Confirm CodeXR discard posture
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb3cfd0464
commit
36fdc9a09b
2 changed files with 91 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
|||
# HyperTwist CodeXR Off-Domain XR Collaboration Discard Confirmation Reconciliation - 2026-05-27
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
This document is the source-backed discard-confirmation note for
|
||||
`aMonteSl/CodeXR` inside the HyperTwist `0R-E` non-live queue.
|
||||
|
||||
It answers one narrow question:
|
||||
|
||||
- does the current `CodeXR` source justify any retained HyperTwist owner,
|
||||
benchmark, clean-room, or comparison lane beyond historical reference
|
||||
|
||||
Result:
|
||||
|
||||
- no retained HyperTwist lane survives
|
||||
- the earlier `0R-E` discard call remains correct
|
||||
- no product-code reopening is required
|
||||
- no clean-room or donor route should be reopened from this row
|
||||
|
||||
## Source basis
|
||||
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_0R_PACKET_0R_E_EVALUATION_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_1R_RETAINED_SET_CONTRACT_AND_HANDOFF_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\repos.manifest.json`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\README.md`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\src\core\startup\startupCoordinator.ts`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\src\code_analysis\engine\analysisOrchestrator.ts`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\src\servers\runtime\multiServerLauncher.ts`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\templates\components\codexr\virtual-screen\virtualScreenRuntime.js`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\templates\components\codexr\collaboration\codexrCollaborationRuntime.js`
|
||||
|
||||
## Why discard remains correct
|
||||
|
||||
The source is real and nontrivial, but its center of gravity is off-domain for
|
||||
HyperTwist:
|
||||
|
||||
- `README.md` is explicitly about Visual Studio Code code-analysis
|
||||
visualization in `XR`, not cubing/training/runtime ownership
|
||||
- `startupCoordinator.ts` is a deferred startup queue for extension boot and
|
||||
analysis/session orchestration
|
||||
- `analysisOrchestrator.ts` is centered on code-analysis execution flow
|
||||
- `multiServerLauncher.ts` is centered on heterogeneous local server/runtime
|
||||
launch and registry patterns
|
||||
- `virtualScreenRuntime.js` is centered on collaborative virtual-screen
|
||||
broadcasting, placement, and transport state
|
||||
- `codexrCollaborationRuntime.js` is centered on room/session signaling,
|
||||
remote presence, and synchronized collaboration state
|
||||
|
||||
Those are interesting generic ideas, but they do not beat HyperTwist's current
|
||||
retained owners for the things that actually matter in-scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- `pmndrs/xr` already covers the retained browser/XR runtime reference side
|
||||
- `screenpipe/screenpipe` already covers retained capture/history reference
|
||||
value
|
||||
- `PostHog/posthog` already covers retained instrumentation/session-control
|
||||
reference value
|
||||
- `remotion-dev/remotion` already covers retained export/explainer reference
|
||||
value
|
||||
|
||||
So `CodeXR` has no surviving unique HyperTwist slice after the later canon was
|
||||
sharpened.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operational result
|
||||
|
||||
Keep `CodeXR` as:
|
||||
|
||||
- historical reference only
|
||||
- restrictive custody only
|
||||
- inactive for HyperTwist implementation planning
|
||||
|
||||
Do not keep `CodeXR` as:
|
||||
|
||||
- an active retained benchmark
|
||||
- a future clean-room row
|
||||
- a generic XR collaboration next step
|
||||
- a donor-style implementation candidate
|
||||
|
||||
## Propagation answer
|
||||
|
||||
The current board, tracker, handoff, and manifest discard posture remains
|
||||
correct.
|
||||
|
||||
This note exists only to make that closure explicit and source-backed, so the
|
||||
row no longer depends on packet-era discard prose alone.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1510,12 +1510,16 @@ Source basis:
|
|||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\src\servers\runtime\multiServerLauncher.ts`
|
||||
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\templates\components\codexr\virtual-screen\virtualScreenRuntime.js`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_0R_PACKET_0R_E_EVALUATION_2026-05-13.md`
|
||||
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_CODEXR_OFF_DOMAIN_XR_COLLABORATION_DISCARD_CONFIRMATION_RECONCILIATION_2026-05-27.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Approved working posture:
|
||||
|
||||
- do not schedule donor, clean-room, or implementation work from this row
|
||||
- if later XR collaboration ideas are compared historically, keep that comparison conceptual and bounded
|
||||
- the active retained set should rely on already-kept XR/runtime/capture rows instead
|
||||
- discard-confirmed on `2026-05-27`: no surviving unique HyperTwist lane
|
||||
remains above retained `pmndrs/xr`, `screenpipe/screenpipe`,
|
||||
`PostHog/posthog`, and `remotion-dev/remotion`
|
||||
|
||||
### `MathewKJ2048/Rubiks-cube-simulator`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue