# HyperTwist Phase J-EM validation minbar-state packets and bounded ongoing-state conclave preparation packet

Date: 2026-06-01

## Objective

Extend the bounded validation lane with first-party minbar-state-packet and
ongoing-state-conclave surfaces without widening HyperTwist into generic
minbar-state platforms, conclave dashboards, or release authority.

The `minbar-state` / `ongoing-state conclave` naming is an explicit local
continuation inference from the landed pulpit/ambo pattern because the current
roadmap canon names `Phase J-EM` but does not yet spell out its noun pair.

## Planned surfaces

- validation minbar-state packet contract
- validation ongoing-state conclave boundary
- bundled runtime accessors for both surfaces
- focused automation coverage for contract and boundary resolution

## Guardrails

- keep validation minbar-state and ongoing-state conclave posture first-party
  and runtime-evidence local
- do not widen into generic minbar-state platforms or ongoing conclave systems
- do not widen into cross-product ongoing conclave ownership or minbar
  orchestration
- do not turn the seam into release-gate authority or public leaderboard logic

## Intended package posture

- `package/hypertwist-validation-minbar-and-ongoing-conclave`
- minbar continuity remains bounded to replay-anchor, benchmark-drift,
  manual-waiver, and continuity-context evidence
- ongoing conclave remains bounded to same-lane runtime evidence and explicit
  exclusion framing

## Next seam after landing

- `Phase J-FD`
