docs: clarify continue adoption boundaries
This commit is contained in:
parent
f664f099f5
commit
db5820bb54
2 changed files with 56 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -84,6 +84,24 @@ Future instances must not interpret `continue` as:
|
|||
- permission to widen into a different pillar because it feels interesting
|
||||
- permission to dissolve a previously declared boundary
|
||||
|
||||
At prepared decision boundaries, plain `continue` may or may not confirm or
|
||||
adopt the displayed suggestion. It may confirm or adopt the suggestion only
|
||||
when the prior closeout or prepared packet explicitly states that recommendation
|
||||
adoption is allowed for that exact boundary. It may fail to confirm or adopt
|
||||
the suggestion when the closeout states that explicit user selection is still
|
||||
required or when a real stop condition remains active. Future instances must
|
||||
not silently assume that `continue` is a universal vote for the last displayed
|
||||
recommendation.
|
||||
|
||||
At prepared decision boundaries, plain `continue` may or may not confirm or
|
||||
adopt the displayed suggestion. It may confirm or adopt the suggestion only
|
||||
when the prior closeout or prepared packet explicitly states that recommendation
|
||||
adoption is allowed for that exact boundary. It may fail to confirm or adopt
|
||||
the suggestion when the closeout states that explicit user selection is still
|
||||
required or when a real stop condition remains active. Future instances must
|
||||
not silently assume that `continue` is a universal vote for the last displayed
|
||||
recommendation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stop rule
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances should halt only when a real stop condition exists.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -184,6 +184,44 @@ or
|
|||
|
||||
- recommendation-adoption status: explicit user choice still required because sovereign ownership or legal routing remains materially unresolved
|
||||
|
||||
Expanded closeout-shape repertoire:
|
||||
|
||||
- recommendation-adoption status: plain `continue` may adopt the displayed
|
||||
recommendation because the boundary is same-family, low-ambiguity, and no
|
||||
real stop condition remains active
|
||||
- recommendation-adoption status: plain `continue` may not adopt the displayed
|
||||
recommendation because the boundary still requires explicit user choice
|
||||
- recommendation-adoption status: plain `continue` does not itself settle the
|
||||
suggestion because a live blocker, quiz boundary, legal boundary, or
|
||||
fresh-family boundary still controls
|
||||
|
||||
The governing interpretation is now explicit:
|
||||
|
||||
- plain `continue` may confirm or adopt a displayed suggestion
|
||||
- plain `continue` may also fail to confirm or adopt it
|
||||
- the closeout must state which case is true
|
||||
- future instances must not infer adoption from `continue` alone when the
|
||||
closeout does not authorize that adoption
|
||||
|
||||
Expanded closeout-shape repertoire:
|
||||
|
||||
- recommendation-adoption status: plain `continue` may adopt the displayed
|
||||
recommendation because the boundary is same-family, low-ambiguity, and no
|
||||
real stop condition remains active
|
||||
- recommendation-adoption status: plain `continue` may not adopt the displayed
|
||||
recommendation because the boundary still requires explicit user choice
|
||||
- recommendation-adoption status: plain `continue` does not itself settle the
|
||||
suggestion because a live blocker, quiz boundary, legal boundary, or
|
||||
fresh-family boundary still controls
|
||||
|
||||
The governing interpretation is now explicit:
|
||||
|
||||
- plain `continue` may confirm or adopt a displayed suggestion
|
||||
- plain `continue` may also fail to confirm or adopt it
|
||||
- the closeout must state which case is true
|
||||
- future instances must not infer adoption from `continue` alone when the
|
||||
closeout does not authorize that adoption
|
||||
|
||||
This field is mandatory because deterministic continuation now includes a narrow
|
||||
safe path for recommendation adoption, and future instances must not leave that
|
||||
truth implicit.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue