Record HyperTwist intake and product-fit doctrine
This commit is contained in:
axiomlogicnexus
parent
63b9c2019e
commit
5630d1b881
21 changed files with 1178 additions and 18 deletions
|
|
@ -78,6 +78,21 @@ Important correction added on `2026-05-13`:
|
|||
- absence from this report's live-evidence bucket does not prove that no human ever looked at a donor repo while writing first-party code.
|
||||
- it does prove that this pass did not find exact repo-tagged incorporation evidence inside the checked live Unreal project surfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 interpretation update
|
||||
|
||||
This audit is now explicitly an implementation-state artifact, not a default evaluation step.
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances must not use bookmark presence, queue presence, planning artifacts, or doc metadata as proof of implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances must also not treat this audit as something every ordinary repo evaluation needs to rerun.
|
||||
|
||||
Default rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority or an implementation-state-dependent task requires proof otherwise
|
||||
- verify live or product-surface incorporation only when the active task actually depends on current implementation state
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the canonical rule for that distinction.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence anchors
|
||||
|
||||
- Live training source attributions in code:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ It exists to prevent future sessions from mixing:
|
|||
- clean-room workflow precedent
|
||||
- actual live implementation truth
|
||||
|
||||
It now also exists to prevent future sessions from collapsing:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked
|
||||
- queued
|
||||
- source-read
|
||||
- retained
|
||||
- product-fit
|
||||
- implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implemented
|
||||
|
||||
into one vague repo judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope of this reconciliation
|
||||
|
||||
This pass parsed the canonical docs, ledgers, prompts, clean-room notes, and workspace manifest that future sessions are most likely to treat as authority.
|
||||
|
|
@ -59,12 +71,14 @@ The thirteen currently verified live permissive lanes are:
|
|||
- `poliva/cubedex`
|
||||
- `newyork-anthonyng/rubiks-cross-trainer`
|
||||
|
||||
The four currently verified live boundary-sensitive lanes are:
|
||||
The six currently verified live boundary-sensitive lanes are:
|
||||
|
||||
- `cubing/cubing.js`
|
||||
- `cutelyaware/magiccube4d`
|
||||
- `google/model-viewer/packages/shared-assets`
|
||||
- `PostHog/posthog`
|
||||
- `screenpipe/screenpipe`
|
||||
- `remotion-dev/remotion`
|
||||
|
||||
The one currently verified live restrictive lane is:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -77,7 +91,7 @@ That restrictive lane must be treated as:
|
|||
- preserved as the current clean-room precedent
|
||||
- not to be reopened as an unresolved direct-donor contamination event
|
||||
|
||||
The remaining `54` rows are not to be treated as already implemented.
|
||||
The remaining `51` rows are not to be treated as already implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
`Phase 0R` is now closed for that non-live set.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -89,6 +103,30 @@ Those rows now resolve into:
|
|||
- retained benchmark, oracle, and clean-room-later rows
|
||||
- discarded active-set rows
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 intake and product-fit doctrine update
|
||||
|
||||
HyperTwist now treats the following as mandatory doctrine:
|
||||
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is only intake
|
||||
- a queued repo is only sequencing
|
||||
- a source-read repo is only evidence gained
|
||||
- a retained repo is only a repo that survived evaluation in some posture
|
||||
- product-fit is a separate judgment from retention
|
||||
- implementation-authorized is a separate judgment from product-fit
|
||||
- implemented means landed in first-party product surfaces under explicit implementation authority
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical doctrine docs:
|
||||
|
||||
- `docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Operational implication:
|
||||
|
||||
- do not let bookmark presence, queue position, frequent mention, planning artifacts, or docs metadata masquerade as product intent or proof of implementation
|
||||
- routine live or product-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation step
|
||||
- assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority says otherwise
|
||||
- verify current implementation state only when the active task depends on that fact
|
||||
|
||||
## Canonical-location findings
|
||||
|
||||
### `C:\HyperTwist\docs`
|
||||
|
|
@ -133,24 +171,26 @@ It needed correction because:
|
|||
For restart and future widening decisions, use this order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `docs/HYPERTWIST_CANONICAL_RESTART_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-12.md`
|
||||
2. `docs/HT_REPO_INCORPORATION_AUDIT_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
3. `docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
4. packet-level deep-source authority docs for any repo being implemented:
|
||||
2. `docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
3. `docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
4. `docs/HT_REPO_INCORPORATION_AUDIT_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
5. `docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
6. packet-level deep-source authority docs for any repo being implemented:
|
||||
- `docs/HYPERTWIST_PHASE_0R_PACKET_0R_A_EVALUATION_2026-05-12.md`
|
||||
- later `Phase 0R` packet docs as they are upgraded to the same standard
|
||||
5. `docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
6. `docs/REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`
|
||||
7. `docs/v6_5_deep_manual_pack/README.md`
|
||||
8. `docs/v6_5_deep_manual_pack/HyperTwist/ROADMAP.md`
|
||||
9. `docs/v6_5_deep_manual_pack/HyperTwist/DEVELOPMENT.md`
|
||||
10. safe parse/workbook governance docs:
|
||||
7. `docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
8. `docs/REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`
|
||||
9. `docs/v6_5_deep_manual_pack/README.md`
|
||||
10. `docs/v6_5_deep_manual_pack/HyperTwist/ROADMAP.md`
|
||||
11. `docs/v6_5_deep_manual_pack/HyperTwist/DEVELOPMENT.md`
|
||||
12. safe parse/workbook governance docs:
|
||||
- `06-project-agnostic-repo-evaluation-modus-operandi.md`
|
||||
- `07-benchmark-oracle-vs-clean-room-implementation.md`
|
||||
- `88-roadmap-implementation-workbook.md`
|
||||
- `89-phase-0-and-phase-1-bootstrap-packet.md`
|
||||
- `90-clean-room-safe-project-context.md`
|
||||
- `122-hypertwist-phase-0r-restart-authority-and-sequencing.md`
|
||||
11. the current v6.3 CSV boards and prompts
|
||||
13. the current v6.3 CSV boards and prompts
|
||||
|
||||
Use the following only as lineage or historical context unless a restart doc explicitly points back to them:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -162,14 +202,15 @@ Use the following only as lineage or historical context unless a restart doc exp
|
|||
|
||||
The restart is not a mass revert.
|
||||
|
||||
It is a provenance and planning reset around the remaining `53` current non-live rows while preserving the eighteen already-landed lanes.
|
||||
It is a provenance and planning reset around the remaining `51` current non-live rows while preserving the twenty already-landed lanes.
|
||||
|
||||
Required standing rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- preserve the eighteen landed lanes
|
||||
- preserve the twenty landed lanes
|
||||
- preserve `onionhoney/roux-trainers` as the only currently verified landed restrictive clean-room lane
|
||||
- do not collapse `bookmarked`, `queued`, `source-read`, `retained`, `product-fit`, `implementation-authorized`, and `implemented`
|
||||
- do not collapse `selected`, `retained`, `integrate`, `repurpose`, or `donor bench` into `already implemented`
|
||||
- do not widen new donor-shaped implementation from the remaining `54` current non-live rows until the closed packet sequence routes it
|
||||
- do not widen new donor-shaped implementation from the remaining `51` current non-live rows until the closed packet sequence routes it
|
||||
- before implementing any retained repo, read the packet-level deep-source authority doc for that repo class if one exists
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-12 packet-depth correction
|
||||
|
|
@ -206,7 +247,7 @@ Practical implication:
|
|||
|
||||
Goal:
|
||||
|
||||
- deeply evaluate the remaining `54` rows repo by repo
|
||||
- deeply evaluate the remaining `51` rows repo by repo
|
||||
|
||||
Required output per retained row:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,25 @@ Use this document to answer the live-lane questions that the `0R-*` packets do n
|
|||
- what should not be promoted from each lane
|
||||
- what legal or provenance nuance must remain visible during future widening
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 implementation-state clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This audit is for lanes already proven live.
|
||||
|
||||
It must not be used to weaken the broader doctrine that:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked is only intake
|
||||
- queued is only sequencing
|
||||
- source-read is only evidence
|
||||
- retained is not automatically product-fit
|
||||
- product-fit is not automatically implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implementation-authorized is not automatically implemented
|
||||
|
||||
This audit is the exception-based place to verify live first-party incorporation when a task actually depends on implementation state.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not a standing requirement for ordinary evaluation of non-live rows.
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the canonical authority for those distinctions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Safe-use boundary
|
||||
|
||||
This document intentionally separates permissive, boundary-sensitive, and restrictive handling:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -64,6 +64,29 @@ It is not itself a `Model B` implementation handoff.
|
|||
|
||||
`Model B` still implements only from scrubbed handoff materials and allowed first-party docs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Intake and product-fit clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This doctrine does not treat bookmark presence as a reason to extract value.
|
||||
|
||||
HyperTwist now treats:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gained
|
||||
- retained = survives evaluation in some posture
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment
|
||||
|
||||
That means:
|
||||
|
||||
- a repo is not entitled to rich extraction merely because it was bookmarked
|
||||
- a repo is not entitled to a donor lane merely because it was source-read
|
||||
- a repo may have real donor value and still fail the HyperTwist product-fit test
|
||||
- a repo may be retained only as reference-only, pattern-only, or donor-only for later
|
||||
|
||||
The canonical anti-conflation doctrine now also lives in:
|
||||
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1)
|
||||
|
||||
## Core doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Maximize retained value
|
||||
|
|
@ -219,6 +242,11 @@ When `Model A` evaluates or refreshes a retained repo, the output should try to
|
|||
- exact files or directories read
|
||||
- enough specificity that later operators know what was actually inspected
|
||||
|
||||
### Product-fit verdict
|
||||
|
||||
- explicit statement of whether the durable value actually belongs in HyperTwist's real product direction
|
||||
- no hiding product fit inside a generic repo summary
|
||||
|
||||
### Preserved subsystem ideas
|
||||
|
||||
- the deep durable value
|
||||
|
|
@ -243,6 +271,20 @@ When `Model A` evaluates or refreshes a retained repo, the output should try to
|
|||
- explicit reasons for omitted surfaces
|
||||
- no vague “not needed” language
|
||||
|
||||
### Retention posture and owner-lane placement
|
||||
|
||||
- whether the repo is worth later bounded integration, donor-only for later, reference-only, pattern-only, or not worth integrating
|
||||
- which owner lane it belongs to if retained
|
||||
|
||||
### Realization depth
|
||||
|
||||
- whether the later target is no implementation, reference-only, pattern-only, bounded subsystem realization, broader bounded realization, or full positive realization of the retained lane
|
||||
|
||||
### Explicit anti-misreading note
|
||||
|
||||
- what the repo should never be mistaken for
|
||||
- especially when the repo is technically strong but not a product fit, or retained only in a narrow posture
|
||||
|
||||
### No-copy guardrail
|
||||
|
||||
- when the row is clean-room-sensitive, make the source-access boundary explicit
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
|
|||
# HyperTwist Model A / Model B Coordinator Doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
Created on `2026-05-14`
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
This document is now the coordinator-facing doctrine for HyperTwist repo
|
||||
evaluation, clean-room routing, and implementation-state discipline.
|
||||
|
||||
It is the HyperTwist-local coordinator counterpart to:
|
||||
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1)
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md:1)
|
||||
- [MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md:1)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
The coordinating HyperTwist instance must not let intake metadata, queue
|
||||
position, frequent mention, or packet presence impersonate product truth.
|
||||
|
||||
Coordinator work must keep these states separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked
|
||||
- queued
|
||||
- source-read
|
||||
- retained
|
||||
- product-fit
|
||||
- implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## Core coordinator rules
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Intake is not intent
|
||||
|
||||
A bookmarked repo is only intake.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not:
|
||||
|
||||
- an integration commitment
|
||||
- a retained-donor decision
|
||||
- a product-fit decision
|
||||
- an implementation authorization
|
||||
- proof of current implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Queue is not merit
|
||||
|
||||
If a repo appears in a queue, packet, sequence doc, or prompt pack, that means
|
||||
sequencing only.
|
||||
|
||||
It does not make the repo:
|
||||
|
||||
- preferred
|
||||
- stronger than an existing owner
|
||||
- more product-fit than a non-queued alternative
|
||||
- already implementation-authorized
|
||||
- already implemented
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Source-read is evidence, not approval
|
||||
|
||||
Source reading can justify stronger judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
It does not, by itself, mean:
|
||||
|
||||
- keep
|
||||
- fit
|
||||
- retain
|
||||
- implement
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Retained is not automatically active build scope
|
||||
|
||||
A retained repo may still be:
|
||||
|
||||
- donor-only for later
|
||||
- reference-only
|
||||
- pattern-only
|
||||
- later-horizon only
|
||||
- outside current implementation scope
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Implementation requires explicit authority
|
||||
|
||||
Treat a repo as implementation-authorized only when a bounded implementation
|
||||
lane has been explicitly approved in the active authority path.
|
||||
|
||||
Treat a repo as implemented only when first-party product surfaces actually
|
||||
landed through explicit implementation authority.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Live-surface scanning is exception-based
|
||||
|
||||
Routine live or product-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation
|
||||
step.
|
||||
|
||||
Assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority says
|
||||
otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
Only verify current implementation state when the active task actually depends
|
||||
on it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Coordinator routing order
|
||||
|
||||
When coordinating repo judgment or widening, use this order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1)
|
||||
2. [HYPERTWIST_CANONICAL_RESTART_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-12.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_CANONICAL_RESTART_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-12.md:1)
|
||||
3. [HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md:1)
|
||||
4. [HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md:1)
|
||||
5. repo-specific packet authority docs
|
||||
6. [HYPERTWIST_PHASE_1R_RETAINED_SET_CONTRACT_AND_HANDOFF_2026-05-13.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_PHASE_1R_RETAINED_SET_CONTRACT_AND_HANDOFF_2026-05-13.md:1)
|
||||
7. [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md:1)
|
||||
8. [REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md:1)
|
||||
9. [MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md:1) when clean-room-sensitive work is involved
|
||||
|
||||
## Model A / Model B split
|
||||
|
||||
Coordinator rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- `Model A` may read allowed donor source where appropriate
|
||||
- `Model B` must not read forbidden donor source
|
||||
- if the handoff is too thin, strengthen `Model A`
|
||||
- do not quietly move discovery burden into `Model B`
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Phase 5R clarification
|
||||
|
||||
For the current clean-room sequence:
|
||||
|
||||
- repo presence in the `Phase 5R` prompt pack means active clean-room routing
|
||||
- it does not mean those repos are already implemented
|
||||
- it does not mean queue presence is proof of merit beyond the already-closed retained-set and packet decisions
|
||||
- the prompt pack is routing authority, not product-surface proof
|
||||
|
||||
## Closing rule
|
||||
|
||||
The coordinating HyperTwist instance must preserve the right to say:
|
||||
|
||||
- worth bookmarking, not worth integrating
|
||||
- worth reading, not worth retaining
|
||||
- retained, but not active build scope
|
||||
- product-fit, but later-horizon only
|
||||
- implementation-authorized, but not yet implemented
|
||||
|
||||
If the coordinator cannot say those things cleanly, the authority docs have
|
||||
drifted and must be corrected.
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,6 +46,44 @@ It answers, repo by repo:
|
|||
- which repo should own a domain when two repos overlap
|
||||
- how the repo should enter `Phase 2R`, `Phase 3R`, or `Phase 6R`
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 intake and product-fit clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet is source evidence plus evaluation judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
It must not be read as proof that any row here was automatically:
|
||||
|
||||
- favored merely because it was bookmarked earlier
|
||||
- favored merely because it was queued earlier
|
||||
- retained without further judgment
|
||||
- a product fit by default
|
||||
- implementation-authorized by default
|
||||
- already implemented in first-party surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances must keep the evaluation states separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gathered
|
||||
- retained = survived evaluation with preserved value
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment about HyperTwist direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = separate bounded build approval
|
||||
- implemented = landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Every future evaluation refresh or reuse of this packet should keep explicit:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact source basis read
|
||||
- licensing posture
|
||||
- preserved subsystem ideas
|
||||
- subordinate or later value
|
||||
- explicit product-fit verdict
|
||||
- explicit non-promotion decisions with rationale
|
||||
- retention posture
|
||||
- owner-lane placement
|
||||
- recommended implementation phase and realization depth if retained
|
||||
- what the repo should never be mistaken for
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the canonical anti-conflation doctrine and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the coordinator-facing routing rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Storage boundary
|
||||
|
||||
To stop future confusion, the storage boundary is now explicit:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -75,6 +75,44 @@ It answers, repo by repo:
|
|||
- which repo should own a domain when multiple permissive repos overlap
|
||||
- how the repo should enter `Phase 2R`, `Phase 3R`, or `Phase 6R`
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 intake and product-fit clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet is source evidence plus evaluation judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
It must not be read as proof that any row here was automatically:
|
||||
|
||||
- favored merely because it was bookmarked earlier
|
||||
- favored merely because it was queued earlier
|
||||
- retained without further judgment
|
||||
- a product fit by default
|
||||
- implementation-authorized by default
|
||||
- already implemented in first-party surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances must keep the evaluation states separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gathered
|
||||
- retained = survived evaluation with preserved value
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment about HyperTwist direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = separate bounded build approval
|
||||
- implemented = landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Every future evaluation refresh or reuse of this packet should keep explicit:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact source basis read
|
||||
- licensing posture
|
||||
- preserved subsystem ideas
|
||||
- subordinate or later value
|
||||
- explicit product-fit verdict
|
||||
- explicit non-promotion decisions with rationale
|
||||
- retention posture
|
||||
- owner-lane placement
|
||||
- recommended implementation phase and realization depth if retained
|
||||
- what the repo should never be mistaken for
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the canonical anti-conflation doctrine and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the coordinator-facing routing rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Storage boundary
|
||||
|
||||
To stop future confusion, the storage boundary is explicit:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -32,6 +32,49 @@ Before a future instance implements any `0R-C` repo, it must read:
|
|||
2. [REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md:1) for license, attribution, notice, asset-term, publication, subtree, and provenance obligations
|
||||
3. [HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md:1) for sequencing
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 intake and product-fit clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet is packet-grade source evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not a bookmark list.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not an automatic implementation approval.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not proof that every repo here belongs in HyperTwist equally.
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances should read every repo section as answering, or helping answer:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact source basis read
|
||||
- licensing posture
|
||||
- preserved subsystem ideas
|
||||
- subordinate or later value
|
||||
- explicit product-fit verdict
|
||||
- non-promotion decisions with rationale
|
||||
- retention posture
|
||||
- owner-lane placement
|
||||
- recommended implementation phase
|
||||
- recommended realization depth
|
||||
- acceptance markers if the repo later returns
|
||||
- what the repo should never be mistaken for
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluation-state rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gained
|
||||
- retained = survives evaluation
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = separate later judgment
|
||||
- implemented = explicit landed first-party work only
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical doctrine:
|
||||
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1)
|
||||
|
||||
Operational note:
|
||||
|
||||
- routine live or product-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation step
|
||||
- assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority says otherwise
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This packet redoes `Phase 0R-C` as a true deep source parsing packet for:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -51,6 +51,48 @@ It answers, repo by repo:
|
|||
- which repo should own a domain when restrictive rows overlap with already-retained permissive or boundary-sensitive lanes
|
||||
- how the repo should enter `Phase 2R` and later `Phase 5R` clean-room implementation work
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 intake, product-fit, and clean-room routing clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet is source evidence plus retained-lane judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
It must not be read as proof that any row here was automatically:
|
||||
|
||||
- favored merely because it was bookmarked earlier
|
||||
- favored merely because it was queued earlier
|
||||
- entitled to maximum realization merely because it is restrictive
|
||||
- a product fit by default
|
||||
- implementation-authorized by default
|
||||
- already implemented in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances must keep the state vocabulary separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gathered
|
||||
- retained = survived evaluation with preserved value
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment about HyperTwist direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = explicit approval for a bounded clean-room build lane
|
||||
- implemented = landed in first-party product surfaces under explicit implementation authority
|
||||
|
||||
For these restrictive rows, clean-room prompt packs, handoff files, or queue position are routing evidence only.
|
||||
|
||||
They are not proof of current implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Future refreshes of this packet and its handoffs should keep explicit:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact source basis read
|
||||
- licensing posture
|
||||
- preserved subsystem ideas
|
||||
- subordinate or later value
|
||||
- explicit product-fit verdict
|
||||
- explicit non-promotion decisions with rationale
|
||||
- retention posture
|
||||
- owner-lane placement
|
||||
- recommended clean-room phase and realization depth if retained
|
||||
- what the repo should never be mistaken for
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the canonical anti-conflation doctrine and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the clean-room routing and implementation-state rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Storage boundary
|
||||
|
||||
To stop future confusion, the storage boundary is explicit:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -51,6 +51,33 @@ It answers, repo by repo:
|
|||
- which repo should own a domain when these rows overlap with stronger retained donors
|
||||
- whether the row survives as benchmark, oracle, clean-room-later reservation, or discard
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 intake and non-promotion clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet is source evidence plus evaluation judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
It must not be read as proof that any row here was automatically:
|
||||
|
||||
- favored merely because it was bookmarked earlier
|
||||
- favored merely because it was queued earlier
|
||||
- entitled to implementation merely because it remained documented
|
||||
- a product fit by default
|
||||
- implementation-authorized by default
|
||||
- already implemented in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Future instances must keep the evaluation states separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gathered
|
||||
- retained = survived evaluation with preserved value
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment about HyperTwist direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = separate bounded build approval
|
||||
- implemented = landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Rows that survive here as benchmark-only, reference-only, oracle-only, or clean-room-later reservations remain non-authorized until later doctrine says otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the canonical anti-conflation doctrine and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) as the routing and implementation-state rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Storage boundary
|
||||
|
||||
To stop future confusion, the storage boundary is explicit:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,39 @@ This document answers the next question instead:
|
|||
- which documents must be read before that row is widened
|
||||
- which rows are out of the active implementation set entirely
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 state-separation doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
This document starts after the intake and source-evaluation stages.
|
||||
|
||||
That means a row appearing here is not merely:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked
|
||||
- queued
|
||||
- source-read
|
||||
|
||||
It already passed into retained-set discussion.
|
||||
|
||||
But this document still must not collapse:
|
||||
|
||||
- retained
|
||||
- product-fit
|
||||
- implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implemented
|
||||
|
||||
Retained-set rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- a retained row here survived evaluation in some posture
|
||||
- that does not automatically mean the row is a preferred donor
|
||||
- that does not automatically mean maximum realization is required
|
||||
- that does not automatically mean the row is currently implementation-authorized
|
||||
- that does not automatically mean the row is already implemented
|
||||
|
||||
Use:
|
||||
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1)
|
||||
|
||||
for the canonical definitions and anti-conflation rules.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
`Phase 0R` closed the source-evaluation backlog.
|
||||
|
|
@ -101,6 +134,7 @@ The `39` non-live active implementation-board rows break down as:
|
|||
## Core doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
- Retained rows default to `full bounded realization of their retained value`, not token helper reuse.
|
||||
- Bookmark presence or queue position never grants a row ownership weight or implementation momentum by itself.
|
||||
- `Not foundation owner` does not mean `take one helper and forget the rest`.
|
||||
- For boundary-sensitive and clean-room-sensitive rows, `do not promote` and similar packet wording is a boundary filter, not a cap on later `Model A` extraction depth.
|
||||
- If a future `Model A` instance finds that a retained row's positive handoff is too thin, the right move is to strengthen the packet or scrubbed handoff while preserving the existing guardrails.
|
||||
|
|
@ -108,6 +142,7 @@ The `39` non-live active implementation-board rows break down as:
|
|||
- Discarded rows are not soft-retained. They are out of the active set unless new evidence reopens them explicitly.
|
||||
- `Permissive` does not automatically mean `high priority`.
|
||||
- `MIT` or `Apache-2.0` status never outranks stronger retained anchors, domain fit, or already-set ownership boundaries.
|
||||
- implementation truth is exception-based: assume a row is not implemented unless explicit landed packet authority or the live-lane audit says otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
## Landed preserve lanes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -43,6 +43,30 @@ These five rows define the critical entry points for:
|
|||
|
||||
Without this packet, future instances would still be able to widen the right repos for the wrong reasons.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 ownership-routing clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet records ownership and acceptance boundaries for retained rows.
|
||||
|
||||
It does not retroactively collapse the earlier evaluation states.
|
||||
|
||||
For every row in this packet, future instances must still keep separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gathered
|
||||
- retained = survived evaluation
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment that the retained value belongs in HyperTwist direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = explicit bounded phase entry approval
|
||||
- implemented = actually landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore:
|
||||
|
||||
- appearance in this packet is not a claim that earlier bookmark or queue position had merit value
|
||||
- retained status here is not proof of broad product ownership beyond the bounded lane described here
|
||||
- phase entry permission here is not proof that implementation has already happened
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) for the state vocabulary and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) for the authority-path reading rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authority boundary
|
||||
|
||||
Use the documents in this order for these five rows:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -37,6 +37,30 @@ This packet answers the next question instead:
|
|||
|
||||
Without this packet, future instances would still be able to widen the right support repos for the wrong reasons.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 ownership-routing clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet records ownership and acceptance boundaries for retained support-plane rows.
|
||||
|
||||
It does not collapse the earlier evaluation states into one vague approval signal.
|
||||
|
||||
For every row in this packet, future instances must still keep separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gathered
|
||||
- retained = survived evaluation
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment that the retained value belongs in HyperTwist direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = explicit bounded phase entry approval
|
||||
- implemented = actually landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore:
|
||||
|
||||
- appearance in this packet is not a claim that earlier bookmark or queue position had merit value
|
||||
- retained status here is not proof of broad product ownership beyond the bounded lane described here
|
||||
- phase entry permission here is not proof that implementation has already happened
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) for the state vocabulary and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) for the authority-path reading rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
|
||||
This packet closes ownership and acceptance for these retained `0R-B` rows:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -37,6 +37,30 @@ This packet answers the next question instead:
|
|||
|
||||
Without this packet, the final `0R-B` rows would still sit on inherited routing without explicit ownership and acceptance boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 ownership-routing clarification
|
||||
|
||||
This packet records ownership and acceptance boundaries for retained residual rows.
|
||||
|
||||
It does not collapse the earlier evaluation states into blanket approval.
|
||||
|
||||
For every row in this packet, future instances must still keep separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gathered
|
||||
- retained = survived evaluation
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment that the retained value belongs in HyperTwist direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = explicit bounded phase entry approval
|
||||
- implemented = actually landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore:
|
||||
|
||||
- appearance in this packet is not a claim that earlier bookmark or queue position had merit value
|
||||
- retained status here is not proof of broad product ownership beyond the bounded lane described here
|
||||
- phase entry permission here is not proof that implementation has already happened
|
||||
|
||||
Use [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) for the state vocabulary and [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1) for the authority-path reading rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
|
||||
This packet closes ownership and acceptance for:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ This packet does not reopen broad repo evaluation.
|
|||
|
||||
It operationalizes the already-closed evaluation and routing work.
|
||||
|
||||
It also must not be misread as product-surface proof.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current project state
|
||||
|
||||
Current truth:
|
||||
|
|
@ -44,6 +46,41 @@ It does not mean:
|
|||
- run a single source-exposed thread across all four raw restrictive repos
|
||||
- run one giant multi-repo bounded implementation pass
|
||||
|
||||
It also does not mean:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmark presence equals retained status
|
||||
- queue presence equals merit
|
||||
- sequence-file presence equals implementation
|
||||
- prompt-pack presence equals landed product truth
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 coordinator doctrine note
|
||||
|
||||
For this packet, keep the following states separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked
|
||||
- queued
|
||||
- source-read
|
||||
- retained
|
||||
- product-fit
|
||||
- implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implemented
|
||||
|
||||
This packet means:
|
||||
|
||||
- the four restrictive rows are already selected retained clean-room candidates with active routing
|
||||
- the four rows are queued for explicit `Model A` and `Model B` clean-room work
|
||||
|
||||
This packet does not mean:
|
||||
|
||||
- those rows are already implemented
|
||||
- those rows outrank stronger owners outside their approved lanes
|
||||
- those rows became product truth merely by being listed here
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical doctrine docs:
|
||||
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1)
|
||||
- [HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md](C:/HyperTwist/docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md:1)
|
||||
|
||||
## Restrictive repos in current scope
|
||||
|
||||
The active four-repo restrictive queue is:
|
||||
|
|
@ -277,8 +314,10 @@ Current project truth:
|
|||
Your first operating references are:
|
||||
|
||||
1. C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_5R_CLEAN_ROOM_PROMPT_AND_HANDOFF_PACKET_2026-05-14.md
|
||||
2. C:\HyperTwist\docs\MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md
|
||||
3. C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\0600-phase5r-clean-room-operator-sequence-and-handoff.md
|
||||
2. C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md
|
||||
3. C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md
|
||||
4. C:\HyperTwist\docs\MODEL_B_SOURCE_ACCESS_BOUNDARY.md
|
||||
5. C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\clean-room-specs\0600-phase5r-clean-room-operator-sequence-and-handoff.md
|
||||
|
||||
Then load the current repo-specific sequence file as needed:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,6 +34,52 @@ The current restart authority addendum is:
|
|||
|
||||
Use that document when a future session needs the cross-location restart authority order, the stale-doc demotions, and the explicit post-`Phase 1R` sequence.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 intake, retention, and product-fit doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
HyperTwist now treats the following as explicit evaluation doctrine:
|
||||
|
||||
- `docs/HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `docs/HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Strong rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is only intake
|
||||
- a queued repo is only sequencing
|
||||
- a source-read repo is only evidence gained
|
||||
- a retained repo is only a repo that survived evaluation in some posture
|
||||
- product-fit is a separate judgment from retention
|
||||
- implementation-authorized is a separate judgment from product-fit
|
||||
- implemented means landed in first-party product surfaces under explicit implementation authority
|
||||
|
||||
Schedule implication:
|
||||
|
||||
- do not let bookmark presence, queue position, planning artifacts, or docs metadata masquerade as product intent
|
||||
- do not treat a source-read repo as automatically approved
|
||||
- do not treat a retained repo as automatically implementation-authorized
|
||||
- do not treat a discussed repo as already implemented
|
||||
|
||||
Future serious repo evaluations should now explicitly try to state:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact source basis read
|
||||
- licensing posture
|
||||
- preserved subsystem ideas
|
||||
- subordinate or later value
|
||||
- explicit product-fit verdict
|
||||
- explicit non-promotion decisions
|
||||
- rationale for exclusion, demotion, or non-fit
|
||||
- retention posture
|
||||
- owner-lane placement
|
||||
- recommended implementation phase if retained
|
||||
- recommended realization depth if retained
|
||||
- acceptance markers if the repo later returns
|
||||
- explicit statement of what the repo should never be mistaken for
|
||||
|
||||
Operational scanning rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- routine live or product-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation step
|
||||
- assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority says otherwise
|
||||
- only verify current implementation state when the active task specifically depends on that fact
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-12 Packet 0R-A status
|
||||
|
||||
The first `Phase 0R` packet is now closed as an evaluation packet:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
|
|||
# HyperTwist Repo Intake, Retention, And Product-Fit Doctrine
|
||||
|
||||
Created on `2026-05-14`
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
This document is now the canonical HyperTwist doctrine for keeping the
|
||||
following states separate:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked
|
||||
- queued
|
||||
- source-read
|
||||
- retained
|
||||
- product-fit
|
||||
- implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implemented
|
||||
|
||||
It is operating doctrine.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not a casual note.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not packet-local wording.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not a temporary preference.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core rule
|
||||
|
||||
A bookmarked repo is only intake.
|
||||
|
||||
That means:
|
||||
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is a candidate for later review
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not an integration commitment
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not a retained-donor decision
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not a product-fit decision
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not an implementation authorization
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not proof of ownership in any product lane
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not proof that it should survive evaluation
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not proof that it should receive maximum realization later
|
||||
- a bookmarked repo is not proof that it belongs in HyperTwist at all
|
||||
|
||||
HyperTwist must preserve the right to stop cleanly at any later stage.
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-conflation rule
|
||||
|
||||
Future HyperTwist instances must not collapse the following into one vague
|
||||
“good repo” judgment:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked != retained
|
||||
- retained != product-fit
|
||||
- product-fit != implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implementation-authorized != implemented
|
||||
- source-read != approved
|
||||
- queued != preferred
|
||||
- compared != selected
|
||||
- legally usable != strategically correct
|
||||
- feature-rich != product-relevant
|
||||
- technically elegant != worth integrating
|
||||
|
||||
These distinctions are mandatory.
|
||||
|
||||
They belong in the authority path, not only in one packet summary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Multi-stage decision model
|
||||
|
||||
Every serious repo evaluation should keep the following questions separate.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Intake question
|
||||
|
||||
Was the repo worth bookmarking, parking, or capturing for later review?
|
||||
|
||||
This is the weakest statement.
|
||||
|
||||
It means only:
|
||||
|
||||
- worth remembering
|
||||
- worth revisiting
|
||||
- possibly relevant later
|
||||
|
||||
It means nothing stronger.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Source-evidence question
|
||||
|
||||
Has the repo actually been read deeply enough to justify a real judgment?
|
||||
|
||||
Possible evidence levels include:
|
||||
|
||||
- no real source read yet
|
||||
- shallow metadata only
|
||||
- README-level read only
|
||||
- selective source read
|
||||
- full packet-grade source evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
Bookmark presence must never masquerade as evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Donor-value question
|
||||
|
||||
Does the repo contain durable value at all?
|
||||
|
||||
Possible value classes include:
|
||||
|
||||
- architecture
|
||||
- domain models
|
||||
- contracts
|
||||
- runtime patterns
|
||||
- orchestration logic
|
||||
- protocol seams
|
||||
- persistence models
|
||||
- UX patterns
|
||||
- workflow patterns
|
||||
- tests or fixtures
|
||||
- observability patterns
|
||||
- tooling structure
|
||||
- adapter patterns
|
||||
- clean-room-worthy subsystem ideas
|
||||
|
||||
A repo may contain no meaningful donor value.
|
||||
|
||||
That is an allowed conclusion.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Product-fit question
|
||||
|
||||
Even if a repo has donor value, does that value fit HyperTwist’s actual
|
||||
product direction?
|
||||
|
||||
This verdict must be explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
A repo can be:
|
||||
|
||||
- impressive
|
||||
- legally usable
|
||||
- feature-rich
|
||||
- technically strong
|
||||
- architecturally interesting
|
||||
- worth studying
|
||||
|
||||
and still not fit HyperTwist.
|
||||
|
||||
That is a valid result.
|
||||
|
||||
Donor value is not the same as product fit.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Retention question
|
||||
|
||||
If the repo has real value and meaningful fit, what is its retained posture?
|
||||
|
||||
Allowed outcomes include:
|
||||
|
||||
- worth later bounded integration
|
||||
- donor-only for later
|
||||
- reference-only
|
||||
- pattern-only
|
||||
- not worth integrating
|
||||
|
||||
These outcomes are materially different and must not be blurred.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Ownership question
|
||||
|
||||
If retained, what exact lane does the repo belong to?
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
- primary owner of a bounded subsystem
|
||||
- secondary owner inside a narrower lane
|
||||
- subordinate donor under a stronger owner
|
||||
- adjacent donor beside a stronger owner
|
||||
- reference-only and not an owner at all
|
||||
|
||||
Bookmark presence must not give a repo artificial ownership weight.
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Realization-depth question
|
||||
|
||||
If the repo later returns, what is the intended depth?
|
||||
|
||||
Possible outcomes:
|
||||
|
||||
- no implementation
|
||||
- reference-only
|
||||
- pattern-only
|
||||
- bounded subsystem realization
|
||||
- broader but still bounded realization
|
||||
- full positive realization of the retained lane
|
||||
|
||||
Do not jump from bookmark to “must fully integrate.”
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Implementation question
|
||||
|
||||
If retained, what exact bounded lane should it enter, at what phase, and at
|
||||
what depth?
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation authorization must be explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
Planning artifacts alone are not authorization.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required evaluation output standard
|
||||
|
||||
Every serious repo evaluation should now try to state all of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact source basis read
|
||||
- licensing posture
|
||||
- preserved subsystem ideas
|
||||
- subordinate or later value
|
||||
- explicit product-fit verdict
|
||||
- explicit non-promotion decisions
|
||||
- rationale for exclusion, demotion, or non-fit
|
||||
- retention posture
|
||||
- owner-lane placement
|
||||
- recommended implementation phase if retained
|
||||
- recommended realization depth if retained
|
||||
- acceptance markers if it later returns
|
||||
- explicit statement of what the repo should never be mistaken for
|
||||
|
||||
The product-fit verdict must not be implicit.
|
||||
|
||||
It must be explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
## Approved non-fit or non-integration outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
HyperTwist should be able to conclude any of the following without friction:
|
||||
|
||||
- worth bookmarking, not worth integrating
|
||||
- worth reading, not worth retaining
|
||||
- technically valuable, not a product fit
|
||||
- product-adjacent, but not within current scope
|
||||
- weaker overlap under a stronger owner
|
||||
- donor-only for later
|
||||
- reference-only
|
||||
- pattern-only
|
||||
- interesting but strategically distracting
|
||||
- valuable in theory, not worth the implementation burden
|
||||
- not worth integrating at all
|
||||
|
||||
These are valid outcomes.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not force every bookmarked repo toward implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Approved rationale classes
|
||||
|
||||
If a bookmarked repo is later judged non-fit, non-retained, or non-integrated,
|
||||
record a concrete reason.
|
||||
|
||||
Approved rationale classes include:
|
||||
|
||||
- off-topic to HyperTwist product scope
|
||||
- inferior duplicate
|
||||
- superseded by stronger retained owner
|
||||
- weaker overlapping implementation
|
||||
- host-shell glue
|
||||
- commodity scaffolding
|
||||
- boundary-sensitive value better kept as reference
|
||||
- architecture mismatch
|
||||
- workflow mismatch
|
||||
- strategic non-fit
|
||||
- later-horizon only
|
||||
- useful pattern, but not a real donor lane
|
||||
- not worth the integration cost relative to likely product gain
|
||||
|
||||
No vague dismissal language.
|
||||
|
||||
No hand-waving.
|
||||
|
||||
No silent downgrade.
|
||||
|
||||
No drift from bookmark to exclusion without rationale.
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner-boundary rule
|
||||
|
||||
A bookmarked repo must not receive special authority merely because it was
|
||||
captured.
|
||||
|
||||
It must not displace:
|
||||
|
||||
- stronger retained owners
|
||||
- first-party product architecture
|
||||
- already-closed packet outcomes
|
||||
- established subsystem boundaries
|
||||
- stronger-fitting donors
|
||||
- more coherent product direction
|
||||
|
||||
If a bookmarked repo loses an ownership comparison, record why.
|
||||
|
||||
If it still has residual value in a narrower lane, preserve that value there.
|
||||
|
||||
If it has no durable lane, say so.
|
||||
|
||||
## Failure cases to prevent
|
||||
|
||||
This doctrine exists to block the following failure modes:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Bookmark inflation
|
||||
|
||||
A repo gets bookmarked and later instances start speaking about it as if it is
|
||||
already favored.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Queue inflation
|
||||
|
||||
A repo appears in a sequence doc and later instances start treating queue
|
||||
position as a merit signal.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Evaluation inflation
|
||||
|
||||
A repo gets source-read and later instances assume that source-read means it
|
||||
belongs in the product.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Retention inflation
|
||||
|
||||
A repo is retained for some bounded value and later instances start speaking as
|
||||
if the full product should be integrated.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Implementation inflation
|
||||
|
||||
A repo is discussed often enough that later instances casually describe it as
|
||||
if it already exists in product surfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
All of these are doctrine failures.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operational vocabulary
|
||||
|
||||
Use these definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bookmarked
|
||||
|
||||
Captured for later review only.
|
||||
|
||||
### Queued
|
||||
|
||||
Placed into an evaluation or execution sequence only.
|
||||
|
||||
### Source-read
|
||||
|
||||
Evidence has been gathered from actual source materials.
|
||||
|
||||
### Retained
|
||||
|
||||
The repo survived evaluation as having some meaningful preserved value.
|
||||
|
||||
### Product-fit
|
||||
|
||||
The retained value actually belongs in HyperTwist’s real product direction.
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation-authorized
|
||||
|
||||
A bounded implementation lane has been explicitly approved.
|
||||
|
||||
### Implemented
|
||||
|
||||
The bounded work has actually landed in first-party product surfaces under
|
||||
explicit implementation authority.
|
||||
|
||||
### Reference-only
|
||||
|
||||
Useful to study, not intended for direct donor realization.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pattern-only
|
||||
|
||||
Useful as inspiration or recurring design pattern, not as a retained donor
|
||||
lane.
|
||||
|
||||
### Donor-only for later
|
||||
|
||||
Potentially useful later, but not active implementation scope now.
|
||||
|
||||
### Not worth integrating
|
||||
|
||||
No later bounded implementation should be assumed from the current evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Max-value extraction still applies
|
||||
|
||||
This doctrine must not make evaluation timid.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not interpret “bookmark is only intake” as permission to do shallow review.
|
||||
|
||||
If a repo is actually relevant:
|
||||
|
||||
- read it properly
|
||||
- extract value richly
|
||||
- say clearly if it deserves a bounded retained lane
|
||||
- say clearly if it deserves maximum realization inside that lane
|
||||
|
||||
The point of this doctrine is not:
|
||||
|
||||
- to weaken extraction
|
||||
- to flatten donors
|
||||
- to become fear-driven
|
||||
- to avoid hard judgments
|
||||
|
||||
The point is:
|
||||
|
||||
- to stop intake metadata from masquerading as product intent
|
||||
- to preserve honest product-fit decisions
|
||||
- to prevent false momentum toward implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Live or product-surface scanning rule
|
||||
|
||||
Routine live or product-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation
|
||||
step.
|
||||
|
||||
Assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority says
|
||||
otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
Only verify live or product-surface incorporation when the active task
|
||||
specifically depends on current implementation state.
|
||||
|
||||
Bookmarks, queues, planning artifacts, and docs metadata are not proof of
|
||||
implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authority use
|
||||
|
||||
Use HyperTwist docs this way:
|
||||
|
||||
- this document:
|
||||
- intake doctrine
|
||||
- anti-conflation rules
|
||||
- product-fit doctrine
|
||||
- evaluation-state vocabulary
|
||||
- packet docs:
|
||||
- repo-specific source evidence
|
||||
- donor-value extraction
|
||||
- product-fit verdicts
|
||||
- retention posture
|
||||
- owner-lane placement
|
||||
- retained-set and routing docs:
|
||||
- next-phase entry
|
||||
- implementation authorization routing
|
||||
- landed implementation packets and live-lane audit:
|
||||
- proof of implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Closing rule
|
||||
|
||||
Future HyperTwist instances must be able to answer, for any repo:
|
||||
|
||||
- Was it only bookmarked?
|
||||
- Was it actually source-evaluated?
|
||||
- Does it contain durable donor value?
|
||||
- Does that value fit the product?
|
||||
- Is it retained?
|
||||
- In what posture is it retained?
|
||||
- Is it implementation-authorized?
|
||||
- Has it actually been implemented?
|
||||
|
||||
If those answers are not easy to recover from the authority docs, the docs are
|
||||
too weak and should be strengthened.
|
||||
|
|
@ -121,6 +121,35 @@ Packet overlay result:
|
|||
- `3` discarded active-set rows
|
||||
- the next bounded move is `Phase 5R-A`
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-14 state-vocabulary and anti-inflation rule
|
||||
|
||||
This board is not allowed to collapse the following states:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked
|
||||
- queued
|
||||
- source-read
|
||||
- retained
|
||||
- product-fit
|
||||
- implementation-authorized
|
||||
- implemented
|
||||
|
||||
Board-reading rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gained
|
||||
- retained = survives evaluation in some posture
|
||||
- product-fit = belongs in HyperTwist's actual product direction
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = explicitly approved for bounded build work
|
||||
- implemented = actually landed in first-party product surfaces by explicit implementation authority
|
||||
|
||||
This board is not proof of bookmark merit by itself.
|
||||
|
||||
This board is not proof of implementation by itself.
|
||||
|
||||
Use explicit `Current live state`, landed packet authority, and the live-lane
|
||||
audit when implementation truth matters.
|
||||
|
||||
## Count by live-state class
|
||||
|
||||
- `implemented_live_permissive`: `13`
|
||||
|
|
@ -137,6 +166,10 @@ Packet overlay result:
|
|||
- `Current live state` is the corrected 2026-05-11 implementation truth.
|
||||
- `Reset lane` is the required post-audit scheduling lane.
|
||||
- `Next step` is the immediate repo-specific action after the reset.
|
||||
- `Prior bucket`, `Prior action`, `Reset lane`, and `Next step` are not merit signals by themselves.
|
||||
- queue position or row presence does not prove product fit.
|
||||
- row presence does not prove implementation.
|
||||
- routine live-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation step; when implementation truth matters, verify it from explicit implementation authority rather than from queue or board metadata alone.
|
||||
|
||||
## Landed Permissive Lanes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ Purpose:
|
|||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_2R_PACKET_2R_B_OWNERSHIP_AND_ACCEPTANCE_CONTRACT_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_2R_PACKET_2R_C_OWNERSHIP_AND_ACCEPTANCE_CONTRACT_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_5R_CLEAN_ROOM_PROMPT_AND_HANDOFF_PACKET_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\arch\HYPERTWIST_IMPORTED_GENERATED_MODE_EXECUTOR_PACKET_2026-05-05.md`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,6 +13,19 @@ HyperTwist should be developed as a serious native product:
|
|||
|
||||
Do not reopen broad donor-driven widening as if the whole retained portfolio were already settled.
|
||||
|
||||
State-separation rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gained
|
||||
- retained = survives evaluation in some posture
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = explicitly approved bounded build work
|
||||
- implemented = actually landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Do not let bookmark presence, queue position, or frequent mention masquerade as
|
||||
product intent or proof of implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Current truth:
|
||||
|
||||
- `20` repos are currently verified live in checked Unreal surfaces
|
||||
|
|
@ -44,6 +57,14 @@ For boundary-sensitive and restrictive rows:
|
|||
|
||||
Canonical doctrine doc:
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MAX_VALUE_EXTRACTION_MODUS_OPERANDI_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation-state scanning note:
|
||||
|
||||
- routine live or product-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation step
|
||||
- assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority says otherwise
|
||||
- only verify current implementation state when the active task depends on that fact
|
||||
|
||||
Next sequence:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,19 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Before widening new HyperTwist donor-driven implementation beyond the already landed lanes, preserve this current truth:
|
||||
|
||||
State-separation rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- bookmarked = intake only
|
||||
- queued = sequencing only
|
||||
- source-read = evidence gained
|
||||
- retained = survives evaluation in some posture
|
||||
- product-fit = separate judgment
|
||||
- implementation-authorized = explicitly approved bounded build work
|
||||
- implemented = actually landed in first-party product surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Do not let bookmark presence, queue position, planning artifacts, or docs
|
||||
metadata masquerade as product intent or proof of implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
- current shallow-eval set: `71` repos
|
||||
- currently verified live/implemented in checked Unreal surfaces: `20`
|
||||
- permissive live lanes: `13`
|
||||
|
|
@ -35,6 +48,17 @@ Current routing truth:
|
|||
|
||||
The next bounded move is `Phase 5R-A`, with the optional `Phase 3R-G` browser comparison lane deferred unless the landed primary browser spatial stack exposes a real gap.
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical doctrine docs:
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_INTAKE_RETENTION_AND_PRODUCT_FIT_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_MODEL_A_MODEL_B_COORDINATOR_DOCTRINE_2026-05-14.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Operational scanning note:
|
||||
|
||||
- routine live or product-surface scanning is no longer the default evaluation step
|
||||
- assume a repo is not implemented unless explicit implementation authority says otherwise
|
||||
- only verify current implementation state when the active task depends on that fact
|
||||
|
||||
## Reset phases
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase `0R` — remaining repo deep evaluation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue