Add retroactive backfill doctrine
This commit is contained in:
axiomlogicnexus
parent
8b5be740fa
commit
e2a29fc139
7 changed files with 263 additions and 17 deletions
|
|
@ -333,7 +333,12 @@ When `Model A` evaluates or refreshes a retained repo, the output should try to
|
|||
|
||||
## Retroactive interpretation rule for existing packets
|
||||
|
||||
This doctrine applies retroactively to the already closed HyperTwist packets.
|
||||
This doctrine may inform already closed HyperTwist packets, but it does not
|
||||
authorize fake whole-corpus rewrites or blind full resets.
|
||||
|
||||
Use the governing retroactive backfill doctrine:
|
||||
|
||||
- `docs/ops/HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
|
||||
When reading any existing `0R` packet:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -344,12 +349,17 @@ When reading any existing `0R` packet:
|
|||
|
||||
If an older packet appears too narrow relative to the retained value:
|
||||
|
||||
- update the packet
|
||||
- update the clean-room or boundary-sensitive handoff
|
||||
- reopen the exact earlier affected packet or handoff selectively
|
||||
- name the exact packet or handoff reopened
|
||||
- preserve what remained valid explicitly
|
||||
- change only what later evidence materially changed
|
||||
- preserve the guardrails
|
||||
|
||||
Do not push the ambiguity downstream into `Model B`.
|
||||
|
||||
Repo-local extraction may remain valid even when cross-lane authority later
|
||||
needs selective backfill.
|
||||
|
||||
## Document responsibility split
|
||||
|
||||
Use the HyperTwist docs this way:
|
||||
|
|
@ -386,6 +396,10 @@ Use the HyperTwist docs this way:
|
|||
- slice decomposition before authority ranking
|
||||
- selective retroactive backfill when a later same-family repo materially
|
||||
changes an earlier contested-slice authority call
|
||||
- `docs/ops/HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`:
|
||||
- governing selective retroactive authority and cleanup backfill rule
|
||||
- no fake whole-corpus rewrite rule
|
||||
- exact reopened-packet reporting rule
|
||||
- `docs/ops/HYPERTWIST_PACKET_CLEANUP_AND_REBUILDABLE_ARTIFACT_HYGIENE_2026-05-20.md`:
|
||||
- post-packet cleanup order
|
||||
- rebuildable-artifact rule
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ It is the HyperTwist-local coordinator counterpart to:
|
|||
- [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md:1)
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_CROSS_LANE_AUTHORITY_HIERARCHY_AND_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-20.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/ops/HYPERTWIST_CROSS_LANE_AUTHORITY_HIERARCHY_AND_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-20.md:1)
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_PACKET_CLEANUP_AND_REBUILDABLE_ARTIFACT_HYGIENE_2026-05-20.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/ops/HYPERTWIST_PACKET_CLEANUP_AND_REBUILDABLE_ARTIFACT_HYGIENE_2026-05-20.md:1)
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/ops/HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md:1)
|
||||
- [MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md:1)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
|
@ -163,6 +164,19 @@ note to state:
|
|||
- preserved secondary value
|
||||
- non-promoted families
|
||||
|
||||
Retroactive authority backfill is governed by:
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Required rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- repo-local extraction may remain valid even when cross-lane authority needs
|
||||
backfill
|
||||
- reopen the earlier affected packet or standing note selectively
|
||||
- do not silently contradict older packets
|
||||
- do not bulk-rewrite history for appearance
|
||||
- preserve valid earlier value explicitly
|
||||
|
||||
## Cleanup coordination rule
|
||||
|
||||
Packet cleanup and worktree hygiene are governed by:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ This closeout doctrine is the HyperTwist-local reference target for:
|
|||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_CROSS_LANE_AUTHORITY_HIERARCHY_AND_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_PACKET_CLEANUP_AND_REBUILDABLE_ARTIFACT_HYGIENE_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\MODEL_OUTPUT_RULES.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\README.md`
|
||||
|
|
@ -134,3 +135,17 @@ If a current routing or retention decision depends on that missing taxonomy:
|
|||
- do targeted backfill
|
||||
- say explicitly that the older packet was taxonomy-ambiguous
|
||||
- do not invent certainty that the packet itself did not record
|
||||
|
||||
Retroactive authority and cleanup backfill are governed by:
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
|
||||
For any retroactive backfill pass, the closeout must also state:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact earlier packet or standing note reopened
|
||||
- exact trigger reason
|
||||
- whether repo-local extraction changed, cross-lane authority changed, cleanup
|
||||
interpretation changed, or only wording changed
|
||||
- what remained valid and was preserved
|
||||
- what changed and why
|
||||
- whether more selective backfill remains
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ If a looser prompt, packet, or standing note conflicts with this document on
|
|||
authority ranking, execution routing, realization width, or selective
|
||||
retroactive backfill, this document wins.
|
||||
|
||||
Retroactive backfill behavior itself is governed by:
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the mature decision model for cross-lane discrepancies
|
||||
|
|
@ -296,6 +300,7 @@ This document extends, but does not replace:
|
|||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_CANONICAL_COMPACT_CLOSEOUT_FORMAT_2026-05-19.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_PACKET_CLEANUP_AND_REBUILDABLE_ARTIFACT_HYGIENE_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\MODEL_OUTPUT_RULES.md`
|
||||
|
|
@ -307,22 +312,22 @@ This document extends, but does not replace:
|
|||
|
||||
## Retroactive backfill rule
|
||||
|
||||
Older packets do not all need full re-evaluation.
|
||||
Use the governing retroactive backfill doctrine:
|
||||
|
||||
Backfill in this order:
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
|
||||
1. packets or summary surfaces where contested ownership was stated only
|
||||
loosely
|
||||
2. packets where the current winner, adjunct, reference, or pattern split is
|
||||
ambiguous
|
||||
3. packets where a restrictive repo may actually be the higher capability
|
||||
authority but was previously described too defensively
|
||||
4. earlier same-family packets whose contested-slice authority call is
|
||||
materially changed by a later same-family repo or later reconciliation pass
|
||||
Authority backfill here is selective, comparative, and slice-local.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not rewrite older packets just to paraphrase them.
|
||||
Required rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- do not do fake whole-corpus rewrites
|
||||
- do not do blind full resets
|
||||
- do not invent certainty for older ambiguous packets
|
||||
- reopen only the earlier affected packet or standing note when later
|
||||
same-family evidence materially changes a contested slice
|
||||
- preserve valid repo-local extraction explicitly when only cross-lane
|
||||
authority changed
|
||||
- name the exact earlier packet or standing note reopened
|
||||
|
||||
Backfill only where the hierarchy model materially changes interpretation,
|
||||
implementation routing, or checkpoint gating.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not invent certainty for older ambiguous packets.
|
||||
implementation routing, checkpoint gating, or preserved secondary value.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ If those documents conflict with this one, this document wins.
|
|||
Do not weaken any stricter repo-specific or packet-specific rule that is
|
||||
explicitly documented elsewhere.
|
||||
|
||||
Retroactive cleanup-backfill behavior itself is governed by:
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
- make post-packet cleanup an operating doctrine instead of chat memory
|
||||
|
|
@ -264,12 +268,22 @@ still operationally relied on.
|
|||
|
||||
Do not invent certainty from memory.
|
||||
|
||||
Required retroactive cleanup rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- do not do fake whole-corpus rewrites
|
||||
- do not do blind full resets
|
||||
- the correct target is the relied-on ambiguity, not blanket relabeling
|
||||
- cleanup backfill is comparative and operational, not cosmetic
|
||||
- name the exact earlier packet, standing note, or workflow doc reopened
|
||||
- state whether cleanup interpretation changed or only wording changed
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to active doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
This document is the HyperTwist-local cleanup authority referenced by:
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_WORKTREE_PLACEMENT_AND_VALIDATION_ARTIFACT_POLICY_2026-05-19.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_CANONICAL_COMPACT_CLOSEOUT_FORMAT_2026-05-19.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\MODEL_OUTPUT_RULES.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\README.md`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
|
|||
# HyperTwist Retroactive Authority And Cleanup Backfill - 2026-05-20
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
This document is now the governing HyperTwist doctrine for retroactive
|
||||
authority backfill and retroactive cleanup backfill.
|
||||
|
||||
If a packet, standing note, workflow doc, or prompt implies blanket
|
||||
relabeling, fake whole-corpus rewrite, blind full reset, or invented certainty
|
||||
for an older ambiguous packet, this document wins.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This doctrine exists to make retroactive repair selective, comparative, and
|
||||
operational.
|
||||
|
||||
Its job is to stop two opposite errors:
|
||||
|
||||
1. treating an older packet as frozen even when later evidence materially
|
||||
changes current routing
|
||||
2. treating every later clarification as permission for a cosmetic
|
||||
whole-corpus rewrite
|
||||
|
||||
Retroactive backfill is for the exact contested slice or relied-on ambiguity
|
||||
that still matters now.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not for blanket relabeling.
|
||||
|
||||
## Governing rule
|
||||
|
||||
Do not do fake whole-corpus rewrites.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not do blind full resets.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not invent certainty for older ambiguous packets.
|
||||
|
||||
Do selective backfill only where later evidence materially changes:
|
||||
|
||||
- interpretation
|
||||
- operational routing
|
||||
- authority ranking
|
||||
- cleanup interpretation
|
||||
- active state reporting
|
||||
|
||||
Repo-local extraction may remain valid even when cross-lane authority needs
|
||||
backfill.
|
||||
|
||||
Repo-local extraction may remain valid even when cleanup interpretation needs
|
||||
backfill.
|
||||
|
||||
Backfill is comparative and operational, not cosmetic.
|
||||
|
||||
The correct target is the contested slice or relied-on ambiguity, not blanket
|
||||
relabeling.
|
||||
|
||||
## Backfill classes
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Authority backfill
|
||||
|
||||
Authority backfill is triggered when:
|
||||
|
||||
- a later same-family repo materially changes a contested capability slice
|
||||
- an older packet's winner versus adjunct versus reference versus pattern split
|
||||
is ambiguous
|
||||
- a restrictive or otherwise harder-route repo appears to be the stronger
|
||||
authority and was previously softened incorrectly
|
||||
|
||||
Authority backfill requirements:
|
||||
|
||||
- reopen the earlier affected packet or standing note selectively
|
||||
- name the exact earlier packet or standing note reopened
|
||||
- state the exact contested slice
|
||||
- preserve valid repo-local extraction unless later evidence materially changes
|
||||
it
|
||||
- state whether the change is:
|
||||
- repo-local extraction changed
|
||||
- cross-lane authority changed
|
||||
- only wording changed
|
||||
|
||||
Authority backfill is not permission to:
|
||||
|
||||
- reset an entire family cluster by default
|
||||
- relabel every older packet for appearance
|
||||
- flatten preserved secondary value from non-winners into exclusion
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Cleanup backfill
|
||||
|
||||
Cleanup backfill is triggered when an older packet or workflow doc is still
|
||||
operationally relied on but is ambiguous about:
|
||||
|
||||
- temporary root used
|
||||
- whether cleanup happened
|
||||
- whether retained residue was intentional
|
||||
- whether remaining dirt is packet-created or pre-existing
|
||||
|
||||
Cleanup backfill requirements:
|
||||
|
||||
- mark the ambiguity explicitly instead of inventing certainty
|
||||
- backfill only where the ambiguity still matters operationally
|
||||
- name the exact earlier packet, standing note, or workflow doc reopened
|
||||
- state whether the change is:
|
||||
- cleanup interpretation changed
|
||||
- only wording changed
|
||||
- or whether packet truth itself changed
|
||||
|
||||
Cleanup backfill is not permission to:
|
||||
|
||||
- bulk-rewrite older closeouts for appearance
|
||||
- claim a repo was clean when only packet dirt was removed
|
||||
- erase plausible pre-existing residue by narrative rewrite
|
||||
|
||||
## Prioritization order
|
||||
|
||||
When retroactive backfill is actually needed, prioritize in this order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. contested slices that affect current implementation routing
|
||||
2. older packets whose authority or adjunct or reference or pattern split is
|
||||
ambiguous
|
||||
3. cleanup-ambiguous packets still relied on in workflow or state reporting
|
||||
4. family clusters with dense overlap and high donor value
|
||||
5. lower-risk historical packets only if still active in planning or doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
## Required outputs for every retroactive backfill pass
|
||||
|
||||
Every retroactive backfill pass must output:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact earlier packet or packets reopened
|
||||
- exact standing note or notes reopened when applicable
|
||||
- exact reason the backfill was triggered
|
||||
- whether:
|
||||
- repo-local extraction changed
|
||||
- cross-lane authority changed
|
||||
- cleanup interpretation changed
|
||||
- only wording changed
|
||||
- what remained valid and was preserved
|
||||
- what changed and why
|
||||
- whether more selective backfill remains
|
||||
|
||||
If no retroactive backfill was actually triggered, say that explicitly.
