# HyperTwist CodeXR Off-Domain XR Collaboration Discard Confirmation Reconciliation - 2026-05-27

## Status

This document is the source-backed discard-confirmation note for
`aMonteSl/CodeXR` inside the HyperTwist `0R-E` non-live queue.

It answers one narrow question:

- does the current `CodeXR` source justify any retained HyperTwist owner,
  benchmark, clean-room, or comparison lane beyond historical reference

Result:

- no retained HyperTwist lane survives
- the earlier `0R-E` discard call remains correct
- no product-code reopening is required
- no clean-room or donor route should be reopened from this row

## Source basis

- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_0R_PACKET_0R_E_EVALUATION_2026-05-13.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\REPO_LICENSE_TRACKING.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_STATE_BOARD_2026-05-11.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_PHASE_1R_RETAINED_SET_CONTRACT_AND_HANDOFF_2026-05-13.md`
- `C:\HyperTwist\docs\HYPERTWIST_REPO_EVALUATION_RESET_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_SCHEDULE_2026-05-11.md`
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\repos.manifest.json`
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\README.md`
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\src\core\startup\startupCoordinator.ts`
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\src\code_analysis\engine\analysisOrchestrator.ts`
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\src\servers\runtime\multiServerLauncher.ts`
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\templates\components\codexr\virtual-screen\virtualScreenRuntime.js`
- `C:\Workspaces\HyperTwist\mirrors\restrictive\aMonteSl\CodeXR\templates\components\codexr\collaboration\codexrCollaborationRuntime.js`

## Why discard remains correct

The source is real and nontrivial, but its center of gravity is off-domain for
HyperTwist:

- `README.md` is explicitly about Visual Studio Code code-analysis
  visualization in `XR`, not cubing/training/runtime ownership
- `startupCoordinator.ts` is a deferred startup queue for extension boot and
  analysis/session orchestration
- `analysisOrchestrator.ts` is centered on code-analysis execution flow
- `multiServerLauncher.ts` is centered on heterogeneous local server/runtime
  launch and registry patterns
- `virtualScreenRuntime.js` is centered on collaborative virtual-screen
  broadcasting, placement, and transport state
- `codexrCollaborationRuntime.js` is centered on room/session signaling,
  remote presence, and synchronized collaboration state

Those are interesting generic ideas, but they do not beat HyperTwist's current
retained owners for the things that actually matter in-scope:

- `pmndrs/xr` already covers the retained browser/XR runtime reference side
- `screenpipe/screenpipe` already covers retained capture/history reference
  value
- `PostHog/posthog` already covers retained instrumentation/session-control
  reference value
- `remotion-dev/remotion` already covers retained export/explainer reference
  value

So `CodeXR` has no surviving unique HyperTwist slice after the later canon was
sharpened.

## Operational result

Keep `CodeXR` as:

- historical reference only
- restrictive custody only
- inactive for HyperTwist implementation planning

Do not keep `CodeXR` as:

- an active retained benchmark
- a future clean-room row
- a generic XR collaboration next step
- a donor-style implementation candidate

## Propagation answer

The current board, tracker, handoff, and manifest discard posture remains
correct.

This note exists only to make that closure explicit and source-backed, so the
row no longer depends on packet-era discard prose alone.
