# HyperTwist Phase J-EO validation bema-state packets and bounded ongoing-state convocation preparation packet

Date: 2026-06-01

## Objective

Extend the bounded validation lane with first-party bema-state-packet and
ongoing-state-convocation surfaces without widening HyperTwist into generic
bema-state platforms, convocation dashboards, or release authority.

The `bema-state` / `ongoing-state convocation` naming is an explicit local
continuation inference from the landed lectern/pulpit/ambo/minbar/cathedra
pattern because the current roadmap canon names `Phase J-EO` but does not yet
spell out its noun pair.

## Planned surfaces

- validation bema-state packet contract
- validation ongoing-state convocation boundary
- bundled runtime accessors for both surfaces
- focused automation coverage for contract and boundary resolution

## Guardrails

- keep validation bema-state and ongoing-state convocation posture first-party
  and runtime-evidence local
- do not widen into generic bema-state platforms or ongoing convocation systems
- do not widen into cross-product ongoing convocation ownership or bema
  orchestration
- do not turn the seam into release-gate authority or public leaderboard logic

## Intended package posture

- `package/hypertwist-validation-bema-and-ongoing-convocation`
- bema continuity remains bounded to replay-anchor, benchmark-drift,
  manual-waiver, and continuity-context evidence
- ongoing convocation remains bounded to same-lane runtime evidence and
  explicit exclusion framing

## Next seam after landing

- `Phase J-FD`
