- all tests green on RoaringTx
- RoaringTx on by default
- blueGreenTx testing framework available for A-vs-B comparison
of Tx implementations
- flag -tx added to server command line but not wired to
change NewIndex() selection yet.
- 918 green tests, 14 tests red on BadgerTx.
A full list of the 14 red tests on BadgerTx follows.
Note that these red tests represent not defects in BadgerDB
or BadgerTx but rather failures of the pre-existing pilosa infrastructure to yet
be fully adapted from files to using a transactional storage engine.
As such these are tests that RBF should not be expected to
pass yet either.
Fixing the pilosa infrastructure to allow these tests
to go green under Badger is the next and highest priority
order of business, but RBF can get much testing benefit
from the 918 green tests we do have, and hence we merge
as much as we have today.
The 14 red tests when NewIndex() is set to use
BadgerTx are as follows. Note in particular
that pilosa cluster resizing is not working yet under a
transactional store.
TestCluster_ResizeStates/Multiple_nodes,_with_data
TestImportClearRestart/0MaxOpN10000
TestImportClearRestart/1MaxOpN10000
TestImportClearRestart/2MaxOpN10000
TestImportClearRestart/3MaxOpN10000
TestExecutor_Execute_Existence/Row
TestExecutor_ForeignIndex
TestExecutor_Execute_CountDistinct/Distinct
TestExecutor_Execute_CountDistinct/Count(Distinct)
TestExecutor_Execute_CountDistinct/GroupBy(Distinct)
TestExecutor_BareDistinct
TestExecutor_Execute_TopNDistinct/TopN
TestHolderSyncer_IntField/BasicSync
TestHolderSyncer_IntField/MultiShard
Some cluster tests failed sporadically. In order to fix them, I
introduced some debugging-related functionality, which revealed
several new bugs that were actually existing bugs we just happened
not to hit in testing. This combines various fixes.
We start with "make the nodes used in testing have distinct names
based on the test case name", which lets us discover that we are
leaking clusters, which continue to sit around talking with each
other. That in turn causes significantly higher load on access to
ephemeral ports, which causes sporadic failures when we shut a
node down and try to restart it, but something else has gotten assigned
its ephemeral port number since then.
Part of the fix is to try to rebind on port 0 if an attempt to
bind to a specified port over 32k fails. This is a guess; the
actual ephemeral port range could be 16k+, 32k+, or 48k+, or just
about anything else really, but it seems reasonable in
practice.
There were bugs in the oft-repeated loops to await the cluster
achieving a given state, and it could hang forever if it didn't,
so we add a timeout and a standard function on the test.Cluster
type to handle that. Note that the timeout seems irrelevant; in
every case I've tried, a timeout of 0 is fine because the node
start doesn't complete until the cluster state has changed.
Add a method to test.Command to run a query, expecting a specific
result. Also clean up some of the formatting and generation of
queries, and allow parameterized (badly) queries. This lets us fix
a subtle bug, which is that test cases were depending on assumptions
about shardwidths. Also improve the diagnostic output from some of
these functions so test failures are more comprehensible.
But actually that dependency on shardwidths was ALSO revealing a
genuine underlying bug, which is that a node resize did not correctly
propagate the schema to a new node if there was no data present
on shards that node would own. We now also have a test case that
hits that (or would, if we hadn't fixed it).
Add comments explaining the server options parameters for MustNewCluster
and MustRunCluster.
Also, we implement the ReadFrom and WriteTo behaviors for
InMemTranslateStore, without which some of the cluster resize tests
fail. Props to the comment for specifically stating that they wouldn't
work if that happened, which probably saved me several hours of
debugging. The implementations may not be robust, but
InMemTranslateStore is intended to be used only in lightweight
and transient testing.
This PR adds support for anti-entropy syncing for integer
and decimal fields. It differs from the logic for other
field types in that it does not rely on a consensus to determine
what the value should be; instead, it considers the correct
values to be those of the primary replica. From there, data
is pushed to all non-primary replicas.
This PR adds a field name (string) to the return types
which represent the values from a specific field. For example,
a TopN query on field `x` would be `TopN(x)` and have results
like:
```
[]Pair{
{ID: 14, Count: 10},
{ID: 3, Count: 8},
{ID: 7, Count: 3},
}
```
In order to know what field this result type refers to, we wrap
`[]Pair` in a new struct called `PairsField` which contains an
addition `Field` string where `x` is stored.
This is useful for informing the gRPC server how to construct
more appropriate headers for the result stream (in this case,
the column headers can now be "x" and "count").
Similar logic was applied to `RowIdentifiers` and `Pair` as well.
This change should have been adding the "GetClientCertificate"
function in server/tlsconfig.go. This is in addition to the
GetCertificate func which is only used by servers. It ended up being
much more involved for a few reasons:
1. We had no way of passing a configured HTTP client into the
translate store stuff.
2. Our cluster tests assumed http, not HTTPS, and didn't have any way
to pass the necessary configuration in.
3. I encountered what turned out to be an unrelated bug in
cmd/server_test.go which is why I moved "close(m.Started)" in
server/server.go. Basically, I was running something on port 10111
which caused the test to fail (because it was trying to bind to that),
but the failure was not immediately caught during server startup
because the m.Started channel got closed which allowed the test code
to fall through to where it called m.Close() which then got a nil
pointer exception because m.Handler had never been set up.
4. Our test code was assuming that it could create clients that
ignored the config, which meant they didn't do TLS. I added an
InternalClient() method to pilosa.Server to expose the configured
client.
also fix a *bunch* of tests that weren't closing the clusters they
created. Cleaned up one test to use t.Run instead of just checking
everything in a loop
So with the switch to a new linter, we get a lot of new warnings,
and the majority of them are harmless probably, but a few might be
real. Variously just use _ to suppress warnings, or report errors.
There's probably things here that deserve better fixes, but we can
always revisit it.
report the approximate hardware specs (CPU speed, cores, memory)
of the server in the /info endpoint. This may be useful when
benchmarking.
We do some workarounds because gopsutil's core count output is
confusingly different between Linux and Darwin, and the MHz output
is usually wrong on Linux. Intel's app notes say to just parse
the model string. Whyyyyyyy.
