code | Current live `Capture History, Replay, and Vault Support` reference side includes six rewritten first-party contract/reference targets grounded in `screenpipe/screenpipe`: event-capture, pipe-permission, persistence, vault-lifecycle, timeline-review, and explicit permissive-core-versus-`ee/` compliance-boundary notes. This does not displace the landed `Phase 4R-E` first-party owner lane, the broader replay shell, or the explicit enterprise-subtree exclusion boundary. |
| Layered memory federation | Deep-source grounded retained | memory doctrine + VectorShell import entrypoint | Governing taxonomy exists; HyperTwist uses pointer-based synchronization to the current VectorShell memory canon rather than a frozen local fork. Lane widening remains future work and later superior evidence may revise only the exact affected lane or sub-slice. |
| Continuity Lattice context assembly | Deep-source grounded retained | continuity-lattice doctrine + VectorShell import entrypoint | One federated substrate with two preset-backed, overrideable profiles: `Max-Retention Mode` and `Economic-Retention Mode`. This is not a second memory system, does not weaken lane authority or optional-assistive override control, and does not justify automatic whole-repo absorption when one continuity sub-slice changes owner. |