|
||||
|
||||
## Practical interpretation rule
|
||||
|
||||
If later evidence changes a contested slice:
|
||||
|
||||
- reopen only the earlier affected slice-local packet or standing note
|
||||
- preserve valid earlier value explicitly
|
||||
- patch current routing from the corrected result
|
||||
|
||||
If later evidence does not change the contested slice, do not reopen the
|
||||
earlier packet just to harmonize wording.
|
||||
|
||||
If cleanup posture is ambiguous but no current routing, reporting, or residue
|
||||
decision depends on it, record that the ambiguity exists and defer the
|
||||
backfill.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to active doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
This document governs retroactive backfill behavior across:
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_CROSS_LANE_AUTHORITY_HIERARCHY_AND_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_PACKET_CLEANUP_AND_REBUILDABLE_ARTIFACT_HYGIENE_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_CANONICAL_COMPACT_CLOSEOUT_FORMAT_2026-05-19.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_WORKTREE_PLACEMENT_AND_VALIDATION_ARTIFACT_POLICY_2026-05-19.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\MODEL_OUTPUT_RULES.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\README.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\bounded-implementation-workflow.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\GENERIC_OPERATOR_SEQUENCE_AND_PROMPTING.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\0600-phase5r-clean-room-operator-sequence-and-handoff.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\0500-phase5r-restrictive-lanes.model-b-consolidation-prompt.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Use this document when deciding whether an older HyperTwist packet needs:
|
||||
|
||||
- no change
|
||||
- selective authority backfill
|
||||
- selective cleanup backfill
|
||||
- or only a narrow wording correction
|
||||
|
|
@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ Relationship note:
|
|||
`C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_PACKET_CLEANUP_AND_REBUILDABLE_ARTIFACT_HYGIENE_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- if this document conflicts with the broader cleanup doctrine, the broader
|
||||
cleanup doctrine wins
|
||||
- selective retroactive cleanup backfill for older relied-on packet or workflow
|
||||
ambiguity is governed by
|
||||
`C:\HyperTwist\docs\ops\HYPERTWIST_RETROACTIVE_AUTHORITY_AND_CLEANUP_BACKFILL_2026-05-20.md`
|
||||
- use the broader doctrine for deep source packet evaluation and other packet
|
||||
types that generate rebuildable artifacts outside bounded implementation
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -50,6 +53,9 @@ Cleanup rule:
|
|||
`git worktree remove <path>`; if the folder is deleted manually, follow with
|
||||
`git worktree prune` so stale worktree metadata does not remain under the
|
||||
main repo.
|
||||
- If an older relied-on packet or workflow doc is cleanup-ambiguous, do
|
||||
selective cleanup backfill only where that ambiguity still matters
|
||||
operationally; do not bulk-rewrite older closeouts for appearance.
|
||||
|
||||
Operational note:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue