Align recognition review intervention continuity
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f17b8beae
commit
4c789b2b72
2 changed files with 100 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -29651,7 +29651,13 @@ FHyperTwistTrainingReviewFlowStatus UHyperTwistTrainingRepositoryLibrary::Derive
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (ReviewPlan.Policy.PolicyKind == EHyperTwistTrainingReviewPolicyKind::CoachReview && FlowStatus.RepeatCount > 0)
|
||||
const bool bCoachFacingRepeatPressure =
|
||||
FlowStatus.RepeatCount > 0
|
||||
&& (
|
||||
ReviewPlan.Policy.PolicyKind == EHyperTwistTrainingReviewPolicyKind::CoachReview
|
||||
|| ReviewPlan.Policy.bPreferRecognitionReplayReview
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (bCoachFacingRepeatPressure)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FlowStatus.bNeedsCoachIntervention = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
|||
# HyperTwist Phase 4 recognition review intervention continuity packet
|
||||
|
||||
Created on `2026-05-06`
|
||||
|
||||
Status:
|
||||
|
||||
- first-party HyperTwist packet
|
||||
- bounded Phase `4` coach-to-review runtime validation slice
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This packet closes a review-flow continuity gap inside the now-live recognition-assisted coach-to-review loop.
|
||||
|
||||
The open task is:
|
||||
|
||||
- make recognition-biased review plans escalate into the same coach-intervention lane as explicit coach-review plans when repeat pressure appears
|
||||
|
||||
It is not:
|
||||
|
||||
- a new recognition transport packet
|
||||
- a new queue persistence packet
|
||||
- a new dashboard packet
|
||||
- a broad review-system rewrite
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
|
||||
Bounded lane:
|
||||
|
||||
- adjust review-flow derivation so repeat pressure triggers coach intervention when the active review policy is either:
|
||||
- explicit `CoachReview`
|
||||
- recognition-biased through `bPreferRecognitionReplayReview`
|
||||
- let existing review-program summary, coach brief, and dashboard inspection derive the corrected state through the already-landed continuity path
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- new review-plan schema
|
||||
- new coach-signal heuristics
|
||||
- replay scoring changes
|
||||
- broader UI changes
|
||||
|
||||
## Why this was the right next packet
|
||||
|
||||
Before this slice:
|
||||
|
||||
- recognition replay pressure already flowed into coach signals and briefs
|
||||
- recognition-review preference already persisted through queue materialization and active review policy
|
||||
- dashboard inspection already surfaced active review policy and intervention state
|
||||
|
||||
But one live derivation still lagged behind:
|
||||
|
||||
- review-flow intervention treated repeat pressure as coach-facing only when policy kind was explicit `CoachReview`
|
||||
|
||||
That meant a recognition-biased review plan could:
|
||||
|
||||
- carry recognition-review preference correctly
|
||||
- accumulate repeat pressure correctly
|
||||
- still fail to trip the same coach-intervention lane unless it also used the explicit `CoachReview` kind
|
||||
|
||||
So the next honest move was:
|
||||
|
||||
- align review-flow intervention semantics with the already-landed recognition-review continuity path
|
||||
|
||||
## What landed
|
||||
|
||||
Primary code changes:
|
||||
|
||||
- `UnrealHyperTwist/Source/UnrealHyperTwist/Private/HyperTwistTraining/HyperTwistTrainingRepositoryLibrary.cpp`
|
||||
- review-flow derivation now treats recognition-biased repeat pressure as coach-facing intervention pressure alongside explicit `CoachReview`
|
||||
|
||||
## Product effect
|
||||
|
||||
The coach-to-review loop is now more coherent under recognition-assisted review:
|
||||
|
||||
- recognition-biased review plans with repeats now surface `coach-review-needed`
|
||||
- review-program summaries now inherit that intervention pressure through the existing derivation path
|
||||
- coach brief generation now sees the same intervention state without needing a new heuristic packet
|
||||
- dashboard inspection remains truthful because it already renders the derived intervention flag
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- a recognition-biased review plan with repeat pressure sets `bNeedsCoachIntervention`
|
||||
- `NextActionLabel` resolves to `coach-review-needed` for that case
|
||||
- review-program summary inherits the corrected intervention state without schema changes
|
||||
- full product build succeeds
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation checklist
|
||||
|
||||
1. build `UnrealHyperTwist.sln` / `UnrealHyperTwistEditor`
|
||||
2. confirm review-flow derivation treats recognition-biased repeat pressure as coach-facing
|
||||
3. confirm the derived intervention state continues through review-program summary and coach brief generation without reopening a broader packet
|
||||
4. confirm dashboard inspection remains aligned because it reads the existing derived flow state
|
||||
|
||||
That is the packet.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue